logo
Dem governor's decades-old political persecution claim over alleged cocaine use disputed by bombshell memo

Dem governor's decades-old political persecution claim over alleged cocaine use disputed by bombshell memo

Fox Newsa day ago

FIRST ON FOX: Maine's Democratic Gov. Janet Mills has for years dismissed an investigation into her alleged cocaine use as politically motivated, but a newly unearthed memo obtained by Fox News Digital contradicts her decades-old claim.
In early 1990, the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) in Maine, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Maine's Bureau of Intergovernmental Drug Enforcement (BIDE) investigated Mills, then a sitting district attorney in Maine, after a drug suspect accused her of using cocaine.
The investigation was eventually dropped without charges being filed, but Mills has maintained that the investigation never had any merit and that she was politically targeted for her Democratic affiliation and criticism of BIDE. In 1990, she and two other district attorneys in Maine criticized BIDE for inflating arrest numbers through excessive enforcement of low-level drug offenders.
"It's scary," Mills told the Portland Press Herald in November 1991. "Maine apparently has a secret police force at work that can ruin the reputation of any who opposes it."
A March 1995 memorandum from the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (DOJ/OPR), addressed to the Deputy Attorney General, of whom Merrick Garland was an associate serving as the principal associate Deputy Attorney General, unearthed by Fox News Digital, refutes Mills' claim, revealing there was no misconduct by federal or state authorities investigating her case.
According to the DOJ memo, WCSH-TV reported in December 1990 that Mills was being investigated by a federal grand jury for drug use, citing law enforcement sources. Mills later sued that reporter for libel and slander. The report also prompted Mills' attorney to demand a grand jury investigation, arguing that "the press received leaks from BIDE law enforcement officials."
The results of the libel and slander suit are no longer available. The docket for the case showed that the records were disposed of in 2015 in accordance with policy. However, a 1991 Lewiston Sun-Journal article appears to state that the effort to "end drug probe rumors" was thrown out by a judge.
In January 1992, then-Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., stepped in and requested the DOJ/OPR investigate allegations that Maine's USAO had "refused to investigate the grand jury leak" and that attorneys had engaged in "intimidation and coercion of witnesses" during the investigation.
Those concerns were initially raised by Patrick Paradis and N. Paul Gauvreau, the House and Senate chairs of the Judiciary Committee of the Maine Legislature, in a letter sent to then-Sen. George Mitchell, D-Maine. The letter suggested that the allegations involving Maine's USAO "go far beyond the state agency involved."
Ultimately, no charges were filed against Mills for her alleged cocaine use.
But the Department of Justice also found that all of Mills' claims were "unsubstantiated," including allegations that she was politically targeted, that investigators solicited false testimony, that witnesses were coerced or threatened and that BIDE agents leaked grand jury information to the press.
"The USAO in Maine conducted a proper investigation of serious allegations; no misconduct of any kind can fairly be attributed to any member of that office," DOJ/OPR concluded in 1995.
While the Justice Department debunked Mills' claims, she dismissed the allegations against her as politically motivated throughout the investigation.
According to the memo, Mills "announced publicly that she was the victim of a smear campaign" in 1991.
"I'd say it's awfully coincidental that this investigation started and was leaked to the press shortly after my public comments about the lack of accountability at BIDE," Mills said that same year.
Mills also claimed it sets a "very bad precedent when a prosecutor has to look over his or her shoulder every time you put somebody in jail and wonder whether that person is going to find an audience down the street in the BIDE office or down the road in the U.S. Attorney's Office to say dirty things about you."
Fox News Digital reached out to Mills's office multiple times for comment but did not receive a response.
Earlier this year, Mills accused President Donald Trump of leading a "politically directed investigation" into Maine's Department of Education.
During a National Governors Association (NGA) meeting at the White House in February, Mills and Trump publicly sparred over biological men playing in women's sports.
Trump said Mills should comply with his executive order preventing transgender athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports, or "you're not going to get any federal funding," to which she replied, "We'll see you in court," which is exactly where the issue has been tied up.
Longtime Republican Sen. Susan Collins is up for re-election in 2026, and with Mills' governorship term limited next year, she would be a competitive Democratic candidate to challenge Collins.
Mills indicated in April that she did not "plan to run for another office," but admitted that "things change week to week, month to month," leaving the door open to a potential Senate bid.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Steel buyout gives Trump a new power: What about future presidents?
US Steel buyout gives Trump a new power: What about future presidents?

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Steel buyout gives Trump a new power: What about future presidents?

President Donald Trump will control the so-called 'golden share' that's part of the national security agreement under which he allowed Japan-based Nippon Steel to buy out American steelmaker US Steel. That's according to disclosures filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The provision gives the president the power to appoint a board member and have a say in company decisions that affect domestic steel production and competition with overseas producers. Under the provision, Trump — or someone he designates — controls that decision-making power while he is president. However, control over those powers reverts to the Treasury Department and the Commerce Department when anyone else is president, according to the filings. The White House responded in a statement that the share is 'not granted to Trump specifically, but to whoever the president is". Officials were asked why Trump will directly control the decision-making and why it goes to the Treasury and Commerce departments under future presidents. Still, the wording of the provision is specific to Trump. It lists what decisions cannot be made without 'the written consent of Donald J. Trump or President Trump's Designee' at 'any time when Donald J. Trump is serving as President of the United States of America' or 'at any other time, the written consent of the CMAs', a contractual term for the Treasury and Commerce departments. Nippon Steel's nearly $15 billion buyout of Pittsburgh-based US Steel became final last week, making US Steel a wholly-owned subsidiary. Trump has sought to characterise the acquisition as a "partnership" between the two companies after he at first vowed to block the deal — as former President Joe Biden did on his way out of the White House — before changing his mind after he became president. Related Nippon Steel finalises US Steel takeover after state opposition President Trump orders review into Nippon Steel's bid for US Steel The national security agreement became effective 13 June and is between Nippon Steel, as well as its American subsidiary, and the federal government, represented by the departments of Commerce and Treasury, according to the disclosures. The complete national security agreement hasn't been published publicly, although aspects of it have been outlined in statements and securities filings made by the companies, US Steel said Wednesday. The pursuit by Nippon Steel dragged on for a year and a half, weighed down by national security concerns, opposition by the United Steelworkers, and presidential politics in the premier battleground state of Pennsylvania, where US Steel is headquartered. The combined company will become the world's fourth-largest steelmaker in an industry dominated by Chinese companies, and bring what analysts say is Nippon Steel's top-notch technology to US Steel's antiquated steelmaking processes. That's on top of a commitment to invest $11bn to upgrade US Steel facilities. The potential that the deal could be permanently blocked forced Nippon Steel to sweeten the deal. That included upping its capital commitments in US Steel facilities and adding the golden share provision, giving Trump a veto power on specific matters and the right to appoint an independent director. Those matters include reductions in Nippon Steel's capital commitments in the national security agreement; changing US Steel's name and headquarters; closing or idling US Steel's plants; transferring production or jobs outside of the US; buying competing businesses in the US; and certain decisions on trade, labour and sourcing outside the US.

Beijing confirms that it has signed a trade agreement with the US
Beijing confirms that it has signed a trade agreement with the US

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Beijing confirms that it has signed a trade agreement with the US

The US and China have now signed a trade agreement, said China's Ministry of Commerce on Friday, bringing the two economies further into alignment after the threat of a major trade war. A released statement said that China would continue to approve export permits of controlled items, and that the US would "cancel a series of restrictive measures taken against China accordingly". The statement comes after US President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House late on Thursday that the two nations had reached an agreement. 'We just signed with China yesterday,' he said, offering no further details. Initial talks in Geneva in early May led both China and the US to postpone massive tariff hikes that were threatening to freeze much of the trade between the two countries. Later talks in London set a framework for negotiations, and the deal mentioned by Trump appeared to formalise that agreement. China announced earlier this week that it was speeding up export approvals of rare earths, materials used in high-tech products such as electric vehicles. Beijing's limits on exports of rare earths have been a key point of contention. The Chinese Commerce Ministry said on Thursday that Beijing was accelerating a review of export license applications for rare earths and had approved "a certain number of compliant applications." Related Trump says US has reached a trade deal with China US Steel buyout gives Trump a new power: What about future presidents? Export controls of the minerals apparently eclipsed tariffs in the latest round of trade negotiations between Beijing and Washington after China imposed permitting requirements on seven rare earth elements in April, threatening to disrupt production of cars, robots, wind turbines and other high-tech products in the US and around the world. The agreement struck in May in Geneva called for both sides to scale back punitive tariff hikes imposed as Trump escalated his trade war and sharply raised import duties. Some higher tariffs, such as those imposed by Washington related to the trade in fentanyl, as well as duties on aluminium and steel, remain in place. The rapidly shifting policies are taking a toll on both of the world's two largest economies. The US economy contracted at a 0.5% annual pace from January through March, partly because imports surged as companies and households rushed to buy foreign goods before Trump could impose tariffs on them. In China, factory profits sank more than 9% from a year earlier in May, with automakers suffering a large share of that drop. They fell more than 1% year-on-year in January to May. Trump and other US officials have indicated they expect to reach trade deals with many other countries, including India. "We're going to have deal after deal after deal," Lutnick said.

Gray Television's Q1 Earnings Call: Our Top 5 Analyst Questions
Gray Television's Q1 Earnings Call: Our Top 5 Analyst Questions

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gray Television's Q1 Earnings Call: Our Top 5 Analyst Questions

Gray Television's first quarter results for 2025 were received positively by the market, as the company exceeded Wall Street's revenue and profit expectations despite a year-over-year sales decline. Management attributed the quarter's performance to stronger-than-anticipated political advertising, ongoing cost containment, and the growing contribution from local sports broadcasting. CEO Hilton Howell highlighted the impact of new local sports rights agreements, stating, 'the combination of our premier local news franchises with local sports make our local stations even more relevant and more valuable than ever.' Is now the time to buy GTN? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $782 million vs analyst estimates of $773.2 million (5% year-on-year decline, 1.1% beat) Operating Margin: 11.8%, down from 15.1% in the same quarter last year Market Capitalization: $476.1 million While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Dan Kurnos (Benchmark): Asked about the company's strategic flexibility if deregulatory changes materialize. Chief Legal and Development Officer Kevin Latek indicated Gray Television is considering swaps and other transactions but awaits regulatory clarity before acting. Aaron Watts (Deutsche Bank): Inquired whether advertising declines were due to cancellations or delayed bookings. President Pat LaPlatney clarified that hesitancy, not cancellations, was the issue, and pointed to growth in service categories and unexpected political revenue as positive signs. Patrick Sholl (Wells Fargo): Questioned expectations for political advertising versus prior cycles. CEO Hilton Howell noted that this cycle has seen more substantial and earlier ad buys than previous midterms, but acknowledged political ad revenue is difficult to predict. Craig Huber (Huber Research): Sought details on Assembly Studios' leasing progress and financial contribution. CEO Howell stated occupancy is about 75-80%, with additional upside possible, and CFO Gignac said returns will improve as more leases are signed and new phases of development are completed. Alan Gould (Loop Capital): Asked about the impact of direct negotiations with virtual multichannel video programming distributors (vMVPDs) on retransmission revenue. Latek responded that there is a significant difference in rates, but the net impact would depend on network agreements if regulations change. In the coming quarters, the StockStory team will track (1) the pace of local sports rights adoption and the impact on station viewership and ad sales, (2) evidence of sustained political ad revenue during a non-election cycle, and (3) progress on cost containment translating into improved margins and deleveraging. Developments in industry regulation and the potential for market consolidation will also be important signals for Gray Television's future trajectory. Gray Television currently trades at $4.55, up from $3.72 just before the earnings. Is there an opportunity in the stock?The answer lies in our full research report (it's free). The market surged in 2024 and reached record highs after Donald Trump's presidential victory in November, but questions about new economic policies are adding much uncertainty for 2025. While the crowd speculates what might happen next, we're homing in on the companies that can succeed regardless of the political or macroeconomic environment. Put yourself in the driver's seat and build a durable portfolio by checking out our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Tecnoglass (+1,754% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store