A low-risk options trade on this IT services stock that recently sold off
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Molina (MOH) Loses 18.3% in 4 Weeks, Here's Why a Trend Reversal May be Around the Corner
Molina (MOH) has been beaten down lately with too much selling pressure. While the stock has lost 18.3% over the past four weeks, there is light at the end of the tunnel as it is now in oversold territory and Wall Street analysts expect the company to report better earnings than they predicted earlier. We use Relative Strength Index (RSI), one of the most commonly used technical indicators, for spotting whether a stock is oversold. This is a momentum oscillator that measures the speed and change of price movements. RSI oscillates between zero and 100. Usually, a stock is considered oversold when its RSI reading falls below 30. Technically, every stock oscillates between being overbought and oversold irrespective of the quality of their fundamentals. And the beauty of RSI is that it helps you quickly and easily check if a stock's price is reaching a point of reversal. So, by this measure, if a stock has gotten too far below its fair value just because of unwarranted selling pressure, investors may start looking for entry opportunities in the stock for benefiting from the inevitable rebound. However, like every investing tool, RSI has its limitations, and should not be used alone for making an investment decision. The RSI reading of 21.88 for MOH is an indication that the heavy selling could be in the process of exhausting itself, so the stock could bounce back in a quest for reaching the old equilibrium of supply and demand. The RSI value is not the only factor that indicates a potential turnaround for the stock in the near term. On the fundamental side, there has been strong agreement among the sell-side analysts covering the stock in raising earnings estimates for the current year. Over the last 30 days, the consensus EPS estimate for MOH has increased 0%. And an upward trend in earnings estimate revisions usually translates into price appreciation in the near term. Moreover, MOH currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), which means it is in the top 20% of more than 4,000 stocks that we rank based on trends in earnings estimate revisions and EPS surprises. This is a more conclusive indication of the stock's potential turnaround in the near term. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> . Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Molina Healthcare, Inc (MOH) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Datadog is Joining the S&P 500 Index, But is DDOG Stock a Buy on the Breakout?
Datadog (DDOG) stock is in focus this morning, thanks to the news that it's set to join the benchmark S&P 500 Index ($SPX) effective July 9, replacing acquisition target Juniper Networks (JNPR). This marks a pivotal moment for the cloud observability leader, and the market's immediate response has been overwhelmingly positive, with DDOG stock surging approximately 8.7% in premarket trading. That puts DDOG on pace to break above its upper Bollinger Band, and would place the stock firmly in short-term overbought territory, based on its 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI). Is UnitedHealth Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for July 2025? Michael Saylor Says 'You'll Wish You'd Bought More' Bitcoin as MicroStrategy Doubles Down Is Microsoft Stock About to Go Nuclear? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Operating in a competitive cloud observability market valued between $2.9-8.56 billion, Datadog faces competition from established players like Elastic (ESTC), Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), and Cisco (CSCO). However, DDOG's selection for S&P 500 inclusion over other candidates like AppLovin (APP) and Robinhood (HOOD) suggests a strategic preference for companies focused on foundational enterprise technology and infrastructure management. The stock's new S&P 500 status is expected to drive considerable buying demand for Datadog shares, too, as index funds and ETFs will need to adjust their portfolios to maintain accurate benchmark representation. Datadog's market capitalization of $46.63 billion significantly exceeds the S&P 500's minimum threshold of $22.7 billion, validating its position among America's leading corporations. The company's strong financial performance underpins this status, as evidenced by its impressive Q1 2025 results - where DDOG reported revenue of $761.55 million, representing a 25% year-over-year increase. Datadog's success in securing larger enterprise deals is particularly noteworthy, with 11 contracts worth at least $10 million signed in Q1 2025, demonstrating growing adoption across major enterprises. Additionally, the company's strategic investments and recent partnership with Microsoft-backed OpenAI have strengthened its position in the cloud monitoring and security space, particularly through innovations like its Bits AI offering. This month's major S&P milestone not only validates Datadog's business model, but also signals the growing importance of software-defined infrastructure management in the modern economy. The timing is particularly significant, as it coincides with increasing enterprise adoption of cloud services and the company's strengthening position in agentic artificial intelligence (AI) trends, where autonomous systems operate without human intervention. Wedbush Securities has expressed increased confidence in Datadog's prospects by raising their price target to $170 from $140, citing the company's strong position in the observability space and elevated AI usage across its enterprise customer base. Analysts project significant margin improvement, with expectations for Datadog to reach 40% free cash flow margin by 2029, potentially driving substantial value creation. With AI and analytics budgets on the rise, Datadog's new go-to-market strategy is positioned to drive increased deal flow for cloud migration monitoring and digital transformation projects. Overall, Wall Street analysts rate DDOG stock a 'Strong Buy,' although the shares are set to open today above their consensus price target of $140.57. Valued at a forward price/earnings-to-growth ratio of 3.02, investors should note that Datadog trades at a relatively steep premium - and with the stock looking overbought from a technical perspective, it could be somewhat risky to chase today's rally in DDOG. This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. On the date of publication, the editor had a position in: MSFT. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Okta Tightens Agent Identities For Machine-To-Machine Connections
Black and white cybernetic robot hands pointing at each other When will full autonomy happen? It's the question tabled at every technology vendor meeting these days. The IT industry is frantically building agentic AI services and everybody wants a stake at the table. With various CEOs (including those from Salesforce and Microsoft) both claiming to now hand over somewhere between 30 to 50 percent of work to AI services, the degree to which agents now start talking to agents is of great importance. Human, Out Of The Loop? Until recently, technology advocates and evangelists were fond of mentioning the human-in-the-loop (and human handoff) element when talking about emerging AI services. It was a sort of appropriate lip service that needed mentioning, just to calm the people who worry about the robots taking over. A lot of that has changed and of course Google underlined the trend this April with the introduction of the A2A agentic communications standard. '[We have launched] a new, open protocol called Agent2Agent, with support and contributions from more than 50 technology partners. The A2A protocol will allow AI agents to communicate with each other, securely exchange information and coordinate actions on top of various enterprise platforms or applications. We believe the A2A framework will add significant value for customers, whose AI agents will now be able to work across their entire enterprise application estates,' noted the Google for Developers blog. But where are humans in the loop now? Speaking at a press gathering in London this week, Nutanix CEO Rajiv Ramaswami acknowledged the forthcoming inevitability of agentic intercommunication and said that his firm is working to provide as broad a scope of cloud infrastructure as possible to enable the new (and next) age of AI with simpler (if not pleasingly invisible) cloud services. Acknowledging that the infrastructure comes first… and then agentic identity management comes as a subsequent tier (for which Nutanix itself will look to collaborate with its now significantly expanded partner ecosystem, which has swelled in the wake of VMware's move to Broadcom), Ramaswami called for an understanding into how, when, why and where we weave this new fabric of intelligence. Identity Steps Up If it is time for hardcore identity players to come forward, then identity platform company Okta would arguably rank in the 'usual suspect' lineup in this space. This summer, the company introduced Cross App Access, a new protocol to help secure AI agents. As an extension of the open standard OAuth (technology that provides authorization controls to grant third-party applications access to other resources), Okta says its new services bring control to both agent-driven and app-to-app interactions. In short, it allows developers and data scientists to decide what apps are connecting to what… and what information AI agents can actually access. According to Arnab Bose, chief product officer for Okta platform, more AI tools are using technologes like Model Context Protocol and A2A to connect their AI learning models to relevant data and applications within the enterprise. However, for connections to be established between agents and apps themselves (think about Google Drive or Slack as good examples of applications that an agent might want access to) users need to manually log in and consent to grant the agent access to each integration. Amplified Agentic Explosion Bose says that despite this truth, app-to-app connections occur without oversight, with IT and security teams having to rely on manual and inconsistent processes to gain visibility. This creates a big blind spot in enterprise security and expands an increasingly unmanaged perimeter. This challenge, he says, will be amplified with the explosion of AI agents, which are introducing new, non-deterministic access patterns, crossing system boundaries, triggering actions on their own and interacting with sensitive data. The position at Okta is that 'today's security controls aren't equipped to handle their autonomy, scale and unpredictability' and that existing identity standards are not designed for securing an interconnected web of services and applications in the enterprise. The company says that while MCP improves transparency and communication between agents, it could still benefit from additional identity access management features. 'We're actively working with the MCP and A2A communities to improve AI agents' functionality, their increased access to data and the explosion of app-to-app connections will create new identity security challenges,' said Bose. "With Cross App Access, Okta brings oversight and control to how agents interact across the enterprise. Since protocols are only as powerful as the ecosystem that supports them, we're also committed to collaborating across the software industry to help provide agents with secure, standardized access to all apps.' Where Agents Need Tightening The question now, presumably, is where exactly should we tighten up identity controls for agentic AI services first? The password login box has been a bull's-eye for attackers for a long time. Why? Because it's the primary path to sensitive data. Although most people now realize that "password123" is a bad idea, organizations will now need to gain a new and fundamental understanding of their sprawling human and machine identities. 'Now, take that existing chaos and multiply it by a million. Picture a world where millions of AI agents, autonomous pieces of code acting on behalf of both users and other machines, are interacting with your systems. Suddenly, that messy frontline looks like a wide-open battlefield. We could be in for a world of trouble,' said Shiv Ramji, president, AuthO at Okta. According to PwC's AI Agent Survey, nearly 80% of senior executives said their companies are already adopting AI agents. However, by moving quickly from prototypes to production without adequate governance and access controls, there is a real potential for agentic AI 'shadow IT' and the introduction of systemic risk. The bottom line for developers is all about keeping the IT stack secure, enabling new agent-to-agent intercourse to happen… and still keep the existing operational lights on. But this time, it's not just identity. It extends beyond access to who has permissions to specific resources, such as databases, documents, internal sites, wiki pages, other tools/systems, and other agents. Agentic Weakness Factors Ramji asks us to consider the following risk factors: 'So, how do we tackle these systemic risks at scale? This isn't just about individual application hardening; it's about establishing a standardized, secure way for agents to function in an interconnected world. Open protocols, such as MCP and Google's A2A, will be key to this, enabling interoperability and preventing vendor lock-in. While MCP focuses on an agent's interaction with tools, Google's A2A protocol addresses the equally crucial problem of how AI agents communicate and collaborate with each other. In a complex enterprise environment, you won't have just one agent; you'll have an ecosystem of specialized agents,' said Ramji. 'This is also why you need to build identity security into your AI agents from the ground up. The Way Forward The safest way forward in this space appears to include several factors, such as the need to architect bespoke login flows for AI agents. This means dedicated authentication mechanisms designed for machine-to-machine interaction. Okta's Ramji concludes his commentary in this space by saying that organizations need to use OAuth 2.0 for secure tool integrations i.e. when AI agents integrate with external services like Gmail or Slack, we don't need to reinvent the wheel, we can lean on established, secure authorization frameworks like OAuth 2.0 today. Organizations should also still design for human-in-the-loop approvals, especially for critical or sensitive actions, bake in a mechanism for human oversight. While Okta's key competitor list includes Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco (for Duo Security) ForgeRock, OneLogin, CyberArk, IBM for its Security Verify layer and all three major cloud hyperscalers from AWS to Google Cloud to Microsoft Azure… most of the vendors in this space would largely concur with the general subject matter discussed here. It's all about human management in the first instance and that's why documentation is fundamental in any scenario like this where code annotations have to exist to prove what connects to what. Humans will still be in the loop, even when that loop is humans building an agent-to-agent loop… and that's a large part of of how we keep this tier of software application development working properly.
