Collins Letsoalo's urgent plea for reinstatement amid life-threatening concerns
Image: Supplied
Suspended Road Accident Fund (RAF) chief executive Collins Letsoalo has launched an urgent 'life and death' high court application challenging the troubled entity's board, demanding reinstatement and stopping the advertising of his position.
In papers filed at the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, on Friday, Letsoalo seeks an order declaring that the RAF Board's decision to suspend him earlier this week be set aside as it was unlawful, irrational, and unreasonable.
He wants to immediately resume his duties as the fund's boss.
He also wants to interdict and restrain the RAF and its board from advertising the position of chief executive pending the finalisation of the process to re-appoint him to the position.
Letsoalo has been RAF chief executive since 2020, with his five-year contract due to end on August 6, but the board has resolved to renew his fixed-term contract upon its expiry.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In addition to wanting to return to work, he has also asked the high court to ensure that he keeps his security detail.
'As part of my fringe benefits relating to security, I am provided by the first respondent (RAF) with security vehicles and security personnel. There have been threats made to my life during the course of my employment as the chief executive of the RAF.
'The threats come from various sectors, chief among them from the taxi industry. There was a high-risk assessment conducted on me. I have security guards placed at my house,' Letsoalo stated in his founding affidavit.
He fears for his safety and that of his family, and he is also entitled to R480,000 a year security. Among the conditions of his suspension is that he return all the RAF property in his possession, including the provision of security.
'There is no doubt that this is a matter of life and death, and I cannot wait any longer and need urgent relief now and not later. A grave injustice will befall me or my family if the urgent relief is not granted, especially when the news of my suspension has been widely circulated in print media, television, and social media,' explained Letsoalo.
He added that the risk of harm was real, as if he returned security vehicles and personnel, he and his family would be left without protection and placed in harm's way.
Letsoalo also detailed an incident of his life being targeted.
'Last year, a group of heavily armed men arrived at our offices in Centurion demanding to see me. They tied the security personnel with ropes. It was the day we were having a board meeting, and fortunately, the board meeting was online and not at the office,' he explained.
A case was opened with the police, and Letsoalo revealed that it later transpired that the individuals were sent by someone in prison to harm him.
He undertook to provide the judge presiding over his urgent application with a case number.
'After that incident, the crime intelligence branch of the SA Police Service advised the first respondent (RAF) to beef up my security. The reason why I was provided with security vehicles was that last year, there was an attempt on my life coming from the taxi industry,' he said.
Letsoalo was placed on special leave on May 27, but this was withdrawn on Tuesday, June 3, when he was suspended.
He indicated that should his application not be heard urgently, it would be delayed for months, and in that time, his employment contract expires in August, and his potential re-employment with the concurrence of Transport Minister Barbara Creecy and Cabinet's approval would in all probability not happen.
'I disavow any reliance on Section 186(2) of the Labour Relations Act as amended, as I do not claim that my suspension was unfair, hence I do not approach the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration. I do not claim the conduct of the respondents (RAF and its board) constitutes unfair labour practice,' he explained.
However, Letsoalo categorically and unambiguously stated that his case is that his suspension was unlawful, irrational, and unreasonable.
In the period leading up to his suspension, he described Board Chairperson Lorraine Francis as confrontational, accusing him of changing his tune about attending meeting of the National Assembly's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) and indicating that he must take leave to clear his mind and think about issues as he had been under extreme pressure, which she stated was compassionate leave.
Letsoalo said he refused to take compassionate leave after Francis stated that the board was worried he was taking instructions from his lawyers and wanted him to choose.
'I felt aggrieved that I had to learn about my suspension during the proceedings of the portfolio committee (Scopa) meeting. While I was watching the proceedings of the portfolio committee, I received an SMS from the chairperson of the board, who did not attend the portfolio committee meeting on the allegation that she was attending a prior personal matter,' he said.
Letsoalo added that Francis also told him to check his e-mails and found the letter informing him of his suspension and withdrawing the earlier special leave.
The suspension was allegedly due to adverse findings made by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), which he said has been ongoing since 2022.
Letsoalo complained that the SIU never gave him a right of reply before presenting its preliminary findings before Parliament.
'If the board felt so strongly about my alleged refusal to attend the Scopa meeting, why could they not use the reason for my refusal to attend the Scopa meeting as a reason for my special leave?' he asked.
Letsoalo accused the board of damaging his reputation and integrity and believes that after the board received legal opinion that his special leave was legally suspension, they hastily looked for a reason to suspend him.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
12 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Israel's striking economic boom is fuelled by war and built on injustice
Here's a grim reality: if you had invested in the Israeli stock index on October 7, 2023 — the day of Hamas' deadly attack on Israel — you would now be enjoying the best financial return of any major equity market in the world. Since then, as Israel has systematically flattened Gaza in a devastating campaign that has killed tens of thousands — if not hundreds of thousands — of civilians and displaced millions, openly committing gross human rights violations in the process, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange has soared. By July 2025 the index was up almost 80% in dollar terms, buoyed by both domestic retail investors and foreign capital. Yet this is not an anomaly — it is a feature of the system. As UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese outlines in her brave report 'From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide', Israel's economy is not just surviving amid conflict — it is thriving because of it. The rampage unleashed by Netanyahu's government has been good for business in Israel. The occupation of Palestinian territory is deeply interwoven with corporate interests. Illegal settlements fuel a real estate boom. Military technologies developed through decades of occupation and surveillance are exported globally. Profits are being made from the devastation of Gaza. Those same ruins now promise lucrative reconstruction contracts, once the forced removal of Palestinians is complete. Meanwhile, little appears in the mainstream financial media critical of this brutal Military/Tech/Industrial complex. Instead, commentators like Ruchir Sharma in the Financial Times marvel at its 'economic miracle', and firmly state that Israel is 'winning', while pointing out its scale of research and development spending and rate of productivity growth. On such metrics, of course, they are right. Israel ranks third for companies in the field of generative AI. Its productivity growth outpaces most other developed economies. GDP per capita has tripled since 2000, surpassing $55,000 (about R956,000) — more than Germany and approaching that of the US. But there are two problems with this reading. First, stock markets are never gauges of justice or legitimacy; they are short-term estimates of future profit streams, regardless of what odious activities occur or the context from which those may be generated. The TA-125 index is small, concentrated and heavily skewed to bank, insurance and finance stocks that have benefited from wartime interest rates and a hot domestic tech economy. Other large components are tech AI company Nova, as well as the now infamous Elbit Systems, which manufactures the attack drones, tanks and bulldozers that have flattened Gaza. Narrow bull market It looks like a narrow bull market, and not a more sustainable grind ever higher. The Tel Aviv outperformance may well not last. Israel's bond markets are already flashing warning signs. Credit rating agencies Moody's, S&P and Fitch downgraded its credit rating in 2024, and all have the sovereign on negative outlooks. But there is a second, and more fundamental issue with this reading that a strong stock market and resilient economy in some way means that Israel is 'winning'. As Albanese points out, Israeli economic statistics cannot be seen independently of the violence that underpins them. The same state that supports world-leading tech innovation is also engaged in systematic and unrelenting human rights abuses, from collective punishment in Gaza to apartheid in the West Bank. The same government celebrating a record number of initial public offerings is also facing allegations of genocide at the International Court of Justice. Israel's economic success story is not despite its militaristic belligerence. It is, in many cases, because of it. These contradictions play out, on a structural level, across the country's riven political economy. Israel today is not simply a divided society — it is increasingly an incoherent, socially unsustainable one. Five elections between 2018 and 2022 have failed to resolve deep tensions between dwindling numbers of largely tech sector secular liberals, ultra-Orthodox Jews who refuse to participate in military service, Zionist nationalists of the ilk of Netanyahu, and systemically marginalised Arabs. The mainstream of Israeli political consensus has therefore moved sharply towards the extreme right. Polls now show that a growing majority of Israeli Jews oppose the formation of a Palestinian state and support the expulsion of Palestinians altogether, both from occupied territories in the West Bank and Gaza, and the deportation of Arab-Israeli citizens. This is not a fringe view, it is increasingly the political centre. For decades the idea of a two-state solution served as a way of resolving the contradiction of a supposedly law-abiding democracy committing illiberal, illegal acts. It was a kind of diplomatic placeholder; while never realised, the illusion at least maintained hope and a semblance of legitimacy. That fantasy has evaporated. The West Bank has been Balkanised and largely annexed through settlements. Gaza has been levelled. Mass starvation has been inflicted; food and humanitarian aid have been instrumentalised as weapons of war. The dream of peaceful cohabitation has been buried beneath bulldozed homes and schools, and the growing sense that Jewish sovereignty is equivalent to Palestinian erasure. No return to the 'old' Israel Many in the international community lay the blame squarely on Benjamin Netanyahu. But like Trump in the US, Netanyahu is not the root of the problem. He is a product of the system. He reflects, rather than drives, the will of a large segment of Israeli society. His eventual departure, whenever that may be, will not reverse the current trajectory. There will be no return to the 'old' Israel that liberals nostalgically evoke. That there is widespread anger at Netanyahu in Israel is true. That those angry at Netanyahu want his successor to seek a Palestinian state, or even Palestinian rights, is false. What does the future Israel look like? How will Israel's future be affected by its genocidal actions and the inevitable demolition of its incontestable morality, derived from its birth in the ashes of the Holocaust? Israel's founding promise was born out of unimaginable trauma. For much of the international community, especially those Europeans living in the shadow of a genocide, the state was a moral necessity. But that moral obligation cannot exist alongside the permanent subjugation and expulsion of other people. Israel cannot be both a rogue Jewish supremacist oppressor and a democracy. Its political leadership and citizenry must choose which one it will be. One potentially viable future is where land is shared, in some way — either through two states, one state, or a type of confederation — and in which equal rights are guaranteed for all who live between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean. But that future is not currently on offer, and there is little pressure — either domestically or internationally — to force the issue. Absent that, Israel will drift toward a full-fledged apartheid state, increasingly authoritarian at home and in the Middle East, and increasingly isolated abroad. That the markets are still bullish, and the economy resilient, should not give us cause to reassess. History is full of states, like apartheid South Africa, that prospered economically while being corrupted morally. None endured indefinitely. DM
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
City of Joburg must reassess Sandton City's R10bn market value, rules High Court
The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, has ruled that the City of Joburg must redetermine the value of the Sandton City shopping mall. Image: File The City of Joburg must conduct a new valuation of Sandton City following the Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg which set aside its determination of the country's fourth biggest shopping mall's more than R10.1 billion market value. Sandton City, which is owned by the Liberty Group and property investment company Pareto Limited, successfully challenged the municipality's valuation of the five plots of land of the nearly 137,000-square metre Sandton City, which includes a shopping centre, office blocks and a hotel. The owners of the mall objected to its valuation by the City of Joburg's municipal valuer Piet Eloff, who dismissed their objection and the Valuation Appeal Board also dismissed the appeal. In terms of the Municipal Property Rates Act (MPRA), the board is empowered to hear and decide appeals against the decisions of a municipal valuer concerning objections to matters reflected in, or omitted from the municipality's valuation roll in the area for which it was established. Liberty and Pareto approached the high court to review and set aside the board's February 2023 decision and have the matter adjudicated upon afresh by a differently constituted board. In their papers filed in court, the companies state that the board's determination of the market value of the property was irrational and consequently of no force and effect and that in making its determination, ignored the provisions of the MPRA. In addition, they argued that the board, in making its determination, valued the property as a group, placing a single value on the erven (plots of land) which comprised it and not on each of its individual components, thereby acting in contravention several sections of the MPRA - a contention the companies later abandoned. They also accused the board of betraying a bias adverse to the owners, thereby vitiating (invalidating) its determination. According to the municipality's former assistant municipal valuer, identified as HJP Fouche, he determined the market value of the property from an analysis of the income derived from properties comparable to it and then drawing the mean from that analysis. 'We use the provable method or the comparable method, meaning that we look at rentals that have been concluded and thus comparable to this property being valued and we use that market information to determine a rental range which we then apply to the property and obviously, this rental range was documented in the market report for the municipality,' he explained. Acting Judge Gerald Farber found that Fouche, in order to arrive at the market value of the property, used information embodied in the unregistered leases, which burdened the property. 'It is clear that the board accepted the evidence of Fouche without any proper analysis thereof … The board has fallen far short of its obligations to determine the matter so as to bring about fair administrative justice,' the acting judge stated. Acting Judge Farber upheld Liberty and Pareto's review and set aside the board's determination. The matter was remitted for hearing afresh to a differently constituted valuation appeal board of the City of Johannesburg. The costs of the review proceedings are to be paid by the first, second and third respondents (board, municipal valuer Piet Eloff and Fouche), jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, read the judgment handed down on July 4. The city has chosen to abide the judgment. [email protected]
Eyewitness News
16 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Frustrated passengers say pilots' strike at FlySafair affecting their pockets as well
JOHANNESBURG - Frustrated passengers said the strike by some pilots at FlySafair has not only affected their plans but also their pockets. They have told EWN that the reduction in available flights has resulted in high demand and higher prices. ALSO READ: FlySafair has had to reduce the number of active flights this week to meet the number of pilots available for work amid a salary-related strike. A mother travelling with her daughter from holiday said their travel home has been affected by the strike. She said her second-born, who stays in Cape Town, was unable to book a FlySafair flight to meet them at home in KwaZulu-Natal. She says this has left them all frustrated. 'They were sold out, all of them. Even if they were there, they were very expensive, so we were trying to get to see whether next week will be better, but I'm not sure whether the strike is off now.' She said this delays their plans because the fee hike was not budgeted for. 'It was like R3,500 and we would have got it for a better price, maybe R2,000.' FlySafair said the number of flights scheduled daily will remain at a reduced rate until the strike is resolved.
