After No-Confidence Vote, Tasmania Headed to the Polls July 19
Tasmania is unique among Australian states in that it uses a voting system of proportional representation. The lower house – where government is formed – is elected from five constituencies, each with seven MPs. The Liberal Party had been governing since 2014, but in a minority since the election last year, with the support of smaller parties and independents. But this arrangement broke down due to a pair of issues that cut right into the direct interests of the island of 575,000 people.
The first was the inept handling of the replacement of two aging ferries. The two massive ferries that shuttle between the northern Tasmanian city of Devonport and the Victorian city of Geelong are the only way to transport cars and trucks between Tasmania and the Australian mainland. They are vital for the island's tourist industry, but also essential for getting Tasmanian goods to Melbourne, the country's largest port. The Tasmanian economy is heavily dependent on them.
Two new vessels were commissioned to be built in Finland in 2021. Both were expected to be operational by mid-2024. Yet there has been a significant oversight: the two new vessels are larger than those they are designed to replace, and the dock in Devonport is too small to accommodate them. The government had expected a new dock to be completed by mid-2024, but it's not ready yet and completion isn't expected for at least another year.
With the first ferry completed, the Tasmanian government had nowhere to put it – with all potential sites in Tasmania or mainland Australia unwilling to accommodate an idle ship. Since December, the ferry has been docked in Scotland, with berthing costs around US$30,000 per week. With a parking spot finally having been found in Hobart, this past weekend the ferry began its journey across the world to the city where it will sit until the dock in Devonport is completed. The second ferry is still conducting sea trials in the Baltic Sea.
The mismanagement of infrastructure so vital to the state has obviously led to the questioning of the government's competence.
The second issue that precipitated the government's downfall is both cultural and financial. Despite being a state with a deep passion for Australian Rules football – and having bred some of the game's greats – the state has not had a team in the Australian Football League (AFL). Over the past 15-20 years the AFL has been spending extraordinary sums of money to try and make inroads into the rugby-playing states of New South Wales and Queensland. Two new teams have been created in Western Sydney and the Gold Coast, despite the sport having no cultural legitimacy in those regions.
This has, in turn, irritated Tasmanians, who rightly feel they are a far more legitimate region for the league's expansion, and would be keen on attracting the AFL's buckets of money. This changed in 2023 when the AFL granted a new license for a Tasmanian team for the 2028 season.
However, it came with the condition that the state build a new stadium: a huge financial burden for a small state. To many in Tasmania constructing a stadium with the same seating capacity as Hobart's current stadium seems unnecessary. However, the AFL is insistent on a stadium with a roof. While the sport used to be an all-weather game – played in rain, hail, and snow – in recent years the AFL has expected perfect playing conditions for the game as a television spectacle. Hobart's heavy winter dew is therefore considered a problem, and this has created great division between the people of Tasmania and the AFL – who think they can bully the state into submission. This is something the government has been unable to manage.
Despite not entering the competition for another two and a half years, already over 200,000 people have signed up to be a member of the new football club. That's an extraordinary figure for such a small population. Yet Tasmanians don't feel their love of the game should have to submit itself to a bunch of suits from Melbourne intent on sterilizing it. And they've been willing to bring down their own government to prove it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
18 hours ago
- NHK
US Fed Governor Kugler to resign, allowing Trump to pick replacement
The US Federal Reserve has announced that its board member, Adriana Kugler, will step down on August 8. President Donald Trump will replace her with his pick. The Fed said on Friday that Kugler will resign and return to a university as a professor this fall. She will have resigned before the end of her term set in January next year. Kugler is one of the seven members of the board of governors. The Fed chair is elected from the board members. US media suggested Trump would take the opportunity to influence the leadership of the central bank. Trump has strongly criticized Fed Chair Jerome Powell over monetary policies, apparently believing he should resign. News outlet Axios reported that Kugler's resignation will give Trump "an early opportunity to appoint a favored candidate for potential leadership of the central bank." Trump spoke to reporters after Kugler's resignation was announced. He said, "I'm very happy" that "I have an open spot on the Federal Reserve Board."
Japan Times
a day ago
- Japan Times
U.S. and NATO developing novel funding mechanism for Ukraine arms transfers
The U.S. and NATO are working on a novel approach to supply Ukraine with weapons using funds from NATO countries to pay for the purchase or transfer of U.S. arms, according to three sources familiar with the matter. The renewed transatlantic cooperation on Ukraine comes as U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed frustration with Moscow's ongoing attacks on its neighbor. Trump, who initially took a more conciliatory tone toward Russia as he tried to end the more than three-year war in Ukraine, has threatened to start imposing tariffs and other measures if Moscow shows no progress toward ending the conflict by Aug. 8. The president said last month the U.S. would supply weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but did not indicate how this would be done. NATO countries, Ukraine, and the United States are developing a new mechanism that will focus on getting U.S. weapons to Ukraine from the Priority Ukraine Requirements List, known under the acronym PURL, the sources said. Ukraine would prioritize the weapons it needs in tranches of roughly $500 million, and NATO allies — coordinated by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte — would then negotiate among themselves who would donate or pay for items on the list. Through this approach, NATO allies hope to provide $10 billion in arms for Ukraine, said a European official, speaking on condition of anonymity. It was unclear over what time frame they hope to supply the arms. "That is the starting point, and it's an ambitious target that we're working towards. We're currently on that trajectory. We support the ambition. We need that sort of volume," the European official said. A senior NATO military official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said the initiative was "a voluntary effort coordinated by NATO that all allies are encouraged to take part in." The official said the new plan included a NATO holding account, where allies could deposit money for weapons for Ukraine, approved by NATO's top military commander. NATO headquarters in Brussels declined to comment. The White House, Pentagon, and Ukrainian Embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment. Russian forces are gradually advancing against Ukraine, and control one-fifth of Ukraine's territory. If a NATO country decides to donate weapons to Ukraine, the mechanism would allow that country to effectively bypass lengthy U.S. arms sales procedures to replenish its own stocks, said one U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity. Money for the arms would be transferred into a U.S.-held account, possibly at the U.S. Treasury Department, or to an escrow fund, although the exact structure remains unclear, the official said. The new mechanism would be in addition to the United States' own effort to identify arms from U.S. stockpiles to send to Ukraine under the Presidential Drawdown Authority, which allows the U.S. president to draw from current weapons stocks to help allies in an emergency. At least one tranche of weapons for Ukraine is currently being negotiated under the new mechanism, two sources said, though it was unclear if any money has yet been transferred. Trump's fellow Republicans in Congress have introduced legislation, known as the PEACE Act, that aims to create a fund at the U.S. Treasury in which allies can deposit money that would pay to replenish U.S. military equipment donated to Ukraine. Ukraine's needs remain consistent with previous months — air defenses, interceptors, systems, rockets, and artillery. The last statement of need from Ukraine came in a July 21 video conference of the country's allies, known as the Ramstein group, now led by Britain and Germany.
Japan Times
a day ago
- Japan Times
Trump says he moved U.S. nuclear subs after barbs with Russia
President Donald Trump said the U.S. is moving two nuclear submarines to respond to what he called "highly provocative statements' from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. "I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump said in a social media post Friday. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Trump, speaking to reporters later Friday, suggested he was acting out of caution, saying that "we had to do that, we just have to be careful and a threat was made and we didn't think it was appropriate.' "I have to be very careful, so I do that on the basis of safety for our people,' he said. "We're going to protect our people.' Asked what Medvedev had said that angered him, Trump responded, "You just have to read what he said. He was talking about nuclear. When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared, and we're totally prepared.' The office of the Secretary of Defense referred requests for more details to the White House and declined to comment on whether Trump was referring to submarines armed with nuclear weapons rather than simply nuclear-powered vessels. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, on his personal social media account, shared a screenshot of Trump's post without comment. Officials at the Kremlin didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's post Friday was the latest in a heated public exchange with Medvedev, who currently serves as Russia's deputy chairman of the security council. Medvedev, in a July 28 post on X, had warned Trump that "each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.' West Texas Intermediate crude, the U.S. benchmark for oil, fell as much as 3.2% Friday after weak jobs and manufacturing data, although prices later stabilized following Trump's comments on the potential threat from Russia. His hardening stance toward Russia in recent weeks is raising speculation that the U.S. will impose tariffs on nations buying crude from Moscow, which could tighten global supplies. Trump has said he expects to hit Russia with sanctions after providing a new deadline — which falls on Aug. 8 — for Russian President Vladimir Putin to halt the war in Ukraine. In a social media post on Thursday, Trump assailed Russia and India — a major customer for Russian energy — and lashed out at Medvedev, calling him a "failed' former president who needed to "watch his words.' "He's entering very dangerous territory!' Trump had said. Medvedev responded in a post to Telegram hours later in which he said that Russia would continue in its own way, jabbing at Trump. Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev attends a meeting of the Council for Science and Education at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia, in June last year. | Sputnik / Pool / via REUTERS Trump's interactions with Medvedev intensified in the same week that U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissed the Russian official as "not a relevant player.' Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at Washington-based think tank Defense Priorities, said the social media exchange was an "unhelpful and a very risky way to do international diplomacy.' The U.S. typically has four or five submarines on "hard alert' at any time, Kavanagh said, downplaying the likelihood that Trump significantly changed U.S. nuclear posture. "The likelihood is there are already nuclear submarines positioned in locations where they could strike Russia if necessary,' she said. Putin also has dismissed Trump's latest effort to pressure him into peace, saying that his war goals in Ukraine are unchanged and dismissing calls for a ceasefire. Putin said that recent talks between Ukraine and Russia in Turkey were "positive in general' and dismissed frustration over the war by casting it as the result of "excessive expectations,' without directly naming Trump. Trump campaigned in the 2024 election on a pledge to quickly bring Russia's war in Ukraine — now well into its fourth year — to an end. Those efforts have failed to materialize with Putin only making maximalist demands for Ukrainian territory and rebuffing calls for face-to-face discussions with Ukraine's leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Matthew Kroenig, vice president and senior director at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council, cast Trump's Friday post as a "brilliant move' and "all part of trying to force Putin to the negotiating table.' Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Friday had said it was encouraging that U.S. officials remained open to continuing the conversation — a message posted shortly before Trump's submarine announcement. "The substantive discussions on the Ukrainian issue that have been taking place between Moscow and Washington since the beginning of the year have been very useful and have yielded results,' Lavrov said in comments published on the ministry's website. Trump had said on Thursday that his special envoy Steve Witkoff would head to Moscow after wrapping up a trip to Middle East, though he did not provide an exact date for the visit. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Witkoff still planned to travel to Russia.
