Willie Wilson: Violent crime may be down, but do residents feel safe in all neighborhoods?
Two-thirds of Chicago residents are concerned about public safety in the area where they live, a 2024 Harris Poll found. The data in distressed neighborhoods is bucking the midyear national trend of reductions in violent crime across the country. Austin, the neighborhood Johnson calls home, leads the city with 29 homicides so far this year. In 2024, Austin finished the year with 47 homicides.
In too many neighborhoods, people feel unsafe. The following neighborhoods lead the city in homicides and shooting victims: Austin, Englewood, Garfield Park, South Shore, North Lawndale and Auburn Gresham. These neighborhoods are predominantely African American.
I am appalled that more than 75% of the victims of gun violence are young Black men and boys. African Americans account for 28% of the city's population. The Black community does not feel a 30% drop in homicides and nonfatal shootings — because their neighborhoods remain places with high violence. Aretha Franklin, the singer, had it right: You have to give the people 'something they can feel.'
The city of Chicago data notes that 18% of the fatal and nonfatal victims of gun violence are Latino and 2.4% are white. Thirty-nine percent of the Chicago population is white. Why is there so much violence in Black communities and very little in predominately white areas?
In white communities, there is economic stability. A dollar circulates six hours in an African American community, compared with 17 days in a white community, 19 days in a Jewish community and 28 days in an Asian community. Building wealth in the Black community will lead to economic stability and likely lower crime rates. The mayor's policies supporting red light and speed cameras, parking tickets and high taxes could be causing economic hardship and anger. Economic instability coupled with high poverty, unemployment and poor-performing schools are a recipe for disaster.
How can Johnson celebrate reductions in violence when his community is in crisis? Over 50% of the people being shot in Chicago are young, from children to adults who up to 29 years old. Our young people represent the future.
Some of the teen gatherings downtown have led to violence and property damage. I believe the City Council rightly passed an ordinance to address this issue. Unfortunately, the mayor vetoed the legislation. Johnson should get out of the way and allow Chicago police Superintendent Larry Snelling to do his job. The superintendent is respected by his peers and the community. I believe if he were allowed to do his job without political interference, more cases would be solved and communities made safer.
I understand what it is like to be a victim of violent crime. I lost my 20-year-old son, Omar, to gun violence. It is a pain that stays with surviving family members. That pain is made worse when the perpetrators are not brought to justice. While crime numbers are trending down, if people are victimized and no one is held accountable, that amplifies gun violence in high-crime areas and sends a signal to criminals that community safety is not a priority.
Block Club Chicago and The Trace recently reported that the city's homicide clearance rate is still declining, even with fewer homicides to solve. In 2024, police made arrests in 16% of fatal shootings within a year of the incident, down from 23% in 2022. Eighty percent of Chicago's fatal shooting victims were Black, and their cases had a significantly lower clearance rate. Thus, families do not have closure, and no one has been held accountable for shooting their loved one.
The following are suggestions to curb violence in African American neighborhoods:
Residents living on the South and West sides should not be living in fear. They deserve full-service grocery stores, banks and manufacturing facilities with well-paying jobs.
The highest concentration of people returning from prisons across Illinois reside on the West and South sides. Elected leaders must provide investments in job training, vocational education and other wraparound services for individuals returning from prisons.
The data is not always the best predictor of safe neighborhoods. The people living in those communities know when they are safe — they can feel it.
I write this commentary to make those comfortable celebrating violence reduction statistics uncomfortable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Longmont now accepting nomination petitions for mayor, City Council
The Longmont City Clerk's office is now accepting nomination petitions for mayor, two at-large City Council members and one City Council member from Ward 2, according to a news release. The call for nominations will remain open until Aug. 25. A nomination petition is a document that a candidate circulates to get at least the minimum number of signatures necessary for their particular seat. The signatures must be those of Longmont residents who are registered to vote and, for ward candidates, who reside within the specific ward. Completion of a nomination petition is the last step in the process of becoming a certified candidate for council, according to the city clerk's candidate information page. The minimum required number of signatures for the at-large positions, including mayor, is 50. For candidates running for ward positions, the minimum is 25. Meeting this minimum number of signatures is a requirement for candidates to guarantee a spot on November's ballot. Additionally, there is still an affidavit of intent to be a write-in candidate available; the deadline to file as a write-in candidate is Aug. 29. Candidates who meet all of the eligibility requirements may pick up their nomination petitions in the City Clerk's office, in the Civic Center at 350 Kimbark St. Eligible candidates must have filed a candidate affidavit within 10 days of publicly announcing their intent to run for office. They also must have resided in Longmont for at least one year immediately preceding the election date and be a registered voter for at least a year. Candidates seeking a ward seat must live in the ward they're applying for. Following the nomination petition process, most candidates also form a Candidate Committee Statement of Organization. Candidate committees work to accept campaign contributions on behalf of a candidate and handle other fiscal aspects of their bid for election or re-election to public office. To learn more about campaign finance rules and regulations, visit the Fair Campaign Practices Act webpage. For a downloadable 2025 candidate guide, visit Solve the daily Crossword
Buzz Feed
37 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Liam Neeson's 2019 Racism Controversy Explained
As you've probably noticed, Northern Irish actor Liam Neeson has been dominating the headlines over the last couple of weeks due to his reported romance with his The Naked Gun co-star Pamela Anderson. Pretty much all of the discourse surrounding this new celebrity relationship has been overwhelmingly positive, with many people sharing their joy at Liam and Pamela finding one another. But amid all of this, Liam's widely forgotten racism controversy from 2019 has resurfaced, with some social media users expressing their confusion over how this has been overlooked by the general public. Quote-tweeting a popular post about Liam and Pamela's romance that read: 'Can't think of two public people more deserving of private happiness given all they've both been through,' another X user wrote: 'I must be the only person that remembers Liam Neeson admitting he walked around for a week with a 'cosh' looking for a random black man to attack.''Remember when Liam Neeson said he just wanted to kill the first black person he saw because his friend was assaulted by one,' another tweeted in response to the somebody else wrote: 'Liam Neeson is propaganda I'm not falling for, I remember him saying he went outside looking for black people to kill 😭😭😭😭'So, here's a full recap of the controversy, which started in February 2019 when Liam sat down with the Independent in the middle of the promo tour for his movie Cold Pursuit. '[Liam] is about to recount a disturbing incident from his past, a confession that he's never made before,' the profile begins. 'It will involve how he learnt about the rape of someone close to him many years ago, how he roamed the streets for a week afterwards carrying with him a cosh and brutal, racist thoughts, and how this taught him that violence and revenge do not work.' And Liam was discussing his character in the movie when he made the decision to share a troubling anecdote from his real life. He told the publication: 'There's something primal — God forbid you've ever had a member of your family hurt under criminal conditions… I'll tell you a story. This is true.'He then recalled coming back from a trip overseas 'some time ago' and learning that one of his friends had been raped. Liam said: 'She handled the situation of the rape in the most extraordinary way. But my immediate reaction was… I asked, did she know who it was? No. What color were they? She said it was a Black person.' 'I went up and down areas with a cosh, hoping I'd be approached by somebody — I'm ashamed to say that — and I did it for maybe a week, hoping some Black bastard would come out of a pub and have a go at me about something, you know? So that I could… Kill him,' he went on. 'It took me a week, maybe a week and a half, to go through that,' Liam added at the time: 'She would say: 'Where are you going?' and I would say: 'I'm just going out for a walk.' You know? 'What's wrong?' 'No, no, nothing's wrong.'''It was horrible, horrible, when I think back, that I did that,' he concluded. 'And I've never admitted that, and I'm saying it to a journalist. God forbid… It's awful… But I did learn a lesson from it, when I eventually thought, 'What the fuck are you doing,' you know?' The following month, Liam issued an apology for what he described as an 'impulsive recounting' of an incident from decades ago. In a statement, he said: 'Over the last several weeks, I have reflected on and spoken to a variety of people who were hurt by my impulsive recounting of a brutal rape of a dear female friend nearly 40 years ago and my unacceptable thoughts and actions at that time in response to this crime.' 'The horror of what happened to my friend ignited irrational thoughts that do not represent the person I am,' the statement continued. 'In trying to explain those feelings today, I missed the point and hurt many people at a time when language is so often weaponized and an entire community of innocent people are targeted in acts of rage.''What I failed to realize is that this is not about justifying my anger all those years ago, it is also about the impact my words have today,' Liam added. 'I was wrong to do what I did. I recognize that, although the comments I made do not reflect, in any way, my true feelings nor me, they were hurtful and divisive. I profoundly apologize.' In May 2022, more than three years after the interview, Liam shocked people when he addressed the controversy during a cameo appearance in the Donald Glover TV series Atlanta. In the episode 'New Jazz,' Brian Tyree Henry's character 'Paper Boi' meets Liam, who is playing himself, at a bar called Cancel Club. In the scene, Liam says: "You may have heard about my transgression.' He then recounts what happened in 2019, before saying of his past actions: 'I acted out of anger. I look back now, and it honestly frightens me. I thought people knowing who I once was made clearer who I am, who I have become… But with all that being said, I am sorry. I apologize if I hurt people.'Paper Boi then says: 'It's good to know that you don't hate Black people now,' and Liam replies: 'No, no, no, I can't stand the lot of ya… I feel that way because you tried to ruin my career. Didn't succeed, mind you. However, I'm sure one day I will get over it, but until then, we are mortal enemies.' At this point, Paper Boi suggests that Liam hadn't learned his lesson, and Liam agrees: 'Aye. I also learned the best and worst part about being white is you don't have to learn anything if you don't want to.' In April 2023, Donald Glover admitted that Liam was originally reluctant to do the cameo, and turned the role down at to GQ, Donald said that Liam told him he was 'trying to get away' from the racism controversy. He explained: 'When I got in touch with him, Liam poured his heart out. He was like: 'I am embarrassed. I don't know about this. I'm trying to get away from that.'''I was like: 'Man, I'm telling you, this will be funny! And you'll actually get a lot of cream from it because it'll show you're sorry,'' Donald went on, but Liam still rejected the opportunity before eventually being talked round. Liam has not made any public statements about the controversy since the Atlanta episode.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Judge Emil Bove is dangerous, but let's not freak out
The appointment of Trump apparatchik Emil Bove to the influential Third Circuit Court of Appeals is terrible, deeply compromising the standards of integrity and judicial independence that have been at the core of our constitutional system since 1789. The judiciary is, as Alexander Hamilton declared it, 'the weakest of the three' branches of government. It does not need to be any weaker. But it is not yet the end of the world. The clear and present danger is that the Bove appointment, perhaps the worst Trump has made, is a chip-shot away from our supremely partisan Supreme Court. Only one judge has made it from the Third Circuit to the Supreme Court — the hard-right Justice Samuel Alito, appointed by President George W. Bush in 2006. Alito is 75, at the threshold of a reasonable retirement. But beware, with Bove waiting in the wings, the stage is set for Alito to get off the court. Some of the elements a good judge must possess are experience, intellect, judgment, temperament, integrity, character and fairness. Bove flunks on all counts. Forget that he has no prior federal judicial experience. This has been true of the greatest of our Supreme Court justices, the venerated Chief Justice John Marshall, and the very worst, Chief Justice Roger Taney, who wrote the infamous Dred Scott opinion denying citizenship to Black people. It is also true of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Louis Brandeis. Fifty senators shamefully caved on Bove, just as they did with the hideous appointments of Pam Bondi, Pete Hegseth, Kristi Noem, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Kash Patel, to name a few. But remember, Bove gets a lifetime appointment, while the others will be there only so long as Trump is. Bove is joined even more closely with Trump at the hip, having defended him as his personal lawyer in multiple criminal cases. A group of former prosecutors wrote a letter urging Bove's rejection and calling him 'the worst conceivable nominee.' Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) voted against confirming Bove, stating that his 'political profile and some of the actions he has taken in his leadership roles at the Department of Justice cause me to conclude he would not serve as an impartial jurist.' Bove makes us queasy with statements that put his temperament and judgment in doubt. What is the temperament of someone quoted by Justice Department colleagues as advocating defiance of court orders with the crude battle cry, 'F— the courts!' What is the judgment of someone who has described the investigation and prosecution of those who attacked the Capitol as 'a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people'? What is the integrity of someone who told the court there was no quid pro quo in the Justice Department decision he led to dismiss the indictment of New York City Mayor Eric Adams 'without prejudice'? The federal judge who had the case found this representation to lack credibility and dismissed with prejudice, stating, 'There may or may not be good reasons to drop this prosecution. But the reasons articulated by [the Justice Department], if taken at face value, are inconsistent with a decision to leave the charges in the indictment hanging like the proverbial sword of Damocles over the mayor.' But even though Trump has cheapened the standards for appointment to the federal judiciary, there is still some hope. Sitting in the Third Circuit, which comprises Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and the Virgin Islands, Bove will have to come to terms with a complement of 13 judges, seven Democrats and six Republicans. There is one remaining vacancy which Trump will try to fill. But take a deep breath. The Third Circuit rarely hears cases with ideological implications. Because its jurisdiction includes Delaware, where many corporations are housed, many of the cases coming before it are business or corporate disputes. Bove will mostly sit on a panel of three judges, and some Republican judges on the court have shown considerable independence. In a 2020 election case, for example, Third Circuit Court Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, authored a unanimous decision rejecting the Trump campaign's claims of fraud in Pennsylvania, writing that 'calling an election unfair does not make it so.' The MAGA-era Supreme Court is a horse of a different color from Bove's Third Circuit. If not historically a political policy-making body, it certainly is one now. The Supreme Court has arrogated to itself untrammeled policymaking authority. With cases like the Dobbs decision overruling Roe v. Wade, the immunity decision giving Trump a free pass for criminal deeds while in office, and the shadow docket decisions giving Trump carte blanche to ride roughshod on constitutional rights without opinion or reasoning, we now have a supremely partisan Supreme Court. Emil Bove is 44. If he makes it to the Supreme Court, he will be there for a generation or longer. But of course, he may never make it. Adults in the appointing authority may make a sounder judgment next time around. However fraught, it would be premature for liberals to wear the hair shirt. James D. Zirin, author and legal analyst, is a former federal prosecutor in New York's Southern District. He is the author of ' Supremely Partisan,' a book arguing that the Supreme Court has become politicized. He is also the host of the public television talk show and podcast .
