logo
Diane Abbott leads rebellion against banning Palestine Action

Diane Abbott leads rebellion against banning Palestine Action

Telegraph3 days ago
Diane Abbott joined other Left-wing Labour MPs in rebelling against proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.
Legislation to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000 passed in the House of Commons on Wednesday, with MPs voting 385 to 26 in favour, a majority of 359.
Nine Labour MPs voted against, either by themselves or by proxy, along with a number of suspended former Labour MPs such as Jeremy Corbyn, the party's former leader, and John McDonnell, the ex-shadow chancellor.
The motion is expected to be debated and voted on by the House of Lords on Thursday, before it becomes law.
If it is approved, it will become a criminal offence to be a member of the group or to support it, punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Dan Jarvis, the security minister, told MPs that protesters 'have always been able to, and can continue to' express support for Palestine.
However, he added: 'Palestine Action is not a legitimate protest group.
'People engaged in lawful protest don't need weapons. People engaged in lawful protest do not throw smoke bombs and fire pyrotechnics around innocent members of the public.
'And people engaged in lawful protest do not cause millions of pounds of damage to national security infrastructure, including submarines and defence equipment for Nato.'
Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the Government's bid to proscribe it. A hearing on Friday will decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether the group can bring a legal challenge.
The proscription comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20, in an action claimed by Palestine Action.
Five people have since been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence in relation to the incident.
Mr Jarvis said the attack at RAF Brize Norton 'was just the latest episode in Palestine Action's long history of harmful activity'.
He added: 'Palestine Action has orchestrated a nationwide campaign of property damage featuring attacks that have resulted in serious damage to property and crossed the threshold from direct criminal action into terrorism.'
'Draconian overreach'
But the minister faced backlash from some MPs who described the move as a 'draconian overreach' and likened the group to the Suffragettes.
Zarah Sultana, the Independent MP for Coventry South, said: 'To equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn't just absurd, it is grotesque.
'It is a deliberate distortion of the law to chill dissent, criminalise solidarity and suppress the truth.'
Clive Lewis, the Labour MP for Norwich South who is a formrer soldier, said: 'I understand what terrorism is. I was in London on July 7 in 2007 and I watched my community, this city, attacked by real terrorists.'
Mr Lewis continued: 'And at that point, rightly or wrongly, I decided I was going to Afghanistan to fight the terrorists.
'And I went because I love this country, and I love our democracy, and I want to see it protected. I think today's proscription order against Palestine Action undermines that and I wish my Government wouldn't do it.'
Lord Walney, the former independent advisor to the Government on political violence, said: 'It's good to see that MPs have voted overwhelmingly in support of proscribing Palestine Action.
'This is not about banning peaceful protest but putting a stop to a group known for its use of violence and intimidation of workers.
'Labour must make clear to the rebels that once proscription is in place, any further sympathy for this group will result in their immediate expulsion from the Party.'
The legislation approved by MPs also bans two white supremacist groups, Maniacs Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm Russian Imperial Legion.
The Home Office describes the Maniacs Murder Cult as a neo-Nazi transnational and online organisation which has claimed a number of violent attacks around the world.
Russian Imperial Movement is an ethno-nationalist group which aims to create a new Russian Imperial State. Its paramilitary unit fought alongside Russian forces in the invasion of Ukraine to advance its ideological cause.
It also runs a paramilitary training programme to support terror attacks, the Home Office added.
Arrests after mobility-scooter protest
On Wednesday evening, four people were arrested after a Westminster protest by Palestine Action.
They included 'a man who blocked the gates of Downing Street with his mobility scooter', the Metropolitan Police said.
A Met Police spokesman said: 'Officers have made four arrests in the vicinity of the Palestine Action protest taking place in Westminster [on Wednesday] evening.'
He continued: 'Public Order Act conditions had been imposed to prevent serious disruption, requiring anyone taking part in the protest to assemble on Richmond Terrace, off Whitehall.
'A man who blocked the gates of Downing Street with his mobility scooter and refused to move to the conditioned area was arrested for breaching the conditions.
'A woman who locked herself onto a suitcase outside the gates of Parliament has also been arrested for breaching the conditions and for being in possession of articles intended for locking-on.
'A man who was with her and refused to move to the conditioned area was arrested for breaching the conditions. A fourth man has also been arrested for breaching conditions.'
During the protest, more than 1,000 demonstrators listened to a raft of speeches which were broken up with chants of 'free, free Palestine' and 'from the river to the sea'.
Three MPs – Jeremy Corbyn, Ayoub Khan and John McDonnell – were among speakers. Mr McDonnell said the proposed proscription 'was an attack on democracy and an attack on all of us'.
Towards the end of the two-hour demonstration, two men dressed in the Israeli flag appeared nearby.
This prompted louder chanting from the activists. Some sang 'death, death to the IDF' and 'IDF are terrorists'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Home Office welcomes Palestine Action ban as it comes into force
Home Office welcomes Palestine Action ban as it comes into force

Glasgow Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Home Office welcomes Palestine Action ban as it comes into force

The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The group lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday evening, which sought to stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced the plans in June (Stefan Rousseau/PA) A Home Office spokesperson said on Saturday: 'We welcome the Court's decision and Palestine Action are now a proscribed group. 'The Government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens.' The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million of damage. A group has said it is set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries. A letter for the attention of @metpoliceuk and Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley: 'We would like to alert you to the fact we may be committing offences under the Terrorism Act tomorrow, Saturday 5 July, in Parliament Square at about 1pm.' Full letter: — Defend our Juries (@DefendourJuries) July 4, 2025 In a letter to the Home Secretary, protesters said: 'We do not wish to go to prison or to be branded with a terrorism conviction. But we refuse to be cowed into silence by your order.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident at Brize Norton. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977.

Murder-accused father 'was really rough with two-week-old baby'
Murder-accused father 'was really rough with two-week-old baby'

BBC News

time25 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Murder-accused father 'was really rough with two-week-old baby'

A father who is accused of murdering his premature baby would shout and get angry at the infant, a jury has Gunter, 27, "had no patience" with the two-week-old and was "really rough with him", the father's aunt told Bristol Crown baby, Brendon Staddon, suffered "catastrophic injuries" to his head, neck, legs and jaw while in a special care unit at Yeovil District Hospital in Somerset on 5 March last year. He died on the same Gunter and the baby's mother, Sophie Staddon, 23, both of no fixed address, deny charges of murder and causing or allowing the child's death. Mr Gunter's aunt, Louise Besica, said she first visited her great-nephew in hospital on 22 February last year, two days after his birth, and again on 24 the first occasion, she said Mr Gunter became angry after being told by a nurse he had to wait 20 minutes to pick up his son, because the infant had just been fed through his nasogastric tube."His words were, 'It's not up to the nurses to tell me what to do'," she told the court."He went red in the face and his voice had gone higher. He was saying he was his baby and he should be allowed to change him."She said his voice was "loud" and he was "walking around a lot, and huffing and puffing".On her second visit, Ms Besica said Mr Gunter got angry when Brendon urinated on him as he changed his nappy."He said, 'For God's sake'," she told the court. "He said it in a quite shouty, really quite loud [manner], and I asked to take over."She said he was "really rough" in his handling of Brendon and this caused him to cry, which further "frustrated" his father. 'He controlled things' Ms Besica told the court that during her first visit, the baby's mother was "sat in a chair in the corner like she wasn't interested or really bothered".When asked about any changes in the mother's demeanour when Mr Gunter was present, Ms Besica replied: "Yes, when she was with me she was chattier, and more happy."When Daniel was there she was more quiet and it was more Daniel doing the talking. "He spoke for her sometimes, I noticed."She also described seeing Mr Gunter ordering food for the mother."That made me feel like that she wasn't able to speak for herself, like he had taken over, like he controlled things," Ms Besica told the court she had asked a nurse at the hospital to "keep an eye on them", out of concern for the child's safety.A post-mortem examination found Brendon died of "blunt force impact(s) head injury" with multiple non-accidental injuries to the trial continues.

Critics of UK role in Gaza war consider setting up independent tribunal
Critics of UK role in Gaza war consider setting up independent tribunal

The Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Critics of UK role in Gaza war consider setting up independent tribunal

Critics of the UK's role in the Gaza war are considering setting up an independent tribunal if, as expected, Labour blocks a bill tabled by Jeremy Corbyn backing an official inquiry. Government whips are expected to object to the former Labour party leader's bill in the Commons on Friday, leaving him with few practical options for his legislation to pass. The Middle East minister, Hamish Falconer, said the government saw no need for an inquiry, but 22 NGOs working on issues in the region are supporting Corbyn's call. The Islington North MP is arguing that a host of issues regarding the UK's involvement in what he regards as a genocide by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have not been properly aired in Westminster, except through brief replies by ministers in written or oral questions. The NGOs led by Action Aid said: 'In light of reports of atrocities committed by the Israeli government in Gaza and reports of the UK's collaboration with Israeli military operations, it is increasingly urgent to confirm whether the UK has contributed to any violations of international humanitarian law through economic or political cooperation with the Israeli government since October 2023, including the sale, supply or use of weapons, surveillance aircraft and Royal Air Force bases.' They said establishing an independent public inquiry would provide an evidence-based determination of whether the UK's actions upheld international law. The possible inquiry comes in the week that the UK courts threw out a 20-month legal battle to force the government to end indirect sales of F-35 parts to Israel for use in Gaza. The judges ruled it was not for the courts to make sensitive political judgments regarding whether the risk of curtailing the supply of F-35s for use by Nato outweighed the danger that the IDF with UK weaponry was acting unlawfully in Gaza. Corbyn's inquiry would investigate what the UK did to press Lockheed Martin, the US main F-35 contractor, to give an undertaking that UK-supplied parts would not go to Israel, an issue that was largely covered in a closed court session from which reporters and some barristers are excluded. In written answers the defence minister Maria Eagle said: 'If the UK government were to withdraw from the F-35 global spares pool, it would effectively be withdrawing from the F-35 programme, meaning that the UK would not be able to operate its F-35 fleet of aircraft.' The court case, although a comprehensive defeat for human rights advocates, helped shine a light on how decisions to suspend UK arms sales are made under current arms control laws. The case revealed that due to the lack of definitive evidence ministers had concluded only one IDF military action in Gaza breached international humanitarian law. The Foreign Office had subcontracted examination of 412 incidents, but Falconer told MPs: 'We have not been able to reach a determination in relation to the conduct of hostilities due to the lack of sufficient, verifiable evidence.' Corbyn has also been pursuing information about RAF flights – of which there have been at least 538 – from RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus over the eastern Mediterranean including Gaza since October 2023. The UK insists these flights have purely been to help locate hostages, and not to assist the IDF in pursuing Hamas. It also says the flights have been unarmed. He would like an inquiry to prise open more details of the UK-Israeli military cooperation agreement signed in December 2020. The Ministry of Defence, in a written answer, said the 'agreement incorporates a range of defence engagement activity, including defence education', adding that it was 'not possible to release this agreement as it is held at a higher classification'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store