logo
Women Are Central to Iran's Pro-Democracy Movement

Women Are Central to Iran's Pro-Democracy Movement

Yahoo09-05-2025
In the ongoing struggle for democracy in Iran, women have emerged as some of the most influential and unifying voices, championing secularism, equality and inclusive governance. Over the past 150 years, Iranian women have consistently played key roles in the country's major political movements, from the Constitutional Revolution of 1906 and the oil nationalization movement in the 1950s, to the 1979 Revolution and the student uprisings of the early 2000s. Today, they are again at the forefront of a grassroots democratic movement, leading campaigns that directly challenge both the Islamic Republic and entrenched patriarchy across the political spectrum.
The most emblematic of these recent efforts is the Woman, Life, Freedom movement, ignited by the nationwide protests of 2022 following the death of Mahsa Amini in police custody after she was detained for allegedly violating the law requiring women to wear a headscarf. This slogan is more than a rallying cry. It represents a philosophy that transcends gender, class and ideology. It has brought men and women into a shared camp fighting for a democratic Iran built on secularism, freedom and equality for all, regardless of gender, ethnicity or religious belief.
Though sparked by the popular outrage over Amini's death, this contemporary movement builds upon a long and rich history of women's activism in Iran. During the Constitutional Revolution, women organized and wrote anonymously in underground publications demanding national sovereignty and education rights. In the 1960s and 1970s, Iranian women experienced significant legal and social advancements under the Pahlavi monarchy. They gained the right to vote in 1963 and were granted greater protections in 1967under the Family Protection Law, which curtailed male privileges in divorce and child custody, while raising the minimum age of marriage. Women also entered politics and public life in increasing numbers during this period, with notable milestones such as the appointment of the first female Cabinet minister, Farrokhroo Parsa, as minister of education in 1968.
These developments laid the groundwork for an emerging feminist consciousness and positioned women as active agents in shaping Iran's modern identity. Following the 1979 Islamic Revolution, women resisted the imposition of mandatory veiling and discriminatory laws. And in the years thereafter, they often formed the backbone of Iran's civil society through informal networks, cultural initiatives and quiet but powerful activism.
To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter.
In recent years, women's grassroots campaigns have tackled urgent and deeply rooted issues. Campaigns like the 'One Million Signatures for Gender Equality' drive in 2006 and the 'No to compulsory Hijab for women' initiative in 2017, as well as movements seeking to stop honor killings and end child marriage, among others, have gained traction across the country, raising awareness among women and men about gender discrimination. Grounded in daily realities rather than rigid ideology, these movements have made women's activism especially resonant with Iran's new generation: Many younger Iranians have grown disillusioned by political dogma and are instead drawn to the practical, inclusive and values-driven leadership modeled by women activists, with the most emblematic of these recent efforts being the Woman, Life, Freedom movement.
What sets Iranian women's activism apart is its potential to bridge divides in a fragmented opposition. While much of the political opposition, both inside and outside the country, remains fractured along ideological lines, women have consistently pushed for coalitions that prioritize shared democratic goals over partisan rivalry. This activism tends to be rooted in pragmatism, making it more flexible, solution-oriented and appealing across generational and political divides.
Despite their central role, however, women still face considerable resistance not only from the Islamic Republic's theocratic regime, but also from segments of the opposition that have yet to fully embrace women's leadership as essential to the country's democratic future. Some exiled political groups, as well as traditionalist figures, continue to marginalize women's voices or regard gender equality as secondary to regime change. This attitude not only undermines the democratic credentials of these groups but also overlooks the political reality that any sustainable movement for democracy in Iran must be inclusive and representative.
However, challenges to effective activism also exist within women's groups themselves. While many are grassroots-driven and deeply committed, the movement as a whole must continue to invest in cross-group collaboration, strategic unity and coalition-building to amplify its impact. Building solidarity among diverse women's organizations—from urban activists to provincial advocates, from secular feminists to religious traditional women—will be vital for sustaining long-term democratic change.
This process of collaboration is not without precedent. In the aftermath of the 2022 protests, numerous women-led organizations and activists coordinated across platforms and geographies to document human rights abuses, support detainees and advocate for international pressure. These collective efforts demonstrated the capacity for Iranian women to lead with vision and resilience, often filling the leadership vacuum left by divided or co-opted political groups.
Iranian women are also harnessing digital technologies, storytelling, visual arts and film to amplify their voices and advocate for change. One notable example was the 'My Stealthy Freedom' campaign initiated by journalist Masih Alinejad in 2014. This online movement encouraged Iranian women to share photos of themselves without headscarves, to protest the compulsory hijab laws. The campaign attracted significant international attention and was instrumental in highlighting women's rights issues in Iran. In the realm of cinema, Iranian women filmmakers have been at the forefront of depicting women's struggles and resistance. And artists have used the visual arts to explore themes of gender and repression in Iranian society.
Meanwhile, through transnational networks, Iranian women are building solidarity across borders, while gaining access to resources, visibility and moral support. However, it is crucial that international allies engage with these movements respectfully, supporting them without co-opting or instrumentalizing women's agency.
The Iranian women's movement today offers a blueprint for a future democratic Iran, one where politics is reshaped by civic engagement, inclusive leadership and the persistent struggle for justice. In a region often marked by authoritarianism and gender apartheid, Iranian women are not only fighting for their rights—they are redefining what democracy could look like.
That is growing all the more urgent, as the Iranian regime has already lost popular legitimacy among broad swathes of the population. Combined with the myriad internal and external challenges it faces, that has prompted many observers to begin considering the potential for a change in regime, with some arguing such a critical juncture is imminent.
Should it arrive, international observers, policymakers and democracy advocates must recognize the centrality of women in shaping the country's political future. Their vision of a secular, democratic Iran, free from oppression based on gender, religion or ethnicity, may well be the most unifying and forward-looking project in the country's fractured political landscape. Supporting this vision means amplifying women's voices, respecting their autonomy and investing in their leadership—not only as a moral imperative but as a strategic pathway to lasting and sustainable democratic transformation.
Fariba Parsa holds a doctorate in social science, specializing in Iranian politics with a focus on political Islam, democracy and human rights. She is the author of 'Fighting for Change in Iran: The Women, Life, Freedom Philosophy against Political Islam.' She is also the founder and president of Women's E-Learning in Leadership (WELL), a nonprofit organization dedicated to empowering women in Iran and Afghanistan through online leadership education and training.
How gender inequality makes natural disasters deadlier for women.
How far-right parties in Europe are blocking efforts to curb violence against women.
Why men need to speak up to end rape culture.
Why justice for the victims of forced sterilization in Peru still faces many obstacles.
Why focusing on tackling 'femicide' isn't enough to protect women from violence.
All of our coverage of women's rights and gender equality.
The post Women Are Central to Iran's Pro-Democracy Movement appeared first on World Politics Review.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Control the skies, control the outcome: The criticality of air and space superiority
Control the skies, control the outcome: The criticality of air and space superiority

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Control the skies, control the outcome: The criticality of air and space superiority

In modern warfare, air and space superiority is not just an advantage — it is the price of admission. Having it is the difference between life and death, and for the U.S., a necessary pre-condition to ensuring global stability and effective deterrence. As a four-star general in the U.S. Air Force, I have spent my career preparing airmen to fly, fight, and win. My job demands ensuring they are trained and equipped to provide the president with credible fail-safe options in an increasingly turbulent world. That mission has been a driving fixture for the Air Force since its inception in 1947. It is a goal that every American should embrace and be thankful for, even if he or she doesn't realize why. Owning the sky, being able to fly, and if necessary, successfully fight anywhere at any time has never been more crucial to our national security and the defense of our global interests. It is why we ask so much of our airmen. The price of failure in today's world is unacceptable. If you need proof, look no further than Ukraine — a war where neither side holds air superiority. The result has been a prolonged, brutal conflict with over a million military and civilian casualties and no clear end in sight. Russia's grinding invasion, initially bolstered by overwhelming firepower, has been slowed and blunted by Ukrainian resistance, built on layered air defenses and agile tactics that deny freedom of maneuver in the skies. Contrast that with another example: the U.S. Air Force's mission against Iranian nuclear facilities. Supported by fighters and tankers, B-2 bombers flew deep into Iranian airspace, dropped precision-guided munitions within inches of their targets, and exited without facing a single shot. That is air and space superiority. A deeper analysis of these conflicts provides both lessons and important validation for the money we spend and the effort we devote in the U.S. to ensuring air and space superiority. Russia entered Ukraine with what appeared to be a massive advantage in aircraft, missiles and long-range weapons. But two years later, it still cannot achieve dominance in the air. Meanwhile, Ukrainian resistance continues to deny that freedom, stalling Russian offensives, disrupting logistics, and limiting precision strike capabilities. On the opposite spectrum, the Israel Defense Forces — supported by electronic warfare, aerial refueling, real-time satellite intelligence, and precision-guided munitions — have demonstrated the ability to strike critical targets deep within Iranian airspace with near-impunity. Israel, and in one instance the U.S., has demonstrated the freedom to operate at will while leaving Iran with few credible responses. Air and space superiority allows the U.S. and its partners to operate without prohibitive interference from the enemy. It grants freedom to attack, freedom from attack, and freedom to maneuver. In larger measure, it is the reason average Americans never worry about a military invasion at home. But modern air superiority is no longer just about aircraft. It is also deeply tied to the space domain. The U.S. warfighter's reliance on space-based capabilities — such as the Global Positioning System, high-bandwidth communications, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance — make space superiority a prerequisite for success in the air. This interconnectedness permits air power to be degraded by disrupting space operations. Russia and China understand this. Their growing investment in counter-space capabilities is designed to undermine our effectiveness in the air by targeting the assets we rely on in space. Maintaining — and ensuring — our advantage in the skies and space isn't cheap. But it is a cost we must bear to prevent even more costly outcomes. It's the reason we spend tax dollars developing the newest, most advanced fighter, the F-47, which is designed to penetrate heavily defended airspace and complete its missions. It's why we underwrite the cost of elite training for air crews, focus on electronic and cyber warfare, and ensure that logistics — from aerial refueling to rapid repair — are resilient and integrated. To win, we need real-time situational awareness through integrated sensor networks spanning all domains. And we must remain flexible, continuously adapting doctrine to stay ahead of emerging threats from determined and advanced adversaries like China. History has taught us that decisive victories — and the ability to deter war altogether — are anchored in air and space superiority. We must fund modernization, train relentlessly, and forge strong partnerships with allies and partners who also depend on this shared freedom of action. We must be ready to win fast and come home. When we control the skies, we shape the battle. When we control space, we command the tempo. When we do both, we save American lives and ensure a continuing peace of mind, stability and prosperity that are byproducts of a safe and secure nation.

Britain waves the white flag to Islamization and illegal immigration
Britain waves the white flag to Islamization and illegal immigration

New York Post

time5 hours ago

  • New York Post

Britain waves the white flag to Islamization and illegal immigration

With almost every day that passes, Britain is progressively embracing its own destruction by groveling to its mortal foes and dumping big-time on its most loyal friends. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government is increasingly surrendering to Islamization while presiding over a poisonous culture of antisemitism that's roaring out of control. For the past decade, more than 170,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the English Channel from France in small inflatable boats. Successive governments have failed to deal with this people-smuggling trade, which has provoked fury among the British public aghast at the unsustainable levels of immigration, both legal and illegal. Brits are also horrified by the impact of large numbers of Muslim migrants who refuse to integrate into British society. 4 Abu Wadei, a pro-Hamas Gazan, captured his arrival in Britain via the English Channel in a Facebook post. While most UK Muslims sign up to Western values, a very large minority do not. Of the 43,000 active terrorists on the books of security service MI5, some 90% are Muslim — a community that's a mere 6% of the population. And now the illegal immigrant trade poses an acute danger to British security. With MI5 issuing urgent warnings of an imminent threat of Iranian terrorism within Britain, there are indications the all-too-obvious risk of terrorists coming in across the Channel is real. In May, three Iranian men who arrived in Britain on small boats and a truck to claim asylum were charged with spying for Tehran. 4 Farhad Javadi Manesh, 44, Shapoor Qalehali Khani Noori, 55, and Mostafa Sepahvand, 39, appear in May at Westminster Magistrates' Court after their arrests on spying charges. Julia Quenzler / SWNS In March, an Arab from Gaza who arrived in southern England on a small boat and posted on social-media support for Hamas and calls for the death of Jews was arrested and jailed after pleading guilty to attempting to enter Britain illegally. The UK TV station GB News revealed this month that cross-Channel smuggling gangs are marketing themselves with ISIS recruitment videos and execution footage on social media. Ayaan Hirsi Ali's Courage Media reported a 'credible' intelligence source warns people-smuggling gangs are facilitating trained Islamic militants' passage across the Channel and have trafficked arms across Europe and into Britain. Intercepted 2015 telephone calls and letter correspondence between ISIS members divulged their ambition to use migrants in boats crossing the Mediterranean as a 'psychological weapon' against Europe. Britain already has an estimated 1.2 million illegal migrants, with one in every 13 people in London thought to be there illegally. Despite all this, Starmer's attempts to deal with the small-boats crisis have been feeble in the extreme. He just agreed a 'one migrant in, one migrant out' deal with French President Emmanuel Macron. This deal will reportedly be limited to just 50 illegal migrants a week, or 1.5% of all those who've arrived in Britain since the crisis began. On the very day the deal was agreed, some 573 illegal migrants landed on British shores in small boats from France. The Starmer-Macron agreement provoked ridicule and fury in equal measure among the British public as a hopelessly inadequate response to a national-security emergency. 4 Inflatable dinghies and outboard motors illegal migrants used to cross the English Channel from France are displayed in Dover. Getty Images This must be set in the context of the British state's craven response to the growing political power of British Muslims intent upon Islamizing British society. Britain commemorated the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 human-bomb attacks on the London Underground and a bus in which 52 people were murdered with wreaths laid and solemn speeches made. Yet no one — not the prime minister nor the king nor London Mayor Sadiq Khan — mentioned these were Islamist atrocities. Ludicrously, Starmer hailed 'the unity of Londoners in the face of terror,' saying 'those who tried to divide us failed.' But the bombers didn't try to divide Londoners. They tried to murder as many as possible and in the name of Islam. Starmer tries to pretend there are no divisions between Muslims and the rest of the public by shutting down all criticism of the Muslim world. Accordingly his government is busily working out ways to give the pseudo-offense of 'Islamophobia' real teeth. While seeking to stifle any mention of Islamist terror, the government is trying to criminalize those seeking to defend the British way of life. Thus an online training course hosted on the government's website for the anti-extremism body Prevent lists concern about mass migration as 'cultural nationalism' that could lead to an individual being referred to the deradicalization scheme for subscribing to a 'terrorist ideology.' Starmer has been much criticized for his reluctance to set up a national inquiry into the pimping gangs, composed overwhelmingly of Pakistani-heritage Muslims, that have kidnapped, raped, prostituted and otherwise abused thousands of very young white girls over the past two decades. Yet astoundingly, Muhbeen Hussain, who led a Muslim-community boycott of South Yorkshire police over its admission it had failed to act on rape-gang allegations 'because of fears of being called racist' — which he said attempted to 'scapegoat' Muslims — has been awarded the MBE, a prestigious national honor, for 'services to integration' and 'cohesion.' 4 London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Prime Minister Keir Starmer commemorate the 7/7 terror attacks. Getty Images Compare all this with the treatment meted out to Britain's inoffensive, law-abiding Jewish community, which is experiencing epidemic antisemitism that's off the scale. Lord Mann and Dame Penny Mordaunt, respectively a Labour and a Conservative politician, this month expressed deep shock in their government-backed report that antisemitism has become 'normalised' in middle-class Britain. The report, commissioned by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the country's largest Jewish-community organization, found antisemitism to be pervasive in the health service, universities and the arts. Mann and Mordaunt said what really scared them is 'the increasing normalisation of far more extreme, personalised and sometimes life-changing impact directed at individuals purely and simply because they are Jewish.' Ever since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led atrocities against Israelis, British Jews have run a gauntlet of hatred, intimidation and attacks, both verbal and physical, as the direct result of incitement based on a systematic campaign of demonization and eye-watering falsehoods about Israel's behavior in Gaza. Through distortion, decontextualization and outright lies, Britain's media — led by the BBC and Sky — have channeled Hamas propaganda day in, day out. They have wickedly misrepresented Israel's just and agonizing war to defend itself against extermination and its attempts to safeguard as far as possible the lives of Gazan civilians being used as human shields and cannon fodder as genocide and war crimes. With Israelis being painted as diabolical child-killers, British Jews find themselves being personally accused of 'killing babies' and restaurants and pubs refusing to serve 'Zionists.' No other group is spoken of in such a vile manner. No other people is subjected to such profound and obsessional injustice. No other nation is told it has no right to its own country and its national-liberation movement is a source of evil. Yet instead of defending the country's Jews against this pre-pogrom incitement, the Starmer government has poured petrol on the flames by parroting the same Hamas lies about Israelis killing 'too many' civilians or depriving Gazans of food — this while Israel and America are providing millions of meals to Gazans for the first time receiving food aid that's not being stolen from them by Hamas. Starmer's behavior displays the dire effects of the alliance that's been forged between Western liberals and Islamist radicals. It's laying waste to America's Democratic Party and found its most alarming expression in Zohran Mamdani, the Islamist poised to become New York mayor. He too channels Hamas lies about Israel; he too will make his city's Jewish community more unsafe; he too will undermine America's security. Americans should gaze upon Britain and be warned. Melanie Phillips' latest book is 'The Builder's Stone: How Jews and Christians Built the West and Why Only They Can Save It.'

Iran to Hold Nuclear Talks With 3 European Countries
Iran to Hold Nuclear Talks With 3 European Countries

Newsweek

time7 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Iran to Hold Nuclear Talks With 3 European Countries

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Leaders from Iran, Germany, France, and Britain are finalizing plans to discuss Tehran's nuclear program, a major source of global tension, "in the coming week," a German diplomatic source told Newsweek on Sunday. Newsweek has reached out to press representatives for France, Britain, and Iran via email for comment on Sunday. Why It Matters Iran's nuclear program has long been a source of international concern. In 2015, Iran and several world powers including France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), an agreement aimed at limiting Tehran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. The JCPOA is set to expire in October. The United States withdrew from the accord in 2018 under the Trump administration, reimposing sanctions and reigniting diplomatic friction. Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is intended for civilian purposes, while the U.S. and some of its allies like Israel have accused Tehran of seeking nuclear weapons capability. Tensions spiked again last month when the U.S. conducted airstrikes on three nuclear sites in Iran, prompting Iranian retaliation with a strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar. What To Know The three European countries, known as the E3, "are in contact with Iran to arrange further talks in the coming week," a German diplomatic source told Newsweek in an email Sunday. Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported a source informed on the matter, saying, "The principle of talks has been agreed upon, but consultations are continuing on the time and place of the talks. The country in which the talks could be held next week has not been finalized." The organization of talks with E3 leaders and Iran comes just days after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held discussions with French, German and European Union (EU) officials. That was the first formal call since the Israel-Iran war. A German diplomatic source told Newsweek that "Iran must never possess nuclear weapons." They added: "Regarding the Iranian nuclear program, a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution that addresses the security interests of the international community is essential." The source continued: "If such a solution is not achieved by the end of the summer, the snapback mechanism will remain an option for the E3. We continue to coordinate closely with our E3 and U.S. partners on this issue." The E3 have warned they will trigger a "snapback" of sanctions on Iran by the end of summer if Tehran does not make progress on a nuclear deal. The snapback mechanism embedded in the 2015 deal allows sanctions to be reimposed if Tehran is found noncompliant. Washington and Tehran held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman this year. Talks halted after Israel launched "Operation Rising Lion," a military campaign against Iran that it said was meant to preempt a reportedly planned Iranian attack and disrupt Iran's nuclear capabilities. The war intensified when the U.S. joined and bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz, in the largest B-2 operation in U.S. history. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi attends the 17th annual BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro on July 7. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi attends the 17th annual BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro on July 7. AP Photo/Eraldo Peres What People Are Saying Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said earlier this week: "If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly, and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they lack absolutely [any] moral and legal ground." French President Emmanuel Macron said last month: "We don't want Iran to get a nuclear weapon. But the biggest error would be to use military strikes to change the regime because it would then be chaos and our responsibility is to return discussions as quickly as possible to be able to set a course again on the nuclear and ballistic question." What Happens Next? Details regarding the place and timing of the talks are still being finalized. Tasnim reported that the talks would be carried out by the foreign ministers of the four countries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store