logo
Vizag city gears up to celebrate Rath Yatra

Vizag city gears up to celebrate Rath Yatra

Time of India22-06-2025

Visakhapatnam: Symbolising the confluence of Indian culture, Vizag city is preparing to celebrate the chariot festival of Lord Jagannath in the style of Puri Rath Yatra on June 27 (Friday) at several locations throughout the city.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The authorities of the 185-year-old Lord Sri Jagannath Swamy Temple at the old-Town area in Vizag city, along with Utkal Sanskrutika Samaj and a few other organisations—UCA at Ukkunagaram, the township of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), Visakhapatnam, will mark Rath Yatra in a grand fashion.
The Lord Jagannath Swamy Temple in Vizag, which has stood for 185 years, will celebrate observe the festival of carrying the deities in a unique chariot.
Apart from dignitaries, and prominent citizens, more than 12,000 devotees are expected to participate in the Rath Yatra celebration which would begin at Town Kotharoad and conclude at Turner's Choultry. Utkal Sanskrutika Samaj, a leading socio-cultural organisation of Odias in Vizag city, will start the celebrations on June 27 with the Rath Yatra.
Lord Jagannath and his deity siblings Lord Balabhadra and Goddess Subhadra will be taken in a colourful procession to Sri Gundicha temple at Lawsons Bay Colony, with further celebrations planned for later.
The deities will have sojourn at Sri Gundicha temple for nine days and then, return to the main temple in a procession called Bahuda Yatra on July 4.
On the day of Rath Yatra, thousands of devotees are expected to gather at the Jagannath Swami temples throughout the city. Amid the sounds of conchs, and religious chants, the deities will be carried in their chariots to their aunt's house.
Vizag city police will give special attention during the car festival to prevent any possibilty of stampede situation. The cops will impose certain traffic restrictions on June 27.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Ab aayega Captain Cool powder, oil, deodorant": Fans imagine the wackiest products Dhoni could launch
"Ab aayega Captain Cool powder, oil, deodorant": Fans imagine the wackiest products Dhoni could launch

Economic Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

"Ab aayega Captain Cool powder, oil, deodorant": Fans imagine the wackiest products Dhoni could launch

MS Dhoni, the former Indian cricket captain, has applied for a trademark on the phrase 'Captain Cool,' sparking lively reactions online. The application, filed under Class 41 for sports-related services, has been accepted and advertised. Social media users humorously speculated about potential 'Captain Cool' branded products, while the ICC lauded Dhoni's exceptional consistency and leadership. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As news broke that former Indian cricket captain MS Dhoni has filed a trademark application for the phrase 'Captain Cool', social media lit up with a flurry of hilarious and surprisingly informed term, famously linked to Dhoni's unshakeable calm on the cricket field, is now set to become official property. According to the Trade Marks Registry portal, Dhoni's application, filed on June 5 and listed under Class 41 (sports training, coaching, and facilities), was accepted and advertised on June the trademark is focused on sports services, that didn't stop netizens from imagining a full-blown product universe.'Ab aayega Captain Cool powder, oil, deodorant,' joked one user, summing up the mood X (formerly Twitter), another user cheekily imagined a lineup of Captain Cool-branded underwear, condoms, and slippers, before clarifying that the registration is strictly for sports-related services: 'nothing cheeky like that just yet!'Another user weighed in on the trend of celebrities trademarking fan-given nicknames:'Next he'll trademark Thala. Someone will trademark King, Hitman etc. One has already done for letters S R and K.'Many saw Dhoni's move as a strategic step towards launching his own sports academy or coaching brand.'Bhai Class 41 is for training, entertainment and sporting,' tweeted another user.'Woh academy khol raha hai apni. Tael sabun ki dukaan nahi.'Some couldn't resist taking it a step further. A parody list of future endorsements imagined by @ashishdeora69 included:Captain Cool Saria (construction steel)Captain Cool Dairy ProductsCaptain Cool Tractor ('Ranchi farmers ki choices')And of course, Captain Cool chaddi-baniyanWhile Dhoni hasn't commented on the filing, the timing is notable. The former skipper was inducted into the ICC Hall of Fame earlier this month, alongside greats like Matthew Hayden and Hashim ICC praised Dhoni for his 'extraordinary consistency, fitness and longevity,' and called him 'one of the game's greatest finishers, leaders and wicketkeepers.'

"I stand firmly with Diljit": Naseeruddin Shah defends singer amid 'Sardaar Ji 3' row
"I stand firmly with Diljit": Naseeruddin Shah defends singer amid 'Sardaar Ji 3' row

India Gazette

time36 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

"I stand firmly with Diljit": Naseeruddin Shah defends singer amid 'Sardaar Ji 3' row

New Delhi [India], June 30 (ANI): Veteran actor Naseeruddin Shah came in support of singer-actor Diljit Dosanjh amid the ongoing controversy against him for collaborating with Pakistani artist Hania Aamir in his film 'Sardaar Ji 3'. Amid the ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan, Diljit's recent collaboration with Pakistani artist Hania Aamir is facing massive backlash from social media, celebrities and the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE). However, amid all this, Naseeruddin Shah has now expressed his support for Diljit, clarifying that the singer wasn't responsible for the film's casting, and expressed his disapproval of restricting personal interactions between India and Pakistan. He wrote, 'I STAND FIRMLY WITH DILJIT. The dirty tricks deptt of Jumla Party has been awaiting a chance to attack him. They think they've got it at last. He was not responsible for the casting of the film, the director was. But no one knows who he is, whereas Diljit is known the world over, and he agreed to the cast because his mind is not poisoned. What these goons want is to put an end to personal interaction between the people of India and Pakistan.' He further expressed love for his 'close friends and relatives' who reside in Pakistan. He wrote, 'I have close relatives and some dear friends there and no one can stop me from meeting them or sending them love whenever i feel like it. And my response to those who will say, 'Go to Pakistan', is 'GO TO KAILASA' FWICE has officially boycotted Dosanjh for his collaboration with Pakistani actress Aamir, stating that the singer-actor's association with the Pakistani artists has allegedly 'disrespected' the 'Indian sentiments,' especially following the terror attack at Pahalgam on April 22. 'It is important to bring to your notice that the said film (Border 2) features actor Diljit Dosanjh, who has been officially boycotted by FWICE owing to his involvement with individuals and content that have deeply disrespected Indian sentiments, especially by associating with Pakistani artists known for their anti-lndia views, and participating in projects filmed in sensitive border locations like Pahalgam immediately following terror incidents targeting our armed forces,' the letter read. Earlier, through a social media post, the makers of Border 2 announced that the film has entered its third schedule at the National Defence Academy in Pune. With this in the background, the film union body has requested Amit Shah and Rajnath Singh to 'withdraw' any permission granted to the 'Border 2' makers for filming in its premises. 'The NDA, being a national symbol of military training and sacrifice, must not be used as a backdrop for a film involving an actor who is currently under public and professional boycott due to acts that undermine the spirit of national unity and hurt the sentiments of our defence community.' The letter further read, 'ln this context, we strongly urge your good offices to withdra* qny permission granted for the shooting of the said film at the NDA property in Pune, and to initiate necessary action to ensure that the integrity of sensitive defence installations is not compromised or associated with individuals facing legitimate public outrage.' FWICE has also issued a 'noon-cooperative directive' to singer-actor Diljit Dosanjh after his collaboration with Hania Aamir in 'Sardaar Ji 3'.The film union body has demanded an unconditional apology from the actor for allegedly hurting the 'national sentiments' and disregarding the 'sacrifices' of the Indian soldiers by his actions. After the massive backlash from the film fraternity, FWICE and social media, the makers of Sardaar Ji 3 have announced that they will not release their movie in India. Meanwhile, 'Border 2' is the upcoming sequel to the 1997 blockbuster 'Border' and has a powerhouse production team, including Bhushan Kumar, Krishan Kumar, JP Dutta, and Nidhi Dutta. The film is being directed by Anurag Singh. (ANI)

Yoga, haldi doodh, and now Kolhapuris—Indian culture needs protection from Western plagiarism
Yoga, haldi doodh, and now Kolhapuris—Indian culture needs protection from Western plagiarism

The Print

time37 minutes ago

  • The Print

Yoga, haldi doodh, and now Kolhapuris—Indian culture needs protection from Western plagiarism

In 2013, Nike printed a Samoan tattoo pattern on women's sportswear, leading to an outcry about cultural disrespect. In 2019, the brand was forced to withdraw a range of Air Force 1 sneakers for wrongful representation of designs from Panama's indigenous Guna tribe. And now Prada has said it was 'inspired by' the ubiquitous Kolhapuri—the trademark look of Indian Leftist socialists and the 'cool' young people of all ages—and turned it into a Rs 1.2 lakh luxury adornment. These repeated instances give rise to a debate on the intellectual property rights of a culture and its economic exploitation by a different, often dominant one. Last week, Italian fashion house Prada faced criticism for picking up the simple Kolhapuri chappals—which symbolise the common man in India—and introducing them as a sandal in its Spring Summer 2026 collection. It's not the first time luxury brands have picked up elements from a culture and slapped them on clothes and accessories without a second thought. Not all ideas are unique. In the creative world, it is easy to get 'inspired' by someone else's work. But when your product is merely a copy of an object from another culture, can it even be called yours? And if you seek to profit from it by selling it at several times the price of the original, is it not simply cultural appropriation of the highest order? Art has a provenance; should culture then not have similar protections? The Cambridge Dictionary defines 'cultural appropriation' as ​​the 'act of taking or using things from a culture that is not your own, especially without showing that you understand or respect this culture'. This usually involves members of a majority or dominant group adopting cultural elements of a minority group in an exploitative, disrespectful, or stereotypical manner. In her research article, Racial Plagiarism and Fashion, American cultural theorist Minh-Ha T Pham explains that 'racialized groups' resources of knowledge, labor and cultural heritage are exploited for the benefit of dominant groups and in ways that maintain dominant socio economic relationships'. Prada's appropriation of the Kolhapuri is an instance of racial plagiarism. Economically dominant nations or civilisations 'borrow' traditions of ancient civilisations and religions, and turn them into profit–generating machines for the so–called civilised world. As a citizen of India that represents an ancient civilisation, and as a practising lawyer, I would like to initiate discussion on both national and international law governing plagiarism jurisdiction. Cultural appropriation of haldi doodh Whenever I injured myself or fell sick as a child, my mom had a magic drink that not only soothed my sore body but my bruised spirit as well. It was haldi doodh, a milk-and-turmeric drink which was as delicious as it was healthy. It is the tonic that I, as the mother of two rambunctious boys, used as an elixir. Imagine my shock, when, during a visit to New York in 2015–16, my host offered me a 'magical drink that would take away my tiredness', and I was served haldi doodh for $12 in a fancy coffee outlet. For years, turmeric was the 'curry ingredient that leaves indelible yellow stains on appliances and fingernails'. Yet suddenly, adding a pinch to milk gave it a Midas touch, turning it into a 'Golden Drink'. Instagram influencers couldn't stop extolling the benefits of consuming Turmeric Latte, and it became the go-to health drink for fit, fair, blonde Western women, replacing the morning cup of coffee. With its origins in ancient Ayurveda wisdom, Turmeric Latte is a prime example of the cultural appropriation of Indian traditions. My mother's simple haldi doodh, passed on to her from the many generations of mothers that came before her, is now a multi-million-dollar industry. Had she patented this drink, I could've retired comfortably and made adequate financial provision for the next five generations. Here are the numbers for turmeric milk mix, an industry of $201.9 million in 2023, expected to increase to $326.7 million by 2031. The larger turmeric market was valued at $4.3 billion in 2023. You can get turmeric ginger shots in any wellness or health shop in any part of the world, drawing from our use of adrak and haldi in traditional recipes. Also read: From cotton to carbon fibre, Modi government is quietly rewriting India's textile script Cultural appropriation of yoga We recently celebrated the 11th International Day of Yoga, which has finally been attributed to ancient Indian/Hindu culture thanks to the efforts of PM Narendra Modi. 'The theme of this year's International Day of Yoga is 'Yoga For One Earth, For One Health'. This theme reflects a deep truth: the health of every entity on Earth is interconnected,' he said at Visakhapatnam on 21 June. If not for these efforts, yoga was a classic case of cultural appropriation. It evoked the image of foreigners practising 'downward dog' pose in upscale 5th Avenue New York Yoga Studios. Western brands like Lululemon and Alo Yoga commercialise the practice as purely physical fitness, often removing Sanskrit terms, spiritual roots, and Hindu ethos. An entire industry has sprung up around yoga instructors, apparel, mats and even yoga balms. The estimated size of this market was $107.1 billion in 2023. I have encountered Spanish-speaking yoga instructors in South America who have perfected the art of breathing. They start the class with a namaste and end with chanting 'Om', with some dwelling deep into the idea of the soul, body, and mind connection. Others had no idea or interest in the subject. I grew up watching Dhirendra Brahmachari on the Black & White TV screen, who was often projected as a political companion of Indira Gandhi. Years later, Baba Ramdev took swadeshi and yoga to another level, making it into a successful business while keeping the spiritual practice alive. Indians are happy to accept a White person teaching them their own अधो मुख श्वानासन as the 'mountain' pose. Other asanas were also renamed to sound 'cool': वीरभद्रासन became the warrior pose, भुजन्गासन became the cobra pose, गौमुखासन became the cow pose, and धनुरासन became the bow pose. Yoga finds mention in the ancient Indian text, the Rig Veda. It was one of the six orthodox schools (darshanas) of Hinduism. This must be clarified to the world, or else there's every possibility of it becoming another case of cultural appropriation. 'I'm happy that people find healing and spiritual freedom in something from my cultural roots. But I still find myself resentful that I was made to feel shame for my culture, including my yoga practice, and now it is frequently seen as glamorous, trendy, and often has been divorced from its true meaning,' wrote Indian American Yoga Teacher Rina Deshpande. Recognising the cultural roots of practices and traditions is an important practice in an ethical life. Also read: Early Harappan burial discovery is changing how we understand Gujarat's past Bindi, Ma Kali, and other desecrations For years, the bindi, a religious symbol marking the Ajna Chakra and at times, symbolic of the sanctity of marriage for Hindu women, was used to culturally intimidate Hindus. A hate gang called the Dotbusters operated in Jersey City in the late 1980s. 'We will go to any extreme to get Indians to move out of Jersey City. If I'm walking down the street and I see a Hindu and the setting is right, I will hit him or her… They are a weak race physically and mentally… We will never be stopped,' read the gang's manifesto in The Jersey Journal. Today, celebrities such as Katie Perry, Rihanna, Selena Gomez, Vanessa Hudgens, and others have sported Bindis at Coachella. They've made it a cool 'boho' accessory without the cultural context and the suffering that brown women had to endure. For culturally sensitive people, it's not a fashion accessory but a symbol of culture, religion, and spirituality. Another case of cultural appropriation of ancient Hindu culture is the use of imagery featuring the Hindu deity Kali and the Buddha. In a recent distasteful music video, a Canadian rapper dressed up as the goddess. Pasting images of religious icons on T–shirts would constitute blasphemy in other religions. Yet, the disrespect for Hinduism is rampant. Also read: Why India needs to play hardball on UNSC reform Prada and the ubiquitous Kolhapuri chappals Prada's Spring Summer 2026 collection has introduced the very Indian Kolhapuri on European ramps—a move I welcome. At the same time, there is a deeper problem here. 'Prada is selling products looking like Kolhapuri chappals for over ₹1 lakh. Our artisans make the same by hand for ₹400. They lose, while global brands cash in on our culture,' wrote Harsh Goenka, perfectly voicing my angst. It's perfectly alright for Prada to be 'inspired' by the humble Kolhapuri—robbing cultural heritage and stealing the livelihood of the poor artisanal cobbler from Maharashtra—without crediting the artisan or the community as the source of inspiration. But if the proverbial sandal was on the other foot, Prada would go after the poor cobbler and bankrupt him, alleging him to be a counterfeiter who had stolen Prada's design. This is not the first time design houses have been 'inspired' by Indian/Hindu cultural artefacts. Gucci's sari gown for Alia Bhatt, South American brand Rapsodia copying the work of Anupamaa Dayal, and the Dior sharara worn by Chiara King, are some examples. And who can forget the controversy when Dior copied block printing designs from People Tree? The designs had been handcrafted for over 15 years by Rajasthani block printers. International brands bring global attention to Indian handlooms and arts, which I appreciate. However, the question remains: who profits from this elite fashion's appropriation of heritage? There needs to be a larger debate on intellectual property, cultural credit, and economic justice, especially in the context of ancient Hindu religious symbols, philosophies, and principles of dharma and wellness. The government should consider enacting policies that prevent the economic plundering of Indian culture by foreign conglomerates. After all, is Prada's appropriation of the Kolhapuri not similar to the colonial–era plundering of Indian art and relics? Meenakashi Lekhi is a BJP leader, lawyer and social activist. Her X handle is @M_Lekhi. Views are personal. (Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store