
‘I really hate him for what he did': Wife at the centre of Singapore's shocking rape ring case speaks out
Annie (not her real name) used to break down reading her husband's letters from prison. Now, she barely glances at them.
'I don't love him anymore,' she said quietly. 'I've let go and moved on.'
Her husband, known only as 'J' in court reports, is at the heart of one of Singapore's most disturbing sex crime cases: a calculated and brutal scheme where four men drugged their wives and allowed others to rape them. Annie was the first known victim — and the woman at the centre of it all.
J, who recruited the most accomplices, drugged Annie and facilitated her rape by five men, one of whom attacked her on their wedding anniversary.
She told her story to The Straits Times twice — first in 2024 and again in May 2025 on camera. The pain was raw.
'I really hate him for making me go through this,' she said through tears.
'But I tell myself I have to go on.'
Annie met J in 2008 at a karaoke bar. She was in her 20s, drawn in by his humour and charm. Within months, she was pregnant and reluctantly married him.
'I told him, 'I don't feel secure with you,'' she recalled. He promised he had changed.
But shortly after their first child was born, Annie discovered he had been checking into hotels regularly. At first, he lied, then claimed a woman was 'just giving massages.'
She forgave him, wanting to keep the family intact.
'I didn't want my child to grow up in a broken home,' said Annie, who had been raised by a single mother.
But the cycle repeated. Even during her second pregnancy, she caught J lying about his whereabouts.
Eventually, Annie herself had a brief affair — something J would later use to justify his actions.
Unbeknownst to her, J had already been planning her violation, exchanging fantasies with a man she had contacted briefly online.
'He even gave him details about me — where I studied, what drinks I liked,' she said.
'Everything was so nicely plotted. I thought it was my fault.'
There were signs. J installed a camera in their bedroom, supposedly to watch their children — but later shared access online, where strangers watched them have sex. Another time, he called someone to listen in as they were intimate.
Annie was furious. Her mother-in-law slapped J and told him: 'This is your wife, not some prostitute.'
Annie suggested counselling, but gave up when only group therapy was available.
'I just felt hopeful,' she said. 'I wanted a happy family.'
He remained outwardly devoted to their children and successful in his job, so she kept forgiving him.
Everything unravelled on New Year's Day in 2020. Annie came home from a party and found sexually explicit messages on J's phone, including photos of herself — blindfolded and unconscious.
'I felt very blank. I couldn't believe he had done this to me,' she said.
She confronted him, but he refused to explain. Her family urged her to go to the police. At first, she didn't — afraid of what it might mean for her children.
Later, she confronted one of the men mentioned in the chat, referred to as 'K', and he admitted to raping her. Her sister filmed the exchange.
That was when Annie finally filed a police report.
'I was afraid my children would become victims too if he wasn't arrested.'
J and K were arrested on January 2, 2020. As police investigations progressed, Annie discovered the true extent of the betrayal.
J had orchestrated multiple rapes, drugging her with Dormicum pills bought illegally. He photographed her unconscious body and shared the images with his accomplices.
'I couldn't imagine someone I loved doing this to me,' she said.
'The only 'lucky' thing was that I wasn't awake for the assaults.'
Looking back, she recalled waking up groggy and disoriented, her underwear missing, and wondering why she was taking so many pills.
'He said it was medicine I asked for,' she said.
She also recognised some of her assailants — one had flirted with her online; another had joined her and J for drinks, making her feel uneasy.
Annie's case helped expose the harrowing crimes committed by her husband and six other men, all of whom have since been convicted.
Now in her 40s, she's focused on rebuilding her life and raising her children. She speaks out not for sympathy, but to ensure others know such abuse can happen — even within a marriage.
'I want women to know this kind of thing really happens,' she said.
'And they're not alone.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
12 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ex-deputy chairman fails in review bid over order for fresh insider trading trial
A Court of Appeal bench said there is no breach of natural justice in the findings of the previous panel. PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has rejected a review application by a former executive deputy chairman of Malaysian Merchant Marine Bhd, whose insider trading case was ordered by another Court of Appeal bench to be reheard in the High Court. A three-member bench chaired by Justice Ruzima Ghazali said Ramesh Rajaratnam's application had no merit because there was no breach of natural justice committed by the previous bench. Ruzima said the previous panel, in its grounds of judgment, did not base its decision solely on several provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC). 'They addressed at length the points and authorities raised by parties. There is no breach of natural justice in the findings of the previous panel,' he said. Justices Azmi Ariffin and Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz also heard the application. Ramesh had been found guilty by a sessions court on three charges of insider trading, but the High Court set aside the decision upon his appeal. His complaint was that the previous panel only looked into Sections 173, 180, 182(a) and 422 of the CPC in setting aside his acquittal and ordering a rehearing of his appeal before a new High Court judge. He said this was not canvassed before the panel and only appeared in the grounds of judgment. Ruzima said the threshold for review was high. 'As the apex court, as in this case, we have always been cautious when exercising the power of review of its earlier decision, as on the face of it, it goes against the principle of finality,' he said. He said review powers of the court may only be exercised in exceptional cases if there had been a significant injustice or the applicant had no alternative remedy. Lawyers Gurdial Singh Nijar and Abraham Au appeared for Ramesh in today's proceedings, while Hasley Tajudin, Law Wen Zhen and Danial Ariff Tung represented the Securities Commission Malaysia. Last year, the Court of Appeal said the High Court, as an appellate court, could not decide an appeal solely on the trial court's errors or omissions. Justice Wong Kian Kheong said the High Court had a judicial duty under Section 316 of the CPC to consider the merits of the case. '(Otherwise), there would have been an abdication of the High Court's judicial duty,' he said in the judgment setting aside Ramesh's acquittal. Wong said the High Court was also duty-bound to consider whether the errors or omissions by the trial court had caused a failure of justice as stated under Section 422 of the CPC. On May 6, 2024, Justice Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera, now a Federal Court judge, led a three-member bench in allowing the prosecution's appeal, and remitted the matter to be heard by a new High Court judge. The other member of the bench was Justice Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim. Vazeer said even though there was judicial copying in the sessions court's grounds of decision, and it was a non-speaking judgment, the High Court committed a legal error in granting an acquittal. Ramesh was charged in the Kuala Lumpur sessions court on April 29, 2015 with three counts of insider trading under Section 188(2)(a) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007. On Sept 11, 2019, the trial judge convicted him on all three charges. and sentenced him to five years' imprisonment and a fine of RM3 million on each charge. The prison terms were ordered to run concurrently. Insider trading carries a punishment of imprisonment not exceeding 10 years and a fine of not less than RM1 million. On May 20, 2021, the High Court allowed Ramesh's appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence on all three charges. At the Court of Appeal, the Securities Commission, with the public prosecutor's consent, decided to pursue its appeal on one charge only.


Malay Mail
15 hours ago
- Malay Mail
In Singapore, 147,000 customer records exposed in Cycle & Carriage data breach
SINGAPORE, Aug 1 — About 147,000 customer records were compromised in a recent data breach at car distributor Cycle & Carriage in Singapore, the company confirmed today. Responding to media queries, a Cycle & Carriage spokesperson said the firm detected unauthorised access to its customer relationship management system on July 14, where a threat actor downloaded certain customer details, according to CNA in a report published today. 'About 147,000 data records are affected. Most of the downloaded records have missing or partial information,' the spokesperson said. The compromised data may include names and contact details such as email addresses and phone numbers. Around 2 per cent of the records also contained National Registration Identity Card (NRIC) numbers and deposit amounts. No banking or credit card details were accessed. Cycle & Carriage, the authorised dealer in Singapore for car brands including Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Kia, Citroën and Peugeot, said it has taken steps to block further unauthorised access following the breach. A forensic investigation has since been launched, and the company has brought in cybersecurity experts to determine the cause of the intrusion. Cycle & Carriage has notified Singapore's Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC), lodged a police report, and begun informing affected customers in batches starting Wednesday. In an email to a customer seen by CNA, the company described the incident as a 'cybersecurity breach' and said it was still assessing the full extent of the damage. Apologising to those affected, the company said it had internal protocols and training in place to safeguard data but would continue to improve these measures in light of the breach. Customers were urged to stay alert for phishing scams and suspicious requests for personal information. The PDPC confirmed it is investigating the case, while the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore reminded organisations to strengthen cybersecurity defences to prevent data leaks and limit their impact.


Malay Mail
15 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Man charged with raping former sister-in-law in Cheras, court sets Aug 26 for mention
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 1 — An unemployed man pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court here today to a charge of raping his former sister-in-law two years ago. The 31-year-old man is charged with raping the 31-year-old woman at an apartment unit in Bandar Bukit Jalil in Cheras at 3.30 am on Jan 22, 2023. The charge, under Section 376 of the Penal Code, provides a maximum prison sentence of 20 years and whipping if convicted. Deputy Public Prosecutor Muhammad Zul Hilmi Latif did not request bail as it involved a non-bailable offence. The accused was unrepresented. Judge Siti Shakirah Mohtarudin then set Aug 26 for mention. — Bernama * If you are experiencing sexual violence, the following hotlines offer free and confidential support: Talian Kasih at 15999 or WhatsApp 019-2615999 (24/7); All Women's Action Society at 016-2374221/016-2284221 (9.30am-5.30pm); and Women's Aid Organisation (WAO) at 03-30008858 or SMS/WhatsApp TINA 018-9888058 (24/7)