Israel seeks swift action on Iran, sources say, with a split US administration
Photo:
AFP / JACK GUEZ
By
Humeyra Pamuk
,
Samia Nakhoul
,
Alexander Cornwell
and
Emily Rose
, Reuters
Israeli officials have told the Trump administration they do not want to wait two weeks for Iran to reach a deal to dismantle key parts of its nuclear programme and Israel could act alone before the deadline is up, two sources said, amid [https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/564764/donald-trump-disavows-his-own-spy-chief-tulsi-gabbard-s-take-on-iran-s-nuclear-programme
a continuing debate on the US President's team] about whether the US should get involved.
The two sources familiar with the matter said Israel had communicated its concerns to Trump administration officials on Thursday in what they described as a tense phone call.
The Israeli officials said they did not want to wait the two weeks that US President Donald Trump presented on Thursday as a deadline for deciding whether the US will get involved in the Israel-Iran war, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The Israeli participants on the call included Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defence Minister Israel Katz and military chief Eyal Zamir, according to a security source.
The Israelis believe they have a limited window of opportunity to move against the deeply buried site at Fordow, the crown jewel of Iran's nuclear programme, said the sources. The United States is the only country with the bunker-busting bombs powerful enough to reach the facility, which is dug into the side of a mountain.
Reuters reported on Saturday that the United States is
moving B-2 bombers
to the Pacific island of Guam, reinforcing the possibility that the US could participate directly in an attack.
The B-2 can be equipped to carry America's 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, designed to destroy targets deep underground, such as the one at Fordow.
A person in Washington familiar with the matter said Israel has communicated to the US administration that it believes Trump's window of up to two weeks is too long and that more urgent action is needed. The person did not say whether the Israelis made that point during the high-level call.
During the call, Vice President JD Vance pushed back, saying the United States shouldn't be directly involved and suggesting that the Israelis were going to drag the country into war, said the sources.
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also participated in the call, said a security source.
Reuters could not determine who else took part in the call.
The
Jerusalem Post
reported earlier that a phone call had taken place on Thursday.
The prospect of a US strike against Iran has exposed divisions in the coalition of supporters that brought Trump to power, with some prominent members of his base urging him not to get the country involved in a new Middle East war.
Vance has frequently criticised past US involvement in conflicts, including Iraq and Afghanistan, but has lately defended Trump against Republican critics who urge the administration to stay out of the Iran conflict.
Other Republicans, including Trump ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, have said they hope Trump will help Israel finish destroying Iran's nuclear programme.
Trump, who campaigned on a promise to keep the US out of what he called "stupid" foreign wars, has himself seemed conflicted at times about whether to join the Israeli attack on Iran or focus on diplomatic efforts to end Tehran's nuclear programme.
But his rhetoric in recent days has become increasingly aggressive toward Iran.
Iran insists that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.
The White House declined to comment for this story.
The Israeli Prime Minister's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Iran's mission to the United Nations also did not immediately respond.
Publicly, Netanyahu has not ruled out Israel attacking Fordow alone, though officials have not provided any details on how that would be achieved.
Four sources said it is now increasingly likely that the country will launch a solo military operation. Israeli air superiority over much of Iran makes an operation more feasible, though still risky, said two of the sources.
The Israelis feel they have the momentum and have limited time given the costs of the war, one source added.
"I don't see them waiting much longer," said the source.
It is not clear whether such an operation would involve bombing, ground forces, or both. Two of the sources said that rather than attempting to destroy the entire site Israel could instead do significant damage to it.
That could mean focusing on destroying what is inside the site rather than the site itself, said one of the sources, declining to elaborate.
Some analysts have speculated that Israel could use special forces to enter Fordow and blow it up from inside.
Another scenario being considered, according to a source familiar with the matter, would be to drop a series of munitions in rapid succession in an attempt to breach the fortified site, similar to how the Israeli military killed Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah last year.
Such a strike could be followed by an incursion by special forces, the source said.
It is not clear that Israel has munitions powerful enough to penetrate the fortified facility. It is widely believed that to have a high chance of success, US intervention would be needed.
But even with the massive firepower of a joint US-Israeli military action, military and nuclear experts believe that a military operation would probably only temporarily set back a programme the West fears is already aimed at producing atom bombs one day, although Iran denies it.
-
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Syria tribes clash with Druze fighters near Sweida: combatants, monitor
Fighters from Bedouin tribes gather in the al-Mazraa village in Syria's southern Sweida governorate, as clashes with Druze gunmen continue on 18 July, 2025. Photo: BAKR ALKASEM / AFP Armed tribes supported by Syria's Islamist-led government have clashed with Druze fighters outside Sweida a day after government troops withdrew from the Druze-majority city , the warring parties and a monitoring group said. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported "clashes west of Sweida pitting tribal fighters and Bedouin supported by the authorities on one side, against Druze fighters on the other". Combatants on both sides confirmed the clashes and AFP correspondents reported hearing exchanges of fire. Syrian government forces withdrew from Sweida province on Thursday (local time) after coming under heavy bombardment by Israel. The pullout from Syria's Druze heartland came on the orders of interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who said mediation by the United States and others had helped avert a "large-scale escalation" with Israel. Nearly 600 people have been killed in Sweida province since Sunday, according to the Observatory, as Druze fighters clashed with Sunni Bedouin tribes, who were later joined by government forces. A ceasefire took effect on Thursday, but Sharaa's office accused Druze groups of violating the agreement. Tribal fighters gathered around Sweida on Friday to reinforce the Bedouin, positioning themselves in several villages near the city. AFP correspondents heard intermittent gunfire and explosions and saw smoke rising from the villages. Druze fighters told AFP they were responding to the sources of fire. Anas al-Enad, a tribal chief from the central city of Hama, said he and his men had made the journey to the village of Walgha, northwest of Sweida, because "the Bedouin called for our help and we came to support them". - AFP
Newsroom
15 hours ago
- Newsroom
Watchdog rules against foreign ministry in dispute over whether Israel group was ‘vexatious'
The foreign ministry should not have refused to answer information requests from a pro-Israel think tank on the grounds that it saw them as vexatious, a government watchdog has ruled. However, the Ombudsman's Office has labelled as inappropriate the Israel Institute of NZ's alleged harassment of ministry staff via social media, warning any continuation or escalation of its behaviour could lead to a change of opinion.
NZ Herald
20 hours ago
- NZ Herald
In September, Homeland Security will end temporary protections for more than 50,000 Hondurans and Nicaraguans
The decision, announced in early July, has been met with outrage from immigrant communities across the country, prompting a lawsuit by the National TPS Alliance, an advocacy group, and seven impacted individuals. The parties allege that the decision violated federal law by 'relying on a predetermined political decision' and 'racial animus', while ignoring 'dire' local conditions in those countries. Immigration advocates hope federal courts will step in to intervene. But the order has left tens of thousands of people grappling with the possibility that they will be forced to leave their families and US-citizen children to return to countries where they have no immediate family, no community, no jobs - places that in some cases they haven't seen in nearly three decades. 'My life has been here in the Bay Area,' said Jhony Silva, 29, a certified nursing assistant from Honduras, who is suing the Trump Administration for ending the programme. His parents brought him to the US as a toddler in 1998. 'I've been doing everything the right way this whole time,' said Silva, who fears being separated from his 9-year-old child, a US citizen. 'I am very, very worried.' President Bill Clinton established temporary protections for Hondurans and Nicaraguans after Hurricane Mitch devastated the Central American nations in 1998. Since then, the Government has renewed the programme every six to 18 months, but the Trump Administration let it expire on July 5. The Administration has also moved to revoke TPS for as many as 900,000 people from Haiti, Venezuela, Afghanistan, Cameroon and Nepal living in the US, arguing that the programmes for nationals of countries facing conflict and environmental disaster was always intended to be temporary. Hondurans and Nicaraguans have had temporary protections for much longer - in some cases decades more - than immigrants from the other countries. Nearly 27 years after Hurricane Mitch, 'Honduran citizens can safely return home', Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement about ending that country's programme. Of Nicaragua's termination, a DHS spokesperson said the programme 'was never meant to last a quarter of a century'. It's not clear whether people affected will leave the US voluntarily or try to lie low to avoid deportation. The average TPS holder from Honduras and Nicaragua is aged 48 and has been in the US for more than 30 years, according to estimates from an immigration advocacy group. TPS holders from Honduras and Nicaragua told the Washington Post they now identify as American. Maria Elena Hernandez, 67, came to the US from Nicaragua in 1996 and has worked as a cleaner at a university in Broward County, Florida, for more than 17 years. She stands to lose her job and her employer-sponsored health insurance, which covers medication for asthma and a heart condition. 'This news destroyed me,' said Hernandez, who is also suing the federal Government. 'I am going to be separated from my family. I'm going to lose my medical insurance. I have a medicine that I have to take for life.' The Trump Administration's termination of multiple humanitarian programmes could strip three million immigrants of their status and work authorisation, according to some immigration experts. About 72,000 Hondurans and 4000 Nicaraguans have temporary protections, although roughly 22,100 of them have received green cards, according to the Department of Homeland Security, and therefore will be able to stay. Typically, administrations notify TPS holders six months or more before winding down TPS programmes for countries that have had the designation for more than three years. But when the Administration announced the terminations of the programmes for Hondurans and Nicaraguans on July 7, the programme had already expired two days earlier. 'The cruelty is really extraordinary,' said Emi MacLean, a senior lawyer at the ACLU Foundation of Northern California who is working on the lawsuit. 'These people have no criminal history, because you cannot maintain TPS with criminal history. They've been paying their taxes for decades. They've been paying to reregister. And the administration waiting until after the end date to announce a termination is something that has not been done before.' Jackey Baiza, now 30, was 2 when she came to Boston from Honduras with her mother. Her employer told her a day before the Fourth of July weekend that it was placing her on leave while awaiting notice as to whether the Trump Administration would extend the TPS programme for Honduras past its July 5 expiration. Baiza has since been asked to return to her human resources job until the programme runs out in early September. 'I have no direct communication with anyone in Honduras,' Baiza said. 'Being sent back is going to a place where I have absolutely no roots. I don't know where I would go. I have no clue how to navigate the country.' She fears separation from her mother, sister, and other immediate family members, all of whom have US citizenship or permanent residence. Baiza's mother secured permanent legal residence through Baiza's younger sister who was born in the US. Over the past three decades, thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans have used legal pathways to obtain green cards or citizenship, including through asylum applications, marriage to US citizens or through US-citizen children. But most immigrants with temporary protections, including Baiza, do not have obvious legal ways to remain in the country after early September. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Centre for Immigration Studies, a Washington think-tank that advocates for stricter immigration policies, called the order 'an important step in the right direction'. 'The lie of temporariness needs to end,' Krikorian said. 'It's not a great thing to uproot people who have been here for a long time, but the blame has to be on activists and politicians who have made sure TPS was perverted in this way. If the programme had lasted 12 to 18 months, it would be a lot less disruptive for people.' Many of the affected Hondurans and Nicaraguans work in construction, building and grounds maintenance, and transportation - industries that face labour shortages dating to the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Some regions are going to get hit really hard, and it's going to be even harder for folks to build things or provide healthcare,' said Brian Turmail, a vice-president at Associated General Contractors of America, a trade group that represents the construction industry. Silva worked at a Tesla factory in the paint department throughout the pandemic and was considered 'an essential worker', he said. Now he works as a certified nursing assistant in the cardiac unit at Stanford Hospital, bathing, dressing, and feeding sick patients. Growing up in the Bay Area, Silva participated in his church's youth group, went to the movies and played mini golf. He didn't think much about his immigration status, he said. When he graduated from high school in 2013 and tried to enlist in the US Army, a recruiter told him he was not eligible. 'I've tried to be as American as possible,' Silva said. 'But I've been in his country almost 30 years, and it's still so difficult for me to get any type of permanent status.' Mardoel Hernandez, 57, came by himself to the Washington DC area from Honduras at age 21 under the TPS programme. He works in real estate development and advocates for permanent status for the large Central American immigrant community in the area. The end of the programme 'means the end of everything,' Hernandez said. 'The end of the effort of my life.'
