Why Amazon's Move Into Rural America Can't Cut Walmart's Retail Lead
SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO - APRIL 5, 2020: An Amazon Prime package delivered to a mailbox by a U.S. ... More Postal Service mailman in Santa Fe, New Mexico. (Photo by)
Amazon just announced that it is expanding same-day and next-day deliveries to customers in more than 4,000 smaller cities, towns and rural communities by the end of 2025. This comes on the heels of a 30% increase in same or next-day delivery so far this year compared with same period last year.
Touting speedier delivery to customers in North Padre Island, TX, Asbury, IA, Lewes, DE, Sharpton, MD, Fort Seneca, OH and other locations further afield, Amazon will invest over $4 billion to triple the size of its delivery network by the end of next year. It will transform existing rural delivery stations into hybrid hubs that will store location-specific inventory. This move will also create an average of 170 local jobs per hub, plus additional driving opportunities for independent contractors.
In an unexpected twist, Amazon is copying Walmart, instead of the other way around. One of Walmart's competitive strengths is its foothold in rural America. With over 90% of Americans living within ten miles of a Walmart store, the company is now able to deliver food, general merchandise, and prescriptions to 93% of the U.S. in less than three hours. This reach has powered its e-commerce business to over 20% growth annually for the past two years.
Battle For Market Share
While Amazon is the undisputed leader in e-commerce, with an estimated 42% market share compared to Walmart's 9.4% in 2024, Walmart's share grew by 1.2% over the previous year, outpacing Amazon's 0.8% gain, according to BofA Global Research. And with growth in e-commerce slowing – advancing over 10% in 2021 and 2022, then subsiding to 8.1% in 2024 and 6.4% through May this year – the competition between the two giants is intensifying.
Walmart has been moving aggressively to play catch-up online, but with over 4,600 stores in the U.S., it has an advantage that Amazon can't begin to match. Thanks to its physical connection with customers, it has much more room to maneuver. In effect, Walmart is playing chess and Amazon is playing checkers.
Building Omnichannel Bridges
Walmart's omnichannel customers shop three-times more often and spend 13% more per order. And the new Walton Goggins 'Walmart. Who Knew?' ad campaign is sure to attract more customers to engage online.
Its latest iteration features Goggins in cowboy gear talking to his horse in a barn right out of Yellowstone, and it takes a not-so-subtle jab at Amazon. 'They don't know the first thing about you or Walmart Plus.'
Walmart+ is its answer to Amazon Prime. For $98 per year, Walmart+ members get free shipping on all Walmart orders, as well as free direct delivery from the local store on orders of $35 or more, with deliveries scheduled to meet the customer's timeline. However, there is no minimum on delivery for pharmacy orders.
Walmart+ stands behind members with free online pet services through Pawp and free flat tire repair and road hazard warranty for customers who purchase and install a set of tires at Walmart. Members also get Walmart cash rebates on travel services.
Other benefits include gasoline discounts at over 13,000 stations nationwide, including Exxon, Mobil and Walmart, and a 25% discount at Burger King and a free Whopper with any purchase every three months.
While Walmart+ can't match Amazon Prime's entertainment offerings, it does provide streaming services from Paramount+ and ad-free content with Pluto TV.
Membership Shortfall
Amazon Prime is way out in front when it comes to memberships, with an estimated 85.7 members and according to Capital One, memberships grew from 76.6 million in 2022 even after Prime memberships went up to $139 per year.
Walmart+ has a long way to go to catch up. Morgan Stanley estimates its membership between 17.2 million to 24.6 million based on results of a consumer survey. The company does not release membership figures, though the company has commented that memberships are growing at high double-digit rates.
However, Amazon has been pushing Prime far longer. It launched in 2005 and Walmart+ a mere five years ago.
Best Of Both World's
Increasingly, consumers are opting for both membership plans. Pyments found nearly 25% of consumers have memberships in both plans as of April 2025 with dual memberships highest among Millennials at 37%.
Overall, about 30% of U.S. consumers have yet to sign on to either service, based upon a survey same of 2,000 adults. The highest non-participation rate is among Baby Boomers at 42%. These nones are the prime battleground – pun intended – for both competitors.
Interestingly, Pyments found brand loyalty strongest among Walmart+ members. Some 11% of Amazon Prime-only members made their last retail purchase from Walmart, while no Walmart+ members returned the favor.
While Amazon takes the lead in general merchandise purchases, accounting for some 73% of gross merchandise value, Walmart is catching up. Speaking at a recent Oppenheimer investor conference, CFO John David Rainey shared that about half of its GMV growth in general merchandise has been from its marketplace business.
Overall Walmart's marketplace revenues grew 34% in the last fiscal year and Marketplace Pulse estimates there are 150,000 sellers on the platform.
Dominating Grocery
Walmart's dominance is most pronounced in grocery. Overall 60% of its e-commerce gross merchandise value is credited to grocery, whereas grocery accounts for only about 5% of Amazon's GMV.
In Pyment's survey, only 1% of consumers surveyed who purchased groceries within the last 30 days, made their last purchase with Amazon, compared to 30% who bought from Walmart. And the rate of most recent grocery purchases among Walmart+ members reached nearly 60% and among nones, some 24% purchased groceries from Walmart.
Amazon has yet to crack the code in grocery, not for lack of trying with its new grocery subscription offering and acquisition of Whole Foods. It's an advantage that Walmart will continue to capitalize on.
'If you can attract a customer to come into your website or your store to buy groceries, it's so much easier to sell them other things, whether a T-shirt, furniture, whatever it is,' shared CFRA investment analyst Arun Sundaram with Investor's Business Daily.
That's why Walmart is going to stay in the lead against Amazon. Even while Amazon dominates in e-commerce, that channel accounts for only about 30% of retail sales and online sales growth is slowing.
Walmart operates where consumers still overwhelmingly shop – in physical stores. And it offers digital experiences that are catching up to Amazon's and are even better for online grocery customers far and wide. Walmart is truly an omnichannel retailer and Amazon can hardly say the same.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
28 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Wimbledon 2025: Coco Gauff is just 21 but already thinking about what to do after tennis
LONDON (AP) — To be clear, Coco Gauff didn't bring up the word 'star' during a recent interview with The Associated Press; the reporter did. So as Gauff began to answer a question about balancing her life as a professional athlete with her off-court interests, she caught herself repeating that term. 'I definitely didn't know how it would look like,' she began with a smile, 'before I got to be, I guess, a star — feels weird to call myself that — but I definitely did want to expand outside of tennis. Always. Since I was young.' She still is young, by just about any measure, and she is a really good tennis player — Gauff owns the Grand Slam titles and No. 2 ranking to prove it as she heads into Wimbledon, which begins Monday — but the 21-year-old American is also more than that. Someone unafraid to express her opinions about societal issues. Someone who connects with fans via social media. Someone who is the highest-paid female athlete in any sport, topping $30 million last year, according to with less than a third of that from prize money and most via deals with companies such as UPS, New Balance, Rolex and Barilla. Someone who recently launched her own management firm. And someone who wants to succeed in the business world long after she no longer swings a racket on tour. 'It's definitely something that I want to start to step up for post-career. Kind of start building that process, which is why I wanted to do it early. Because I didn't want to feel like I was playing catch-up at the end of my career,' said Gauff, who will face Dayana Yastremska in the first round at the All England Club on Tuesday. 'On the business side of things, it doesn't come as natural as tennis feels. I'm still learning, and I have a lot to learn about,' Gauff said. 'I've debated different things and what paths I wanted to take when it came to just stimulating my brain outside of the court, because I always knew that once I finished high school that I needed to put my brain into something else.' In a campaign announced this week by UPS, which first partnered with Gauff in 2023 before she won that year's U.S. Open, she connects with business coach Emma Grede — known for working with Kim Kardashian on Skims, and with Khloe Kardashian on Good American — to offer mentoring to three small-business owners. 'Coco plays a key role in helping us connect with those younger Gen-Z business owners — emerging or younger entrepreneurs,' Betsy Wilson, VP of digital marketing and brand activation at UPS, said in a phone interview. 'Obviously, she's very relevant in social media and in culture, and working with Coco helps us really connect with that younger group.' While Grede helped the entrepreneurs, Gauff also got the opportunity to pick up tips. 'It's really cool to learn from someone like her,' Gauff said. 'Whenever I feel like I'm ready to make that leap, I can definitely reach out to her for advice and things like that. ... This will help me right now and definitely in the long term.' ___ Howard Fendrich has been the AP's tennis writer since 2002. Find his stories here: More AP tennis:
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
St. Joseph County home listings asked for more money in May - see the current median price here
The median home in St. Joseph County listed for $265,900 in May, up 9% from the previous month's $243,950, an analysis of data from shows. Compared to May 2024, the median home list price decreased 2.9% from $289,000. The statistics in this article only pertain to houses listed for sale in St. Joseph County, not houses that were sold. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at St. Joseph County's median home was 1,777 square feet, listed at $148 per square foot. The price per square foot of homes for sale is mostly unchanged from May 2024. Listings in St. Joseph County moved steadily, at a median 43 days listed compared to the May national median of 51 days on the market. In the previous month, homes had a median of 43 days on the market. Around 76 homes were newly listed on the market in May, an 8.6% increase from 70 new listings in May 2024. The median home prices issued by may exclude many, or even most, of a market's homes. The price and volume represent only single-family homes, condominiums or townhomes. They include existing homes, but exclude most new construction as well as pending and contingent sales. In Michigan, median home prices were $299,900, a slight increase from April. The median Michigan home listed for sale had 1,618 square feet, with a price of $184 per square foot. Throughout the United States, the median home price was $440,000, a slight increase from the month prior. The median American home for sale was listed at 1,840 square feet, with a price of $234 per square foot. The median home list price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. Experts say the median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average list price, which would mean taking the sum of all listing prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high price. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on Sturgis Journal: St. Joseph County home listings asked for more money in May - see the current median price here
Forbes
36 minutes ago
- Forbes
Will The ‘Beautiful' Bill Increase The Deficit?
NEW YORK - FEBRUARY 19: The National Debt Clock is seen February 19, 2004 in New York City. ... More According to a Treasury Department report, the U.S. governments national debt, the accumulation of past budget shortfalls, reached a total of more than $7 trillion for the first time. (Photo by) The performative exchange of military strikes between Iran and the US means that a nuclear tipped hot war in the Middle East is off the cards for the moment, though the bad news is that a far greater crisis awaits. In the past five or so weeks prominent financiers – Ray Dalio, Jamie Dimon and even Elon Musk – have warned about the burgeoning fiscal deficit and the mountain of debt that the US (and other countries) has accumulated. A very decent blog post by Indermit Gill, the chief economist at the World Bank, outlines the viewpoint. Next week, there is a good chance that the Senate passes President Trump's budget, which according to the independent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) will swell the deficit by close to USD 3trn and push debt to GDP towards an unprecedented 125% in the next ten years Additionally, rumours that the next Federal Reserve chair will be picked soon by President Trump (Powell leaves in May 2026) has upset the dollar, making life even more difficult for foreign holders of US debt. What is interesting is not how gargantuan the world's debt load has become, but how few people care. Politics in the West has changed so much that it has neutered what used to be a political class who in a very Catholic way, pronounced themselves to be fiscally responsible. In the US, it used to be the case that a good number of Senators were what was called 'fiscal hawks', or had an aversion to large budget deficits, and an even greater aversion to resolving them through higher taxes (the US has only produced budget surplus twice – under Lyndon Johnson and then Bill Clinton – and in both cases taxes were raised). Paul Krugman has referred to deficit hawks as 'deficit scolds', because the spend more time warning about the dangers of the deficit than fixing it. Ronald Reagan, and the policy makers who surrounded him – namely James Baker, Nicholas Brady and Don Reagan, were fiscally conservative by reputation but had the luxury of being able to grow the US economy through tax cuts and de-regulation. At the time (early 1980's onwards) some Republicans had a 'starve the beast' mindset, which is to say that they favoured lowering taxes so that the government would have less revenue to spend, but there is little evidence that this worked as a strategy (partly because many of the initial Reagan tax cuts were aimed at the rich). In the post Reagan phase, deficit reduction as a virtue came into its own in the Robert Rubin era (at the Treasury), and many of his former colleagues and acolytes continued this during the early years of the Obama presidency (a relevant private body is the Hamilton Project, where Rubin was a founder). One of the notable initiatives of the Obama White House was the creation of the US National Committee on National Fiscal Responsibility and Reform or the Simpson-Bowles Commission as it became known, a bi-partisan body that aimed to reduce the fiscal deficit and debt. Its most noteworthy aspect, in my memory, was the degree of civility and collaboration between representatives of the Democrats and Republicans. Such a body could not exist today. Indeed, the radicalisation of parts of both parties, in the context of quantitative easing (which has dulled the impact of rising debt and deficits) has broken the link between fiscal responsibility and electability. For example, the first crack in the Republican edifice was the advent of the Tea Party Movement, one of whose tenets was tough fiscal responsibility, as inspired by a 'Chicago Tea Party' rant from CNBC commentator Rick Santelli in 2009. Many of the Tea Party oriented voters and Republican politicians then gravitated to the Trump corner in 2016, the price of which was a surrender of their fiscal sacred cows. Today there is only a handful of fiscally conservative Republican Senators (the Club for Growth publishes an annual scorecard of how fiscally rigorous it thinks members of the House and Senate are). The majority of Republican Senators appear happy to give the nod to a policy that edges the US closer to the financial precipice. Indeed, not only will the Trump budget favour wealthy households but it will increase the number of financially precarious households, and damage healthcare and education provision. The other interesting observation I draw is that the relationship between debt and politics has now reached a turning point, and from here debt will condition politics. I see this happening in at least three ways. The first is that in the context of 'zero fiscal space' the constraints imposed by high levels of debt and deficits, will drive new splits within parties, for example between those who are keen to spend more on defence, versus those who wish to preserve social welfare safety nets. The revolt by a large number of Labour MPs against benefit cuts imposed by Keir Starmer is an example. In the future, this cleavage may inspire new political parties. To echo a recent note (The Power Algorithm) new 'tech bro' parties could materialise that prefer using robots to do the work of immigrants and that technology should be deployed for social control. The second, related scenario is that in the absence of money to spend, the traditional 'pork barrel' cycle of politics disintegrates, and instead politicians tilt the broad political debate to non-fiscal issues – identity, foreign policy, and immigration. A third element in the hypothesis is that voters observe mainstream politicians to be helpless and useless in the face of very high fiscal constraints, and they become largely apathetic about politics and in some cases vote for extreme candidates, such as 'chainsaw economists' as in the case of Argentina. In this way, and perhaps exceptionally in history, the coming debt crisis (if the World Bank's economist is correct) will be intertwined with the current crisis of politics.
