Planning committee refuses permission for Fleur de Lis home
He resubmitted his bid to build a detached home and garage on 'disused' and 'overgrown' land near Summerfield Terrace, after a previous attempt proved unsuccessful.
Mr Cavender questioned why planning permission for an 'extremely large' home had been approved nearby, and said he would 'just want to be treated fairly' by the council.
Cllr Teresa Heron, Caerphilly Council's 'Armed Forces champion', told the committee there was a 'clear precedent' for development in the area, and argued Mr Cavender's plans should be supported.
She explained the Armed Forces Covenant, to which the council has signed up, states serving or former members of the military should 'not be disadvantaged when accessing public services'.
'This is not about special treatment, it's about ensuring equality,' Cllr Heron added.
Council planner Joshua Burrows said officers had recommended the application be rejected because the site is 'outside the settlement limits' set by the council, and within a so-called 'green wedge' of agricultural land.
The proposed new home would be considered an 'unduly large structure', he added.
But committee member Cllr Shane Williams said there are 'quite a lot of large houses in that area'.
Cllr Kristian Woodland asked about Mr Cavender's claims of fairness, given another home had been approved nearby.
Senior planning officer Carwyn Powell said planning permission for that property had been granted before the council published its current Local Development Plan – a strategic blueprint setting out where homes can and cannot be built.
It was therefore 'not possible to compare' the two cases, he explained.
Mr Powell also defended the officers' recommendations in light of the Armed Forces Covenant, which he said had been respected in this case.
'We would refuse an application for any other member of the public' for the proposed development, he said, adding: 'The person is not being treated differently to anyone else.'
It ultimately took intervention from the committee chairman for a decision to be reached, after no committee members initially backed the officers' recommendation to refuse planning permission.
Cllr Roy Saralis, the committee chairman, told colleagues 'the Armed Forces Covenant has been taken into account'.
Planning permission was refused by a majority vote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
Britain to build fleet of spy balloons
Britain is developing a fleet of spy balloons in an intelligence arms race with China. The military has successfully tested high-altitude craft which ministers say will give the Armed Forces 'the edge' on intelligence gathering. The uncrewed vehicles can provide surveillance and communications links, such as internet services, from an altitude of up to 80,000ft. Britain's move to develop its own fleet comes two years after the US air force shot down a Chinese spy balloon off the South Carolina coast. The incident prompted widespread concerns across the West about the extent of Beijing's surveillance activities. At the time, Rishi Sunak, the then prime minister, said that the RAF would take down any such spy balloons found to be flying over the UK. British officials oversaw trials of prototype spy balloons in South Dakota earlier this year. The craft can fly at between 60,000ft and 80,000ft and cover a distance of more than 2,000 nautical miles – the distance from London to Timbuktu. Maria Eagle, the defence minister, said: 'This innovation is about giving our Armed Forces the edge – better awareness, better communications, and lower maintenance needs. 'Stratospheric technology like this could transform how we operate in complex environments, keeping our people safer and better informed than ever before. 'This successful trial is another example of UK defence pushing boundaries, with real potential to strengthen our future capabilities.' The balloons have been developed as part of Project Aether, a military research programme launched under the Tories in 2021. As well as providing military intelligence, they could also be used for support in disaster zones, providing fast wireless internet connections. Officials said the craft, which are fitted with tiny sensors, could also be used to improve weather forecasting and research into climate change. China has heavily deployed spy balloons in the past few years amid growing concerns about its surveillance operations against Western countries. US officials revealed earlier this year that the spy balloon they shot down in 2023 was packed with cutting edge American-made technology. The balloon spent a week crossing the US and Canada, flying over sensitive airbases and nuclear missile launch sites before being downed by an F-22. At the time, American officials said it had been used by China in an attempt to surveil strategic sites in the continental United States. In March of this year, Taiwan, which Beijing still claims sovereignty over, said it had detected six Chinese spy balloons off its main island. In a sign of growing Western fears, the French air force recently conducted an exercise in which fighter jets shot down high altitude balloons. Sébastien Lecornu, France's defence minister, said that near-space altitudes were becoming an 'area of conflict' amid heightened Chinese activity. The MoD's procurement body, known as Defence Equipment & Support (DE&S), is now leading Britain's efforts to develop its own spy balloon fleet. James Gavin, its head, said: 'Defence procurement is making strides in the innovation space and DE&S is looking more at the art of the possible, pushing the boundaries and scoping new technologies. 'These latest trials have been incredibly fruitful and pave the way for more collaborative working with our allies to develop capabilities that will benefit our Armed Forces.'
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Lawfare is the SAS's most dangerous enemy
It might at first glance appear odd that this deeply unpopular government is determined to repeal the Northern Ireland Legacy and Reconciliation Act. Britain's armed forces are one of the last institutions of which the nation is overwhelmingly proud. Why pursue its veterans at the risk of making itself even more unpopular? 'We want to be recruiting into the Armed Forces and we have a government who are about to reopen lawfare against our veterans,' remarked shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge. 'It is crazy.' The government say that they will repeal the Act, which was passed by the Tories in 2023, because it is incompatible with human rights legislation. Their other reasoning is that it is opposed by some of Northern Ireland's political parties as well as relatives of IRA terrorists. One of those relatives is the sister of an IRA terrorist who was killed by the SAS at Loughgall in 1987 along with seven other members of a cell that was en route to attack a remote police station. She and other relatives of the dead terrorists met Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn earlier this year and received a 'reassurance' that a legacy inquest will proceed. The Loughgall ambush was referenced by David Davis during last week's parliamentary debate about the intention to repeal the Legacy Act. The Conservative MP (a former SAS reservist) said that Sinn Féin were trying to portray themselves as victims and the British army as villains. 'That is why battles such as Coagh, Clonoe and, very likely soon, Loughgall feature so large in the demands for inquiries and the prosecution of long-retired, innocent British soldiers,' said David. 'All three of those actions were humiliating defeats for the IRA.' All three battles involved the SAS and, according to another Tory, Mark Francois, the possibility of future prosecutions is 'having an adverse effect on morale in the special forces community'. It is unlikely that will much bother the left. In May this year, Richard Williams, who commanded 22 SAS from 2005 to 2008, wrote a piece for this magazine entitled 'The BBC's War on the SAS'. It was a defence of the regiment against allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan. But the 'war' on the SAS isn't just being waged by elements within the BBC; it is part of a wider attack from a British left that has long loathed the regiment. This animosity stretches back to July 1945. Winston Churchill could in many ways be regarded as the founding father of Britain's special forces. It was his idea to raise the commandos in 1940, and he was an enthusiastic supporter of the SAS when they were formed the following year. His son, Randolph, served for a brief spell in the SAS in 1942 and was a friend of David Stirling, the founder of the regiment. When Churchill lost the 1945 general election, the SAS lost their principal backer. Within weeks they were disbanded, despite the best efforts of Stirling and other senior officers to persuade Clement Attlee's government that the SAS had a role to play in the post-war period. There were several reasons for the regiment's abolition: Attlee's naive belief that the future would be largely peaceful, the government's disapproval of the SAS's irregular nature and the fact that many of its senior officers were upper-class conservatives. Three of them, Lord George Jellicoe, Carol Mather and Stephen Hastings, would have distinguished post-war careers in the Tory party. Although the SAS were reformed as a regular regiment in 1952 – the year after Churchill had returned to power – David Stirling never forgave the Labour government for what he regarded as an act of betrayal. His grievance returned when Harold Wilson was elected PM in 1964, and by the time of his second administration in 1974 Stirling was convinced that Socialism was a clear and present danger to Britain. That year he formed an organisation called GB75, what he told the Times was a core of 'apprehensive patriots' ready to defend Britain against the 'chaos' of hard-left trade unionists and other activists. There was uproar among the Labour party and its media supporters. Stirling was accused of raising a 'private army', described by Defence Secretary Roy Mason as 'near-fascist'. Stirling retorted: Our motivation is to reinforce parliamentary authority in the country whereas Mr Mason is associated with a political party, the left-wing of which can be genuinely stated to be thoroughly undemocratic. GB75 was disbanded but the left-wing press had Stirling and the SAS in their sights. The smear campaign against them reached its height in 1978 and 1979, a time when the regiment was fighting a bloody war with the IRA. Time Out magazine, then a radical left publication, described the SAS as 'Pedigree Dogs of War' and accused them of being guns for hire. In March 1979 Major General Peter de la Billiere, Director of the SAS, took the unprecedented step of writing to the Daily Telegraph to defend the regiment. He was 'disturbed' at their media portrayal, 'as if it were some secret undercover organisation'. This is how the SAS is still regarded by some on the British left, whether politicians, journalists or lawyers. As Richard Williams wrote in these pages, 'the SAS is under fire' but not from terrorists or insurgents. Their adversary is 'lawfare' and it might be their most dangerous enemy yet.
Leader Live
2 days ago
- Leader Live
Ombudsman clears Wrexham councillor who challenged LDP
The independent Ombudsman has ruled that Plaid Cymru group leader Cllr Marc Jones did not breach the Code of Conduct by jointly initiating legal proceedings in Wrexham Council's name with two other members of the council. As a result, it has ruled no further action should be taken. 'The overwhelming feeling is of relief after waiting for 20 months,' said Cllr Jones. 'This feels like the end of a chapter, even if it's not the end of the entire saga surrounding the Local Development Plan (LDP). We stood up for what we believed was the right thing for Wrexham communities and the right of councillors and local democracy to be heard. 'Others didn't feel the same way and tried every way possible to silence us. Ultimately it didn't work and the courts, police and now the Ombudsman have found in our favour. 'It's time to move on and get the LDP withdrawn so that we can ensure we have a plan going forward that works for Wrexham and its communities.' That could happen next Wednesday when an extraordinary meeting of Wrexham Council has been called to debate a notice of motion asking Welsh Government to formally withdraw the LDP. Related reading: The LDP is the strategic plan that outlines where development is appropriate within Wrexham County Borough. It was considered a statutory duty for all Welsh Council's to adopt an LDP until Cllr Jones led a challenge against Wrexham's plan. The opposition to the plan stemmed from what Cllr Jones called the 'excessive allocation of housing on greenfield sites'. That challenge went all the way to the UK Supreme Court who ruled that the authority did not have to adopt the LDP. Currently planning committee can still use the LDP as a guide when deciding applications, but if withdrawn it will fall back to the outdated Unitary Development Plan. During the legal battle, a complaint was made to the Ombudsman that Cllr Jones and his supporters had breached the code of conduct for councillors by beginning legal action on the council's behalf. However, the Ombudsman accepted the explanation that Cllr Jones had taken the action to 'uphold and defend the democratic decisions of the council in April and June 2023 to reject the LDP'. It also accepted that while acting outside the council's usual legal framework could be considered bringing the council into disrepute, stating: 'the factual context of the Member's conduct and subsequent series of events provides strong mitigating factors which must be duly considered when deciding whether further action is required, in the public interest. 'I have considered that the council's statutory officers were acting in good faith and on the external legal advice received at the time, did not take steps to uphold the council/members' decisions not to adopt the draft LDP. 'However, as confirmed by the more recent Court of Appeal decision instituted by the Member, it appears that the officers' position, that the members were obliged to adopt the draft LDP, was based on an incorrect interpretation of the law. 'The crowdfunding campaign established to take further legal challenges against the adoption of the draft LDP received strong public support. Because of this, I have concluded that any impact on the public's perception of the member's conduct – and accordingly the public interest factors and considerations relevant to this complaint – significantly changed during the course of the investigation. 'For these reasons, I do not believe that any further action is required in the public interest.' Cllr Jones said the decision drew a line under the debate and added he wanted to move beyond the legal argument. 'People don't want urban sprawl,' said Cllr Jones. 'They don't want huge super-estates with no community facilities, they want improved public services, genuinely affordable homes, better transport links and the focus of any developments to be on derelict land and empty properties. 'That's the focus for me now – looking forward to improve Wrexham rather than looking back in anger.'
