David Hogg faces possible ouster from DNC after re-election vote
The DNC voted to hold a new election for two vice chair positions, including David Hogg's.
A Credentials Committee complaint alleged the February vote violated party procedures.
Hogg says the move is politically motivated amid his calls to challenge party leadership.
David Hogg may lose his seat as a vice chair of the Democratic National Committee after the party voted to redo its February officer election, citing procedural concerns — and stoking deeper tensions over Hogg's confrontational approach to party reform.
DNC members voted overwhelmingly this week to re-run the elections for two vice chair roles, including the one held by Hogg, a 25-year-old activist and rising progressive voice. The resolution passed with 75% of ballots cast in favor, following a complaint from party activist Kalyn Free alleging that the original election process violated DNC parliamentary rules and disadvantaged women of color candidates.
The re-election will be held June 12–17. Hogg is eligible to run again but could lose his position depending on the outcome.
The backstory
The complaint, submitted after the Feb. 1 officer vote, argued that the DNC's tabulation method violated the party's charter and failed to follow proper procedure. Last month, the DNC Credentials Committee agreed, voting to recommend a re-vote.
While DNC officials emphasized the decision was based on procedural fairness — not personalities — the re-election comes at a politically sensitive time for Hogg.
Big picture view
Hogg, who rose to national prominence as a survivor of the 2018 Parkland school shooting, has since become a forceful advocate for generational change in the Democratic Party. Through his PAC "Leaders We Deserve," he pledged to raise $20 million to primary challenge older Democrats in safe blue districts — a move that drew internal criticism.
Earlier this year, leaked audio from a private Zoom call revealed DNC Chair Ken Martin expressing frustration with Hogg's efforts, telling him, "You essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to."
Following that conversation, Martin offered Hogg a choice: step down from his DNC role or stop organizing primary challenges through his PAC.
While Hogg declined to step down, he now faces an electoral threat to his position.
What they're saying
Hogg has framed the re-vote as "an expedited plan to remove me as vice chair," adding that while the vote was "based on how the DNC conducted its officers' elections, which I had nothing to do with, it is also impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the party."
Kalyn Free, the party member who initiated the complaint, pushed back on that interpretation, telling Fox News Digital, "This was never about Malcolm Kenyatta or David Hogg. For me, this was about ensuring that the Democratic Party lives up to our ideals as the only political party to believe in and stand up for election integrity and a free and fair democracy."
Kenyatta, who received the most votes in the February election and also holds a vice chair role, criticized the idea that the story should center on Hogg at all.
"Any story about this that neatly places this into a narrative about David Hogg is wrong," Kenyatta said. "I worked my a– off to get this role and have done the job every day since I've held it… Even though he clearly wants it to be [about him]."
What's next
The DNC's new vote will include only those candidates who were eligible for the third ballot in February: Hogg, Kenyatta, Kalyn Free, Jeanna Repass, and Shasti Conrad.
According to DNC rules, one vice chair position must be held by a male, while the other can be held by a candidate of any gender. Voting will begin June 12.
The Source
This article is based on official statements from the Democratic National Committee, reporting from Politico and Fox News Digital, and direct quotes from DNC officials and candidates involved in the election dispute. The re-vote was initiated after the DNC Credentials Committee found violations of procedure in the original February election. This story was reported from Los Angeles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
'Train wreck': Trump slams Musk after billionaire announces new political party
President Donald Trump took aim at Elon Musk after his former adviser announced the creation of new political party following staunch opposition to the president's signature legislation. "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump wrote on social media July 6. "He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States." Musk announced the formation of the "America Party" on July 5, the day after Trump signed his mega-bill. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects the legislation will increase the national debt by $3.4 trillion, which Musk as lambasted. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," Musk wrote on his social media platform X on July 5. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Trump criticized third parties in his July 6 post. "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats," Trump wrote. Musk − the world's richest person with a worth of $405 billion, according to Forbes − spent nearly $290 million to help Trump and other Republicans get elected. In the opening months of Trump's presidency, Musk led the effort to slash federal agencies through the Department of Government Efficiency. The two have feuded in recent weeks as Musk strongly criticized Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which includes tax cuts, increased spending on immigration enforcement and the military and deep spending cuts in Medicaid. The bill increases the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. Musk has threatened to boost primary challengers against those who supported the bill, which included all but two Republicans in the House and three in the Senate. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!" Musk wrote before Trump signed the legislation. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk had taken steps to repair his strained relationship with the president ‒ including personally apologizing for insults he made during his combative exit from the Trump administration last month - before the new round of sparring.
an hour ago
Trump admin live updates: Trump calls Musk a 'TRAIN WRECK' after political party announcement
The president addressed their differences on EV mandates, NASA appointment. 2:19 After days of Republican drama, the House on Thursday passed President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill. Trump helped Speaker Mike Johnson pressure GOP holdouts into flipping their no votes to allow the measure to go forward in time to meet the president's self-imposed July Fourth deadline. Latest headlines: 3:10 PM EDT Bessent shades Musk over his new political party 12:03 PM EDT Trump signs disaster declaration after Texas flood Jul 04, 2025, 4:45 AM EDT Trump defends popularity of megabill Jul 03, 2025, 11:13 PM EDT Trump announces UFC fight on White House lawn for America's 250th birthday Jul 03, 2025, 10:55 PM EDT Trump says Iran strikes, megabill passage have been 'best 2 weeks' Here's how the news is developing. 34 Updates Jul 03, 2025, 10:10 AM EDT Jeffries slams Murkowski for her vote House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries continued his speech on Thursday morning -- five hours and counting. Each time the lawmaker from New York builds a crescendo to emphasize his message, his Democratic colleagues are cheering him on -- interrupting his speech with repeated standing ovations. Jeffries brought up Sen. Lisa Murkowski's comments after she voted to pass the bill in the Senate on Tuesday. The Alaska Republican said she was not happy with the bill and it was a hard vote. She also said the bill needed work "across the chambers" and it was "not ready for the president's desk." Jeffries slammed Murkowski on Thursday. "This should not be a hard vote Senator Murkowski, this should be a hell no vote," he said. Jeffries speech stretches more than 3 hours: 'This is a crime scene' "I've been given 15 minutes each on a bill of such significant magnitude as it relates to the health, the safety and the well being of the American people and because that debate was so limited, I feel the obligation, Mr. Speaker, to stand on this House floor and take my sweet time to tell the stories and that's exactly what I intend to do," House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said as he continues to make a "magic-minute" speech -- a procedure that grants members of House leadership unlimited time to speak after debate on a bill has concluded. "This reckless Republican budget is an immoral document," he said, sparking applause from Democrats seated behind him. Much of Jeffries' focus remains on the bill's impact on health care, as it's projected to result in millions of people losing Medicaid coverage. "People will die. Tens of thousands, perhaps year after year after year, as a result of the Republican assault on the healthcare of the American people. I'm sad. I never thought I would be on the House floor saying, 'this is a crime scene,'" he said. Jul 03, 2025, 7:46 AM EDT Johnson praises Trump's help in securing final GOP votes Speaker Johnson praised President Trump, saying he was "very helpful" in securing the votes the Republicans need to clear his signature megabill. "The president's very engaged. He was very helpful in the process. He helped answer questions and articulate his vision and what this bill will mean for the country and his agenda and how urgent it is for us to get it done. So, I think it was very helpful. I'm really appreciative of his leadership," Johnson said in the Capitol this morning. Johnson signaled that moderate Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick might vote against the bill during the final passage vote. "He may have to see what he does. I'm not sure," Johnson said. Johnson said Fitzpatrick, who voted against moving forward on the bill overnight, has "convictions about certain provisions of the bill he's entitled to that." -ABC's John Parkinson and Lauren Peller
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Pathetic Democrats are falling over themselves and in line with the dangerous Zohran Mamdani
Forgive us for finding real comedy in how Zohran Mamdani's rise is making the Democratic establishment squirm. Onetime 'New Democrat' Bill Clinton, who won the White House by breaking with the party's left, now has had to lead the parade of folks congratulating Mamdani on winning the Democratic primary — without actually endorsing him. Oh, and there's Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand popping up the other week to insist Mamdani denounce the phrase 'globalize the intifada' — only to soon feel compelled to turn tail and apologize to him for saying in a radio interview that the anti-Zionist supports 'global jihad' and Hamas. Added irony: Mamdani's excuse for being OK with others' use of 'globalize the intifada' is that he doesn't want to be the 'word police' — yet somehow it's fine for his supporters to police Gillibrand's use of 'jihad'? Meanwhile, a spokesman for Sen. Chuck Schumer told Jewish Insider, 'Sen. Schumer condemns the phrase 'Globalize the Intifada' and believes that it should not be used' — but Chuck's mostly mum on Mamdani himself. Outright condemning city Democrats' chosen mayoral nominee risks angering the party's base enough to lose their own next primary — but embracing this far-left Israel-basher could poison their general-election chances. Gov. Kathy Hochul faces the same dilemma, except that she's up next year — and to protect her own 'sensible' brand has already had to come out against most of Mamdani's agenda, which he can't deliver on unless he wins the state's OK. (Then again, Hochul tried to cover her left flank a bit by joining in the slams of Gillibrand's 'jihad' comments.) Seems he'll have the support of the state Senate, at least: Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and her powerful No. 2, Michael Gianaris, have both endorsed the anti-police Mamdani; of course, they started placing their bets with the hard left years ago. But most of the city's House delegation look like deer in the headlights: Will Reps. Jerry Nadler and Dan Goldman feel compelled to follow city Comptroller Brad Lander in pretending Mamdani's just fine for the Jews? Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is in a bind of his own: To have any hope of becoming majority leader, he needs the party to pick up swing seats next year; for now he's holding off on any commitment by merely asking Mamdani to 'clarify' the whole 'intifada' thing. Rep. Ritchie Torres, a staunch supporter of Israel and outspoken foe of antisemites, is playing it cool, admitting his 'profound differences of opinion' with Mamdani while aiming to continue their 'dialogue'; on the other hand, Torres just admited he's now likely to drop his plans to challenge Hochul from the right next year. Meanwhile, city unions (which had mostly sat on the fence or endorsed Cuomo) are scrambling to win the favor of the likely next mayor: the Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, 32BJ SEIU, the New York State Nurses Association, and the city Central Labor Council have all bent the knee, with the United Federation of Teachers reportedly set to follow. Scrambling back into the sunlight is ex-Rep. Jamaal Bowman, ousted from his suburban district in last year's primary thanks to his own anti-Israel record: There's even talk he'll be Mayor Mamdani's pick to run the city's public schools. You can almost always count on politicians to put their self-interest (career, salary and perks) ahead of any principle; utlra-progressives' steady rise in the city and state Democratic Party had shifted Cuomo far to the left even before scandal forced him to quit as governor. Indeed, Mayor Eric Adams now stands out for his courage: He never stopped slamming the state's dangerous 'criminal-justice reforms,' has stood publicly and firmly against the anti-Israel extremists and dared to keep calling out the Biden administration's bungling on the border. That stand earned Adams a revenge federal investigation that may still end his career even now that the charges are dropped, since the smears kept him out of the primary. At least the mayor, in contrast to most of the Democratic establishment, still has his honor intact.
