New research challenges 50-50 myth: Biological sex of children may not always be random
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Same-sex siblings: More than mere coincidence?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Does parental age factor in?
Genetics: A new frontier?
Contrasting views from the scientific community
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
A new study is turning our understanding of biological sex determination on its head. Long taught in biology class as a 50-50 genetic lottery between X and Y chromosomes , the sex of a child may not be entirely random. According to new findings published in Science Advances on July 18, individual families may have skewed odds toward consistently having either boys or girls — and age, genetics, and environmental factors may be involved.Led by epidemiologist Dr. Jorge Chavarro of Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , the study analyzed data from the historic Nurses' Health Study , one of the largest and longest-running fertility databases in the world. Examining more than 58,000 pregnancies between 1956 and 2015, researchers looked at patterns of sibling sex within families, maternal age, and genetic data.While the broader population showed the expected close-to-even split between male and female births, something surprising appeared at the family level: some couples appeared more likely to have children of the same sex — and not by random chance.Approximately one in three families in the study had children all of the same sex — all boys or all girls — a figure notably higher than simple probability theory would predict, especially in families with three or more kids.The researchers developed a statistical model suggesting that each couple might have their own "unique probability" of producing a child of one sex or the other. While this individual bias remains balanced out when looking at large populations, it could significantly affect outcomes within families.'It's not that boys or girls are more common overall, but that the odds may not actually be 50-50 for everyone,' said Dr. Chavarro.The effect appeared even stronger in women who had their first child later in life. This suggests possible biological shifts over time, potentially influencing which type of sperm — X-carrying (girl) or Y-carrying (boy) — is more likely to fertilize the egg.As women age, for example, vaginal pH and cervical mucus composition change, potentially favoring sperm carrying specific chromosomes. X sperm tend to be larger and more resilient, possibly giving them a better chance at success in slightly more acidic environments, which can develop later in life.The study also uncovered two genetic loci that may be linked to the likelihood of having children of the same sex. However, these genes do not appear to be directly involved in known reproductive pathways — their role is mysterious and not yet fully understood.'These are just initial hints,' Chavarro explained. 'They point to a potential genetic influence on sex bias, but don't yet explain the mechanism.'This finding opens new doors for genetic and evolutionary biologists to explore how heritable factors may interact with environmental and physiological variables to influence offspring sex.The findings, while intriguing, are not without controversy. Australian psychologist and behavioral geneticist Dr. Brendan Zietsch remains skeptical.Zietsch previously worked on a large Swedish study analyzing millions of birth records, which found no evidence of consistent sex patterns within families. He believes that the U.S.-based cohort (95% white, mostly nurses and health professionals) may not be representative enough to make broader claims.This study could reshape how we understand fundamental reproductive biology. For couples puzzled by having multiple same-sex children — and others praying for variety — the research may provide both insight and assurance. While conception still carries an element of chance, it may not be as random as previously believed.It also raises huge questions for future research: Could IVF or fertility treatments one day account for these biological skews? Could genetics or maternal physiology be guided to increase the chances of balancing the family tree?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Satellites reveal a hidden global water crisis that could change life on Earth
For more than 20 years, satellites have been quietly watching Earth's most vital resource disappear, and the data is alarming. A new study led by Arizona State University and published Friday in Science Advances reveals that Earth's continents are drying out at unprecedented rates, threatening water security for billions and accelerating sea level rise. 'We are edging toward an imminent freshwater bankruptcy,' warned Hrishikesh Chandanpurkar, the study's lead author. 'Glaciers and deep groundwater are like ancient trust funds. Instead of saving them for times of real need, we are draining them.' Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category others Management MCA Healthcare Cybersecurity PGDM Finance Data Analytics healthcare Technology Design Thinking Project Management Operations Management Digital Marketing Artificial Intelligence Others Product Management Data Science CXO Leadership Public Policy MBA Degree Data Science Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India Starts on undefined Get Details What the satellites saw Researchers analyzed over two decades of data from NASA 's GRACE and GRACE-Follow On missions, which measure subtle shifts in Earth's gravity to track changes in water storage underground, in soils, snow, and glaciers. The findings stunned even veteran scientists: Drying regions are expanding by an area twice the size of California every year. 75 percent of the world's population, in 101 countries, has lived through continuous freshwater loss since 2002. Groundwater depletion now contributes more to sea level rise than melting ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica combined. Four mega-drying regions The research identifies four massive belts of continental-scale drying, all in the Northern Hemisphere: Live Events Southwestern North America & Central America: From California's farmlands to Mexico City. Alaska and Northern Canada: Accelerated melting of glaciers and permafrost. Northern Russia: Snow and ice losses across Siberia. Middle East–North Africa into Eurasia: Spanning from the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula through Ukraine and northern India to China's North Plain. These regions include some of the planet's most critical agricultural zones and densely populated cities, places where water stress could trigger food shortages, migration, and political instability. The study found 68 percent of land water loss came from groundwater alone, a largely invisible crisis. Why it matters now The researchers warn that without immediate, coordinated policies to slow groundwater pumping, improve recharge, and share water data, the crisis will deepen. 'We can't negotiate with physics,' Famiglietti said. 'Water is life. When it's gone, everything else unravels.' The findings will feed into a forthcoming World Bank report on water security and global economic stability.
Economic Times
15 hours ago
- Economic Times
Study estimates over 9% of world's lands at high risk of animal-to-human infections
Over nine per cent of the world's land area is at "high" or "very high" risk of a zoonotic outbreak -- triggered when an infection spreads from an animal to a human or vice versa, such as the Covid pandemic, according to a published in the journal Science Advances also estimate 3 per cent of the global population to be living in extremely risky areas, and about a fifth in medium-risk areas. Researchers, including those from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) Scientific Development Programmes Unit in Italy, analysed location-specific information from the 'Global Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology Network' dataset and the World Health Organization's (WHO) list of diseases prioritised according to their potential for causing an epidemic or a Ebola, coronavirus-related MERS and SARS, and Nipah are among the most prioritised infections in the WHO's team's analysis suggests that conditions driven by climate change -- higher temperatures and rainfall, and water shortage -- elevate the risk of zoonosis, or 'spillover events'. The study "presents a global risk map and an epidemic risk index that combines countries' specific risk with their capacities for preparing and responding to zoonotic threats (excluding SARS-CoV-2)." "Our results indicate that 9.3 per cent of the global land surface is at high (6.3 per cent) or very high (three per cent) risk," the authors also estimated about 7 per cent of Asia's and 5 per cent of Africa's land area to be at high and very high risk of outbreak, following Latin America (27 per cent) and Oceania (18.6 per cent).Overall, the authors found that climate-related changes to the environment substantially drove a region's vulnerability to the risk of a spillover wrote, "This underscores the need for continued monitoring and the integration of climate adaptation and mitigation efforts into public health planning." "Translating these risk estimates into an epidemic risk index allows for the identification of high-risk areas and supports policymakers in improving response capacities, allocating resources effectively, and fostering international collaboration to address global health threats," the team said. A study by the Indian Council of Medical Research found that over 8 per cent of outbreaks reported between 2018 and 2023 under the country's infectious disease surveillance system were zoonotic. Of a total of 6,948 outbreaks analysed, 583 (8.3 per cent) were spread to humans from animals. Outbreaks were also found to consistently peak during June, July, and August. The findings were published in The Lancet Regional Southeast Asia journal in May this year.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
science for all: 64% of carnivores' homes facing high human pressure
Big carnivores like wolves, tigers, and wolverines help keep ecosystems healthy yet many of them are disappearing. To understand where these declines are most pronounced, a new study in Science Advances has reported where on the earth the world's 257 land‑dwelling carnivore species live and how much of their home ranges are safe versus where they are threatened by people building roads, farms, and cities. The authors of the study, an international team from institutes around the world, downloaded the latest range maps for every living carnivore from the IUCN Red List and retained 257 strictly terrestrial species for their analysis. Then, they combined each range map with the 2018 Human Footprint layer, a grid of 1 sq. km cells that scored eight kinds of human activity, from population density to railways, on a 0 to 50 scale. Scores of 4 or higher marked land that had been heavily altered by human activities. They overlaid three global datasets on this grid: Protected Areas listed by the IUCN, Indigenous peoples' lands managed by native communities, and wilderness areas (large tracts with almost no human pressure). When they analysed these composite maps, they found that 64% of all carnivore habitats worldwide are currently in high‑pressure hotspots. The pattern was the same for species already on the IUCN threatened list and those still considered stable. They also found Indigenous peoples' lands shelter 26% of global carnivore range, wilderness areas 16%, and Protect Areas 10% — and together they cover about 35% of carnivore habitat, meaning most carnivore territory lies outside areas set aside for nature. More specifically, most canids, felids, mongooses, and mustelids each had far less than 40% of their ranges in any protected category. Unsurprisingly, already shrinking animal populations had the biggest share of their habitats in high‑pressure zones, confirming human activity is a major driver of their decline. Statistical tests also indicated carnivores generally occupy larger, unprotected areas outside conservation lands. '[W]e found that the overlap between Protected Areas and wilderness areas is minimal in the Indo-Malay region, covering only 0.2% of the area, while the highest overlap occurs in the Neotropic region at 7%,' the team wrote in its paper. Taken together, the study showed that most carnivores live where people are changing the landscape fastest, and formal reserves alone are not large or connected enough to keep these predators safe. While Indigenous territories are critical havens, they also face growing pressures. From the Science pages Question Corner Where is the centre of the universe? Find out here Flora and fauna
