
Supreme Court rejects case over Montana abortion law requiring parental consent for minors
In rejecting the appeal from Montana state officials, the high court turned away what the officials said was a chance to clarify the scope of parents' right to be informed of and participate in their children's medical decisions, including abortion.
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, wrote a separate statement respecting the court's decision not to take up the case. Alito said the case is a "poor vehicle" for deciding the question at hand.
"It is therefore especially important that the denial of review is not read by interested parties or other courts as a rejection of the argument that the petition asks us to decide," Alito wrote.
The long-running dispute dates back to 2013, when the Montana legislature approved the Parental Consent for Abortion Act, which requires physicians to obtain notarized written consent from a parent or guardian before performing an abortion for patients under the age of 18. The law allows a minor who cannot get parental consent to access abortion care through a court order.
Before the consent law took effect, in July 2013, Planned Parenthood sued to block the measure as a violation of the Montana Constitution. The Montana attorney general agreed to a preliminary injunction preventing enforcement of the consent requirement, and it has never gone into effect. A separate state law that requires parental notification before an abortion is performed on a minor is in place.
The case languished for several years until the Supreme Court in 2022 overturned Roe v. Wade. A state trial court ruled that the consent requirement violated the Montana Constitution because it interfered with a minor's right to privacy.
The state appealed, and the Montana Supreme Court upheld the district court's decision. It found that when evaluated under the most stringent level of judicial review, strict scrutiny, the consent law was not narrowly tailored to any of Montana's compelling interests that they said justified the requirement.
The consent rule, the state supreme court found, violates the "fundamental right of a minor to control her body and destiny," as guaranteed by the state constitution.
Montana officials asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the state court's decision earlier this year and warned that its view of a minor's right to privacy under the state constitution threatens parental rights under the federal Constitution to direct their child's medical care, including decisions about abortion and access to contraception.
"State experimentation with the scope of a minor's state constitutional right to seek an abortion threatens to erode parents' federal fundamental rights," Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen wrote in urging the Supreme Court to take up the appeal.
State officials are asking the justices to decide whether a fundamental right to direct the care and custody of their children includes a right to "know and participate in decisions" about their medical care, including getting an abortion.
But lawyers for Planned Parenthood urged the high court to turn away the case because it involves unique provisions of Montana's Constitution — one that grants all Montana citizens the right to individual privacy and a second that guarantees minors the same state constitutional rights as adults.
State officials, they wrote in a filing, "seek to use the parental right as a cudgel against a minor's rights."
"The court's protection of a minor's right to privacy is not any less of a deserving counterweight to the federal Constitution's guarantee of parental rights, simply because that protection inheres in Montana's constitution," Planned Parenthood lawyers wrote.
The Montana Supreme Court recognized the right to abortion under its constitution in 1999, and it is legal up to the point of fetal viability. In the 2024 election, Montana voters approved an initiative that amended the state constitution to "expressly provide a right to make and carry out decisions about one's own pregnancy, including the right to abortion."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seth Meyers Roasted Karoline Leavitt In A Comedy Bit About What Trump Shockingly Called His "Past" Supporters
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt left Seth Meyers baffled during a spoof press briefing on NBC's Late Night Tuesday. In the latest installment of the recurring comedy segment — which uses clever editing to insert Meyers into mock exchanges with Leavitt ― the host asked her to respond to President Donald Trump calling his supporters 'weaklings' for demanding the release of the Epstein files. Related: 'That claim is just simply untrue,' Leavitt replied. 'What? He posted it on social media last week,' Meyers shot back. Related: What followed was a looping exchange of contradictions, with Leavitt denying Trump ever made the comment while also acknowledging he had. Related: The back-and-forth ended with Meyers exasperatedly saying, 'Oh, my God! Why are you like this?!?' Leavitt's final response? 'There really isn't a good explanation for that.' Related: Watch here: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 things in markets that will make you do a double-take
Well, it is mid-summer, and the markets — and the business world — just get weirder and weirder. Rather than connect five points directly to one theme this week, we are going to take a look at five news items that have recently made me do a double-take, and have reminded me that there is never a dull moment in business and in investing. Yes, the business world remains — always — surprising and unique. Trump's Powell obsession U.S. President Donald Trump wants to fire Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell. He seems obsessed with it, and it has gotten to the point of school-yard name calling bullying. But my question is: Why? Trump of course wants lower interest rates. Investors, home buyers and consumers like low rates, and lower rates will also substantially help the U.S. budget by lowering its massive interest rate charges. But let's take a look at Powell's record: He managed to successfully slay the inflation dragon of 2022; he steered the U.S. economy through the COVID pandemic and essentially by doing so saved the world; unemployment is low and stock markets are near record highs. What's not to like? Trump needs to understand that simply lowering the Fed rate does not always work, anyway. The market is smarter than that. Market interest rates can still rise even if Fed overnight rates fall. Before making any Fed personnel moves to enhance his own agenda, Trump might want to look at the economic record of Turkey, which pursued a lower interest rate policy before it was ready. (Hint: It's not good.) Sarepta Therapeutics Inc. It's been a long time since we have seen a blow-up fist fight between a company and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). But Sarepta came close. The company is developing drugs and therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, a horrible disease affecting mostly boys. Elevidys, its gene therapy treatment, showed promise in treating the disease. But then three patients died taking the drug and the FDA asked the company to stop shipments. On July 18, the FDA met with the company and the company essentially said, 'Nah, we are not going to do that.' Eventually the company relented and voluntarily stopped shipments. This week, it was allowed to resume shipments after patient advocacy groups lobbied for the drug's return. How has all this worked out for Sarepta? Shares are down about 87 per cent this year. Palantir Technologies Inc. Palantir has been one of the best-performing large-cap stocks this year, up more than 100 per cent. Market capitalization is now about US$370 billion. Its focus on artificial intelligence and data analytics has been in the sweet spot of this year's tech rally, and the company has reported solid growth in revenue and earnings. That being said, every single analyst report on the company discusses its extreme valuation. It is certainly notable: The stock trades at 267 times earnings and at nearly 100 times forward sales. Some analysts view it as the most expensive stock ever. Of course it was expensive at the start of the year too, before its big move. So, considering this, we looked at the short interest of the company. Right now, it is 2.5 per cent. So while it may be very expensive, the short sellers are not really committing capital to this call by shorting it. As a comparison, Manulife Financial Corp., the conservative and stable insurance company, has a higher short interest, at 2.8 per cent. And, by the way, its price-earnings ratio is only 11 times earnings. Maybe all the short sellers in Palantir have given up. They have certainly lost money so far. But the situation is a good example of how some companies can stay expensive for a long time. Or, sometimes they are expensive for a reason. What year is it again? Despite lots of worries in the world investors seem to have lots of confidence. Yes, meme stocks are back again, like they were in 2021. Companies such as QuantumScape Corp., GoPro Inc. and Kohls Corp. have seen their stock prices soar as retail traders and Reddit chat boards hype up their prospects. Being on the right side of this trade can be very profitable but investors are not exactly buying 'quality' here. Meme stock traders are buying with the expectation, simply put, that someone is going to pay more. We heard a new phrase this week regarding the phenomenon: One noted analyst called it a 'flight to crap.' Meme stocks are causing some excitement during the slow summer months, but, like prior instances, we doubt it is going to end well for traders. If it sounds too good to be true, it could yield trouble We have been watching with interest this year's obsession with very-high-yield exchange-traded funds (ETFs). There are products out there, such as YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (symbol MSTY), that have an indicated yield of — wait for it — 72.91 per cent. This ETF uses a synthetic option strategy on a single stock, MicroStrategy Inc. to enhance yield, which is paid out to unitholders. MicroStrategy is among the largest corporate holders of bitcoin right now, and with bitcoin's rally, the stock has done very well. But even with such a high yield the units of MSTY are down more than 20 per cent this year. ETF owners, attracted by the giant income, still haven't made any real money, even though MicroStrategy stock itself is up about 36 per cent so far this year. Yet, this has not stopped investors from pouring money into the ETF, now at about US$5.6 billion in assets. And this is just one example. There are now many dozens of such super-high yielding ETFs. We think investors need to be careful here. In addition to getting seduced by high yields, investors could be in trouble in a different type of market, or if the derivative market seizes up, as it has done before. Peter Hodson, CFA, is founder of 5i Research Inc., an independent investment research network helping do-it-yourself investors reach their investment goals. He is also portfolio manager for the i2i Long/Short U.S. Equity Fund. (5i Research staff do not own Canadian stocks. i2i Long/Short Fund may own non-Canadian stocks mentioned.) 5 reasons to be worried about the market today 5 reasons new market highs are not necessarily a sign to sell If you like this story, sign up for the FP Investor Newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News' Jesse Watters ridiculed for sharing another rule for men to follow
Fox News anchor Jesse Watters another 'rule' for men to follow — and used President Donald Trump as a model example. On 'Jesse Watters Primetime' Wednesday evening, the host showed a clip of New Jersey Democratic Senator Cory Booker erupting on the floor this week at his colleagues, accusing some of being 'complicit' with the Trump administration's policies. Democrats are 'turning on each other like the Real Housewives,' Watters said, speaking alongside an image of an enraged-looking Booker dressed as a gladiator along with the caption 'Spartacus Strikes.' He then revealed his latest in a list of rules of how 'real' men should act. 'Rules for men: control your emotions,' Watters said. 'You never see Trump lose his cool — even when they arrested him and put him on trial.' Trump, who was arrested in Georgia in August 2023 in relation to 2020 election interference charges, appears to be scowling in his mugshot as he stares down the barrel of the camera. He pleaded not guilty. In a more recent example, on Thursday, the president posted a scathing message on Truth Social about Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, using his signature mix of some all-caps text and name-calling. "Jerome 'Too Late' Powell has done it again!!! He is TOO LATE, and actually, TOO ANGRY, TOO STUPID, & TOO POLITICAL, to have the job of Fed Chair," Trump wrote. Social media users quickly suggested that Trump may not have been the best example to use, with several pointing out the president's social media tirades. 'Oh yeah, Trump never whines or complains about the world being against him. Never the victim. Sure,' one X user remarked. Another sarcastically wrote: ''Trump never loses his cool?' @JesseBWatters must've missed the all-caps meltdowns, the table-pounding depositions, and the tantrums over toilets. If that's stoicism, I'm the Queen of England.' 'Apparently, man's man Jesse doesn't follow Trump on social media,' yet another said. Watters' so-called 'Rules for Men' haven't historically been well-received. 'I have rules for men,' Watters told 'The Five' in March. 'They're just funny, they're not that serious. Like, you don't eat soup in public. You don't cross your legs. And you don't drink from a straw. And one of the reasons you don't drink from a straw is the way your lips purse. It's very effeminate.' He added: 'Men don't wave simultaneously with both hands. We wave with one hand, not both hands at the same time.' Past photos of the Fox News host drinking with a straw quickly resurfaced on social media. Others also posted photos of Trump, who Watters often voices support for, using a straw. In June, Watters revealed another one of his rules. 'A man should never Photoshop his picture — ever. A man who Photoshops his picture is a woman,' he declared.