Treasury minister Emma Reynolds suffers live interview meltdown as she has no idea of cost or location of new £10bn River Thames crossing she is announcing
Emma Reynolds was announcing a package of infrastructure spending on LBC when the toe-curling moment happened.
The £10billion Lower Thames Crossing will link Essex and Kent - but the economic secretary was unable to give the location or the total cost of the project.
She also mistakenly referred to the existing crossing being the 'Dartmouth Tunnel', apparently confusing the Devon town with Dartford.
'I meant Dartford, excuse me, I had a very early morning,' the minister told LBC Radio.
Asked by presenter Nick Ferrari about the proposed new crossing's location, Ms Reynolds frantically leafed through paperwork.
'You'll forgive me, I can't recall the landing zone,' she said.
Ferrari said: 'So the crossing that you're talking about, you don't know where it is?'
A floundering Ms Reynolds seeming resorted to reading out some text about how the crossing would connect the North with 'key ports in the South East'.
'It's almost as if you're reading from a piece of paper there, isn't it?' the presenter interjected.
Ferrari put the minister out of her misery by informing her that the crossing will involve two tunnels under the Thames to the east of Tilbury in Essex and Gravesend in Kent.
Pressed on the cost, an increasingly dejected-looking Ms Reynolds said 'it's going to cost quite a lot of money', suggesting it would be 'several billion pounds'.
But a clearly exasperated Ferrari said: 'You don't know that either, do you?'
He added: 'Is there much point continuing this conversation because you don't know where a bridge starts, where it ends and you don't know how much it costs?'
Ferrari then asked about the Hammersmith Bridge.
'I'm not here to talk about the Hammersmith Bridge. I'm not a transport minister,' Ms Reynolds said.
National Highways has estimated the cost will be between £9.2billion and £10.2billion depending on the funding model chosen.
It would connect the A2 and M2 in Kent to the A13 and M25 in Essex via a 2.6-mile tunnel under the Thames, which would be the UK's longest road tunnel.
The funding for the Lower Thames Crossing will be part of the Government's 10-year plan for infrastructure.
A new structures fund will also invest in repairing bridges, flyovers, tunnels and other transport infrastructure such as roads.
The Lower Thames Crossing is aimed at reducing congestion at Dartford.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has said that the project is 'essential for improving the resilience of a key freight route and is critical to our long-term trade with Europe'.
Pressed on the cost, an increasingly dejected-looking Ms Reynolds said 'it's going to cost quite a lot of money', suggesting it would be 'several billion pounds'
'It will speed up the movement of goods from south-east England to the Midlands and the north, crucial to thousands of jobs and businesses,' she added.
Rachel Reeves has said ministers are 'going all in by going up against the painful disruption of closed bridges, crossings and flyovers'.
The Chancellor added: 'This is a turning point for our national infrastructure, and we're backing it with funding to support thousands of jobs and connect communities, delivering on our plan for change.'
It comes ahead of the Government's infrastructure strategy, expected this week, while public procurement rules are set to be overhauled so that public bodies will have to give more weight to firms which can prove they will boost British jobs when they are bidding for contracts.
The Chancellor outlined a range of infrastructure investments as part of last week's spending review.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' has sparked ugly debate - so why is it so controversial?
It is certainly big - 940 pages long - but on the question of beauty, Congress is divided. Donald Trump's"big, beautiful bill" has sparked ugly debate - both for its ambitious scope and for the political manoeuvring that's gone on around it. Elon Musk branded it "political suicide" for Republicans and threatened to fund challenges against those who back it in next year's midterm elections. But the president hit back, suggesting he would consider cutting Musk's lucrative government contracts or even deporting him back to South Africa. The "big, beautiful bill", or HR 1 to give the proposed legislation its proper title, is Mr Trump's signature spending and tax policy. It extends tax cuts he secured in 2017 and bankrolls his second-term agenda in the White House. 1:34 • Permanent tax cuts: Extending relief from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act • Small business support: Doubling the small business expensing limit to $2.5m (£1.8m) to help businesses expand and hire staff • Child tax credit: Expanding the child tax credit and making it permanent, benefiting 40 million families • Making housing affordable: Expanding the low-income housing tax credit to kickstart construction of affordable homes • Defence and border security: Allocating $170bn (£123bn) for border security alone, including $46bn (£33bn) for completing the border wall • Made-in-America incentives: Providing tax breaks and incentives for domestic manufacturing to promote US industry • Healthcare and social welfare: Implementing restrictions on Medicaid, which provides healthcare for millions of Americans, and reducing funding for certain healthcare and nutrition programmes. Clash over 'monster' debt bill Musk, Mr Trump's former ally and the man who established the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), claimed the bill "raises the debt ceiling by $5trn, the biggest increase in history." "DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon," was President Trump's response. The national debt currently stands at $37trn (£27trn) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill could add $2.4trn (£1.7trn) to that over the next decade. 1:25 Bill splits Republican ranks Republican Senator Thom Tillis voted against the bill and, following criticism from the president, announced he would not seek re-election in North Carolina. He said he couldn't support it due to his concerns about the impact cuts to Medicaid would have on people in his state. Democrats in the Senate forced a full reading of all 940 pages and then a vote-a-rama, a series of marathon voting sessions. In the House of Representatives, it passed by a single vote, 215-214. In the Senate, Vice President JD Vance, had to cast the deciding vote to break a tie (50-50). Legislatively, the progress of the bill has been a case study in the complexities of American law-making. Strategically, it represents a mammoth effort to consolidate the president's policy agenda and secure his legacy.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Households to receive up to £2,000 in compensation for water failures
Households in England will be paid up to £2,000 in compensation for water service failures as part of new efforts to reform the sector. The government announced that compensation payments from water firms, for problems such as low pressure, disruptions to supply or sewer flooding, will increase tenfold from July 2. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said the move was the first increase in compensation rates in 25 years in recognition of the 'urgent need' to bring payments in line with inflation and properly compensate households for poor service. Severe issues such as flooding will see customer compensation double from £1,000 to up to £2,000, while households suffering consistent low water pressure will be automatically eligible to receive up to £250, up from the previous compensation rate of £25. Payments will automatically be credited to the accounts of eligible customers with immediate effect. The announcement comes as the government attempts to grapple with the problems engulfing the water sector in the face of high public anger over the degraded and polluted state of rivers, lakes and coasts, rising bills, bosses' bonuses and shareholder payouts. Environment Secretary Steve Reed said that 'too many water companies are letting down their customers – with leaking pipes, poor water supply and low water pressure'. 'The Government is holding water companies to account by making them put money back into people's pockets when they fail their customers.' Defra said it was working with water companies to expand the list of circumstances that would trigger compensation payments. Compensation for when customers are asked to boil their water due to a contaminated supply will come into force later this year, it said. The standards, outlined in the Guaranteed Standards Scheme, set out a baseline for customer service in the water sector and include providing timely restoration of the water supply following an interruption, responding to written complaints and managing the risk of sewer flooding. Action already announced to cut sewage spills and attract investment in the sector includes: strengthening regulation to ensure polluting water bosses who cover up their crimes now face two-year prison sentences; the banning of 'unfair' bonuses for bosses of six polluting water companies; and 81 criminal investigations into sewage pollution. Mike Keil, the chief executive of the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), said: 'Customers expect to be treated fairly when their water company lets them down, so we're delighted the Government has moved at pace to strengthen service standards. 'This should give people peace of mind, they now have far stronger protection from a much broader range of water company service failures – from the slow installation of water meters to the mishandling of debt recovery. 'As well as bolstering payments for thousands of customers, these changes mark an important step towards restoring trust in the water sector, which is at an all-time low.' Ofwat chief executive David Black said it welcomed 'these improvements to guaranteed standards and payments for customers. 'When customers suffer from problems like low pressure, disruptions to supply or sewer flooding, they can experience major stress and inconvenience, and payment amounts must recognise the disruption to their lives when standards are not met. 'These new changes are another way to make sure customers are protected when companies get it wrong.'
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Major coffee chain with 2,000 branches suddenly shuts high street store following string of closures
A MAJOR coffee chain with 2,000 branches has suddenly shut a high street store after a string of closures. The decision to close another town centre branch has been described as a "sign of the times" as businesses face increasing cost pressures. 1 Costa Coffee on Whitstable High Street, Kent, closed its doors for the final time on June 29. Customers will now have to go to the drive-thru cafe beside Chesterfield roundabout instead. When Costa Coffee first arrived on Whitsable High Street five years ago there was some initial disquiet. The area is fiercely proud of its reputation for independent stores and cafes. But it's the latest casualty in a string of nationwide closures by the coffee chain which were first announced last year. This included the Costa in Maidstone town centre which shut up shop in January 2024. The Whitstable store had mixed reviews online and only gained an average of three stars on Tripadvisor. Customers complained about cutbacks to opening hours and describing the cafe as "dingy". However, the location had 4.1 out of 5 stars on Google reviews with customers praising the coffee and the service. The location is now being advertised for an annual rent of £35,000. Costa confirmed the closure of the branch on June 30 but did not reveal why it had shut or how many staff were to be affected. The boss of Kent's biggest independent coffee shop chain, HatHats, which has a store in Whitstable Harbour, told KentOnline that it's a "sign of the times". Louis Hurst said: "I think the fact that a name as big as Costa is closing branches shows the increasing cost pressures so many businesses in our sector and beyond are facing. "Increases to National Insurance contributions, and in our case the number of staff who now qualify for employers' National Insurance, has seen a huge hike in our employment costs - and that's before we talk about increases in rent, utilities and the goods we buy.' "The world coffee price for green beans, for example, has also risen by over 90% in a year.' Costa have closed a number of its stores this year. In April, the company announced it was pulling down the shutters on its branch in Broxbourne, leaving locals gutted. In the same month, the Lyme Regis branch also announced its closure after more than a decade serving flat whites, cappuccinos and caramel lattes to locals and tourists alike. Plenty of other locations throughout the UK have been pouring their last cup of coffee too. RETAIL PAIN IN 2025 The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs will cost the retail sector £2.3billion. Research by the British Chambers of Commerce shows that more than half of companies plan to raise prices by early April. A survey of more than 4,800 firms found that 55% expect prices to increase in the next three months, up from 39% in a similar poll conducted in the latter half of 2024. Three-quarters of companies cited the cost of employing people as their primary financial pressure. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year. It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year. Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025." Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector. "By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."
