Secret Service Debut Armored Polaris Ranger 'Golf Force One' To Help Protect Trump
The UTV made its first apparent public appearance just 10 months after someone tried to shoot Trump at his Florida golf course. This vehicle was made by the Polaris corporation but modified by someone else, a Polaris company spokesperson confirmed to The War Zone. You can read more about the fleet of armored vehicles protecting presidents in our story here.
#LOOK — President Donald Trump has a new heavily armoured golf cart dubbed "Golf Force One" which followed him as he played Turnberry. pic.twitter.com/3HAEOf7N3B
— NUCLR GOLF (@NUCLRGOLF) July 28, 2025
NEW: Armor plated 'Golf Force One' spotted with President Trump at the golf course.Additional security measures are being deployed to protect Trump, even on the golf course, according to the Telegraph.'Mr Trump's team deployed an additional security measure in the form of a… pic.twitter.com/gxiEjL1sx0
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 27, 2025
The ballistic protection on the UTV at the Trump Turnberry hotel and golf course can either be added from a kit or specifically built out for the vehicle.
According to the Government Services Administration (GSA) website, a Chicago company called Scaletta Armor makes an 'add-on armor kit to Polaris XP 1000 Ranger UTV with protection scalable to mission.' The kit has a unit price of nearly $190,000.
The GSA site includes a photo, which you can see below, of a Polaris Ranger X UTV very similar to the one seen in Scotland. We reached out to Scaletta Armor for more details.
Other companies, like MacGyver Solutions, make similar armored UTVs based on the Polaris Ranger X UTV. MacGyver has contracts to provide the U.S. Customs and Border Protection with ballistic-protected Polaris Ranger X UTVs.
Mike Jackson, who founded MacGyver, said he was unsure who provided the armor for the UTV seen at the golf course and would have to seek U.S. Secret Service (USSS) permission to provide further details.
USSS had little light to shed.
'The U.S. Secret Service employs a variety of tools and resources to safeguard our protectees,' USSS said in a statement. 'In order to maintain operational security, the Secret Service does not discuss the specific means and methods used to conduct our protective operations.''
The Polaris Ranger X is used by the military, law enforcement and many other agencies for off-road transportation. The basic version retails for about $20,000. There are multiple variants of this UTV.
'As far as armoring goes, the world is your oyster,' a U.K. law enforcement expert told The Telegraph, which first published pictures of the armored UTV. 'If your threat is someone with a baseball bat, you might fit plexiglass. But if it's a 7.62mm Dragunov sniper rifle with a full metal jacket bullet, then you need thicker transparent armour,' he said, referring to the layers of laminate which, combined with layers of glass, are used to make bullet-proof windows.'
'The thicker the transparent armoring, the more tinted the window looks,' added the expert, who spoke to The Telegraph on condition of anonymity.
During his outing on Saturday, Trump was seen driving a regular golf cart in between holes. Trump is well known to enjoy driving his own cart.
The UTV was likely there in case Trump needed additional protection. Considering golf course fairways are wide open areas, having a vehicle to rapidly provide cover and whisk the president away in, even to a nearby standard up-armored vehicle, seems not just logical, but necessary. There are limits to what kinds of vehicles can travel on golf courses without destroying the manicured grass, so the UTV would still be restricted in wait and feature wide tires to spread out that weight.
Trump has already been the subject of two assassination attempts, including one at his golf course in Florida, and had previously been threatened by Iran.
The most recent attempt came Sept. 15, 2024, at the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida.
As Trump golfed, a Secret Service agent conducting a perimeter security sweep saw the partially obscured face of a man in the brush along the fence line near the sixth hole, according to a Justice Department media release at the time.
'The agent observed the barrel of a rifle aimed directly at him,' the release stated. 'As the agent began backing away, he saw the rifle barrel move, and the agent fired at the man, later identified as Ryan Wesley Routh, 58, of Hawaii. Routh survived and is currently in prison awaiting trial.
A few months earlier, on July 13, 2024, at a campaign event in Butler, Pennsylvania, a man fired a shot at Trump. Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, was later killed, and a bloodied Trump was whisked away.
Prior to those attempts, Iran made a veiled golf-related threat against Trump.
An image highly suggestive of a drone targeting the then-former President Trump on a golf course in a 'vengeance' strike in retaliation for the death of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani was posted on Twitter by an account for Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The U.S. military killed Soleimani in a drone strike in Iraq in January 2020, which had already prompted public threats from Iranian officials, including against Trump specifically.
Twitter suspended the @khamenei_site account around 15 hours after the post with the image first appeared on January 21, 2020.
Trump's famous love of golf has created problems for the Secret Service, given how frequently he plays and how difficult it is to protect someone in that situation.
'In some instances, Secret Service personnel accompanying Trump have used hand-held magnetometers to screen people for weapons. In others, spectators, vendors and reporters have walked alongside Trump without being searched at all,' The New York Times noted shortly after the assassination attempt at his Florida golf course 'Agents sometimes warn people from getting too close to Trump, but the former president has usually embraced a laid-back atmosphere, inviting people to pose for pictures or talk with him.'
Trump's courses 'are generally considered among the best in the world, golf-wise. But they include security vulnerabilities that any course would have — vast spaces and often few places to take cover,' the publication added. 'Trump generally drives his own golf cart, which, aside from the presidential seal, looks much like any other golf cart, devoid of bullet-resistant glass or other overt protective measures. He is often alone, with the nearest agents yards away in their own carts. Only occasionally can the service's black SUVs get close enough to the holes to be seen nearby while Trump is playing.'
Given all this, it is surprising that this appears to be the first time Golf Force One has been seen in public. Considering that golf is Trump's favorite pastime, it is likely we have not seen the last of this UTV.
Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
US readies executive order to penalise banks for political discrimination
The US Government is in the process of drafting an executive order that would impose penalties on banks for terminating customers based on political affiliations, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal cited by Reuters. The order would instruct regulators to investigate potential breaches of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws, or consumer financial protection laws by financial institutions. If signed, the order could be enacted as early as this week and would empower regulators to impose monetary penalties, consent decrees, or other disciplinary actions against banks found in violation. Additionally, the order seeks to eliminate policies that may have led to banks severing ties with certain customers and mandates the Small Business Administration to review the practices of banks that guarantee its loans. The White House has refrained from commenting on the report when approached by Reuters. In January, President Donald Trump accused the CEOs of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America of denying banking services to conservative clients, a claim the banks have denied. This criticism from Wall Street banks has emerged amid allegations from congressional Republicans and Republican-led states, who assert that these institutions are engaging in "woke capitalism" by cutting ties with gun manufacturers, fossil fuel companies, and other businesses perceived to align with the political right. The Trump administration is actively pursuing a comprehensive reform agenda aimed at altering regulations governing financial institutions, including capital requirements, with the intention of fostering economic growth and encouraging innovation. "US readies executive order to penalise banks for political discrimination" was originally created and published by Retail Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.


The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas Democrat: Trump ‘demanding' allies ‘rig' midterms for him
Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) said during a recent interview that President Trump is 'demanding' allies to 'rig' the 2026 midterms for him and argued that by redrawing the Congressional district in Austin, lawmakers are violating the Voting Rights Act. 'This is a five-alarm fire for our democracy. Donald Trump is the most corrupt president in American history, and he has no plan for winning the upcoming midterm elections,' Casar, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said Monday night on CNN. 'So, he essentially is demanding that his cronies rig those elections for him in this corrupt scheme.' 'That's why I'm so proud of the Texas Democrats who are showing the entire nation what it looks like to fight by going out across the country. We need everyone viewing at home, across America to say, even if we may have our differences on some issues,' the lawmaker told 'The Source' host Kaitlan Collins. 'At the end of the day, we should have the voters pick their politicians, not have politicians pick their voters.' He added, 'Donald Trump should not get to pick who your member of Congress is.' The redistricting tussle intensified on Monday as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) ordered the Democrats who fled the Lone Star State to be arrested. Over 50 state-level Democrats have left Texas, breaking quorum and hoping to wait out until the special legislative session ends. The move is a bid to stall the Republicans' effort to pass a mid-decade redistricting plan. Trump has blessed the effort, saying he would like the GOP to gain five seats in Texas in the 2026 midterms. Democrats who have left the state have fired back at Abbott for arrest threats and the redistricting efforts, while Democratic Party governors have warned they could retaliate similarly in their states. 'If Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us no choice; we must do the same,' New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) said on Monday. Casar, who represents Texas's 35th congressional district — which encompasses parts of East Austin — said the push to draw the lines of his district is a violation of the Voting Rights Act 'It disenfranchises the Latino voters that have a protected district here in Central Texas, and if Donald Trump is allowed to shred the Voting Rights Act here in Austin,' Casar said. 'He wants to spread that across America, just like you mentioned Kaitlan in Missouri or in Louisiana, or who knows where else.'


Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Where Homeowners Benefit Most from Capital Gains Tax Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Blue states, including California and Washington, are among those that stand to benefit the most from President Donald Trump's idea to eliminate the federal capital gains tax on home sales, according to a new study. A proposal to abolish the tax was first pushed forward by Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene last month and then echoed by Trump, who told reporters on July 22 that he was "thinking about…no tax on capital gains on houses." While it is not yet clear if the president's suggestion may lead to a real change in the way home sales are taxed by the government, real estate brokerage Redfin has calculated that homeowners in California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Washington, and New Jersey, in this order, would benefit the most from the abolition of the capital gains tax. What Is the Federal Capital Gains Tax on Home Sales—and Why Does Trump Want To Abolish It? Homeowners who sell a property where they have been living for longer than a year may have to pay capital gains taxes if they sell their property for more than they originally purchased it for. Capital gains taxes are a portion of the profit made by homeowners through the years that their property has appreciated in value. At the moment, capital gains taxes are limited by a cap. Homeowners who have lived in a home as their primary residence for at least 24 months in the five years before the sale receive an exemption on the first $250,000 of gains for individuals and $500,000 for married couples filing jointly. This cap, however, has not been updated since it was introduced in 1997 nor adjusted for inflation—leading many experts to support urgent changes to the exclusion. "It is not indexed for inflation. In real terms, the exclusion has gone down over these last 20-something years," William McBride, Chief Economist & Stephen J. Entin Fellow in Economics at the Tax Foundation, told Newsweek. "The high inflation we had in recent years, during the pandemic and consequently, is one of the things that has caused a lot of home price appreciation." While this is a problem that typically affects wealthier homeowners the most, the rapid appreciation that occurred during the pandemic homebuying frenzy means that "this is no longer just a concern for high-end properties," Shannon McGahn, executive vice president and chief advocacy officer at the National Association of Realtors (NAR), told Newsweek. According to a recent report by NAR, nearly 29 million homeowners, about one-third of the U.S. market, already face potential capital gains taxes if they sell, "and that number is expected to climb sharply over the next decade," McGahn said. If no change is made to the way capital gains are taxed, nearly 70 percent of homeowners could exceed the $250,000 cap, according to NAR. "A sizable portion of homeowners, especially in states with high home prices that have grown quickly, are sitting on more than the $250k/$500k of capital gains that are exempt from capital gains taxes," Chen Zhao, head of economics research at Redfin, previously told Newsweek. "These homeowners generally have owned their homes for a long period of time, but in some places, people are exceeding the current capital gains exemptions solely based on appreciation during the pandemic." Trump has hinted at the idea of abolishing the capital gains tax on home sales as a solution to the ongoing affordability crisis in the U.S. housing market. On July 22, he told reporters that "if the Fed would lower the rates, we wouldn't even have to do that." Greene has framed the tax as an "unfair burden" hurting the "American dream." Which States Will Benefit the Most—and the Least According to Redfin, more than a quarter of homes across the U.S. have gained at least $250,000 in value since the last time they were purchased, with 8 percent having gained more than $500,000. The owners of these homes are the ones that stand to benefit by a potential elimination of the capital gains tax. By the same reasoning, the states where homeowners stand to gain from the abolition of the tax are those where homes have appreciated the most in recent decades. These include some of the most expensive housing markets in the country: California and Hawaii. In the Golden State, the median home value is $766,896 and the typical capital gain of all homes is $332,659, according to Redfin. A total of 62.3 percent of homes in the state have gained at least $250,000 since they were last sold—the highest share of any state in the nation. One in three (33 percent) have gained more than $500,000. Hawaii followed with 61 percent of homes having gained more than $250,000 in value since they were last sold, while 34.6 percent gained over $500,000. The overall capital gain was even higher than that of California, however, at $338,346. The top five states that would benefit most from the abolition of the federal capital gains tax also include Massachusetts, Washington and New Jersey, with respectively 58.4 percent, 54.1 percent, and 52.2 percent of homes that have gained at least $250,000 in value since they were last sold. Do you think abolishing the federal capital gains tax on home sales is a good or bad idea? Let me know your opinion by emailing The states where homeowners would benefit the least from the change, on the other hand, are Mississippi, North Dakota, Iowa, Oklahoma and Wyoming, which have seen the smallest share of homes that have appreciated over $250,000 in the country, respectively at 1.2 percent, 2.2 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.1 percent and 3.4 percent. What Would Be the Impact of Eliminating the Capital Gains Tax? According to experts, eliminating the federal capital gains tax could have a positive impact on the U.S. housing market, unlocking homes that homeowners were previously holding on to to avoid a high fiscal burden. "Ending the capital gains tax could potentially spur some sales by removing a barrier to selling. Home sales have been in a slump for the past couple years, and this might nudge some sellers to consider," Bankrate's Jeff Ostrowski told Newsweek. "However, the tax burden is far from the main cause of the housing market slowdown." Some experts fear that such a move could have unwanted consequences. "Ongoing affordability issues could be exacerbated by abolishing this tax as it could fuel demand and lead to a more competitive housing market, especially where supply is constrained," Hannah Jones, senior economist at told Newsweek. "Removing this tax would favor wealthy owners which could worsen equity inequality and make the market even more challenging for low-to-mid-earning buyers." McBride also said the measure does not address another cause of home price appreciation in recent years: the lack of supply. "There's a shortage of supply and that's the fundamental problem that needs to be addressed directly. This proposal does not address that," he said. "We have a penalty on investment in housing, on the supply of housing, due to its tax treatment through our depreciation system. That should be addressed, that's the way to directly address this."