Glennon Doyle's antisemitic posts have no place at pride. Reconsider, Nashville
Glennon Doyle, a best-selling author and social media icon with millions of followers, was recently named Grand Marshal of Nashville Pride.
This honor is meant to reflect the highest values of the LGBTQ+ community. But Doyle's platform has become a megaphone amplifying disinformation that endangers Jews — and distorts the truth about Israel.
On May 16th, Doyle posted on Instagram: 'For the love of all humanity: FREE PALESTINE.'
Four days later, she reposted a viral claim — since retracted by the United Nations — that 14,000 babies in Gaza had 'less than 48 hours to live.' She closed her caption again with the words: 'Free Palestine'
Let's stop pretending this is harmless.
On May 25th in Washington, D.C., two young people — Sarah Milgrim, a Jewish woman, and Yaron Lischinsky, a Christian Israeli man — were targeted and murdered at a Jewish peace event. The gathering, hosted by the American Jewish Committee and attended by Israeli embassy staff and young American delegates, focused on humanitarian aid for Gazan civilians.
After pulling the trigger, the shooter shouted: 'Free Palestine.'
On June 1st in Boulder, Colorado, another violent attack took place. Molotov cocktails were hurled at Jews in broad daylight — including a Holocaust survivor. The assailant screamed 'Free Palestine' as he lit Jewish bodies on fire.
Let's be clear: 'Free Palestine' — a political slogan tied to the Iranian-backed BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement — is doing exactly what it was designed to do: morph into an open call for violence.
More: A surge in antisemitism on campuses is changing how Jewish students pick universities
These are not innocent reposts. These are narratives that demonize Jews, erase Zionism, call for the destruction of Israel and undermine American values. From Instagram captions to the final words of murderers, this is no longer just a chant. It's a weapon.
And this isn't just a Jewish problem. This is an American problem.
Islamist radicalization — fueled by online propaganda, spread through campus activism and now cloaked in the language of influencer 'empathy' — is here. And it is deadly.
The irony is hard to ignore: Doyle champions a cause whose militant factions would criminalize her very existence as a gay woman — an identity that, in most all of these regimes, is punishable by death.
Yet whether knowingly or not, she continues to echo slogans rooted in movements hostile to LGBTQ+ rights and women's freedoms.
I write this not just as a Jew, but as a Nashvillian. I recently returned from a post-war delegate mission to Israel, my third since the war.
I've walked through the ashes of October 7th. I've spoken to survivors. I've embraced released hostages. I've met with those on the physical front lines of this conflict as well as foreign ambassadors brokering solutions.
I've attended foreign-policy conferences focused on peace and accountability. And I've seen how disinformation spreads online before the truth can take a breath.
What Doyle may see as compassion is functioning as accelerant — fueling age-old antisemitic tropes and justifying hate on American soil. Her followers are not extremists. They're American women, moms, activists, authors, dreamers and influencers — many of whom now echo phrases like 'genocide,' 'apartheid' and 'settler-colonialism' without context, education or accountability.
This isn't empathy. It's a polished, pastel-wrapped form of hate — and it's metastasizing.
More: Nashville Jewish community reflects on Israel support since Oct. 7, rallies for road ahead
It flattens geopolitical complexity into clickbait and repackages extremism as virtue. It radicalizes soccer moms in yoga pants, sipping green juice and posting 'sham spirituality' between affiliate links while chanting BDS slogans they don't understand.
Chief among them: 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free' — a call for the erasure of Israel and the Jewish people.
Worse, it's being celebrated. Instead of confronting the harm Doyle's posts have caused, Nashville is rewarding her with the Grand Marshal title — a role that symbolizes community trust, visibility and shared values.
We know false claims travel faster than truth. And their damage lingers. Nearly 70% of people still believe misinformation even after it's been debunked. And nearly half the world's population — 46%, according to the ADL — harbors antisemitic views.
In this climate, elevating someone like Doyle isn't just irresponsible. It's reckless.
Jewish safety is everyone's safety. What begins with the Jews never ends with us. A society that tolerates antisemitism invites violence, radicalization and collapse — for all.
This isn't a call to cancel. It's a call to wake up.
Doyle must take responsibility. She must meet with Jewish leaders, learn the truth behind the slogans she's amplified and publicly acknowledge the damage done. Silence is complicity. Influence is never neutral.
And Nashville Pride must reconsider its decision.
You cannot fight for one group's dignity by standing on the neck of another. You cannot celebrate love while platforming hate. Let this be a moment of intellectual courage and civic clarity.
Because when slogans become weapons and lies go viral, our only defense is truth. And who we choose to elevate reveals who we are.
Alyssa Rosenheck is a bestselling author and photographer who uses her lens to advocate for our collective home. Through her forthcoming book, White. Blonde. Jew. (Spring 2026), and firsthand insights from post-war delegations to Israel, she confronts modern antisemitism while inspiring truth-tellers and cultural clarity.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Nashville Pride Grand Marshal Doyle is complicit in hate | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
How does it feel to be an American? We asked, and you answered.
We heard from schoolteachers, IT professionals, musicians, veterans, retirees, and caregivers. Above all, we heard from a pool of people deeply committed to the American project. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Pride, betrayal, and duty: A veteran's call to lead by example Ian Thomson, military veteran and entrepreneur, Cape Town, South Africa Born abroad to American and Colombian parents, raised across cultures and continents, educated at Boston University, my identity was never simple. At 18, I consciously chose America; not out of obligation but out of admiration for its core values. My commitment deepened when I joined the Marines, eager to embody and defend the principles that drew me: liberty, equality of opportunity, and the promise of justice for all. I finally felt that my American-ness was unquestionable when I first pinned on the Eagle, Globe, and Anchor at the end of officer candidate school, where the motto was 'ductus exemplo' — imploring us to lead by example. Those ideals were tested when strict rules of engagement clashed with my conscience: facing an injured child in a war zone, I chose humanitarian compassion over military compliance (and I was proud that in that moment I served my country faithfully). It was a reminder of the paradox of law, that sometimes obedience becomes complicity, and disobedience becomes our duty. Rosa Parks broke the law — and she was right. Nazi concentration camp guards, tobacco executives, and Enron accountants all hid behind the law — and they were wrong. Morality does not reside in compliance; it resides in conscience. Today, however, my American pride is tinged with a sense of betrayal — not solely by leaders acting in self-interest, but by my fellow Americans, whose silence and acceptance of falsehoods allow dangerous narratives pushed by our leaders to flourish. Recent events remind us how easily power cloaks itself in moral pretense. This July Fourth, let's reaffirm our commitment to integrity and beat the odds that suggest our decline is inevitable. Preserving a nation worthy of its promise can't be relegated only to those wearing a uniform; it is the duty of all Americans who believe that through leading by example, with honesty and accountability, we can truly be free. Finding America in conversations with strangers Alex Chueh, writer, Cambridge Our nation brims with stories about hopeful souls formulating plans that imbue life with purpose; striving, scheming, American dreaming. An American's initial impulse isn't why? , but why not? I learned this firsthand by hatching my own shamelessly ambitious project: meeting someone new every single day. Since Nov. 20, 2022, no day has gone by without me talking to a stranger. America responded with a resounding, hell yeah! Initially I prepared to get blown off. But most Americans I chatted up at coffee shops or city parks lit up with excitement, intuitively connecting with me. Time and again, these spontaneous conversations have gifted me with unforgettable stories and lifelong friendships. Why has it worked? Americans are remarkably open, shockingly willing to unspool their lives to a stranger. (I learn at least one family inside joke a week.) From Iowa cornfields to the Maine coast, rifle clubs to yoga studios, and factory workers to literature PhDs, American openness transcends cultural divides. My journal holds endless scarcely believable examples: Yup, I really did get an impromptu shooting lesson from Appalachian teens eating at a roadside pizza shop. No wonder I've found America a delightful place to meet people, and an even better place to be myself. A plea for a better America Reya Kumar, communications specialist, Boston Every Fourth of July, I write an Instagram post about how I felt about America that year. It's a way to wrestle with my complicated relationship with my American identity. When I think about America, I'm caught between frustration at our failures and an unshakeable hope for what this country has the capacity to be. I grew up saying the Pledge of Allegiance every morning at school, believing deeply in the promise of 'liberty and justice for all.' Even when I'm sorely disappointed in our leaders and systems, I could never imagine leaving. This country is too much a part of who I am, even when it breaks my heart. This Fourth of July feels different. We're celebrating independence from a king while our president But that's exactly why I refuse to write off this country. The most beautiful thing about America is that we have the capacity to change it. From abolishing slavery to winning marriage equality, our history is one of imperfect progress — messy, slow, but real. Being American means holding two truths simultaneously: loving your country enough to demand better from it, and believing that better is possible. Upholding American values: A daily fight against fear Elliot, nurse, Hampshire County My grandparents came here from Latin America with their two young sons and truly lived the American dream. I've heard stories of how my dad earned his pocket money in the garage of his childhood home, helping his dad machine munitions casings for the military when he wasn't working at the factory. Now I worry that my 93-year-old grandmother will be stopped and something about her — her accent, the way she dresses, the color of her skin or hair — will give some power-hungry bureaucrat the excuse to say she doesn't belong. I'm also a transgender nurse, who works in transgender health care. I spend every day reassuring my patients that we are still here, still providing the lifesaving care they need, as long as we possibly can. Then I go home and wonder if I'll still have access to the care I need in 3 months, 6 months, a year. Some days I live in panic that America can't come back from this, at least not an America I can be proud to belong to. Most days I try to make my little pocket of America a place that lives up to its values. That means volunteering for community meals; honking support for the protesters and the picket lines; attending the local civic association meetings, even when they bore me out of my mind; and comforting my partner when It means doing something, doing anything, doing everything I can, to feel like there could be good in this place, despite the evidence. The dream isn't dead Jon Dickinson, tech entrepreneur, Portsmouth, N.H. My first memory was being one of three kids under five, gloriously crammed into an 800-square-foot rental with my parents and a dog. My parents worked multiple jobs to make ends meet. My grandparents and aunt helped raise us, offering laughter, love, and structure. With little time to supervise, my parents gave us independence, as long as we did our chores and followed the rules. Freedom came with responsibility. Strict discipline ensured I respected boundaries. I was expected to be courteous, hold a job, save money, and pay for college. Weeks after graduating college, I moved from Wisconsin to Boston with a suitcase, $375, and full confidence I'd find success. I couch-surfed and slept on floors for a few months. I worked retail by day and was a bouncer at night to make ends meet. When I finally landed a job in tech, I poured everything into the opportunity, became successful, and bought a business. I honor my parents by showing my children the same mettle and passion they showed me. My work has taken me all over the US, where I've made amazing friends and been involved in exciting projects. Some say the American dream is dead. I don't buy it. Too many are distracted by media outrage, virtue signaling, and curated personal narratives. Opportunities exist for everyone but are won only when you hold yourself accountable for your own success. Our country is becoming what immigrants once tried to escape Juan Wulff, student, Needham I grew up in Venezuela missing school because of protests and riots, watching my parents' universities crumble, and hearing constant talk about inflation and the economy. So when I immigrated to the United States at age 8, the latter part of 'Venezuelan American' felt like a new, fresh part of my identity. At school I memorized the Pledge of Allegiance, caught up on American media, and made American friends with my American accent. Later, when my parents were naturalized, I finally felt really American. Since then, I have fulfilled my parents' American dreams and will go to college. Yet I am entering a university fighting for its existence with a federal government that is trying to silence it. I live in an America where my people are hated, disappeared, and separated from their loved ones. I am American in an America I no longer recognize, one that looks like the place from which I escaped. A young first-generation American still hopeful for its opportunities Michael Barbalat, high schooler, Newton My parents and grandparents came to this country from the Soviet Union. When they arrived, they didn't have job guarantees, they didn't have a plan, they didn't even speak much English. But they believed America would give them a chance to start again. And it did. I grew up hearing their stories at the dinner table and, even as a kid, I understood that being here meant being able to speak your mind, choose your own path, and live without fear. For me, being American means having the freedom to think for yourself. It means being able to build your life in a way that feels right to you, without having to follow a predetermined path. It's not always easy, it's not promised, and it's definitely not perfect, but there's something unique and amazing about the idea that in this country your future is, in many ways, up to you. Optimistic that brighter days are ahead Casey Tylek, military veteran and research scientist, Leominster I'm as proud to be an American as I ever was. I carry on the tradition of this country, in being a perpetual optimist, never believing that something can't be done or accomplished. Whether it was in the taverns in the 1700s where independence was born, the Wright brothers believing they could fly, scientists working to put men on the moon, or Martin Luther King Jr. taking on the most powerful government on earth in pursuit of equal rights, this country has always inspired the idea that there are better days ahead, and is full of people working to accomplish that. Whether your beliefs align with the current leaders, or clash with them — America will move forward with constant innovation and tranquility. A mother fears that the worst of our culture has prevailed Sophia Carroll, mother and writer, Concord I was an exchange student to East Germany in 1994, soon after reunification, and people were so excited to meet their first American. My world was free from so much they had endured: widespread censorship, surveillance and arrests, the romanticizing of mindless factory work, economic stagnation, and corrupt officials who took orders from Russia. Layered structures of intimidation protected those with power by keeping regular people silent, stressed out, and poor. Now half of America seems to be naïvely embracing similar treatment from our own government. I wish those who rage against illegal immigrants would ask themselves: Isn't it better to live in a country that people are sneaking into than one they sneak out of? If we continue following Trump down his embarrassing gold-tone escalator, it will be a tragic fate for our once-great nation. People who live surrounded by fear are not free. Conflicted, worried, but still proud Joshua, data technician, Newton I've long held contradictory feelings as an American. There is a great democratic heritage in this country to be proud of: the But hypocrisy, inequality, and ignorance are American, too. We've fallen for demagogues and snake-oil salesmen before. Reconstruction was followed by a century of terror against freedmen; our democracy has been stunted by disenfranchisement; the financial oligarchy has now totally captured the state and is using it to claw back all the working-class gains of the past century. Despite everything, despite feeling some days like America neither wants me, its native son, nor my wife, an immigrant, I'm proud of the America of Tom Paine and Sam Adams, of Frederick Douglass and John Brown, of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant, of Eugene Debs and John Reed, of Medgar Evers and Viola Liuzzo, of Editors: Jim Dao, Rebecca Spiess. Digital editor: Rami Abou-Sabe. Audience engagement editor: Karissa Korman. Copy editor: Karen Schlosberg. Podcast: Katelyn Harrop and Shirley Leung.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Michael Goodwin: Cuomo remains NYC's best shot to keep socialist Mamdani from being mayor – or the city will never be the same
He lost the primary by a stunning 12-point blowout, but as strange as it sounds, the ball is again back in Andrew Cuomo's court. Is he going to run a serious campaign in the general election, or is he ending his political career with a humiliating defeat? That's the key question for him, but it's also vital for the November election. Cuomo's answer is crucial because the Democrats' full-blown socialist nominee, Zohran Mamdani, is a heavy favorite to win. If he does and is able to implement even half of his radical agenda, New York will never be the same. It's teetering under the flawed leadership of Mayor Adams, but Mamdani is a human wrecking ball whose City Hall would make these troubled days look like a Golden Age. His policies would destroy Gotham's economy and shred the fragile social fabric. Nepo baby disaster His plan to freeze rents on 1 million privately owned apartments would turn the housing crisis into an unfixable disaster. What private developer is going to build apartments if it means losing money on the whims of a nepo-baby mayor who never held a job in the private sector? And if government becomes the major builder, look to the perpetually troubled Housing Authority projects for a vision of the hellscape future. Follow The Post's coverage of the NYC mayoral race Mamdani's racist plan to tax white-owned property higher than others and his support for antisemitic policies are beyond the pale. On top of his backing for the BDS movement, his refusal to condemn the odious phrase 'globalize the intifada' offers tacit support for violence against Jews in Israel and around the world. He's also a 33-year-old elitist who joined the 'defund the police' mob and has talked about dismantling the jail system. Next to him, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is a throw-away-the-key champion of law and order. New York has never had a mayor so far out of the mainstream. The closest was Bill de Blasio, and Mayor Putz was the worst leader the city had in 50 years. Which brings us back to Cuomo. The November ballot essentially comes down to a four-person race. In addition to Mamdani on the Dem line, Cuomo and Eric Adams hold independent lines, and Curtis Sliwa is the GOP nominee. Cuomo I believe, is the only one with a realistic chance of defeating Mamdani. Yes, yes, I know that's a hard sell in the immediate aftermath of the thumping the former governor suffered last week. Mamdani beat him by 7 points on the straight vote counting, and the final margin grew to 12 points when the ranked-choice votes were tabulated. Full of regrets The difference reflected the cross-endorsement arrangements Mamdani made with like-minded lefties that enabled him to pick up much of their support when they were eliminated. But the key was the record turnout of 100,000 new voters from ages 18 to 30, who went overwhelmingly for the Queens lawmaker. Polls didn't pick up the surge until the very end, with Cuomo consistently a dominant front-runner since March. One result was that Cuomo was too cautious, acting like an incumbent playing not to lose instead of playing to win. His Rose Garden strategy of skipping candidate forums and granting few interviews reflected what the polls were saying: that his lead was safe. It wasn't and I'm told he's now full of regrets and admits he ran a terrible race. He acknowledged as much in a brief statement to me late Tuesday, in which he said the 'buck stops with me' and that 'I should have focused on a simpler affordability message even in these complex times.' After saying that 'Effective social media is paramount,' he added, 'We're going through the data, but there's no question a fall campaign needs to be a different effort informed by the lessons of this one.' His points reflect the fact that his ads, including those of his well-funded PAC, were good enough in a vacuum, but never countered his opponent's appeal to new voters. In addition, Cuomo was saddled with his own disgraceful exit from Albany four years ago over sexual harassment allegations. He also carries the baggage of his fatal Health Department order requiring nursing homes to take COVID patients, and he never owned and apologized for either, apparently assuming they were too far in the past to matter. He's wrong, and to run in the fall, he must express honest regret to voters. Poll optimism Still, there is already one poll looking ahead that is giving his team some optimism. It was conducted in the first two days after the primary, but got little attention. It deserves more. The Cuomo-aligned Honan Strategy Group found that, going into the general, Cuomo and Mamdani are essentially tied at 39%, with Adams at 13% and Sliwa at 7%. The survey considered two major scenarios: First, if Cuomo didn't actively campaign, Mamdani would have a lead of 15 points over Adams. Second, if Adams effectively decided to drop out, Cuomo would lead Mamdani by four points. In part that's because Cuomo did well among black voters, and would do even better absent Adams. One important finding was this sentence from the pollsters: 'We examined voter sentiment towards the leading candidates among General Election voters, and found that only Andrew Cuomo has a positive favorability rating of 56% to 43% unfavorable.' They found 'Mamdani is more negative than positive, at 48% unfavorable to 40% favorable.' Remember, these results were obtained in the aftermath of Mamdani's victory. Another key takeaway is that 66% of likely fall voters have an unfavorable opinion of Adams, with only 23% favorable. Two-thirds disapprove of his job performance, and '75% agree with the statement that Eric Adams is corrupt and should not run for reelection.' Those findings suggest Adams has almost no chance of winning. The numbers haven't escaped the Cuomo camp, which also believes Sliwa cannot win. Party infighting Part of their confidence in a potential comeback is that Cuomo, although elected four times as a Democrat — once for attorney general and three times as governor — has long had a tense relationship with the party's progressive wing that dominates primaries. Clearly, that wing has grown dramatically in the city, but his team believes the mix of general election voters would be more moderate and more receptive to his ideas. They also believe the fear over a Mamdani mayoralty, even among top Dem officials, works in his favor. One part of his agenda that could be important is Cuomo's plan to hire 5,000 more police officers and keep the popular and successful Jessica Tisch as commissioner of the NYPD. The contrast with Mamdani's anti-police rhetoric and 'defund' record deserves more attention than it got during the primary. My prediction is that Cuomo, after licking his wounds and sounding out key donors and supporters, will throw himself into the November race. At this point, foolish pride is the only thing he has left to lose.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
I was chased out of MIT — and it was all because I'm Jewish
Before Oct. 7, 2023, I was the literal poster boy for a Ph.D. student at MIT. I was featured in a July 2023 profile in MIT News, which relayed my background and aspirations. 'Although he has just two years of graduate school under his belt,' it said, 'Sussman is considering a career in academia.' That career is no longer available to me. In January, I left MIT because of the antisemitism I experienced on campus. Now I'm suing the university. Advertisement The antisemitism didn't start on Oct. 7. I joined the board of MIT Grad Hillel during my first year on campus because, as I told MIT News, 'I think it's important to demonstrate Jewish culture at a time when antisemitism is on the rise.' Three months after the profile was published, Hamas terrorists waged the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust — and my fellow students at MIT celebrated, posting, 'Victory is ours.' Chanting for violence As president of Grad Hillel, I had to cope not only with my own grief but also with that of my community members who sought support in the face of antisemitism that they encountered on campus. We witnessed our peers chant for violence against Jews, take over buildings, interrupt classes with antisemitic rants, and harass, intimidate and bully Jews for being Jewish. This hostile environment was exposed to the world in December 2023 when MIT's president, Sally Kornbluth, was called to Congress alongside the presidents of Harvard and Penn, to answer for the antisemitism on her campus. Advertisement She testified, now infamously, that calls for the elimination of the Jewish people can be antisemitic 'depending on the context.' After that day, calls for the genocide of Jews continued, and the climate of terror on campus intensified. It became increasingly difficult to focus on my computer science research. Students were arrested for unruly protest both inside and outside my office building. A man urinated on the window of the MIT Hillel Center. When demonstrators erected an encampment in the middle of campus, MIT Hillel was forced to move and postpone its long-planned annual celebration of Israel's Independence Day. With MIT doing nothing to curb the escalating antisemitism on campus, the situation spiraled out of control. In November 2024, a tenured MIT professor posted online that a 'Zionist 'mind infection' ' is being funded by 'Jewish student life organizations' such as Hillel and Chabad. Advertisement When I pointed out that his message was extremely dangerous rhetoric, the professor began targeting me personally in X posts to his 10,000 followers. He did so over and over again. In his sixth post, for example, he referred to me as 'an excellent case study.' I sent the professor an email with a simple request: 'Please leave me alone.' He then emailed the entire Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, including students and faculty, promising to use me in his upcoming seminar as a 'real-life case study' of the Jewish 'mind infection.' He continued targeting me in a relentless series of mass emails, copying high-level administrators, including President Kornbluth. In one of these emails, he stated that I have 'powerful connections' to the media and to 'influential friends in Congress like Rep. Elise Stefanik' — which is false. Staying silent Suddenly, I became the target of widespread harassment. Students, staff and non-affiliates piled on, amplifying the professor's vitriol against me. One staff member sent a mass email painting me as a racist. My mother worried I would be killed. Advertisement The most disturbing aspect of this whole episode was that President Kornbluth — who was copied on the exchange where the harassment was on display in real time — stayed silent, as did the other high-level administrators. Not one of them intervened. On the morning of the seminar, flyers were slipped under the doors in the graduate dormitory where I used to live, containing an article advocating for violent 'resistance' against Jews. The flyer specifically targeted me. It contained a graphic styled after Hamas headbands that read, 'This article and the author were banned from MIT after Zionists tweeted about it.' I was one of the Jews who had tweeted about the article, which says, 'We will burn the ground beneath your feet' next to the logo of a US-designated foreign terrorist organization. Then the professor followed through on his awful promise, beginning his seminar — titled 'Language and linguistics for decolonization and liberation and for peace and community building from the river to the sea in Palestine and Israel to the mountaintops in Haiti and beyond' — by discussing me. 'There was one student . . . I won't mention his name, but you probably know who he is,' the professor said. 'Let us not forget that as we engage in this academic exercise that there is a genocide going on.' I filed a formal complaint with MIT's Institute Discrimination and Harassment Response Office, but the staff decided 'not to pursue a discrimination investigation' and stated their decision 'is not subject to appeal.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Incredibly, they claimed that the professor's conduct was not antisemitic because his use of the term mind infection refers to 'settler-colonial Zionist propaganda' that he believes 'is funded by the Israeli government.' Advertisement I was left with the distinct impression that MIT's own antidiscrimination office had used common antisemitic tropes to reject my antisemitism complaint, and I felt there was nowhere left to turn. No other choice It was the privilege of a lifetime to study computer science at MIT. But when it became clear that the university would not protect me from the ongoing harassment and threats, I had no choice but to leave my Ph.D. program and abandon my dream. All because I am Jewish. From Tablet magazine. Will Sussman is the lead plaintiff in a new lawsuit against MIT. He served as president of MIT GradHillel from 2023–2024. Follow him @realWillSussman
