Punjab assembly passes animal welfare bill to resume bullock cart racing. ‘Not cruelty,' says CM Mann
A 2019 Bill brought in by the then Congress government in the state that allowed the resumption of bullock cart races at the famous Kila Raipur Rural games in Ludhiana had received the assent of the President in September 2024. The bill passed by the assembly today widened the 2024 Act beyond Kila Raipur to include all rural games across the state.
Chandigarh: The Punjab assembly Friday unanimously passed the 'The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2025' to facilitate the resumption of bullock cart races in rural games across Punjab. The popular sport was banned in 2014 following a Supreme Court ruling.
Speaking during the discussion on the bill, Chief minister Bhagwant Mann said that the animals used in the games were taken care of by the owners as if they were children. 'Specially crafted ornaments and decorations are bought to make them look beautiful. They are fed the best of feed and kept healthy,' said Mann, adding that it was wrong to say that these animals are subjected to cruelty.
He said just as bullock cart races were banned in Punjab, the Jallikattu sport had been banned in Tamil Nadu. 'The ban on Jallikattu has been lifted. That, too, is a traditional sport involving bulls,' said the CM. Jallikattu is a bull-taming event held during pongal celebrations in Tamil Nadu.
The Chief Minister said that rural games have been an integral part of the culture of the state. He said that the bill aims at giving impetus to rural games, particularly bullock cart races and others which were held in every part of the state. Mann said cattle have been an integral part of the agrarian economy of the state and Punjabi farmers have always nurtured cattle as their children.
'Punjabis have always loved games like bullock cart race and the race at Kila Raipur was acclaimed the world over,' he said. He also said the bill will be instrumental in further popularising such games across the state in future without harming the animals. 'Special focus will be laid on protecting the animals and any sort of cruelty against them will not be allowed,' said the CM.
The Chief Minister said that the main objective of this bill is to ensure safety measures for animals taking part in sports, with adequate animal veterinary supervision, safety standards, registration/documentation and penalty for violations. He that this bill will also help save indigenous cattle breeds of Punjab, besides promoting traditional sports in the villages.
The bill will now be sent to the Governor for approval. The rules framed under the 2024 act have already been approved by the Punjab cabinet.
'Bullock cart races are nothing short of savagery'
When contacted Ambika Shukla, a trustee with People for Animals (PFA), told ThePrint that holding bullock cart races was nothing short of 'savagery'.
'It belittles us as a society. It reduces us as human beings,' she said.
'How can bullock cart races be called a sport? A sport involves voluntary participation and contest between competing equals where skill, endurance and strength is tested. These races and nothing but a test of torture. These involve hitting, beating and other forms of torture to make the bull run. Bulls, and for that matter all cattle, are not animals which can run fast. They are slow moving animals and to make them run, all sorts of cruelty is undertaken. So many of them die, if not on the day of a race, then subsequently,' added Shukla.
'Just because as human beings we have the upper hand, do we have to bring it down so heavily and cruelly on animals? Our hand should be that of a benevolent, kind caretaker,' she further said.
Previous such bills
In May 2023, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court upheld the amendments made by Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Maharashtra to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 that permitted Jallikattu and Kambala and bullock-cart races. The five-judge Bench of the apex court had overruled a judgment of a two-judge SC Bench in 2014. The 2014 judgement had banned the Jallikattu events and all bullock cart races.
In 2017, the Tamil Nadu government passed the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act that permitted the sport, while introducing rules to govern the practice including banning use of force, whips, etc., during the conduct of the sport. The Act was challenged in the Supreme Court by bodies working towards prevention of cruelty towards animals. The petitions were referred to a five judge bench in 2018.
Addressing a press conference following the end of the assembly's proceedings for the day, Mann said his government had restored the glory of a traditional event. 'The bullock cart races are among the most popular events in rural games. These are not limited to Kila Raipur alone,' said Mann. He met some bullock cart owners outside the assembly who had come to thank him.
BJP leader Jaiveer Shergill who met Union Ministers Hardeep Puri last year and Anurag Thakur in 2023 for the resumption of bullock cart races, thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi for ensuring that the 2019 Bill gets the Presidents' assent in 2024.
'Thanks to the efforts of the PM @narendramodi Govt, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2019 received Presidential assent in 2024 paving the way for bullock cart races in Kila Raipur heritage games. Today, the Punjab Govt has moved the 2025 Amendment Bill to allow bullock cart races across the state—a welcome step! Urge the Punjab Govt to ensure that all rural sports, including greyhound racing are regulated transparently and allowed without arbitrary administrative hurdles. Rural games are the heartbeat of Punjab—they deserve protection, not obstruction!' Shergill wrote on X.
Thanks to the efforts of the PM @narendramodi Govt, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2019 received Presidential assent in 2024 paving the way for bullock cart races in Kila Raipur heritage games.
Today, the Punjab Govt has moved the 2025 Amendment…
— Jaiveer Shergill (@JaiveerShergill) July 11, 2025
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Also read: 'Won't disrupt legislature view': Supreme Court upholds bull-taming sport 'Jallikattu'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 minutes ago
- India.com
2006 Mumbai Train Blasts: Maharashtra Moves SC Against Acquittal Of All Accused
NEW DELHI: The Maharashtra government has filed an appeal in the Supreme Court challenging yesterday's Bombay High Court's decision to acquit twelve persons who were accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts. The plea was mentioned on Tuesday before a bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai by Solicitor General of India (SGI) Tushar Mehta, who requested that the plea be taken up urgently by the top court. The Court listed the matter for hearing on Thursday, July 24. The High Court had on Monday acquitted the twelve accused persons by noting that the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) failed to prove the offences beyond a reasonable doubt. In doing so, the High Court set aside a September 2015 judgment of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA) court that had imposed the death penalty on 5 of the 12 accused persons and had sentenced the remaining 7 to life. Following the Bombay High Courts' decision, Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis expressed shock and said that the Maharashtra government will challenge it in the Supreme Court. The case is listed for hearing before the CJI's bench on Thursday. On the evening of July 11, 2006, bomb blasts took place at seven different places in the Mumbai local trains within just 11 minutes. In this incident, 189 people died, while more than 827 passengers were injured. The bombs were placed in first-class compartments of trains from Churchgate. They exploded near the stations of Matunga Road, Mahim Junction, Bandra, Khar, Jogeshwari, Bhayandar, and Borivali. A trial court in 2015 convicted 12 people in the blasts' case.
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Manipur Congress seeks clarity from Governor on Assembly status
The Manipur Pradesh Congress Committee on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) sought clarification from Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla regarding the constitutional status of the State's 60-member Legislative Assembly, which has not convened since August 2024. President's Rule was imposed in Manipur on February 13 this year, following the resignation of Nongthombam Biren Singh as Chief Minister on February 9, amid the ongoing ethnic conflict in the State. In a memorandum submitted to the Governor, State Congress president K. Meghachandra Singh questioned whether the 12th Manipur Legislative Assembly 'is still alive or already dead' or 'constitutionally deemed to be dissolved from midnight' of February 11, two days prior to the imposition of President's Rule. 'The last sitting of the 60-member House was held on August 12, 2024, and according to Article 174(1) of the Constitution of India, the next sitting ought to have been mandatorily held on or before February 11. However, Mr. Biren Singh resigned as the Chief Minister on February 9, and on that day, the Governor declared his January 24 order summoning the Assembly for February 11 to be null and void,' said Congress spokesperson and advocate Ningombam Bupenda Meitei. Mr. Meitei was part of a four-member delegation from the Congress's legal department that submitted the memorandum at the Raj Bhavan in Imphal. The other members included Wahidur Rahman, S. Shyamacharan, and L. Brojen Singh. The delegation noted that the Assembly was not in suspension at the time of the Chief Minister's resignation, and thus Article 174(1) — which mandates that no more than six months should elapse between two sittings of a Legislative Assembly — remained applicable. The Congress said the Governor's February 9 order effectively 'circumvented the rigours of Article 174(1)' and further delayed the Assembly's sitting beyond the constitutionally permitted time frame. The party asked the Governor to clarify whether the 12th Legislative Assembly has remained 'alive', 'dead', or 'dissolved' since February 12. It also sought to know whether the Governor would now be 'constitutionally barred from summoning the sitting for the next session' of the current Assembly's remaining term. The memorandum added that any gubernatorial action or order requiring a new Chief Minister to undergo a floor test 'would tantamount to the violation of Article 174(1)'.
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Sports Governance Bill to be tabled in the Parliament on Wednesday
In an attempt to empower Indian sports, and to drive it towards a sparkling presence in the global arena, the Union Government has carefully drafted the Sports Governance Bill, relinquishing its previously perceived status as a 'controller' and accepting the role of a 'facilitator'. The Bill, scheduled to be tabled in the Parliament on Wednesday, will try to lighten the load on the beleaguered judiciary by having a Sports Tribunal, headed by a Supreme Court judge, for speedy redressal of disputes. Many National Sports Federations are caught in legal tussles that have been dragging for years, harming the growth of the sport. The Union Sports Ministry itself is supposed to be dealing with more than 300 legal cases. After the judgment of the Sports Tribunal, as and when it is established, the matter can only be taken up with the Supreme Court. Even though the Bill will be athlete-centric, ensuring the presence of athletes in administration, it will encourage competent administrators, allowing the National Sports Federations to align with the International Federations and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in terms of age and tenure norms. Overall, the autonomy of the National Sports Federations would be fully respected, while ensuring the execution of fair election, selection, etc. It is a holistic approach by the Government, which has consulted all the stakeholders and has arrived at a system to rid Indian sports of its many problems and help it grow stronger in the international arena, matching its vast potential for excellence. Every sport will come under the Sports Governance Bill without exception, even though the Government is focused on the Olympic medals apart from hosting the Olympics itself.
