New Jersey Gun Crime Lawyer Adam M. Lustberg Discusses Unlawful Firearm Training
Lustberg, who represents clients across New Jersey as a gun crime lawyer at Lustberg Law Offices, LLC, notes that violations of this law can carry serious consequences, including second-degree felony charges. The statute's reach is broad, covering not only direct instruction but also group training sessions that mimic paramilitary activities. As a New Jersey gun crime lawyer, Lustberg warns that the consequences can extend well beyond prison time, potentially affecting future employment, housing, and immigration status.
Adam M. Lustberg, a New Jersey gun crime lawyer, highlights that the law is rooted in preventing organized violence or terroristic plots. "The legislative intent of N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 is to prevent the formation and operation of private groups preparing for violent or terroristic acts," Lustberg explains. Originally enacted in 1983 and later amended in 1988, the statute aligns with New Jersey's broader efforts to keep military power in check under civilian authority. This legal framework targets behavior not addressed by general conspiracy laws—specifically the act of training others to commit crimes involving weapons.
N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 criminalizes both individual and group activities. Individuals who knowingly or intentionally instruct someone in using or constructing firearms or explosives for criminal purposes face second-degree charges. Similarly, assembling with others to drill or train in tactics intended for unlawful use is also prosecutable under this statute. According to Lustberg, the law particularly focuses on gatherings that resemble private militias or extremist groups, which law enforcement views as public safety threats.
It is important to note that the law does not prohibit lawful firearms training. Activities like gun safety classes, recreational shooting, and martial arts remain legal provided there is no intent to use the instruction for unlawful acts. The intent requirement is central to this statute. Lustberg points out that teaching someone to shoot for sport or helping a homeowner with firearm safety is fully permissible, but that same training could become illegal if it's clear that the knowledge will be used for a crime.
Penalties for violating N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 are severe. As a second-degree felony, it carries five to ten years in prison, fines up to $150,000, and a presumption of incarceration—even for first-time offenders. The law falls under the Graves Act, New Jersey's stringent firearm sentencing legislation, which mandates minimum parole ineligibility terms and restricts bail and early release options. These sentencing structures significantly limit judicial discretion, making it difficult for defendants to avoid prison time if convicted.
Beyond incarceration, the long-term impact of a conviction is extensive. A felony record under this statute can lead to loss of gun ownership rights, employment difficulties, and trouble with professional licensing or housing. For non-citizens, it may be classified as an aggravated felony under federal immigration laws, potentially leading to deportation or barring access to legal relief options.
Lustberg emphasizes that N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 is distinct from other New Jersey weapons laws. Unlike statutes focused on unlawful possession or direct use of weapons, this law targets instructional and preparatory conduct. For example, someone lawfully possessing a firearm could still face charges under 2C:39-14 if they train someone for illegal purposes. It also differs from trafficking laws, which center on the sale and distribution of firearms rather than instruction or preparation.
There are legal defenses available to those charged under this statute. One primary defense strategy involves challenging the intent element—prosecutors must prove the defendant knowingly trained someone for criminal purposes. According to Lustberg, demonstrating that a defendant believed the training was for lawful self-defense or sport can be an effective argument. Other defenses might question whether actual instruction took place or assert constitutional protections such as free speech or freedom of association. In some cases, defendants may also argue entrapment, particularly if law enforcement played a significant role in initiating the activity.
When legal defenses are limited, negotiated resolutions may offer a path to reduced charges or sentencing. Lustberg notes that prosecutors may be open to plea deals in cases with weak evidence of criminal intent. In rare situations, defendants may even qualify for Pre-Trial Intervention, which could allow them to avoid incarceration entirely if no actual harm occurred.
Facing charges under N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 carries serious risks that demand strong legal representation. Adam M. Lustberg of Lustberg Law Offices, LLC has handled numerous firearm-related cases and works to protect clients from the harsh penalties imposed by this statute. As Lustberg explains, even lawful gun owners can find themselves in legal jeopardy if their actions are misinterpreted as criminal training efforts.
Laws like 2C:39-14 reflect New Jersey's strict approach to gun control and public safety. The consequences for those accused under this statute can be severe and long-lasting. For anyone facing investigation or charges related to unlawful firearm training, understanding the law and acting quickly is essential.
About Lustberg Law Offices, LLC:
Lustberg Law Offices, LLC represents clients throughout New Jersey in criminal defense matters. Led by attorney Adam M. Lustberg, the firm handles a range of legal issues including gun crime charges, with a commitment to defending client rights and seeking favorable outcomes in cases.
Embeds:
GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=17248268094099978177
Email and website
Email: alustberg@lustberglaw.com
Website: https://www.lustberglaw.com/
Media Contact
Company Name: Lustberg Law Offices, LLC
Contact Person: Adam M. Lustberg
Email: Send Email
Phone: (201) 880-5311
Address: One University Plaza Dr Suite 212
City: Hackensack
State: New Jersey 07601
Country: United States
Website: https://www.lustberglaw.com/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Northern Ont. school board prepares for cellphone rule changes
After the province's decision to limit cellphones in schools, students will see their phones stored away this year. Lyndsay Aelick reports. Students in Ontario will be ringing in the new school year with their phones on silent or put away in lockers or assigned personal spaces next week as the Ministry of Education rolls out new cellphone rules across the province. 'For Grades, from kindergarten to Grade 6, students are asked to keep their phone, in their personal space. If they have a locker or a personal space, that's where their phone has to be,' said Bruce Bourget, Rainbow District School Board's director of education 'For Grades 7 to 12, It's the same. you know, the difference is before and after school, during lunchtime, there is permission to use it, but in a respectful way. The difference for us. That might be, noted from others is that we are not asking students to bring their phone to class and store them. We feel that that is not an effective use of time or funds.' Bourget told CTV News cellphone use will be permitted for educational purposes as directed by an educator and in specific situations for health and medical purposes. He said teachers will be the ones enforcing the rules with the focus first on education. 'The education piece is to say, you know, for the brief period of time during the day that you're in class, honor the moment, be present. Now, engage with your peers and your teachers and dig into the learning and not be distracted,' said Bourget. 'We're not looking to start with a punitive approach. If someone is persistent, there is progressive discipline.' Sarah Macdougall is an elementary school teacher in the board and a parent of teens, she told CTV News that she feels it's a good thing. 'From an educators perspective, we don't have to worry about managing the protocols it's already been outlined for us, so we don't have to worry about that,' she said. 'Then I also feel like as a parent of teenagers who are in high school I also see that they don't have to manage, what's cool or what's not. They just have to put their cellphones away. So walking back into that 2025 school year, we feel like, okay, teachers can teach, students can learn without that distraction.' However – not everyone feels it will be an easy transition. Several students told CTV News that that some of their peers may have a hard time with the change. Our cameras caught up with some students preparing for back to school and this is what some of them had to say: 'I see a lot of people that can't really like apart from their phone – well, I guess I am one of those people,' said one student. 'It makes sense because it has kind of gotten a problem, especially in the learning environment,' said another. 'But some like states or some areas are taking it too far.' The Rainbow District School Board put out a survey about the cellphone changes last spring which saw more than 2,000 people respond. The survey showed 85 per cent of parents felt phones are a distraction and 87 per cent said prolonged social media use is not good for mental health. For more details on the board's new cellphone policy and administrative procedures, visit their website.
CTV News
5 hours ago
- CTV News
Police descend on Twin Flames Universe headquarters months after W5 exposé
Michigan authorities raid two properties linked to the controversial online group Twin Flames Universe after a W5 exposé. Michigan authorities have raided two properties linked to the controversial online group Twin Flames Universe, including the sprawling northern Michigan mansion that serves as its headquarters. The criminal investigation comes just months after a two-hour W5 documentary exposed the group's inner workings, revealing disturbing allegations of control, coercion and psychological pressure from former members. The group has also been the subject of docudramas on Netflix and Amazon Prime. In a video posted to social media on Tuesday, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel confirmed the raids and announced a criminal probe targeting the group's founders, Jeff and Shaleia Divine. @miattygen Dana Nessel is announcing an ongoing investigation into Twin Flames Universe. TFU is an organization with a largely online following operated by Jeff and Shaleia Divine, which gained notoriety through a series of documentaries. Read more at — Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (@MIAttyGen) July 1, 2025 'Twin Flames is a largely online organization that allegedly uses coercive control over its members,' Nessel said. 'We believe that many of their actions may have been illegal, and we are asking for the general public's help in this investigation.' The investigation also names Twin Flames Universe members Chrissy and Jason Emerick, as well as programs promoted by the group, including the Church of Union and the Mind Alignment Process. Shaleia Divine is Canadian, as are some of the group's members and former followers. The attorney general's office has launched a dedicated website for tip submissions, which can be made anonymously. For tips on this or any other story please email: Former members say justice may finally be catching up Keely Griffin, once the highest-ranking insider in Twin Flames Universe, described the raids as a breakthrough. 'Huge progress toward justice for those who have been harmed by Jeff and Shaleia and Twin Flames Universe,' Griffin told W5. 'I'm a bit overwhelmed with emotions.' Canadian Angie Moggy, who told W5 she was pressured to change her gender identity while inside the group, praised fellow survivors who helped bring attention to the group's practices. 'I commend my fellow ex-members on speaking out,' said Moggy. 'It finally feels like there's a light at the end of the tunnel.' Victoria Bonilla, another former member, said the attorney general's move is a signal to others still afraid to come forward. 'It's a reminder of how important it is to speak out and not let abusers or oppressors scare us into silence.' What W5 uncovered Twin Flames Universe promises to help followers find their one true love, but W5's two-hour documentary We're Not a Cult: Inside Twin Flames Universe revealed allegations of emotional manipulation, rigid control over relationships and even claims that members have been coerced into changing genders. Former members described being told to cut off their families, change their names, or medically transition in order to align with relationships assigned by the group's leadership. The Divines have denied all allegations and reject the label 'cult.' Investigation ongoing The search warrants were carried out with support from Michigan State Police, the U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General, and local sheriff's departments. Authorities have not disclosed what was seized. No charges have been laid to date. The case remains active. W5 will continue to follow developments.
CTV News
7 hours ago
- CTV News
Jury reaches verdict on 4 of 5 counts in Diddy trial but is told to keep deliberating
Sean 'Diddy' Combs participates in "The Four" panel during the FOX Television Critics Association Winter Press Tour in Pasadena, Calif., Jan. 4, 2018. (Photo by Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP) Warning: The following story contains graphic details NEW YORK — The jury in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial said Tuesday that it has reached a verdict on four of five counts against the hip-hop mogul. But the partial decision remained under wraps after jurors were told to keep deliberating because they were stuck on the top charge, racketeering conspiracy. Prosecutors, Combs' defense team and Judge Arun Subramanian reasoned that after just two days of deliberations, it was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts. So rather than taking a partial verdict, Subramanian told the jury to continue weighing the remaining charge. Deliberations will continue Wednesday. The developments came late Tuesday afternoon, when the jury sent a note saying it was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy charge because there were jurors with 'unpersuadable views' on both sides. But in less than 13 hours of deliberations, the jury did reach a verdict on two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. The latter concerns allegations of arranging to fly the women and sex workers across state lines. If there is a conviction, the sex trafficking charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in prison and a maximum sentence of life. Transportation to engage in prostitution carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. The outstanding charge, racketeering conspiracy, carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. After hearing about the jury note, Combs, 55, appeared morose as his lawyers spoke with him. At one point, the hip-hop mogul solemnly read a piece of paper that attorney Marc Agnifilo handed to him. After the jury came in for instructions and then exited the room, a subdued Combs sat in his chair for a few minutes. As he stood to leave, he faced his relatives and supporters in the audience, blew a kiss and tapped his heart, as he frequently has done at the start and end of each day. Then he paused before his mother and exchanged a few words, telling her, 'Love you' and 'I'll be all right.' Marshals then led him from the room. Jurors are weighing charges that Combs used his fame, wealth and violence to force two girlfriends into drug-fueled sex marathons with male sex workers known as 'freak-offs' or 'hotel nights.' He has pleaded not guilty. His lawyers contend prosecutors are trying to criminalize Combs' swinger lifestyle and that, if anything, his conduct amounted to domestic violence, not federal felonies. Racketeering conspiracy is the most complicated charge because it requires the jury to decide not only whether Combs ran a 'racketeering enterprise,' but also whether he was involved in committing such offenses as some or all of various types of offenses, such as kidnapping and arson. Earlier Tuesday, the jury asked to review critical testimony from one of the prosecution's most important witnesses: the hip-hop mogul's former longtime girlfriend Cassie, the R&B singer born Casandra Ventura. The panel of eight men and four women asked for Cassie's account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 -- an assault captured on now-infamous security camera footage. They also asked to see Cassie's testimony about when she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off their yacht at the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. On their way back to the U.S., she said, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex. In addition, the jury asked for Cassie and stripper Daniel Phillip's testimony about her jumping into his lap at a New York City hotel. Phillip testified that 'she was terrified,' and he suspected Combs had been slapping and slamming her around an adjacent room. Phillip testified that he told her she was in real danger. Cassie, he said, 'basically tried to convince me that it was OK: `It's OK. I'm fine, I'll be OK.'' Tuesday's court session began with the lawyers and judge considering the jury's request late Monday for clarification about what qualifies as drug distribution, an aspect of the racketeering conspiracy charge. Subramanian ultimately reminded jurors of instructions he'd already given on that part of the case. On Monday, barely an hour into deliberations, the foreperson sent a note complaining that there was one juror 'who we are concerned cannot follow your Honor's instructions.' In response, the judge reminded jurors of their duties to deliberate and follow his instructions on the law. At the trial, Combs chose not to testify. His lawyers built their arguments for acquittal mostly through lengthy cross-examinations of dozens of prosecution witnesses. By Michael R. Sisak, Larry Neumeister And Jennifer Peltz.
