logo
Centre clears elevation of two advocates as HC judges

Centre clears elevation of two advocates as HC judges

Hindustan Times18 hours ago
MUMBAI: The Ministry of Law and Justice on Friday notified the appointment of advocates Gautam Ashwin Ankhad and Mahendra Madhavrao Nerlikar as additional judges of the Bombay High Court. The two will serve an initial term of two years from the date they assume office. Centre clears elevation of two advocates as HC judges
'In exercise of the powers conferred under clause (1) of Article 224 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint... Ankhad and Nerlikar as Additional Judges of the Bombay High Court,' the official notification said. They will take charge in order of seniority.
Their names were among nine recommended for elevation by the Bombay High Court Collegium in April this year, in consultation with the two senior-most judges of the court. The Supreme Court Collegium later endorsed the recommendations after securing the concurrence of the chief ministers and Governors of Maharashtra and Goa.
According to the apex court's note on Ankhad's candidature, he has argued in cases leading to 56 reported judgments and is known for his expertise in commercial, contract, and arbitration matters.
Nerlikar, who has over two decades of experience in civil, criminal, constitutional, labour and service law, represented the Maharashtra government at the Aurangabad Bench for a decade. Since November 2023, he has served as additional government pleader and additional public prosecutor. His elevation, the collegium observed, would enhance social diversity in the judiciary as he belongs to a Scheduled Caste.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CITU Calls for Nationwide General Strike on July 9 to Protect Constitutional and Labor Rights
CITU Calls for Nationwide General Strike on July 9 to Protect Constitutional and Labor Rights

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

CITU Calls for Nationwide General Strike on July 9 to Protect Constitutional and Labor Rights

Gadwal: The Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) has called upon workers and the general public to make the upcoming nationwide general strike on July 9 a grand success, asserting that the strike is being organized to safeguard the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India. District Vice President of CITU, Mr. Upper Narasimha, gave a clarion call to the working class and the people at large to actively support and participate in the strike. On Saturday, he led a campaign at various key locations in Jogulamba Gadwal district, including the Old Bus Stand, Ganjipet, Chintalapet, Godown Hamalis, and Agricultural Market Hamalis, where pamphlets were released and distributed to mobilize support for the strike. Key Issues Highlighted: Speaking on the occasion, Mr. Narasimha expressed deep concern that the fundamental rights provided by the Constitution are under threat. He sharply criticized the central government for introducing four labor codes that, according to him, serve the interests of corporates at the expense of workers' welfare. He condemned the move to replace the standard 8-hour workday with a 12-hour legal provision, which he called regressive and exploitative. Mr. Narasimha also accused the government of slashing funds for social security schemes and attempting to dismantle trade unions, which are vital to the workers' rights movement. He highlighted how the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (Indian Justice Code) is being used to criminalize workers' rights activities. Activities such as distributing leaflets or conducting gate meetings at workplaces, which were previously legitimate forms of protest, are now being made punishable under non-bailable offenses, effectively stifling dissent and crushing constitutional rights. Labor Codes Designed to Enslave Workers, Says CITU Mr. Narasimha further criticized the government for reducing penalties for employers who violate labor laws, converting the Labor Department into a facilitation wing for employers, and failing to recognize scheme workers as legitimate laborers. He accused the government of designing the four new labor codes to create an environment where strikes are impossible and workers are pushed back into bonded labor-like conditions. He urged both workers and the public to rise up in defense of constitutional and labor rights and make their voices heard by participating in large numbers in the nationwide general strike on July 9. Leaders and Participants Several other labor leaders and workers participated in the awareness campaign, including: Ramakrishna, Town President of the Building Construction Workers Union Shiva, District Vice President of the Civil Supplies Union Ranganna, President of the Hamali Workers Union Ramudu, Raju, Gopal, Srihari, Ramakrishna, Kalyan, Ram Anjaneyulu, Singotam Chinna, Naresh, and Hanumanth among others. The event underscored the growing unrest among the labor community in Jogulamba Gadwal and across India, as workers prepare to assert their rights through collective action on July 9.

Khap Panchayats rally for legal sanctity after HC's suo motu push. ‘We're backbone of rural justice'
Khap Panchayats rally for legal sanctity after HC's suo motu push. ‘We're backbone of rural justice'

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

Khap Panchayats rally for legal sanctity after HC's suo motu push. ‘We're backbone of rural justice'

The high court bench, comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel, initiated the PIL on 1 July, 2025, to address the non-implementation of Chapter X of the Mediation Act, 2023, particularly Sections 43 and 44, which provide for community mediation to resolve interpersonal disputes such as those between neighbours, families, and communities. The meetings are spurred by the Punjab and Haryana High Court's suo motu Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking responses from the Centre, the governments of Punjab and Haryana, and the Chandigarh administration on integrating traditional institutions like Khap Panchayats into the legal framework for community mediation under the Mediation Act, 2023. Gurugram: In a significant development in Haryana, several Khap Panchayats across the state have convened urgent meetings in districts like Rohtak, Jind, and Hisar over the past week, where their leaders have sought to secure legal sanctity for their decisions. During the proceedings, Chief Justice Nagu emphasised the potential of community mediation, stating, 'Community mediation holds significant potential for resolving interpersonal disputes, such as those between neighbours, families, and communities. Despite being highly effective in delivering inexpensive and speedy resolution of disputes at the grassroots level, community mediation has not been enforced so far.' The court suggested that formalising Khaps' role under the Mediation Act could transform them into effective mediators, provided their practices align with constitutional norms. The Bench noted that, 'The Khap Panchayats in the rural Haryana exercise significant social influence within the community they represent and exercise a form of social governance in their respective areas.' The court directed the states, Union Territory, and the Centre to file their responses by 5 August 5, when the matter is next scheduled for hearing. Also read: After success in metros, SC panel & NALSA working on module to train community mediators in villages Demand for legal sanctity The high court's initiative has galvanised Khap Panchayats, with leaders viewing it as a historic opportunity to formalise their dispute resolution mechanisms. In Rohtak, the Phogat Khap held a large gathering on Wednesday, where leaders unanimously demanded legal recognition for their decisions. Kitab Singh, a senior leader of the Phogat Khap, told The Print, 'Giving legal responsibility to Khap Panchayats is a commendable step. Our decisions are rooted in community consensus and aim to maintain harmony. Legal recognition will strengthen our ability to resolve disputes peacefully and swiftly.' He highlighted Khaps' historical role in resolving disputes over land, marriage, and social conflicts, often preventing escalation to formal courts. In Jind, the Kandela Khap convened a meeting on Thursday. The Kandela Khap chief, Tek Ram Kandela, told ThePrint Friday, 'For centuries, Khap Panchayats have been the backbone of rural justice, settling disputes with fairness and community welfare in mind. The high court's move is a chance to formalise our role, ensuring our decisions carry legal weight while respecting constitutional values.' In Hisar, the Satrol Khap echoed similar sentiments, with its chairman Satish Chander noting while speaking to ThePrint, 'We welcome the court's initiative. Our mediation practices are community-driven, and with legal backing, we can bridge the gap between traditional and modern justice systems.' He said that during its meeting the Khap has also called for clear guidelines to ensure Khap decisions align with constitutional principles, particularly on issues like gender equality and fundamental rights. The high court's PIL has sparked a debate on integrating traditional institutions into India's legal framework. The move raises concerns about aligning traditional authority with constitutional norms. P.K. Sandhir, a noted criminal lawyer from Haryana, said Khap Panchayat is a very loosely defined term in Haryana and hence it would become difficult to say which panchayat is Khap and which is not. 'There are Khaps representing a particular caste. Also, there are Khaps representing a group of villages. We have often seen in disputes where couples have married of their will against the families, the Khap from where the girl belongs comes out with one edict while the one from where the boy belongs has an altogether different decision,' he told ThePrint. He further said that giving legal sanctity to the Khap Panchayats would also amount to usurping the powers of the legislature. 'When the legislature has passed the Mediation Act, 2023, and included a chapter on community mediation, they must have had something in mind on what they meant for the community in the Act. Let the government come with the rules and say what did the legislature meant by community mediation. Even if they meant including Khaps, the question is whether the legislature would like to give this task entirely to the Khap Panchayats or just include one or some members in the community mediation set-ups,' Sandhir said. Ramesh Dalal, president of the Dalal Khap, however, said that medition was the basic role of the Khap Panchayats for ages and they should be given legal sanctity. 'Khap Panchayats have been unduly demonised as Talibani bodies by Haryana in certain controversial cases, particularly of honour killings, without going into the details. The fact of the matter is that Khaps give decisions based on consensus,' Dalal said. Controversial legacy of Khap Panchayats While Khap leaders advocate for legal recognition, their past decisions have often drawn criticism for clashing with constitutional values. Khap Panchayats have been associated with controversial rulings, including demands for bans on live-in relationships, opposition to inter-caste and same-gotra (clan) marriages, and enforcing social boycotts against individuals or families deemed to have violated community norms. In March this year, the Banian Khap that met at Danoda village of Haryana had given a call for social boycott of 'live-in' couples in the presence of a minister Krishan Bedi. In another instance, the Sangwan Khap led by Independent MLA Sombir Sangwan had ordered 'Hukka-Paani Band' (ostracisation) of nine families in Charkhi village of Haryana in July 2023 for 'disobeying' the Panchayat's edict of not sowing paddy in the village. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: Khap calls for 'social boycott, ban' on live-in relationships in Haryana minister's presence

Can 70 judges do work of 94? Top court judge flags workload at Bombay High Court
Can 70 judges do work of 94? Top court judge flags workload at Bombay High Court

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Can 70 judges do work of 94? Top court judge flags workload at Bombay High Court

Supreme Court judge Justice Dipankar Datta on Saturday urged judges of the Bombay High Court to reconsider the long working hours they put in, asking if 70 judges could do the work of the judiciary in Mumbai, the former Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court warned that the intense workload could cause long-term personal harm, despite their noble service to Datta noted that judges were devoting between 12 and 16 hours daily for judicial and administrative work, which he said was unsustainable and detrimental. He stressed that while their commitment is commendable, "you may be causing some harm to yourself in the future". Pointing to a shortage in judicial appointments, he recalled that in 2013, the sanctioned strength of the Bombay High Court was raised from 75 to 94 under the National Court Management Systems recommendation. However, the court has barely reached the figure of 75 since, and today operates with around 68 to 70 judges."Do you think 68 to 70 judges can do the work of 94? You can't. In fact, you are doing a great disservice to yourself, your family, and to everyone who depends on you," he cited a recent example where a judge delayed issuing an order for months due to the overwhelming workload. "You are not required to explain. We know the burden you carry. But please try to divide your time wisely," he Datta stressed that the judiciary's well-being often goes unrecognised. "If anything happens to you, there will be sympathisers for a month, but after that, no one will remember your service," he also revealed that the Chief Justice of India had sought his opinion on 15 to 16 names for judicial appointments to the Bombay High Court. Even if only 10 to 12 are appointed, the court will still fall short of the sanctioned strength. At a recent informal gathering attended by the CJI, Justice Datta suggested increasing the sanctioned strength from 94, calling it insufficient for the demands of the Datta also raised two long-standing concerns shared by Maharashtra's judiciary: outdated limits on electricity and fuel allowances. He pointed out that the 10,000 units of electricity per judge were fixed decades ago, before the advent of common household appliances. 'That limit is no longer adequate in today's time,' he said, requesting an he endorsed a proposal from the Aurangabad bench to shift from a monthly fuel cap of 200 litres to an annual cap of 2,400 litres, a change that wouldn't increase costs but would offer more flexibility. Both proposals, he said, were previously rejected but should now be Datta expressed hope that Chief Justice BR Gavai would take action on these issues before his term concludes in November.- Ends

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store