Gujarat rolls out electronics policy to xraw investment of Rs 35,000 crore
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
In a bid to attract attract industries and boost production of electronic components in the state, Gujarat rolled out he Gujarat Electronics Component Manufacturing Policy-2025 ( GECMS-2025 ).The police targets to garner over ₹35,000 crore in New Investments and high-skilled employment generation in Gujarat's electronics component manufacturing sector.According to the state government, under this new policy, projects approved and supported by the MeitY, Government of India, will be eligible for 100% central assistance when established in Gujarat. Hence, MeitY-approved projects set up in the state will receive dual incentive benefits, one from the Central government and another from the state government.Aligned with the Central Government's Electronics Component Manufacturing Scheme (ECMS), Gujarat's GECMS-2025 ensures a 100% top-up on central support and guarantees timely disbursement of assistance.Also, once a project receives approval under the ECMS from MeitY, it will automatically become eligible for the same grant-in-aid in Gujarat. The state government will disburse its incentive within 30 days of the Central government releasing its assistance.The policy will boost investment in key segments such as multi-layer and HDI printed circuit boards, lithium-ion cells, SMD passive components, display and camera modules, electronic parts, and the additional required machinery essential for their production. A core focus of the policy is to bridge the talent gap, promote innovation and offer support for Research and development initiatives. Recognised institutions based in Gujarat will be eligible for assistance of up to ₹12.5 crore from the state government to establish centres of excellence, finishing schools, or applied research laboratories.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
4 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Central govt refusing to cooperate in crackdown on drug trafficking": AAP's Saurabh Bharadwaj
New Delhi [India], July 1 (ANI): AAP leader and Delhi Unit President Saurabh Bharadwaj on Tuesday levelled allegations against the BJP-led Central Government and claimed that the Delhi Police--under direct control of the Centre--is obstructing crucial anti-drug operations by Punjab Police across the national capital. According to an official release, the AAP Delhi State President alleged that the Centre was playing politics on an issue as serious as narcotics and demanded immediate cooperation with state agencies to dismantle the drug trafficking network operating in Delhi. Addressing a press conference at the party headquarters, AAP Delhi State President Saurabh Bharadwaj stated, 'We all know that under the leadership of Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, a sustained and major crackdown is underway against drug abuse and those engaged in the drug trade. For years, former Punjab Minister Vikramjit Singh Majithia's name has been repeatedly linked with the drug business in Punjab. Just a few days ago, Majithia was arrested by the Punjab Vigilance Department in connection with a drug-related case.' He added, 'As part of this investigation, the Punjab Police and Vigilance Department are today conducting raids in several states across the country.' Saurabh Bharadwaj further said, 'It is with great regret that I share with you all that the Punjab Police and Vigilance Department have been seeking to conduct raids at multiple locations in Delhi since this morning. However, the Delhi Police, which reports directly to the BJP-led Central Government, is refusing to cooperate with the Punjab Police and Vigilance Department in executing these raids.' He stated, 'It appears deliberate efforts are being made to obstruct these raids in Delhi, potentially allowing other culprits involved in the drug racket to destroy evidence and evade arrest.' Appealing to the Central Government, Saurabh Bharadwaj said, 'Drug addiction is a serious issue that is destroying our future generations and ruining our youth. On such a sensitive issue, the Central Government must rise above politics and extend full cooperation to state governments.' AAP leader and Delhi Assembly LoP Atishi took to X and posted, 'Has a deal been struck between BJP and Vikram Majithia, accused in the drug money case? Now, the BJP is saving Majithia from the drug money case; in return, Majithia will join the BJP. Since this morning, Punjab Police have been present to raid two important locations in Delhi. But the BJP's Delhi Police is not allowing the raid to happen. Why is BJP protecting the accused in the drug money case?' (ANI)
India Gazette
4 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Landmark day for India's efforts to encourage sporting talent": New National Sports Policy 2025 approval
New Delhi [India], July 1 (ANI): On the occasion of the approval of the new 'Khelo Bharat Niti 2025', Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that the policy marks a 'landmark day for India's efforts to encourage sporting talent and become a hub for sports!'. The Union Cabinet, chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the National Sports Policy (NSP) 2025, a landmark initiative aimed at reshaping the country's sporting landscape and empowering citizens through sports. Taking to X, PM Modi wrote, 'Today is a landmark day for India's efforts to encourage sporting talent and become a hub for sports! The Cabinet has approved Khelo Bharat Niti, a national policy for sports. This policy is anchored on 5 pillars: Excellence on the Global Stage. Sports for Economic Development. Sports for Social Development. Sports as a People's Movement. Integration with Education (NEP 2020). May Indian sporting talent always flourish! ' The Minister of State for Union Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Raksha Nikhil Khadse hailed the newly-launched 'Khelo Bharat Niti 2025, calling it a 'comprehensive blueprint' designed to 'revolutionize our sporting ecosystem'. Taking to her official Linkedin account, Khade said that under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership, 'Bharat is on trajectory of becoming a sporting nation'. 'The Khelo Bharat Niti 2025 is far more than just a policy, it is a comprehensive blueprint designed to revolutionize our sporting ecosystem. The policy envisions harnessing the power of sports for nation-building, economic growth, and social inclusion aligned with the Viksit Bharat vision. This new framework replaces the National Sports Policy of 2001, which was in place for the last two decades. It is the result of extensive consultations with a diverse range of stakeholders from Central Ministries, State Governments, Sports Federations, Athletes, domain experts, and the public. Our vision to cultivate excellence at global events is clear, with our sights firmly set on achieving glory at the 2036 Olympic Games and in the future. Under visionary leadership of Hon'ble PM Narendra Modi ji, Bharat is on trajectory of becoming a sporting nation. #KheloBharatNiti Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports, Government of India Sports Authority of India,' posted Khadse. Union Minister of Information and Broadcasting Ashwini Vaishnaw also posted on X, 'Khelo Bharat Niti 2025 A strategic roadmap to promote sports culture at the grassroots & establish India as a global sporting powerhouse.' Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya also hailed the policy as a 'transformative step towards reshaping India's sporting ecosystem.' 'Making India a Global Sporting Powerhouse! Grateful to PM Shri @narendramodi Ji, the Union Cabinet has approved Khelo Bharat Niti - 2025, a transformative step towards reshaping India's sporting ecosystem. This landmark policy outlines a strategic roadmap to promote sports culture at the grassroots, enhance infrastructure, support athlete development, and establish India as a formidable force in global sports,' said Mandaviya. The new policy supersedes the existing National Sports Policy of 2001 and outlines a visionary and strategic roadmap to establish India as a global sporting powerhouse and a strong contender for excellence at international sporting events, including the 2036 Olympic Games. The NSP 2025 is the outcome of extensive consultations involving Central Ministries, NITI Aayog, State Governments, National Sports Federations (NSFs), athletes, domain experts, and public stakeholders. The policy is anchored on five key pillars. The pillar of excellence on the Global Stage aims to strengthen sports programs from the grassroots to elite levels, including mechanisms for early identification and nurturing of talent. Promote the establishment of competitive leagues and competitions, and develop sports infrastructure in both rural and urban areas. It aims to build world-class systems for training, coaching, and holistic athlete support and enhance the capacity and governance of National Sports Federations. Encourage the adoption of sports science, sports science, medicine, and technology to boost athletic performance. Train and develop sports personnel, including coaches, technical officials, and support staff. The NSP 2025 recognises the economic potential of sports and seeks to promote sports tourism and attract major international events to India. It aims to strengthen the sports manufacturing ecosystem and promote startups and entrepreneurship in the sector. Encourage private sector participation through Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and innovative funding initiatives. The policy emphasises the role of sports in driving social inclusion by Promoting participation among women, economically weaker sections, tribal communities, and persons with disabilities through focused programs. Revitalising and promoting indigenous and traditional games. The policy positions sports as a viable career option by integrating it into education, encouraging volunteering, and facilitating dual-career pathways. The policy aims to engage the Indian diaspora through sports. To make sports a national movement, the policy aims to drive mass participation and a culture of fitness through nationwide campaigns and community-based events. Among its other objectives include launching fitness indices for schools, colleges, and workplaces and enhancing universal access to sports facilities. In alignment with the National Education Policy 2020, the NSP 2025 proposes to: Integrate sports into school curricula. Equip educators and physical education teachers with specialised training to promote sports education and awareness. To realise its objectives, the NSP 2025 lays down a comprehensive implementation strategy encompassing: Governance: Establish a robust regulatory framework for sports governance, including a legal framework. It aims to develop innovative financing mechanisms and engage private sector participation through PPPs and CSR. The policy aums to leverage emerging technologies, including AI and data analytics, for performance tracking, research, and program implementation. The NSP 2025 aims to create a national framework with well-defined benchmarks, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and time-bound targets. Model Policy for States: The NSP 2025 will serve as a model for States and Union Territories, encouraging them to revise or formulate their own policies in alignment with national objectives. The policy calls for a whole-of-government approach to integration of sports promotion into the activities, schemes, and programs of all Ministries and Departments to achieve a holistic impact.(ANI)
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Empowering state police to enforce drone regulations: A legislative need in India's Evolving space
In the current age of multifarious technological evolution and some significant ongoing warfare, drones have emerged as one of the biggest challenges for state. Recognizing the growing use and potential risks associated with drones, the Government of India enacted the Drone Rules, 2021 under the authority of The Aircraft Act, 1934. However, recent incidents across India involving unregistered, unauthorized, and even hostile drones have highlighted a critical gap in enforcement mechanism in the Aircraft Act with respect to Drones in particular. Alarmingly certain recent events have shown the usage of categorized drones by non-state and criminal actors for disruption of public safety causing damage to mankind and critical infrastructure. While the Central Government and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) have the primary regulatory role, State Police and state law enforcement agencies currently lack the statutory authority to act effectively and independently against drone-related violations. This legal void and statutory silence have implications for national security, civil safety, and privacy rights. Need for statutory empowerment of state police There have been multiple incidences in recent past loudly exposing the enforcement void. Under the present statue these frameworks do not empower State Police explicitly, nor do they prescribe procedures for local enforcement leaving authorities on the ground with little recourse when encountering unauthorized drones. Some of such incidences are mentioned below - A. Misuse of Drones by non-state actors 1. Jammu Airport Drone Attack (2021) In a first of its kind incident, drones dropped explosives at the Air Force Station, Jammu, injuring personnel and damaging property. The attack exposed a glaring vulnerability with no defined role for local police to neutralize or investigate rogue drones, especially near high-value assets. 2. Drone Flight near Oil Refinery – Mumbai (2022) A drone was spotted hovering near the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) refinery in Mumbai. Refineries are classified as "critical infrastructure," and drone activity could potentially aid planning of sabotage or attacks. Mumbai Police could not arrest the concerned due to absence of direct enforcement powers under present statue. 3. Oil Depot Survey Attempt – Chennai (2023) A drone was seized while it was filming the periphery of a petroleum depot in North Chennai. It was alleged to be used for illicit surveillance for potential vandalism or intelligence gathering. Operator fled; police were unable to prosecute under Aircraft Act and Drone Rules due to lack of clear seizure protocol and state powers. B. Urban Drone Misuse: Multiple City Incidents 1. Mumbai (2022) – Unauthorized drones were spotted over Mantralaya and Bombay High Court, raising alarms of potential surveillance on government premises. Mumbai Police had to depend on the DGCA for post-facto verification, delaying enforcement. 2. Bengaluru (2023) – Drones flown near the Kempegowda International Airport triggered disruptions and led to flight diversions. CISF and airport authorities were unable to take immediate action due to the lack of real-time tracking and police authority under current laws. 3. Hyderabad (2023) – Commercial drone operators were found filming over private gated communities and industrial estates without consent or permits. Local police cited lack of clarity under the Aircraft Act to prosecute for aerial trespass. C. Drones in Naxal Territories: Emerging Internal Security Risk 1. Chhattisgarh (2022) – Security forces discovered a drone crash site used by Naxalites for surveillance of CRPF camps. The drone was unregistered, but local police lacked the jurisdiction to prosecute under Aircraft Act. 2. Odisha (2022) – Drones were reported scouting forested areas near Malkangiri and Kandhamal, suspected to be used for arms drops. The local police confiscated equipment but faced no clear legal procedure for seizure, examination, or prosecution. IV. Global Approaches to Local Enforcement Across the world, democratic nations are facing rise in drone usage and thus associated risks. Many of them have decentralized enforcement powers, recognizing that ground-level response is essential for public safety, national security, and privacy protection. The following international models offer useful precedents for India: 1. United States of America Under the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization Act of 2018, the Local and state law enforcement agencies are empowered to detain drones, question operators, and initiate enforcement actions. 2. United Kingdom Following the 2018 Gatwick Airport drone disruption, the UK amended the Air Navigation Order 2016 and the Police Act to empower law enforcement with the authority to land, seize, and inspect drones. It provides the police with powers to issue on-the-spot fines up to £1,000 for registration and permission breaches. 3. France France enforces strict drone regulations under the Code de l'Aviation Civile (Civil Aviation Code) 1958. Under the code, Municipal police are empowered to inspect drones and question operators. In Paris, drone surveillance and enforcement are handled jointly by Police and Directorate General of Civil Aviation. 4. Germany Germany's Luftverkehrs-Ordnung (Air Traffic Regulation) 1964 empowers State Police to detain unlicensed drones and initiate proceedings under aviation safety and privacy laws. 5. Australia Under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations (CASR) 1998, Australia empowers State and Territory Police to enforce no-fly zones, register violations, and confiscate rogue drones. V. Existing Legal Framework: Aircraft Act 1934 & Drone Rules 2021 Drones are Unmanned Arial Vehicles which is a type of Unmanned Aircraft System that falls under the ambit of Aircraft as per section 2(1) of the Aircraft Act 1934. Drones are thus governed by The Aircraft Act, 1934 and The Drones Rules, 2021. Under the Aircraft Act, 1934, the Central Government is empowered to regulate the manufacture, possession, operation, and safety of aircraft. The Drone Rules, 2021, notified under this Act, introduced a streamlined framework for drone classification, registration, pilot certification, and operation permissions. In case of any violations of Drone Rules, Rule no. 50 of Drone Rules 2021 states levying penalty up to Rs 1 lakh by the DGCA or any other authority authorized by central government in accordance with provisions of section 10A of Aircraft Act which mentions about adjudication of penalties. As far as cognizance of offence is concerned, as per section 12B of the Aircraft Act, no courts can take cognizance without a complaint made by Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) or Director General of Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (DGBCAS) or Director General of Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (DGAIIB). This clearly shows that state police have no statutory authority to register a FIR in case of violation of the Drone Rules under The Aircraft Act. Suggested Legislative Amendments The need to empower State Police and law enforcement agencies to act against unauthorized drone activity cannot be realized without clear statutory backing. While current law i.e. The Aircraft Act 1934 centralize enforcement under DGCA and the Ministry of Civil Aviation, they lack a federalist structure for operational enforcement. The following suggested amendments aim to create an enabling legislative framework: 1. Insertion of a new sub section under section 12 of The Aircraft Act 1934 Since Section 12 (B) of the Act clearly mandates prior sanction for any cognizance to be taken against unauthorized Drones by DGCA or DGBCAS or DGAAIB, it gives no autonomous authority to state police/state enforcement agencies for acting against offences committed by unmanned aerial vehicles endangering public safety. Therefore Section 12 can be enhanced with a new sub section – 'c' providing for autonomous powers and rights to the local police to address unauthorized arial activities. The new sub section may include the following to ensure strict implementation of Drone Rules: (a) Any police officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector shall have the authority to: * Intercept, search, and seize any unmanned aircraft system (UAS) and associated devices, including drones, found operating in contravention of this Act or any rules made thereunder. * Require any drone operator to produce a valid Unique Identification Number (UIN), flight authorization, remote pilot license, and other necessary permits. (b) State Police shall have the jurisdiction to register FIR against anyone responsible for violating drone rules, conduct investigations, and initiate legal proceedings as per the procedure established by law for offences punishable under the Aircraft Act 1934 and Drone Rules 2021 without mandatory requirement of complaint made by DGCA, DGBCAS or DGAAIB. Justification: This provision will create statutory recognition of police powers and ensures lawful drone seizure, investigation, and prosecution without requiring prior approval from central authorities—essential for time-sensitive security interventions. 2. Insertion of a new clause under sub section 5(2) of The Aircraft Act 1934 An amendment can be made under section 5(2) of The Aircraft Act by adding a new clause 'r' making central government duty bound to provide for rules regarding localized scheme of enforcement prescribing the powers, functions, responsibilities, and standard operating procedures for enforcement of drone-related laws by State Governments and their police. Justification: At present, no delegated legislation exists to support drone law enforcement by States. This amendment provides the statutory hook for the Centre to issue rules that support decentralized implementation. A written standard operating procedure for States will also rule out all sorts of ambiguity amongst police of different states with respect to addressing drone rules violations. 3. Purpose of arial activity should be intimated To curb Drone missuses, the Drone Rules 2021 should be amended requiring operators to pre-register the purpose of their arial activity on the Digital Sky platform, with full access granted to police. This will help address security and individual's privacy concerns. For operationalizing the proposed legislative framework, a structured, multi-phase roadmap must be adopted. The implementation plan must account for legal preparedness, inter-agency coordination, infrastructure, and technical capacity-building at the State level. VII. Conclusion As India's airspace becomes increasingly populated with drones, it is imperative that enforcement should be decentralized. While the DGCA and Ministry of Civil Aviation remain the principal regulatory bodies, law enforcement agencies particularly police being the first responder to any adversary must be empowered to register a criminal case autonomously against unauthorized or dangerous drone operations protecting mankind and infrsastructure. Empowering State Police through clear legislative amendments will bridge the existing enforcement vacuum, enhance national security and urban safety, create accountability at both operational and regulatory levels. Therefore it's need of the hour that India must adopt a dual-layer enforcement model comprising of central regulation with decentralized enforcement mirroring global best practices to ensure persistent security. (Writer is a lawyer practising in Supreme Court of India, Allahabad High Court & tribunals) Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Doctor's Day 2025 , messages and quotes!
