
Deportees from the US hop embassy to embassy in Panama in a desperate scramble to seek asylum
Earlier this month, Panama released those remaining migrants from the camp, giving them one month to leave Panama. The government said they had declined assistance from international organizations, instead choosing to make their own arrangements. But with limited money, no familiarity with Panama and little to no Spanish, the migrants have struggled.
Advertisement
Seeking asylum door-to-door
On Tuesday, about a dozen migrants began visiting foreign missions in Panama's capital, including the Canadian and British embassies, and the Swiss and Australian consulates with the hope of starting the process to seek refuge in those countries. They were either turned away or told that they would need to call or reach out to embassies by email. Messages were met with no response or a generic response saying embassies couldn't help.
In one email, Omagh detailed why he had to flee his country, writing 'please don't let me be sent back to Afghanistan, a place where there is no way for me to survive.'
'The Embassy of Canada in Panama does not offer visa or immigration services, not either services for refugee. Nor are we allowed to answer any questions in regards to visa or immigration,' the response read.
Advertisement
At the British Embassy, a security guard handed asylum-seekers a pamphlet reading 'Emergency Help for British People.' The Swiss consulate told the group they would have to reach out to the embassy in Costa Rica, and handed the migrants a piece of paper with general phone lines and emails printed from the embassy's website.
Canadian, British and Australian diplomats in Panama did not respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press. The Swiss consulate denied that they turned away the asylum-seekers.
Panama limbo
The migrants had travelled halfway across the globe, reached the U.S. border where they sought asylum and instead found themselves in Panama, a country some had traversed months earlier on their way to the U.S.
Many of the deportees said they would be open to seeking asylum in Panama, but had been told both by international aid groups and Panamanian authorities that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to be granted refuge in the Central American nation.
Álvaro Botero, among those advocating for the migrants at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, said he wasn't surprised that they were turned away from embassies, as such help is often only offered in extreme cases of political persecution, and that other governments may fear tensions with the Trump administration.
'It's crucial that these people are not forgotten,' Botero said. 'They never asked to be sent to Panama, and now they're in Panama with no idea what to do, without knowing what their future will be and unable to return to their countries.'
The Trump administration has simultaneously closed legal pathways to the U.S. at its southern border, ramped up its deportation program, suspended its refugee resettlement program, as well as funding for organizations that could potentially aid the migrants now stuck in Panama.
Advertisement
Over the weekend, the Trump administration sent more than 200 Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador to be held in a maximum-security gang prison, alleging that those expelled were part the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang without providing evidence.
Limited options remain
On Thursday, the migrants visited the Panama offices of the U.N. refugee agency. Omagh said they were told that the agency could not help them seek asylum in other countries due to restrictions by the Panamanian government. A U.N. official told them they could help start the asylum process in Panama, but warned that it was very unlikely that Panama's government would accept their claim, Omagh said.
The U.N.'s International Organization for Migration and the refugee agency did not immediately respond to requests for comment by the AP.
The same day, Filippo Grandi, head of the U.N. refugee agency, warned that aid cuts by the U.S. government would hurt refugee services around the world.
'We appeal to member States to honor their commitments to displaced people. Now is the time for solidarity, not retreat,' Grandi said in a statement.
Deportees including Omagh worried that foreign governments and aid organizations were washing their hands of them.
Omagh said that as an atheist and member of an ethnic minority group in Afghanistan known as the Hazara, returning home under the rule of the Taliban would mean death. He only went to the U.S. after trying for years to live in Pakistan, Iran and other countries but being denied visas.
Russian Aleksandr Surgin, also among the group seeking help at the embassies, said he left his country because he openly opposed the war in Ukraine on social media, and was told by government officials he could either be jailed or fight with Russian troops in Ukraine.
Advertisement
When asked Thursday what he would do next, he responded simply: 'I don't hope for anything anymore.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Sends Message To Iran Over Nuclear Ambitions
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has warned Iran not to attempt to rebuild their nuclear facilities, after he claimed recent U.S. military strikes in June "completely destroyed" Iran's sites. The President wrote on Truth Social on Saturday: "All three nuclear sites in Iran were completely destroyed and/or OBLITERATED. It would take years to bring them back into service and, if Iran wanted to do so, they would be much better off starting anew, in three different locations, prior to those sites being obliterated, should they decide to do so. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Why it Matters The stakes surrounding Iran's nuclear program remain high for U.S. national security interests and for stability across the Middle East. President Trump's warning comes against a backdrop of ongoing debates about the effectiveness of U.S. strikes and the future of diplomatic efforts to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. What To Know On June 21, the U.S. military—under an operation code-named Midnight Hammer—conducted airstrikes against three of Iran's principal nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. President Trump and defense officials publicly claimed that all three sites were "completely destroyed," saying that Iran would require years to reconstitute its nuclear program if it tried to rebuild. Trump reiterated this with his message on Saturday. But some U.S. intelligence assessments have challenged the administration's narrative. Only one out of three of Iran's nuclear sites was destroyed with the other two surviving enough to be able to resume nuclear enrichment within several months if Tehran wants it, according to NBC News, which cited five current and former U.S. officials familiar with the assessment. The Defense Department and the White House have pushed back, asserting that their own intelligence showed all three facilities were "completely and totally obliterated." Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Purnell said: "President Trump was clear and the American people understand: Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were completely and totally obliterated. There is no doubt about that." "The credibility of the Fake News Media is similar to that of the current state of the Iranian nuclear facilities: destroyed, in the dirt, and will take years to recover." Iran maintains that its nuclear program serves peaceful purposes, despite long-standing Western suspicions. Iranian diplomats are set to meet in Europe next week for discussions about a possible nuclear deal, according to the Institute for the Study of War. "Iran has not softened its position on its right to enrich uranium on Iranian soil, which makes it unlikely that Iran will accept a nuclear deal that includes a zero uranium enrichment demand," the Institute said in its most recent report. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the White House in... U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the White House in Washington, D.C. on Friday, June 27, 2025—President Trump addressed Iran, the "Big, Beautiful Bill" and tariffs. More AP What People Are Saying Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell previously told reporters that American strikes had "degraded (Iran's) program by one to two years." He said: "We believe, and certainly, all of the intelligence that we've seen have led us to believe that Iran's—those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated." Trump said in an interview on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures: "It was obliterating like nobody's ever seen before. And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time." What Happens Next The debate over the true impact of the U.S. airstrikes on Iran's nuclear capabilities is likely to persist, with calls for independent verification of the destroyed facilities. Iran's response to both the military strikes and diplomatic overtures remains uncertain, as tensions in the region continue to simmer.

Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The Trump-Powell feud keeps heating up. Meet the betting markets' top picks to replace the Fed chief.
Scott Bessent Who is he: Treasury Secretary Polymarket odds: 23% Market commentary: Bessent is the top pick to replace Powell, but he's in a tricky position as Trump's right-hand man for all things markets. Trump himself has flagged Bessent as a potential candidate for Fed chair, but the president said on Tuesday that he likes Bessent where he is now. When Bessent first assumed the role of Treasury Secretary, Wall Street believed he would promote policies that appeased markets. However, he's often come out on Trump's side when stocks have crumbled, stating that he and the president aren't concerned about a little volatility. Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman wasn't particularly bullish on Bessent in a recent Substack post. "What Trump looks for in his personnel choices is, above all, groveling loyalty. So anyone he chooses will, more or less by definition, be a spineless toady. Even if the appointee looks qualified for the position, we can be sure that he or she will indulge and cheer on every Trump idea, no matter how bad," Krugman wrote. "I call this Bessent's Law because when Trump chose Scott Bessent as Treasury Secretary a number of Wall Street people assured us that he was a good, competent choice." Key quote: Bessent's been tight-lipped about any Powell replacement details. "There's a formal process that's already starting. There are a lot of great candidates and we'll see how rapidly it progresses," Bessent told Bloomberg on Tuesday. Kevin Warsh Who is he: Former Federal Reserve Governor Polymarket odds: 20% Market commentary: Warsh is seriously pulling out all the stops for the chance to take Powell's job. In a twist, he was passed over for Fed Chair in 2017, when Trump picked Powell to replace Janet Yellen. Earlier in July, Warsh appeared on Fox Business, where he pushed for lower interest rates and argued that "tariffs are not inflationary." His current stance is an interesting reversal from his time as a hawkish Federal Reserve Governor from 2006 to 2011, when he expressed concern that aggressive rate cuts could lead to higher inflation. Neil Dutta, head of economics at Renaissance Macro, said he thinks Warsh is one of the worst picks for Fed Chair. Key quote: "I don't think we need continuity when the central bank doesn't have credibility," Warsh said on CNBC on Thursday, criticizing Powell's decision to make a jumbo 50 basis point rate cut last September. "We need regime change at the Fed." Kevin Hasset Who is he: National Economic Council Director Polymarket odds: 16% Market commentary: There's another Kevin in the running. As Trump's current economic advisor, Wall Street strategists think Hasset is likely to follow Trump's orders. When asked about Hasset during a press briefing, Trump said "Kevin is fantastic." Hasset has been critical of the Federal Reserve's renovation project budget and has voiced support toward the idea of firing Powell. But similar to Bessent, Hasset hasn't commented much on whether Trump has asked him to be the next Fed chair. However, he has backed Trump's call to cut interest rates by up to three points. "Kevin Hassett and Scott Bessent are blatant political picks, which may struggle to achieve Senate confirmation," Michael Brown, senior research strategist at Pepperstone Group, wrote in a note late last month. Christopher Waller Who is he: Federal Reserve Governor Polymarket odds: 12% Market commentary: Waller is gaining momentum in the race as a dark horse candidate, receiving a 9% boost on Polymarket early Friday after giving a speech arguing for a July rate cut. Waller cited weak private payroll growth as one of the main reasons for the Fed to lower rates at this month's meeting. Out of all the options, Waller would probably be the one most palatable to investors, as his arguments for cutting are the least political, and he would represent a fairly establishment pick to run the central bank. "He is not talking about cost overruns on the Eccles building or lowering the cost of government finance or 'regime change,' but he is talking about the shifting balance of risks in the economy," Dutta wrote in a note on Thursday. "There is a huge distance from him — someone who has an intellectual consistent/defensible/sound position — and the sycophants (Hassett, Bowman, Warsh) who are extensions of DJT," Warren Pies, founder of 3Fourteen Research, wrote in an X post on Thursday. Key quote: "While the labor market looks fine on the surface, once we account for expected data revisions, private-sector payroll growth is near stall speed, and other data suggest that the downside risks to the labor market have increased. With inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate," Waller said on Thursday.


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
From Washington: Congress Claws Back Billions. A Sign of More Cuts to Come?
This week, Congress passed President Trump's $9 billion rescissions package, codifying cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting. Now, Republicans are eyeing even more cuts to avoid a government shutdown in September. FOX News Senior Congressional Correspondent Chad Pergram explains the process of passing the rescissions package and what it could indicate for future spending cuts. Later, Charles Payne, host of 'Making Money' on FOX Business, discusses the state of the housing market and how the Federal Reserve's decisions are impacting Americans. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit