These companies sidestepped EPA regs with a keystroke
Applications from oil refiners, coal-fired plants, steel mills and chemical companies, among others, arrived in EPA's inbox within days of the agency offering to take requests from companies seeking to dodge recently strengthened emission requirements for mercury and other toxic substances.
Records obtained by the Sierra Club through a Freedom of Information Act request and first shared with The New York Times reveal some of the companies that sought exemptions. Requests for the same records from POLITICO's E&E News are still pending.
Advertisement
The documents provide a window into the behind-the-scenes process the Trump administration is using to claw back regulations for industry. Earlier this month, the White House gave dozens of plants around the country more time to meet EPA regulations intended to cut emissions of air toxics tied to cancer and other serious health problems.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs will damage economy 'by definition': Former US trade rep
President Trump unveiled a host of new trade deals on Thursday and granted Mexico a 90-day reprieve, just one day before the self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline to finalize trade deals. Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations and former US trade representative under the Obama administration, discusses the potential long-term results of Trump's trade policy and its effect on the economy. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. Related videos Why Danes may have hit their limit on retirement age Britain's gas imports surge as Miliband abandons North Sea Is this thrillingly cheap FTSE growth share about to fulfil its massive potential? Bank of England set to split again in face of inflation, job risks Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Politico
2 minutes ago
- Politico
Leavitt cleans up Bessent's Social Security privatization comments: ‘Supplement, not substitute'
Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump will protect Social Security, after Bessent said newborn accounts are a 'backdoor for privatizing' it. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent arrives before President Donald Trump speaks at an event to promote his proposal to improve Americans' access to their medical records in the East Room of the White House, July 30, 2025. | Mark Schiefelbein/AP By Nicole Markus 07/31/2025 02:56 PM EDT White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that President Donald Trump is 'wholeheartedly committed' to protecting Social Security, after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent framed his 'Trump accounts' as a 'backdoor for privatizing' it. 'What the secretary of Treasury was saying, and what this administration believes, is that these Trump newborn accounts — which is an incredibly creative and great provision that was in the One Big Beautiful Bill for newborn children, and families and future generations of Americans — will help supplement, not substitute, Social Security,' Leavitt said during Thursday's briefing. The tax-deferred investment accounts allow parents to contribute up to $5,000 a year for their children. The accounts allow for penalty-free withdrawals after age 59. The government will also contribute $1,000 to each baby born from 2025 to 2028.
New York Post
3 minutes ago
- New York Post
Judges skeptical of Trump using emergency powers for tariff spree
WASHINGTON — A panel of appeals court judges bombarded a Trump administration attorney Thursday with pointed questions about the president's use of emergency powers to levy reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries — hours before 'Liberation Day' duties were set to take effect. The 11-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit put their most searching inquiries to Assistant US Attorney General Brett Shumate. 'The negative balance of goods is decades and decades old,' one jurist said before asking how the trade deficit could be considered a national emergency given its longstanding nature. Shumate argued that the gap between US imports and exports had widened recently and further contended that Congress has given presidents broad leeway to wield tariffs. He cited a 1975 appeals court decision that permitted former President Richard Nixon to slap a 10% charge on imported merchandise to combat inflation four years earlier. 4 The Trump administration argued that President Trump has the authority to slap tariffs against foreign countries unilaterally. REUTERS 4 The court hearing comes before President Trump's Aug.1 deadline for countries to make deals. Bloomberg via Getty Images The hearing on Thursday dealt with the Trump administration's challenge to a May 28 decision by the US Court of International Trade quashing most of the president's tariffs. The appellate court promptly paused that decision to give time for it to hear the White House case. At issue is Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs without congressional approval. The act gives presidents sweeping powers to regulate international financial transactions and trade, including by imposing economic sanctions, but has never been used to tax imports. 'IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them,' a judge griped at one point. Shumate admitted that 'no president has ever read IEEPA this way' but insisted Trump's interpretation did not violate the law. 4 The White House has signaled that tariff negotiations with other countries will go down to the wire ahead of the Aug. 1 deadline. A coalition of 12 blue states and five small businesses brought the case, hoping to get the president's tariff regime thrown out. Neal Katyal, representing the businesses, warned of 'staggering consequences' should the fees be allowed to go ahead. 'You just heard an argument … that our federal courts are powerless, that the president can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, for as long as he wants, so long as he declares an emergency,' chided Katyal, a former solicitor general under Barack Obama. Heading into the court hearing, Trump stressed the high stakes and warned that if the courts side against him, it could be a death knell to his trade agenda. 'If our Country was not able to protect itself by using TARIFFS AGAINST TARIFFS, WE WOULD BE 'DEAD,' WITH NO CHANCE OF SURVIVAL OR SUCCESS. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' he dramatically warned on Truth Social. 4 President Trump has made overhauling US trade relations a key pillar of his second term agenda. Bloomberg via Getty Images It is unclear when the appellate court will rule on the case, V.O.S. Selections v. Trump. Regardless of the outcome, the matter is likely to go to the Supreme Court. Since unveiling a slate of customized tariff rates April 2, Trump has imposed a blanket 10% duty on all imports while negotiating framework deals with some of America's biggest trading partners. Those include the European Union, United Kingdom, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Cambodia and Thailand.
