Florida's attorney general appeals immigration ruling to U.S. Supreme Court
Uthmeier's office filed a 34-page document seeking a stay of a preliminary injunction that U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued in April to block the law. A panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 6 rejected such a stay.
If the Supreme Court grants Uthmeier's request, the state could enforce the law while what could be a lengthy court battle plays out.
'Florida is enjoined from enforcing its statute to the detriment of Florida's citizens and the state's sovereign prerogative to protect them from harm,' lawyers in Uthmeier's office wrote in the document. 'Illegal immigration continues to wreak havoc in the state while that law cannot be enforced. And without this [Supreme] Court's intervention, Florida and its citizens will remain disabled from combatting the serious harms of illegal immigration for years as this litigation proceeds through the lower courts.'
The request, filed last Tuesday, is the latest twist in a contentious fight about the law, which passed during a February special legislative session and was signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis. The law created state crimes for undocumented immigrants who enter or re-enter Florida, with supporters saying it was aimed at helping carry out President Donald Trump's policies on preventing illegal immigration.
Attorneys for the Florida Immigrant Coalition, the Farmworker Association of Florida and two individual plaintiffs filed the federal lawsuit in April, alleging the law is unconstitutional. After initially issuing a temporary restraining order, Williams issued a longer-lasting preliminary injunction to block enforcement.
Williams ruled that the law was likely preempted by federal immigration authority. Uthmeier appealed that ruling and asked the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for a stay of the injunction but was turned down.
The three-judge appellate panel said its decision 'does not definitively resolve' whether federal immigration law preempts — essentially takes precedence over — the state law, but it said Uthmeier had not met tests for a stay.
'It seems likely — given the federal government's longstanding and distinct interest in the exclusion and admission of aliens, and the [federal] Immigration and Nationality Act's extensive regulation of alien admission — that this principle is satisfied with respect to the field of alien entry into and presence in the United States,' said the June 6 decision shared by Judges Jill Pryor, Kevin Newsom and Embry Kidd. 'Accordingly, the attorney general has not made a 'strong showing' that the district court was wrong to conclude that SB 4-C is likely field preempted.'
But in the document filed last week at the Supreme Court, Uthmeier's office disputed that the state law is preempted, saying it 'purposefully tracks federal law to a tee.' It also argued that the Supreme Court ultimately would side with Florida on the underlying issues in the dispute.
'The district court's injunction is indefensible both on the merits and in its sweeping breadth,' the state's attorneys wrote. 'Should the Eleventh Circuit nevertheless affirm (Williams' ruling), there is a strong likelihood that this (Supreme) Court will reverse.'
The document also delved into a dispute between Uthmeier and Williams about whether the injunction should apply to law-enforcement officers across the state — a dispute that last week resulted in the judge finding Uthmeier in civil contempt.
Uthmeier argued the injunction should only apply to him and local state attorneys, the named defendants in the lawsuit. But Williams also applied it to police agencies across the state, effectively ensuring the law is not enforced.
While Uthmeier wants the Supreme Court to issue a stay on the entire injunction, last week's request also raised the possibility of the court issuing a partial stay so that the injunction would not apply to law-enforcement officers.
'Worse still, the district court bound all Florida law-enforcement officers, who are not parties to this case,' the state's attorneys wrote. 'That decision inflicts irreparable harm on Florida and its ability to protect its citizens from the deluge of illegal immigration.'
The appeals-court panel declined to issue a partial stay that would have applied Williams' ruling only to Uthmeier and state attorneys.
Williams' unusual contempt finding last week stemmed from a letter that Uthmeier sent in April to police after she ordered a halt to enforcement of the law. Williams said Uthmeier violated a directive to notify police agencies that what was then a temporary restraining order barred them from enforcing the law.
'Uthmeier's role endows him with a unique capacity to uphold or undermine the rule of law, and when he does the latter by violating a court order, the integrity of the legal system depends on his conduct being within the court's remedial reach,' Williams wrote in the 27-page contempt decision.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Ex-Secret Service director fires back at Rand Paul's accusations she lied about lack of resources given to Trump's Butler rally
Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle was adamant that she directed 'additional assets to be provided' for President Trump's Butler, Pa., rally a year ago and refuted Sen. Rand Paul's blistering report. Paul (R-Ky.) alleged that Cheatle had not been truthful to Congress when she testified that the Secret Service didn't deny Trump's team resources it requested for the Butler, Pa. rally. 'The Director of the Secret Service is not typically directly engaged in the approval or denial of requests for support,' she said in a statement Sunday, released by her attorney. 'For the Butler rally, I actually did direct additional assets to be provided, particularly in the form of agency counter-snipers.' Advertisement 'Any assertion or implication that I provided misleading testimony is patently false and does a disservice to those men and women on the front lines who have been unfairly disciplined for a team, rather than individual, failure.' Cheatle's attorney confirmed to The Post that her statement was directed at Paul's report and his 'defamatory comments on Face the Nation' earlier in the day on Sunday. 3 Kimberly Cheatle vehemently refuted allegations that she gave misleading testimony to Congress. The Washington Post via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Sunday marks the one-year anniversary of the Butler, Pa., assassination attempt. AP Paul, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, released his scathing report on the one-year anniversary of the assassination attempt against Trump. It concluded based on documents that there were 'at least two instances of assets being denied' by the Secret Service related to the Butler rally. That entailed a request for more Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS), which are used to counter drones, which was 'unfulfilled due to the lack of manpower to support the request.' Additionally, the Secret Service did not provide a Counter Assault Team liaison to coordinate between its operation and the local team, according to testimony from the advance agent. Advertisement Paul's report found that broadly speaking, there were at least 10 major requests for more resources from the president's team during the 2024 campaign cycle that were either denied or unfulfilled. Cheatle had testified to the House Oversight Committee nine days after the assassination attempt last year that 'for the event in Butler, there were no requests that were denied.' 'She did not tell the truth,' Paul told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' on Sunday. 'The primary request that was made by both Trump's Secret Service detail, as well as his campaign, was for counter-snipers. 'Counter-snipers were denied until Butler. So, thank God, on that day in Butler County, Pennsylvania, that was the first time he was allowed counter-snipers.' Advertisement The former Secret Service director revealed that she read through some of the report, was 'aware of certain congressional criticism,' and agrees that 'mistakes were made and reform is needed.' 3 Sen. Rand Paul had ripped into former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle in his report on the assassination attempt. AFP via Getty Images She stressed that her testimony to the Oversight Committee was based on 'information provided to me by personnel from Headquarters' as well as current Secret Service Director Sean Curran, who helmed Trump's detail at the time. Cheatle also paid tribute to the families impacted by the deadly shooting at the rally. 'The tragedy that occurred on July 13, 2024, remains a profound event that deeply affected our nation,' she said. 'My thoughts and heartfelt condolences continue to be with all those impacted.' Cheatle resigned as Secret Service director a day after she testified before the House Oversight Committee. Acting director Ronald Rowe briefly took her place during the months that followed. Trump appointed Curran as Secret Service director shortly after taking office again back in January. Multiple investigations from lawmakers in Congress, as well as law enforcement, have uncovered a myriad of shortcomings in the run-up to the assassination attempt. Advertisement Despite the concerns, Trump has said that he still retains 'great confidence in these people.' 'They should have had somebody in the building [Crooks shot from], that was a mistake,' he told Fox News' 'My View With Lara Trump' in an interview that aired Saturday. 'They should have had communications with the local police, they weren't tied in. 'So there were mistakes made … But I was satisfied in terms of the bigger plot, the larger plot,' he added. 'I have great confidence in these people. I know the people. And they're very talented, very capable. But they had a bad day. And I think they'll admit that. They had a rough day.'

Time Business News
4 hours ago
- Time Business News
Justice Dept fires more prosecutors support staff involved in Trump prosecutions AP sources say
Washington, Jul 13 (AP) The Justice Department has fired additional lawyers and support staff who worked on special counsel Jack Smith's prosecutions of President Donald Trump, according to two people familiar with the matter. The overall number of terminations was not immediately clear but they cut across both the classified documents and election interference prosecutions brought by Smith, and included a handful of prosecutors who were detailed to the probe as well as Justice Department support staff and other non-lawyer personnel who aided them, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel moves that have not been publicly announced. The firings are part of a broader wave of terminations that have roiled the department for months and that have targeted staff who worked on cases involving Trump and his supporters. In January, the Justice Department said that it had fired more than a dozen prosecutors who worked on prosecutions of Trump, and last month fired at least three prosecutors involved in US Capitol riot criminal cases, Smith's team in 2023 brought separate indictments accusing Trump of hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida as well as conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the run-up to the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the US Capitol. Neither case reached trial. The Supreme Court significantly narrowed the election interference case in a ruling that said former presidents were immune from prosecution for official acts, and a Trump-appointed judge dismissed the classified documents case by holding that Smith's appointment as special counsel was illegal. Smith ultimately withdrew both cases in November 2024 after Trump's victory, citing a Justice Department legal opinion that protects sitting presidents from federal prosecution. (AP) NB) (This story has not been edited by TIMEBUSINESSNEWS and is auto-generated from PTI) Author Credits TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
ICE may deport migrants to countries other than their own with just six hours notice, memo says
By Nate Raymond and Ted Hesson BOSTON (Reuters) -U.S. immigration officials may deport migrants to countries other than their home nations with as little as six hours' notice, a top Trump administration official said in a memo, offering a preview of how deportations could ramp up. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement will generally wait at least 24 hours to deport someone after informing them of their removal to a so-called "third country," according to a memo dated Wednesday, July 9, from the agency's acting director, Todd Lyons. ICE could remove them, however, to a so-called "third country" with as little as six hours' notice "in exigent circumstances," said the memo, as long as the person has been provided the chance to speak with an attorney. The memo states that migrants could be sent to nations that have pledged not to persecute or torture them "without the need for further procedures." The new ICE policy suggests President Donald Trump's administration could move quickly to send migrants to countries around the world. The Supreme Court in June lifted a lower court's order limiting such deportations without a screening for fear of persecution in the destination country. Following the high court's ruling and a subsequent order from the justices, the Trump administration sent eight migrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Sudan and Vietnam to South Sudan. The administration last week pressed officials from five African nations - Liberia, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania and Gabon - to accept deportees from elsewhere, Reuters reported. The Washington Post first reported the new ICE memo. The administration argues the third country deportations help swiftly remove migrants who should not be in the U.S., including those with criminal convictions. Advocates have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language. Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for a group of migrants pursuing a class action lawsuit against such rapid third-county deportations at the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said the policy "falls far short of providing the statutory and due process protections that the law requires." Third-country deportations have been done in the past, but the tool could be more frequently used as Trump tries to ramp up deportations to record levels. During Trump's 2017-2021 presidency, his administration deported small numbers of people from El Salvador and Honduras to Guatemala. Former President Joe Biden's Democratic administration struck a deal with Mexico to take thousands of migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, since it was difficult to deport migrants to those nations. The new ICE memo was filed as evidence in a lawsuit over the wrongful deportation of Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador.