Aussie boxer's furious manager is set to lodge formal complaint with the WBA following shock KO defeat by Fabio Wardley
The 26-year-old Queenslander had been in control for much of the fight, and was ahead on the judges' scorecards, but appeared to over-stretch his right arm during the 10th round, allowing Wardley to snipe a huge right-hand hook across the temple of his opponent.
The blow sent him crashing to the ground and ended his unbeaten fight streak, with Wardley securing the win and a potential shot at the winner of Daniel Dubois ' fight with Oleksandr Usyk.
However, Fox Sports Australia are reporting Huni's team are furious at the result.
They claim English referee John Latham had not given the Aussie fighter a proper 10 count.
Mr Lathan had appeared to stoop down to Huni who lay with his back to the floor and began to issue the count. However, he then called the fight before he reached 10 seconds.
Huni's manager, Mick Francis, vented his frustrations after the bout and revealed he had even voiced his complaints to Eddie Hearnm, adding he'd be issuing a complaint to the WBA immediately.
He told the Matchroom promoter: 'You haven't heard the last of this.'
He added: 'He just waved it off.
'I'm lodging a protest with the WBA.
'I've already spoken to Eddie Hearn and Spencer (Brown) and they agreed.
'It's a f***ing world title, not some fight in the park.
'And they didn't give Justis Huni the correct opportunity.'
He noted that while Huni had been hit by a good shot in the 10th round, he believed he hadn't been given a fair chance to continue.
'Justis wasn't wobbly when he got to his feet.
'Yes, he got hit with a good shot.
'And if he'd had enough, fair enough.
'But Justis was putting on a boxing clinic.
'They were looking for any opportunity to give this fight to Wardley.'
Despite the loss, Huni had produced an excellent performance to keep Wardley quiet for most of the fight, which he had only accepted five weeks ago.
Scorecards had shown that the Australian was up 89-82 on two of the judges' scorecards, while the third had given him the fight 88-83 after 10 rounds.
However, Huni wasn't letting the brutal punch get to him after the fight.
The Aussie star, whose record now drops to 12-1 following his first defeat, managed to give fans a smile and shrugged off the loss, saying: 'That's my curse.
'I even said before this fight that it only takes one split second to switch off,' Huni said.
'And it happened tonight.
'Credit to Fabio and his team, I'm grateful for the opportunity.
'He's a real champion.
'Get behind him because he's doing good things.'
The humble Australian added: 'He's just an awesome fighter man.
'He never gave up and he got the win tonight. Credit to Fabio.'
Wardley also admitted he had struggled across some of the early rounds.
'Look, Justis Huni is a great operator,' he said
'But no matter what, I'm going to be aggravated with myself because we'd been through everything over and over again – knew the game down to a 't' – and I should've gone better in some of those rounds.
'But that's how it goes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Chaotic build-up tested Daniel Dubois before Oleksandr Usyk fight
As the clock neared midnight in the bowels of Wembley Stadium, Oleksandr Usyk was asked how it felt to be one of boxing's all-time great fighters. 'I'm just Alex, a Ukrainian guy,' said the two-times undisputed heavyweight champion. A rare bastion of modesty in a sport sold on macho, Usyk instead deferred the praise to the training team surrounding him, some of whom are childhood friends from Simferopol in Crimea, and have remained by his side throughout an astonishing run spanning an Olympic gold medal in 2012 and supremacy in two weight divisions. A few hours earlier in the opposing locker room, the contrast could hardly have been starker. Daniel Dubois had not arrived at Wembley until 8.20pm on Saturday, less than 90 minutes before he was due to make his ring walk. A source close to the British heavyweight's team described a chaotic chain of events that began during fight week when his father, Stanley, who takes close control of his son's career, apparently became agitated by a sensationalist article claiming the total purse for the fight was £150million; it is understood Dubois is expected to earn under £10million. That point of consternation gave way to a madcap fight day when Stanley hosted a party for dozens of his friends at the family mansion in Essex, where Daniel still lives, in the afternoon. The source claimed Dubois, a reclusive character despite the spotlight of the profession his father guided him towards, did not know all of the guests well and left at one stage for a drive. From there, the source claims their departure was delayed after Stanley requested extra people carriers to bring his entourage to the venue. He then drove Daniel to the venue himself, which caused another administrative issue as only the designated vehicles had been accredited. They then walked to the stadium entrance on foot from the car park, but a video clip shows Stanley calling Daniel towards the door after security attempted to prevent some of his friends from entering. The source alleges Stanley essentially told them Daniel would not proceed without them. Stanley Dubois has been approached for comment. The commotion was described as an unnecessary distraction that truncated Dubois's final preparations for the bout. The gulf in class between Dubois and Usyk assured it would not have changed the result, but the fact that Stanley was in the corner, often shouting instructions over his trainer Don Charles throughout the fight, added to the sense of maelstrom. After the Briton's spirited but ultimately unsustainable effort in the first two rounds, it was Stanley who threw in the towel in the fifth after an overhand left knocked Dubois down for the second time. While Usyk's team celebrated their victory back in the changing room, it is understood Stanley left the stadium before Daniel with his younger brother, Solomon. Presumably, the entourage evaporated too. Dubois is still only 27 and showed clear improvements in victories over Jarrell Miller, Filip Hrgovic, and Anthony Joshua to establish himself among the elite as the IBF champion — it should be noted that Stanley also threw a party before the Joshua fight to no great consequence. In fact, it is said to have eased Dubois's nerves compared to previous fights when he grew tense. Usyk may only have surrendered that belt because of boxing's political wranglings, but it is still no mean feat for a boxer forged in a cramped flat on a council estate in southeast London. Dubois will come again because his entire life has always revolved around boxing, whether it meant skipping school to do press-ups on his fists for hours on end, and largely forgoing childhood friends and even the internet at his father's behest. It has already taken them further than everyone except Stanley, who claims he had a 'spiritual vision' that his next-born son would become a world champion, could have imagined, even if aspects of their relationship have drawn scrutiny. As for Usyk, his place among the all-time greats was already secure long before this bout, which only makes his longevity more remarkable. Tyson Fury pushed him close in their first fight in particular before Usyk made the adjustments to nullify an enormous size difference. Joshua could not comprehend how Usyk's vastly superior skill was able to stifle his power; cue his meltdown after their rematch. A golden generation for British heavyweight boxing has been single-handedly consigned to silver; Usyk has also beaten Tony Bellew and Derek Chisora. Perhaps the quality of those glory days have been overblown, even if they delivered many great spectacles. Joshua nearly lost his defining bout against an aged Wladimir Klitschko before he was stunned by Andy Ruiz Jr. Fury went life-and-death with the MMA fighter Francis Ngannou and was taken into deep waters by Otto Wallin, even if his trilogy with Deontay Wilder was mesmerising viewing. Or rather, perhaps Usyk is simply so good that he would have stood out in any generation. Lennox Lewis, Usyk's predecessor as undisputed champion, would certainly argue against that. Muhammad Ali's movement, Larry Holmes's jab, and Mike Tyson's power, among others, would too. Instead, Usyk's hardest fight as a professional might actually have been against Mairis Briedis, a Latvian former police officer, whom he defeated via a close decision back in 2018. It can be a funny old game like that, but the fact Usyk's name can even be mentioned among the sport's heavyweight icons is a testament to the fact that he not only beat everyone in front of him, but did so on away soil as the sporting symbol of a nation's defiance. Boxing is so easily lamented for its scandal and unsavoury characters that overshadow the bravery of those in the ring. But in Usyk, it has a peerless champion and a prize ambassador that history will celebrate.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
How Tadhg Beirne responded to selection ‘pressure' with statement first Test performance
British and Irish Lions forward Tadhg Beirne has admitted that he 'felt the pressure' to produce a big performance in the first Test win against Australia after his selection had been questioned ahead of the game. Beirne had been somewhat surprisingly installed on the blindside by head coach Andy Farrell for the opening clash of the series against the Wallabies having been short of his best since arriving on tour. The 33-year-old Munster and Ireland forward upped his level, however, in Brisbane, combining with fellow flanker Tom Curry to set the tone physically as the Lions took a 1-0 lead in the series. While Curry would not be drawn on the criticism his own selection ahead of Jac Morgan and Josh van der Flier had garnered, Farrell hailed both he and Beirne as 'big game players'. And Beirne, who looks well placed to keep his place in Melbourne next week, admitted that he had been fuelled by a desire to prove the critics wrong and hit the heights he had been yet to reach in Australia. 'I felt the pressure,' Beirne conceded. 'I'm not going to lie, I did feel the pressure this week. There are some things you can't shy away from. A lot of people [were] calling for your head out there. 'I know my performances to this date weren't up to par by my standards. Faz [Farrell] has put a lot of trust in me and it was an honour to be selected. I had to put in a performance today. All of us did. 'This is the game. Big games. You want to perform. You either step up to it or you don't. I tried my best to step up to it and hopefully when [the coaches] review the game they will be happy with my performance. 'You have to back yourself, but I also knew that if I didn't put in a performance today that there was a good chance I won't be there next week. It's a credit to the whole team here because the whole team put in a great performance, particularly in the first half. We controlled the game really well.' The fight for back row places had shaped as a theme of the tour from the moment Farrell named his party, with real strength in the area. The exclusion of Morgan, particularly, had attracted attention with the openside in fine form as the last Welshman in the touring party. Beirne revealed that Farrell had underlined to he, Curry, No 8 Jack Conan and Ben Earl the need to be at their best given the internal competition for places. 'Look, Andy had a quiet word with the back row, the captains, and he said a few things to us,' the 33-year-old explained. 'He put a little bit of pressure on us without putting pressure on us, you know, as Andy does. 'But it gives you motivation and it gives you a little bit of realisation as to where his head's at and the opportunity that's being presented to us. Those words certainly sat with me for the 24 hours leading up to the game. 'That's the thing about the Lions. Any man next up has more than earned their spot. There's been incredible performances in the lead-up to these Tests. If I'd have gone down with an injury, [ Ollie Chessum ] would have went into six, no-one would have batted an eyelid there, not 'oh no, Tadhg's out', do you know what I mean? It would have been like 'great, Chess is in'. 'So that's the tour we're in. These guys everyone's gunning for a position here and everyone's worthy of a position here. The responsibility is on us to try and keep our positions.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Dominant Lions must now deliver a display that can stand the test of time
Had the British & Irish Lions been offered their current position a month ago, they would have jumped at it. One-nil up in the series with two to play and the chance to seal the deal in one of the world's greatest sporting arenas? For anyone raised on the mythical deeds of past Lions tours this should be as good as it gets. So why was the mood so pancake-flat at the final whistle after the 27-19 first Test win in Brisbane? Primarily because the best sport requires at least a hint of jeopardy. From an early stage at the Suncorp Stadium, sadly, there was absolutely no doubt which side was going to win. For the first time in living memory, a Lions Test victory had become a foregone conclusion. The boot has occasionally been on the other foot, notably in 2005 when it swiftly became clear the All Blacks were a class above Sir Clive Woodward's squad. There is no massive shame when that happens, and to witness Dan Carter twinkling in the second Test was a privilege. But Saturday was different: playing against distinctly moderate opposition, the Lions were so far in front after 42 minutes that everything else became irrelevant. This is not remotely to diminish the excellence of Tom Curry, Finn Russell, Tadhg Beirne and Huw Jones, among others. The Lions can beat only whatever is put in front of them. If England's cricketers come over later this year and take a big early lead in the Ashes series they are not going to waste time worrying about the shaky state of Australia's top order. But, goodness, it has made the second Test this Saturday a bellwether fixture. Here's hoping the Wallabies, for the sake of all concerned, will emerge a lot quicker from the blocks this time. They should have Rob Valetini and Will Skelton back, and Angus Bell, among others, could be promoted from the bench. What the hosts cannot afford to be is as deeply mediocre as they were made to look in the first half in Brisbane. Because another one-sided contest would do more than just bruise Australian pride. If the gap cannot be narrowed it risks undermining everything this series is meant to be about. The Lions' unique appeal is based squarely on the four‑yearly crackle of pre-game anticipation. It also has to make onlookers feel they are watching something genuinely special. In that regard, the game on Saturday fell short of the levels required. In certain quarters, of course, this is a minor problem. The father of one high-profile Lions player, over a beer on the eve of the game, told me how sick he was of hearing about the need for a closely contested series to lure more neutral eyeballs. His view is that winning every Test convincingly and grinding the Wallabies into the dirt is all that matters. Lions series are about winning: they do not arrange open-top bus parades for plucky losers. On a basic sporting level he is, of course, correct. But when sold-out stadiums fall quiet and even rugby diehards at home start channel-hopping to find more gripping viewing, something is not quite right. If the Lions return home having barely been run close in a single competitive game in Australia it will be a desperately sad state of affairs. So, for everyone's sake, one of two things now has to happen. Either Australia must boomerang their way back into the series at the Melbourne Cricket Ground as a matter of urgency, or the Lions need to give a statement performance that will stand the test of time. Listening to Australia's head coach, Joe Schmidt, suggesting after the game that the experience of this Lions series would benefit his younger players in the forthcoming Rugby Championship is to suspect the second option is the more likely. Either way, Andy Farrell will surely be stressing the need to dial things up at the MCG. He will have been frustrated by the lack of bench impact in Brisbane and may be tempted to inject some fresh energy. Henry Pollock, Jac Morgan, Josh van der Flier, Owen Farrell, Blair Kinghorn and Jamie George could all enter the conversation, while Joe McCarthy's injury may prompt a modest forward reshuffle. Might Beirne and Ollie Chessum both start? One of them will probably have to feature in the second row. Sign up to The Breakdown The latest rugby union news and analysis, plus all the week's action reviewed after newsletter promotion Whoever plays, this feels like the 2025 Lions' defining moment. Farrell rightly hailed the big-match temperaments of Curry, Beirne, Russell and Jamison Gibson‑Park but will now be seeking an all‑court, 80-minute performance similar to the final Test in Sydney in 2013 when the Lions stood up magnificently with the series on the line. He will want James Lowe and Tommy Freeman to show they can finish as sharply as Australia's Max Jorgensen, for Jones and Sione Tuipulotu to dovetail sweetly once again, and for the Lions to generally be more ruthless in their opponents' 22. He will want more ball claimed in the air and even more pressure heaped on the Wallabies' playmakers. Above all else, perhaps, he will want his chosen ones to show that, even if they were facing the All Blacks or the Springboks, they possess the requisite class and composure. That the thousands of fans who have made the long pilgrimage here have invested shrewdly. And that, emotionally, the Lions are still capable of stirring feelings other teams cannot. If, alternatively, they allow Australia back into the series – or, heaven forbid, lose the last two Tests – they will regret it for the rest of their days.
