VitalTrace fetal monitoring device touted as 'absolute revolution' in childbirth
Experts have described the "breakthrough technology", developed in Western Australia, as a world-first and the biggest development in fetal monitoring in 50 years.
The VitalTrace device attaches to the baby's head and transmits small, continuous electrodes to measure the baby's heart rate and level of lactate, which can detect fetal distress.
University of WA professor Jane Pillow described the device as "the first breakthrough in fetal monitoring that we've had since the 1960s".
She said the current method of fetal monitoring was not a "good predictor" of how well oxygen was being delivered to the baby during labour, she said.
"The problem with that is … sometimes we miss babies that are not getting oxygen all that well," she said.
"And at other times the diagnosis of when they aren't getting oxygen might be significantly delayed, and the consequence of that for babies is really devastating."
A lack of oxygen could result in death but often it's the cause of significant health issues like cerebral palsy, brain damage and organ function complications.
Emily Stone said it could provide re-assurance to mothers.
"There were times during the birth of my daughter, when her heart rate couldn't be detected," she said.
"It can be quite frightening in what's already an intense experience.
"If this device was available, it just would have given me greater piece of mind that she was healthy and safe."
Obstetrician and associate professor and the University of WA Scott White said the new development had the potential to halve unnecessary emergency caesareans, describing it as "an absolute revolution in childbirth".
"It allows us to better identify those babies who are compromised," Ms Scott said.
"But equally as important, it allows us to reduce the interventions we unnecessarily apply to women, which is a real profound improved health outcome."
Mr Scott explained one of the well-known side effects of traditional heart rate monitoring is its inaccuracy.
"At the moment, we look at changes in the babies heart rate pattern, that requires a lot of training, skill and interpretation and therefore errors can happen," Mr Scott said.
"Whenever you use an indirect measure, you get false positive results and false negative results … [and] it tells us babies are unhappy when frequently they're not.
"But this device is much more accurate which allows us to safely leave babies in when they're safe and to more accurately recognise those babies that truly do need to be delivered early."
The device has taken about seven years to develop and the technology is similar to what people with diabetes use to monitor their glucose levels.
VitalTrace co-founder and chief executive Arjun Kaushik said the response to the device had been overwhelming.
"The enthusiasm to adopt this device cannot be overstated, I think this is an area of medicine that has long been under-served in technology," he said.
Both the state and federal government have backed the device, with the state government contributing about $5 million to the technology's development.
Early trials of the technology involved 20 mothers who participated nationwide.
But professionals are hoping another larger trial will start next year to test the devices efficacy and dependability with the aim of getting regulatory approval in 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
3 hours ago
- 9 News
Dad barred from interfering with son's cancer treatment speaks out
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here A WA father barred from interfering with his teenage son's cancer treatment says he now supports the boy receiving chemotherapy . The family claims they wanted time to consider their options, but the boy was taken away before they could. His son is fighting a rare blood cancer, which was only recently diagnosed, but this father says he feels like the teenager was kidnapped after doctors said he needed chemotherapy. A WA father barred from interfering with his teenage son's cancer treatment says he now supports him receiving chemotherapy. (9News) "They said, 'We're taking the boy to Perth, we're flying him right now to hospital', and we felt very pressurised," the father claimed in an interview with 9News. "I said, 'we need 24 hours just to review our options, there's a few key people to speak to'." The father claimed they did not get that time and police eventually arrived at their home. "The boy went back in the house because the house was surrounded, and it seemed that they were absolutely going to kidnap him," the father claimed. "Every time there's a a shape move behind us or a red and blue light, we're all filled with terror." The father (left) was handcuffed and his teenager taken to Perth Children's Hospital for treatment for acute myleoid leukemia. (9News) The father was handcuffed and his teenager taken to Perth Children's Hospital for treatment for acute myleoid leukemia. The Family Court was told it was an emergency and without it, the boy could die within weeks. But on the weekend, his father cut his chemotherapy line. "I asked for them to pause until we could then look at alternatives," the father claimed. He said he had now changed his mind and "we fully support the hospital". "We're happy to go along with them. Honestly I just need the time to do my own research. A WA father barred from interfering with his teenage son's cancer treatment says he now supports him receiving chemotherapy. (9News) "I do believe that each of us should be able to choose our own healthcare, that should be a human right." The boy's chemo continues here at Perth Children's Hospital where it's expected he'll have to attend for at least the next four to six weeks. "He's a real talent and he's an amazing boy," the father said. "If anyone's going to beat it, he will." Western Australia Perth courts cancer health CONTACT US Auto news: Why Australians are still driving around without insurance.
Perth Now
7 hours ago
- Perth Now
Top docs call for action on speedy e-scooters and bikes
Doctors have thrown their weight behind a push to tackle high-speed electric scooters and bikes, as the national injury and death toll among riders, passengers and pedestrians grows. The Australian Medical Association says a national body is urgently needed to develop an Australia-wide safety strategy and regulations for e-mobility vehicles. "Doctors around the country have seen a massive spike in injuries," emergency medicine representative Sarah Whitelaw told AAP on Thursday. "Complex limb injuries, young people with facial injuries that will impact them for the rest of their lives, chest injuries and brain injuries. "The devastation from patients and their families, who tell us over and over that they just had no idea that they could get so significantly injured." The peak national body for doctors also wants better data capture to help decision makers and for infrastructure that, for example, separates electric mobility devices from pedestrians. A national strategy also needed to recognise the different types of electric rideables and the way they were being used, so that specific policy could be formulated, Dr Whitelaw said. "We need, right now, a national body that's set up to bring all this information together and have a national approach, not this piecemeal state and territory approach," she said. "We're at the very beginning of electric mobility devices in Australia and we are going to see hundreds of thousands more of these devices." From 2016 to 2021, there were 14 deaths reported to an Australian state or territory coroner in which an electric mobility device, including e-bikes, e-scooters and electronic self-balancing devices, contributed to the death, according to the Monash University Accident Research Centre. A University of Melbourne study of media reports from January 2020 to April 2025 found the number of electric mobility device-related deaths across the country had more than doubled to 30 during that period. One of the most recent fatalities was in Perth on Saturday, when a teenage boy allegedly riding erratically on an electric dirt bike struck and killed a 59-year-old woman in a suburban park. The 17-year-old was charged with manslaughter, and a Western Australian parliamentary committee inquiry into electric rideable devices, which started this week, has been expanded to include e-bikes. An inquiry has also been launched in Queensland, and the NSW and Victorian governments wrote to the federal government earlier in July calling for a crackdown on the importation and sale of some e-bikes and e-scooters being illegally ridden on Australian roads. High-speed and dangerous mobility devices are being imported and sold and the states want them banned. In Australia, the maximum speed e-scooters can be ridden is from 20 to 25km/h, depending on the jurisdiction. E-bike motors must cut off when the bike reaches 25km/h. NSW and Victoria also called for tougher safety regulations and import laws for lithium batteries, citing the risk to public safety an "increasing" number of fires posed. The federal government has been contacted for comment.
ABC News
7 hours ago
- ABC News
Midwives express remorse after home birth and Victorian baby's death
Two midwives have told a coronial inquest about their regrets after a baby died in hospital following a home birth in 2022. The infant, who can only be known as Baby R, died in August 2022 of perinatal hypoxia, six days after an emergency caesarean at Bendigo Health. The inquest, held in the Coroners Court of Victoria this week, heard two private midwives present during the home birth of Baby R conceded their care was inadequate when complications arose, and that a transfer to the hospital should have happened sooner. The Melbourne court heard Baby R's mother, a former midwife herself, wanted a "natural" vaginal home birth after a traumatic first birth in 2019, which resulted in an emergency c-section after her baby was born macrosomic (large). The inquest heard on Thursday that under Australian midwifery guidelines, Baby R's mother was not considered suitable for a home birth. Earlier this week, an obstetrician at Bendigo Health said she held concerns at the time that the two private midwives were practising "outside national midwifery guidelines". Elizabeth Murphy was Baby R's mother's primary midwife while Marie-Louise Lapeyre, the only other private midwife in the region, was also present to assist in the birth. The women were experienced home birth midwives and had worked together frequently. The inquest heard doctors Andrew Woods and Helen Cooke suggested both midwives should have discussed a transfer to hospital with Baby R's mother about four hours earlier than they did. Ms Lapeyre broke down in court as she called it a "deep regret" and that "extreme tiredness" could have impaired her decision-making during the birth. Both women had come straight from other births and had not slept. The inquest heard Baby R's mother thought she would be on her way to hospital when she passed meconium liquor, which could indicate a baby in distress. Instead, Ms Lapeyre told her they would monitor the baby more closely. "I should've given Baby R's mother a choice and I didn't, and that goes against everything I stand for as a midwife," Ms Lapeyre told the court. Ms Murphy echoed her colleague's regrets, and said the midwives should have consulted another midwife or obstetrician at that moment. "I recognise that in this situation we made mistakes and I'm so remorseful about that," Ms Murphy said. "I know that Baby R suffered because of what we did, but I think that women can have a good experience and mostly do at home, even when they're having a vaginal birth after a caesarean." Later in the labour, Ms Murphy was taking a nap at 6:55pm when Ms Lapeyre first detected that Baby R's heart rate was abnormally fast. Ms Lapeyre did not wake Ms Murphy but told the coroner's court in hindsight, she should have. The inquest heard when the baby's heart rate was again found to be too fast 50 minutes later, Baby R's mother was taken to hospital. "I'm just sorry for the journey of grief you are undertaking and will be ongoing — I know about that journey," Ms Laperye said to Baby R's parents watching the inquest online. Ms Murphy told the inquest on Thursday she maintained Baby R's mother was "suitable to have the opportunity to try and have a home birth". She told the coroner's court she felt Baby R's mother was aware of the potential risks and was "diligent" in her preparation for birth. The inquest heard that in January 2022, eight months prior to Baby R's death, Bendigo Health head of obstetrics Nicola Yuen met with Ms Lapeyre and Ms Murphy with the aim of building a "collaborative relationship". "There were a couple of times Bendigo Health became aware of women birthing in the community who were high-risk," Dr Yuen said. Dr Yuen said while Ms Lapeyre was highly engaged with Bendigo Health after the meeting, the doctor did not recall the same attitude from Ms Murphy. Dr Yuen said there was a "missed opportunity" to change the outcome for Baby R, when the baby's mother declined a routine obstetrician consultation at 36 weeks' gestation. Ms Murphy had written to Bendigo Health saying Baby R's mother did "not need" the consultation, but hospital staff flagged risks in Baby R's mother's birth history and offered it anyway. Baby R's mother said in her statement to the inquest she declined the hospital's offer as she thought it was a "box ticking exercise". Ms Murphy told the court she regretted her wording in the letter and should have written that Baby R's mother did not "want" to see an obstetrician. However, the midwife said she did not think an obstetrician would have "positively contributed" to Baby R's mother's care. She said her previous clients had been "badgered and treated unkindly by obstetricians because of the choices they were making". Ms Lapeyre said women who chose home birth were rarely respected for their choices and obstetricians often used coercive language. But, she said she would tell her patients they needed to go into a home birth "with eyes wide open" and recommended they faced their fears of seeing an obstetrician. The court has heard since Ms Murphy and Ms Lapeyre were directed not to practice private midwifery by health authorities, more women in central Victoria had chosen to "free birth" without any healthcare professional present. The inquest continues.
