
FATF points to fund trail, slams Pahalgam attack
Countries in the grey list are subject to increased scrutiny, given an action plan, and their implementation of this is monitored every four months. If they fail to show any progress, then they are pushed to the 'black list' and subjected to counter measures. Countries currently on the FATF black list are Iran, Myanmar and North Korea.
The global body further said that it has enhanced its focus on the effectiveness of measures countries have put in place, identified gaps in terror financing, and will soon release a comprehensive analysis on that.
'Terrorist attacks kill, maim and inspire fear around the world. The FATF notes with grave concern and condemns the brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22 April 2025. This, and other recent attacks, could not occur without money and the means to move funds between terrorist supporters,' the statement titled 'Strengthening efforts to combat terrorist financing' said.
A government official, who did not wish to be named, said, 'FATF rarely issues condemnation of terrorist acts. It is only the third time in the last decade that they have issued condemnation of a terrorist attack.' The watchdog had earlier issued condemnation in 2015 and 2019 of severe terrorist attacks. 'It has issued the condemnation because the international community has felt the severity of the attack and spotlights that such attacks will not go unpunished,' he added.
FATF developed a TF [terror financing] Risk and Context toolkit for assessors, so that rogue states such as Pakistan cannot fool it with lies, he said. 'FATF is releasing a report on TF risks in a month's time. This is the first time the concept of 'state-sponsored terrorism' is being acknowledged by FATF as a funding source. Only India's National Risk Assessment (NRA) recognises state-sponsored terrorism from Pakistan as a key TF risk. The inclusion of 'state-sponsored terrorism' as a concept in the report demonstrates international recognition of state-sponsored terrorism by Pakistan,' he said.
He quoted FATF president Elisa de Anda Madrazo's recent comments, 'No single company, authority, or country can combat this challenge alone. We must be unified against the scourge of global terrorism. Because terrorists need to succeed only once to achieve their goal, while we have to succeed every time to prevent it.'
People familiar with the statement said an Indian team comprising officials from the ministries of home and finance, the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and other agencies, which had travelled to Strasbourg, France, for the FATF plenary from June 10-13, highlighted Pakistan's support for terrorism, including the Pahalgam attack, in which 26 tourists were killed. 'Evidence has been provided to prove that Islamabad has failed to enforce anti-money laundering and counterterror reforms and made no headway in prosecuting UN-designated terrorists,' said an officer, who asked not to be named.
Pakistan was removed from the FATF grey list in October 2022 but Indian officials have highlighted that its support to terrorism persists and that Islamabad provides safe haven to designated terrorists. It is due for an evaluation in 2026, and Indian officials are making efforts to convey to the international community that Islamabad needs to be put back in the increased monitoring category (grey list).
Before Pahalgam, a similar statement was issued by FATF in 2019 after the Pulwama terror attack, in which 40 Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel were killed. Both the incidents forced India to respond by conducting air strikes deep inside Pakistan and brought both the countries on the brink of full-scale war.
The Pahalgam attack was raised by India last month at a UN meeting in Vienna as well, saying Pakistan based UN-proscribed terrorist groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad and their proxies have orchestrated attacks on Indian soil, leading to tragic loss of innocent lives.
'Incidents such as the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the attacks in Uri and Pathankot in 2016, the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing, and most recently, the heinous terror attack in Pahalgam where 26 tourists were shot dead, remain deeply etched in our national consciousness,' the Indian government said last month in a statement in Vienna.
In response to the Pahalgam attack, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7. Indian forces bombed nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in pre-dawn strikes — in which at least 100 terrorists were killed —and sparked a series of attacks and counter-attacks across the western border, involving fighter jets, missiles, armed drones, and fierce artillery and rocket duels. In one such attack on the night of May 9-10, the Indian Air Force struck targets at 13 Pakistani airbases and military installations. After four days of fighting, military hostilities were stopped on May 10 evening as the two nations reached an understanding.
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is currently investigating the terror attack and is looking for terrorists — estimated to be four in number—who shot 26 tourists at close range before fleeing. The federal agency has interrogated several individuals including pony operators, vendors, photographers and those employed in adventure sports activities apart from hundreds of overground workers to get clues in the case.
Asserting that as terrorism continues to threaten societies and citizens around the world, FATF said in its statement on Monday that it supports over 200 jurisdictions within its global network to build and enhance their counter-financing of terrorism (CFT) measures, including through the strategic use of financial intelligence – making this 'one of the most powerful instruments for dismantling terrorist financing networks'.
It further said that 'in addition to setting out the framework for combating terrorist financing, the FATF has enhanced its focus on the effectiveness of measures countries have put in place'.
'That is how, through our mutual evaluations, we have identified gaps that need to be addressed'.
The global watchdog claimed that it has developed 'guidance on terrorist financing risk to support experts that contribute to evaluations of the 200+ jurisdictions in the global network'.
FATF asserted that it is working to improve its support to countries to stay ahead of terrorist financing risks – for example, relating to abuse of social media, crowd funding, and virtual assets -- and release a comprehensive analysis of terrorist financing.
'To improve this picture, the FATF will soon release a comprehensive analysis of terrorist financing, compiling cases provided by our global network. It will also host a webinar to help public and private sectors understand the risks and stay alert to emerging threats,' FATF added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
18 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Muslim bodies urge govt to ensure end of 'Israeli aggression' in Gaza
In a joint statement, prominent Muslim organisations and Islamic scholars called on both the Indian government and global powers to intervene and stop the 'continuing atrocities' in Gaza.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India-UK trade pact: Tariff cut may not impact Scotch whisky retail prices
The India-UK free trade agreement (FTA), under which tariffs on whisky and gin have been halved from 150 per cent to 75 per cent, which will further fall to 40 per cent in a decade's time, will not necessarily impact prices of Scotch whisky and gin for Indian consumers. According to a May 2025 report from the International Wine & Spirit Research (IWSR), blended Scotch grew the strongest of all the large whisky categories in India in 2024, with volumes rising by medium single digits and sales more than doubling since 2020. India is known to be a whisky market, with widespread national sales. However, while the data company's forecasts anticipated an upside from the FTA, it added that its impact should not be overestimated. 'While tariffs have been slashed from 150 per cent to 75 per cent, the impact on shelf prices is closer to 10 per cent and it is not a given that this will be passed on to consumers,' it had stated in the 2025 executive summary. The revised tariffs will apply to both bottled-in-origin (BIO) and bulk imports. Industry executives agree, stating that tariffs make up only up to 15 per cent of the final retail price, and with state taxes and costs for distribution and marketing, prices could be down by a mere 10 per cent. This may not be passed on to consumers, they said on the condition of anonymity. A senior commerce ministry official said that a major portion of whisky imports into India are used in the manufacture of blended whisky, whose production is set to rise due to cheaper raw material. 'We are foreseeing significant strategic and cost advantages from this development. We have estimated our Scotch requirements at over ₹250 crore in 2025-26 (FY26), and this treaty represents a substantial opportunity for value creation,' said Abhishek Khaitan, managing director at Radico Khaitan, one of the largest importers of Scotch whisky. Some liquor players also believe that the FTA will help consumers have access to premium Scotch whisky at reduced prices. 'The UK FTA is a positive move for the Scotch whisky segment, and it will enhance accessibility and affordability for Indian consumers. For import-driven portfolios like ours, this could fast-track category adoption, bring price parity closer to Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL), and enable deeper reinvestment into consumer-building efforts,' said Debashish Shyam, cofounder and director, Ardent Alcobev, which sells Dram Bell blended Scotch whisky. However, the real benefit, Shyam added, will depend on how quickly the duty reductions are implemented, and whether the states align their tax structures accordingly. Spirits made up 51.2 per cent of the total beverage alcohol market in 2024, dominated by whisky. According to the data company, India consumed 258,750 under-9-litre cases of whisky in 2024, which is set to witness a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.1 per cent from 2024 to 2029. These included 8,509.60 cases of Scotch whisky, the company stated, adding that India is set to become the biggest Scotch market in the world by 2027.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Look at your own country: Bombay High Court raps CPI(M) over Gaza protest petition
The Bombay High Court on Friday (July 25, 2025) dismissed a petition filed by the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the CPI challenging the Mumbai Police's decision to deny permission for a protest at Azad Maidan against the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The court observed that the Indian political organisations should prioritise domestic issues over international conflicts. A Division Bench comprising Justices Ravindra Ghuge and Gautam Ankhad pulled up the petitioners for focusing on matters outside the country and said, 'Our country has enough issues to deal with. We do not want anything like this. I am sorry to say that you are short-sighted. You are looking at Gaza and Palestine while neglecting what's happening here. Why don't you do something for your own country? Look at your own country. Be patriots. People say they are patriots, but this is not patriotism. Show patriotism for the citizens of our own country first,' the Bench remarked sharply during the hearing. Senior advocate Mihir Desai representing CPI(M), informed the Bench that on June 13, 2025, his clients submitted an application seeking permission from the Azad Maidan police station to hold a peaceful protest and gathering in Azad Maidan to show solidarity with the people of Gaza, who are currently in the midst of a genocide, by calling for a ceasefire. On June 17, denying permission to the All India Peace and Solidarity Foundation (AIPSF) that police informed them that the permission to protest was being denied in exercise of their powers under Section 168 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 68 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Mr. Desai informed the Bench that the political parties have time and again taken up several causes that has concerned India and have been conducting health and education camps. The Court noted that the CPI(M), being a registered as Indian political party, should ideally be engaging with local civic concerns. 'You are a registered party in India. Your party could have taken up issues like garbage dumping, pollution, drainage, or flooding. Why are you not protesting on these issues? We are only giving examples. Instead, you want to protest over something happening thousands of miles away and showing concern for Palestine and Gaza,' the Bench observed. The petitioners stated that the Indian government's stance and support of Palestine as a State, has been an integral part of the nation's foreign policy. In 1974, India became the first Non-Arab State to recognize Palestine Liberation Organisation as the sole and legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. In 1988, India was also one of the first countries to recognize Palestine as a State. In April 2024, India voted in favour of the Human Rights Council Resolution on the Right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. Moreover, India is a State signatory to the Genocide Convention, 1948, and the protest which was held to condemn violence and genocide in Gaza, can in no way termed to be the foreign policy of the India State. Mr. Desai further argued that citizens have a fundamental right to protest at designated places and that disagreements with the government's foreign policy cannot be grounds to stifle dissent. He also contended that mere apprehensions of law-and-order issues, without concrete evidence, should not override constitutional freedoms. He also clarified that the protest has nothing to do with Operation Sindoor or India's border relations with neighbouring countries. CPI(M) issues statement Rejecting the petition, the court observed, 'You don't know the dust it could kick up. Whether to take a side for Palestine or Israel is their (Govt of India) work, why do you want to create such a situation that the country has to take sides on this? Why do you want to do this? It's obvious, going by the party you represent, that you don't understand what this could do to the foreign affairs of the country.' The CPI(M) has strongly condemned the Bombay High Court's remarks while dismissing its petition challenging the denial of permission to protest against the Gaza conflict. Calling the Court's comments unconstitutional and politically biased, the CPI(M) criticised the bench for questioning its patriotism and aligning with the Central government's foreign policy stance. 'It is regrettable to say that the Bench appears to be completely unaware of the constitutional provisions that empower political parties or the history of our country and the support and brotherly feelings of the Indian people towards the Palestinian people for their right to a homeland. The statement made by the High Court bench regarding the CPI(M) smacks of the bench aligning itself with the position of the Central Government,' the party said in a statement. The party invoked India's historical support for Palestine and urged citizens to reject what it termed a troubling judicial trend undermining democratic rights. 'We appeal to the freedom and democracy-loving people of the country to stand shoulder to shoulder with us in unequivocally rejecting this objectionable view,' the statement read.