
US Embassy warns of visa consequences after shoplifting incident involving Indian woman
This cautionary note comes after a widely shared video showed an Indian woman, identified as Avlani, being arrested for allegedly shoplifting items worth approximately INR 1.1 lakh (around $1,300) from a Target store in Illinois. The footage, released on a YouTube channel called @BodyCamEdition, shows her pleading with officers to let her go. 'Why can't I just pay for it?' she asks. But the officer responds, 'We're way past that.
You committed a felony.'
Read more:
By 4 PM, these Indian hill stations turn into foggy escapes
A day after the video went viral, the US Embassy in India took to X (formerly Twitter) to post a clear message: 'Committing assault, theft, or burglary in the United States won't just cause you legal issues—it could lead to your visa being revoked and make you ineligible for future US visas. The United States values law and order and expects foreign visitors to follow all US laws.'
The embassy further emphasised that criminal activity, regardless of the perceived severity, can have long-term immigration consequences.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Acer TravelLite Laptop Your AI assistant at work
acer
Book Now
Undo
''Regardless, this is a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude, namely one that involves dishonesty and could have serious consequences. If you are in the U.S. on a student visa, an arrest for shoplifting, let alone a conviction, could result in your visa being revoked. If you are in the U.S.
on a visitor or work visa, it could lead to you not being allowed to reenter the US in the future' said Alen Takhsh, a US based immigration lawyer.
The woman in question reportedly spent over four hours in the Target store, browsing various sections, before allegedly leaving with unpaid merchandise. A store employee alerted the authorities, who later apprehended her. In the video, she is heard saying, 'I don't want to get into any trouble… I haven't done anything yet… I'm really sorry.' When asked about her passport, she pleads with the officers not to take her to the police station.
This incident has sparked debate and concern across social media, especially among Indian nationals traveling to or residing in the US. While some expressed sympathy, others pointed out that ignorance or regret doesn't excuse criminal conduct, particularly in a country with strict immigration laws.
Read more:
5 hill stations in India where the toy train still runs
The embassy's advisory also arrives amid broader immigration crackdowns under the Trump administration. According to the United Nations, over 1.42 lakh individuals have been deported from the US since January. In recent years, the country has increased scrutiny of visa applicants, including mandatory disclosure of social media accounts and tighter enforcement at ports of entry.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Fake currency worth Rs 9 crore recovered in West Bengal's Dhamakhali
KOLKATA: Fake notes worth Rs nine crore have been recovered from Dhamakhali ferry ghat under Sandeshkhali police station in North 24 Parganas district in West Bengal. Two persons, namely Sirajuddin Mollah and Debabrata Chakraborty have been arrested in connection with the incident, police said on Saturday. The two arrested persons had checked into the Royal Guest House near Dhamakhali ferry ghat on Friday night. When buying goods at a local shop, the shopkeeper suspected that the notes were fake after seeing them. He immediately informed the police. Then the police came and detained the two persons. Later, they were arrested. Some original Indian currency and Nepalese currency were recovered from these two persons. A machine capable of punching large amounts of money was also found in their possession. Additionally, two Aadhaar cards have been recovered from Sirajuddin. The arrested are being interrogated, with the investigators trying to figure out the reason behind their stay at the Royal Guest House, whether they were planning to meet anyone in Dhamakhali, and what was their intended use of the extra Aadhaar cards. Efforts are being made to find if others are involved in this fake currency racket. Dhamakhali is a strategic location from where one can go to Kolkata, via Basanti highway, or to Bangladesh, through a river. Therefore, it is being investigated whether the arrested people had a plan to escape to Bangladesh.


Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
Pakistan punishes parrot sellers for selling birds to a journalist they don't like: No, this is not a joke
Rozi Khan from Karachi found his bank account blocked. The bank said it was linked to his dealings with journalist Asad Ali Toor, who had bought parrots from him. Khan was left confused and upset. The 29-year-old bird seller learnt the account was closed by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA). 'Why would they suspend my account for dealing with a customer who just happens to be a journalist?' wondered Khan while speaking to Al Jazeera. But, he is not the only one. In cities like Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Lahore, and Sargodha in Pakistan, bird sellers face the same problem. Their bank accounts are being closed after they sell birds to Toor. Nadeem Nasir, a 60-year-old businessman from Lahore, learned that his account had been shut. He last sold parrots to Toor in early 2024 but received no warning. 'It was only after I managed to get in touch with some FIA officials through my contacts that they asked me about my relationship with Toor. That's when I realised what had happened,' he told the publication. Asad Ali Toor is a journalist and YouTuber from Islamabad. The 40-year-old is known for speaking openly against the government, courts and Pakistan Army. The FIA blocked bank accounts linked to Toor, including those of his family. 'I only found out about the account suspension after my cousin told me his account had been frozen due to transactions with me,' Toor told the publication. 'As I looked into it, I discovered that my own account along with those of my family and even my bird sellers had been locked without any prior warning or notification from the bank or the FIA,' he added. He has 3.35 lakh YouTube subscribers and over 3.55 lakh followers on X (formerly Twitter). In 2021, unknown men attacked him at home. He believes they were from military intelligence. He was arrested again in 2024 for posting 'anti-state' content online. The YouTuber stayed in jail for 18 days. Recently, his YouTube channel was listed among 27 channels to be banned for similar reasons. A court later cancelled the suspension. Toor is known for his love for birds. He spends over 50,000 Pakistani rupees ( ₹ 15,000) each month to care for his parrots. He pays for this hobby using money earned from his online work. For over a month, Toor had no access to his bank money, and he depended on friends for help. In May, a court told the FIA to restore his account. The FIA claimed they were checking for 'anti-state income' and money laundering. However, according to the court, Toor's rights were denied. His account has now been restored, but his family's accounts remain blocked.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump administration seeks release of Epstein grand jury records but not Justice Department files
Under intense pressure from President Donald Trump 's own supporters, his administration on Friday asked a federal court to unseal secret documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's case in an effort to put to rest for good a political crisis largely of its own making. But even if those records become public, it's far from certain they will appease critics enraged over the administration's unfulfilled promises of full transparency about evidence against the wealthy financier. Meanwhile, the administration remains dogged by questions about its refusal to release other records in its possession after stoking conspiracy theories and pledging to uncover government secrets of the "deep state." Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Others Technology Degree Leadership PGDM Cybersecurity Data Science Digital Marketing Data Science Product Management Management Public Policy healthcare Finance MCA Operations Management Design Thinking Healthcare Artificial Intelligence MBA Project Management others Data Analytics CXO Skills you'll gain: Duration: 28 Weeks MICA CERT-MICA SBMPR Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT-ISB Transforming HR with Analytics & AI India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 months IIM Lucknow SEPO - IIML CHRO India Starts on undefined Get Details Here's a look at the ongoing Epstein files controversy and what may happen next: by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Transform Your Child's Confidence with Our Public Speaking Program Planet Spark Book Now Undo How the case got here Trump is desperately trying to turn the page on a crisis that has consumed his administration since the Justice Department announced last week that it would not release any more evidence about the sex trafficking investigation into Epstein, who killed himself behind bars while awaiting trial in 2019. The latest development came Thursday when the Wall Street Journal described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump denied writing the letter, calling it "false, malicious, and defamatory." Live Events Shortly after the story was published, Trump said he had directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval." "This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!" the president wrote on social media. Bondi then announced that the Justice Department would move Friday to ask the court to unseal the grand jury transcripts. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche filed the motion urging the court to release the transcripts. Courts are typically reluctant to release grand jury materials Grand juries decide whether there is enough evidence to bring an indictment, or a formal criminal charge, and their proceedings are secret to protect the reputations of people who end up not being charged and to encourage reluctant witnesses to testify. Grand jury transcripts - which could show the testimony of witnesses and other evidence presented by prosecutors - are rarely released by courts, unless they need to be disclosed in connection with a judicial proceeding. In fact, grand jury secrecy is such a sacrosanct principle under the law that government officials who improperly disclose testimony are subject to prosecution. Witnesses are not bound by those rules. Even with the Justice Department endorsement, it could take weeks or months of legal wrangling to decide what can be released and how to protect witnesses and other sensitive victim information. And it's unlikely the transcripts would shed any light on a major fascination of conspiracy theorists obsessed with Epstein's case: the financier's connections to other powerful figures whom some believe were involved in Epstein's sex trafficking scheme. Court have blocked the release of grand jury materials in other high-profile investigations. House Democrats in 2019 sought grand jury testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation while Congress was conducting its impeachment inquiry into Trump. But the Justice Department successfully fought for years to keep the material secret. The administration could release other records right now The Justice Department's decision to seek grand jury transcripts gives the administration a reason to point to the courts to explain why more material hasn't yet been released. But the uproar over the Epstein files was never about the grand jury transcripts - it was about the thousands of other pages in the government's possession that the administration now says it won't release. Facing outrage after the first release of Epstein files flopped in February, Bondi said officials were poring over a "truckload" of previously withheld evidence she said had been handed over by the FBI. But after a monthslong review of evidence in the government's possession, the Justice Department determined that no "further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted." The Justice Department has yet to fully explain why none of that material could be released. It noted in its memo earlier this month that much of the material was placed under seal by a court to protect victims and "only a fraction" of it "would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial." Since then, Bondi has largely refused to answer questions from reporters about the matter. Congress' Epstein files resolution carries no legal weight House Republicans may vote next week on a resolution that seeks to appease GOP demands for more transparency on the Epstein case. The resolution calls on the Justice Department to publicly release records, but it carries no legal force. "The House Republicans are for transparency, and they're looking for a way to say that they agree with the White House," House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday. "We agree with the president. Everything he said about that, all the credible evidence should come out." Democrats, with the support of nine Republicans, have advanced their own legislation that would require the Justice Department to release more information about the case.