logo
No deal struck on US tariffs

No deal struck on US tariffs

Bangkok Post18 hours ago
Thailand has yet to conclude negotiations with the United States on reciprocal tariffs but has gained 'valuable insights' that will guide the development of a revised proposal, Deputy Prime Minister Pichai Chunhavajira said on Friday.
Speaking during a live broadcast on X while transiting through South Korea on his way back to Thailand, Mr Pichai said that initial trade talks had made encouraging progress, despite no final agreement being reached.
He gave no indication about when further talks might take place, even as a July 9 deadline looms to reach a deal. In the absence of a deal, Washington could impose a 36% tariff on all imports from Thailand as soon as Wednesday, compared with the 10% baseline tariff in effect now.
President Donald Trump has conceded that negotiating trade deals with dozens of countries has proved impractical. As a result, Washington plans to unilaterally decide final tariff rates and send out letters to many trade partners, he said.
Thailand is believed to be among a handful of countries that might get a reprieve because talks are sufficiently advanced, but that is just speculation at this point.
Mr Pichai, who led the Thai delegation in Washington, said he held high-level discussions with senior US government officials and representatives from major American corporations with significant long-term investments in Thailand. He also held formal policy talks with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury.
'We received significant feedback that reaffirmed the United States' confidence in Thailand as a long-standing economic partner,' he said. 'This lays a solid foundation for further negotiations.'
The discussions helped Thai officials better understand US expectations, Mr Pichai added, noting that these insights would shape a new proposal addressing concerns from both sides.
'The talks were constructive. Although a conclusive outcome was not reached, the US appreciated Thailand's proactive approach,' he said. 'We will return with a new proposal that ensures mutual benefit.
'Our position remains firm that the final deal must be practical, sustainable, and a win-win for both sides,' he said. 'We have to work hard to refine Thailand's proposal to ensure the success of the negotiation and benefits of the two sides.' (Story continues below)
Thai officials being realistic
In Bangkok, meanwhile, Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat said Thai officials were taking a realistic view of events and were prepared for any outcome.
'We are not viewing the tax negotiations with the US as a worst-case scenario, as we have been preparing for them since President Trump took office and then announced the reciprocal tariff policy on April 2,' he said.
'We are aware of the US demands, such as the need to address issues related to transshipment, or goods falsely claimed as originating from Thailand for export to the US.
'Discussions have already taken place and are heading in a positive direction. But if you're asking whether we hope to return to the best-case scenario — such as the point before the 10% tariff was imposed — then we must admit the reality: there's no way to go back to that original point,' he said.
'Everyone in the world knows this. Ultimately, we have to move forward towards a new balance that will result from the negotiations. If you ask which tariff group we'll end up in, I must admit deep down that we hope to be in the 10% basket.'
Mr Julapun said Thailand has a long-standing relationship with the US and holds a stronger negotiating position than Vietnam, as Thai exports are more globally diversified and not so heavily reliant on the US market as those of Vietnam.
Vietnam, which has agreed on a new trade deal with the US, sends roughly 30% of its exports to the US, while the figure for Thailand is only 18%.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Casino bill delay likely for review by new cabinet
Casino bill delay likely for review by new cabinet

Bangkok Post

time2 hours ago

  • Bangkok Post

Casino bill delay likely for review by new cabinet

The controversial entertainment complex bill needs to be reviewed by the newly formed cabinet before proceeding with it further, Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat said. Speaking at a forum hosted by the Press Council of Thailand to mark its 28th anniversary on Friday, Mr Julapun said government whips and cabinet representatives have discussed the possibility of delaying the bill for a thorough review by the new ministers. He dismissed speculation that the bill's fate was tied to the recent withdrawal of the Bhumjaithai Party (BJT) from the coalition, saying the coalition still commands a majority that is enough to secure its passage. However, Mr Julapun noted that due to the major cabinet reshuffle, fresh input from the new ministers on the highly contentious issue is welcome. There are also calls for the government to first address ongoing Thai-Cambodian border tensions, he added. According to the minister, the formal withdrawal of the bill typically requires a resolution by the cabinet, and the bill could be withdrawn immediately if the House raises no objections. Mr Julapun admitted that the opposition might push for deliberation and vote the bill down. "But the government is confident it has sufficient support to either delay deliberation or withdraw the bill for review," he said. The bill, which seeks to establish integrated entertainment complexes that include casinos, was originally scheduled to be the first item on the House agenda on July 9. It was to be followed by four other bills related to social harmony and political amnesty. Mr Julapun also dismissed any connection between the government's casino policy and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen's recent criticism of Thailand, saying the decision to delay it is primarily to allow for further review and ease political tensions. Visuth Chainaroon, the chief government whip, yesterday echoed the need for its withdrawal, citing the coalition's slim majority and an unfavourable political climate. He said he discussed the matter with Prime Minister's Office Minister Chusak Sirinil, and both agreed that a postponement could still intensify public pressure, making a full withdrawal the better course of action. "If the new cabinet is ready, it can resubmit the bill. But it must engage with the public first, as this bill has wide-ranging repercussions," he said.

Delay likely so that new cabinet can review casino bill
Delay likely so that new cabinet can review casino bill

Bangkok Post

time3 hours ago

  • Bangkok Post

Delay likely so that new cabinet can review casino bill

The controversial entertainment complex bill needs to be reviewed by the newly formed cabinet before proceeding with it further, Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat said. Speaking at a forum hosted by the Press Council of Thailand to mark its 28th anniversary on Friday, Mr Julapun said government whips and cabinet representatives have discussed the possibility of delaying the bill for a thorough review by the new ministers. He dismissed speculation that the bill's fate was tied to the recent withdrawal of the Bhumjaithai Party (BJT) from the coalition, saying the coalition still commands a majority that is enough to secure its passage. However, Mr Julapun noted that due to the major cabinet reshuffle, fresh input from the new ministers on the highly contentious issue is welcome. There are also calls for the government to first address ongoing Thai-Cambodian border tensions, he added. According to the minister, the formal withdrawal of the bill typically requires a resolution by the cabinet, and the bill could be withdrawn immediately if the House raises no objections. Mr Julapun admitted that the opposition might push for deliberation and vote the bill down. "But the government is confident it has sufficient support to either delay deliberation or withdraw the bill for review," he said. The bill, which seeks to establish integrated entertainment complexes that include casinos, was originally scheduled to be the first item on the House agenda on July 9. It was to be followed by four other bills related to social harmony and political amnesty. Mr Julapun also dismissed any connection between the government's casino policy and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen's recent criticism of Thailand, saying the decision to delay it is primarily to allow for further review and ease political tensions. Visuth Chainaroon, the chief government whip, yesterday echoed the need for its withdrawal, citing the coalition's slim majority and an unfavourable political climate. He said he discussed the matter with Prime Minister's Office Minister Chusak Sirinil, and both agreed that a postponement could still intensify public pressure, making a full withdrawal the better course of action. "If the new cabinet is ready, it can resubmit the bill. But it must engage with the public first, as this bill has wide-ranging repercussions," he said.

5 ways for Thai unis to tackle population
5 ways for Thai unis to tackle population

Bangkok Post

time4 hours ago

  • Bangkok Post

5 ways for Thai unis to tackle population

On June 16, the Bangkok Post published an article about the future of Thai education in light of a declining population. Addressing the problems and answering the questions has been left for the next person in charge -- to till the hard ground of comfort for new growth. Since the 1990s (at least), Thai demographers and academics have raised the issue of declining population and education. In the 1960s, there were about 20 universities in Thailand and six children per woman. By the 1990s, that had changed to over 100 tertiary institutes and less than two children per woman. Almost any Thai high schooler, in the 2020s, can get into a university programme provided they can pay tuition. Here are five achievable things that I believe would make Thai universities more relevant to Thai society, with a declining and ageing population. 1) Close and merge some universities and their programmes. In Bangkok, universities across the street from each other offer fundamentally the same courses. Within some universities, different lecturers teach almost identical courses at different faculties. I believe consolidation allows for greater efficiencies and rationalisation of resources. Ironically, the benefits of partnerships are taught in the courses that are repeated across faculties. In many universities, faculties are silos with a sprinkling of external courses allowed to meet local quality standards. The overall value of education improves through being more efficient and rational. 2) With improved quality, international student recruitment can flourish. Thai universities hardly advertise their "International Programmes" internationally outside the occasional university fairs in China or some in Asean countries. Rarely in international media do you see advertisements for Thai universities. I have found that websites and social media are mostly in Thai, email contacts are missing, application instructions are opaque, and supporting documentation requirements are absent. Information on scholarships, bursaries, housing and so on is missing, and the available information is geared towards Thai students. There is little understanding of alternative high school education systems. Overseas students have mentioned these frustrations, but alas, using feedback to improve is uncommon. With global demand for foreign university programmes taught in English growing, few Thai universities try to meet this need, preferring the slow and easy memorandums of cooperation and occasional exchange students. 3) Micro credits, credit transfers, and part-time degrees can increase the relevancy of Thai universities. These will attract international students who are on different academic calendars. Micro-credits are short courses where learners specialise in one area. They are ideal for working professionals looking for formal certification; while students can sample options before committing to a programme. However, the credit transfer system in Thailand is restricted. So, after two years in, say, an international degree programme, the student may have to start at year one in a related Thai degree programme. This requirement discourages students from changing degrees. Few Thai universities offer part-time degrees, thus making it difficult for students who want to pursue a degree but do not have the time or resources. Even intellectual curiosity cannot be met locally, as professionals wanting flexibility cannot apply to one of Thailand's few internationally recognised degrees. 4) Thai universities need to expand into professional or adult education to directly address skilled needs. Top universities globally offer an array of executive courses. In Thailand, few do. Even fewer offer courses for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. These enterprises are usually managed by 40- or 50-year-olds who may have missed tertiary education, and with kids not interested in the business. They themselves are smart enough to learn and earn. I have worked with a few, and guidance is all that is needed for these mechanics, massage shop owners, and farmers to grow. Several new companies and government outreach programmes have targeted these individuals, but universities have a cultural and intellectual grounding that gives them an advantage. Research projects at Thai universities can develop further, academically and business-wise, if known to the broader public. 5) Too often, skill-based pragmatism gets lost in pursuit of academic rigour and reputation. Many programmes at Thai universities claim alignment with professional life, yet employers and alumni say graduates are woefully under-prepared for workplaces.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store