Employment Equity Amendment Act will worsen unemployment, says DA's Zille
Helen Zille
Unemployment
DA federal council chairperson, Helen Zille, addressed a media briefing in Johannesburg on 5 May 2025. Picture: @Our_DA/X
JOHANNESBURG - The Democratic Alliance (DA) believes the Employment Equity Amendment Act will worsen unemployment instead of achieving its intended goal of promoting participation among disadvantaged groups.The party is taking its fight against the law to the Pretoria High Court on Tuesday.
It is seeking to have the law declared unconstitutional.
While the DA opposes the entire act, this challenge specifically targets section 15(A) of the legislation.
This section requires companies with more than 50 employees to meet numerical targets for the representation of black people, women, and people with disabilities.
Speaking at a media briefing in Johannesburg on Monday, DA federal council chairperson, Helen Zille, said that the legislation would not help reduce unemployment.
"It will continue to drive unemployment up, economic growth down and make far more people unemployed and marginalised in our economy than they already are. One thing I've learned in all my years in politics is that you never judge a bill by the intention of the government."
She claimed that the DA was not against affirmative action or transformative policies.
"And so, while we strongly support in the Democratic Alliance redress measures, they need to be fair, they need to be rational, they need to promote economic growth and they need to get people into jobs. That is the number one objective."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Battle for northern areas support
News DA and PA seen as front-runners in tightly contested Ward 34 by-election on Wednesday Premium By Andisa Bonani - 15 July 2025 The battle for the northern areas begins on Wednesday, as residents of Ward 34 head to the polls for a by-election widely viewed as a litmus test ahead of the 2026 local government elections. It will also be a test for the Patriotic Alliance (PA), which has been making inroads in coloured wards across SA...
The Herald
14 hours ago
- The Herald
'He acted decisively': Ndlozi supports Ramaphosa's decision amid criticism
Opposition parties including the EFF, ActionSA, DA, GOOD Party, ATM and Build One SA have rejected Ramaphosa's decision. The EFF said Ramaphosa should've fired Mchunu instead of placing him on special leave. 'This so-called 'special leave' is a cowardly deflection, designed to shield a corrupt minister whose involvement in organised crime has been laid bare by Mkhwanazi,' EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo said. Build One SA leader Mmusi Maimane said the move was not enough. 'We have had enough commissions of inquiry. I believe Mchunu should have been fired and the other ministers who have lied to parliament. This was a missed opportunity,' he said. The DA said it would not allow another commission of inquiry that would take years to yield results. 'These allegations provided the president with an opportunity to show bold and firm leadership,' DA leader John Steenhuisen said. 'Instead, he has again outsourced executive responsibility to a commission and South Africans have grown cynical of talk shops, task teams and commissions which they see as buying time and avoiding accountability. 'The country cannot afford another elaborate filing cabinet of findings that gathers dust while the politically connected escape justice.' Social media users have also expressed disapproval of Ramaphosa's decisions. Here are more reactions from X:
TimesLIVE
16 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
'He acted decisively': Ndlozi supports Ramaphosa's decision amid criticism
Former EFF member Mbuyiseni Ndlozi has supported President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place police minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave of absence pending a commission of inquiry's investigation into allegations of political interference in police investigations. On Sunday, Ramaphosa announced that a commission of inquiry, chaired by acting deputy chief justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, would be established to probe allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi against senior law enforcement officials including police minister Senzo Mchunu. He said the commission is expected to complete its work and submit a final report to him. Interim reports are expected after three and six months respectively. While some political parties criticised the move, Ndlozi said Ramaphosa made the right decision. 'He has acted decisively. Go argue with a wall,' Ndlozi said on X. 'In a democracy, in any just world, a president can't find anyone guilty. It's correct for him to set up a judicial commission of inquiry with a judge and strict time frame. This is proper.' He called on national police commissioner Gen Fannie Masemola to suspend deputy national commissioner for crime detection Lt-Gen Shadrack Sibiya, who was also implicated in Mkhwanazi's allegations. Opposition parties including the EFF, ActionSA, DA, Good Party, ATM and Build One SA have rejected Ramaphosa's decision. The EFF said Ramaphosa should've fired Mchunu instead of placing him on special leave. 'This so-called 'special leave' is a cowardly deflection, designed to shield a corrupt minister whose involvement in organised crime has been laid bare by Mkhwanazi,' EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo said. Build One SA leader Mmusi Maimane said the move was not enough. 'We have had enough commissions of inquiry. I believe Mchunu should have been fired and the other ministers who have lied to parliament. This was a missed opportunity.' The DA said it would not allow another commission of inquiry that would take years to yield results. 'These allegations provided the president with an opportunity to show bold and firm leadership,' DA leader John Steenhuisen said. 'Instead, he has again outsourced executive responsibility to a commission and South Africans have grown cynical of talk shops, task teams and commissions which they see as buying time and avoiding accountability. 'The country cannot afford another elaborate filing cabinet of findings that gathers dust while the politically connected escape justice.'
