logo
Victorian influencer Jordan van den Lamb, known as ‘Purple Pingers' sparks Aussie housing war

Victorian influencer Jordan van den Lamb, known as ‘Purple Pingers' sparks Aussie housing war

7NEWS21-06-2025
When a Victorian woman returned to her investment property in Melbourne's outer suburbs, she didn't expect to find squatters inside — or to learn that her home's address had been shared online by a Federal Senate candidate.
The woman, who had been managing her late father's estate, reportedly arrived to find the locks changed, security cameras installed, and new heating fitted to the exterior.
Police were called to force entry, where she discovered most of her father's belongings were missing, including sentimental items like antique furniture and family heirlooms.
The damage left her about $70,000 out of pocket after her insurance claim was denied.
The property had been vacant and was publicly shared by Jordan van den Lamb, known online as 'Purple Pingers', as part of his campaign encouraging people to identify and use unused homes for shelter.
Mr van den Lamb has become a lightning rod in the national housing debate. But as his TikTok-fuelled activism escalates, so too do the consequences for homeowners, real estate agents, and authorities caught in the fallout.
While some of his followers see occupying vacant properties as a form of protest, the legal reality is more complicated.
A squatter is someone who enters and uses an abandoned or unoccupied property, often through unlocked access. While entering through an open door is not technically illegal, remaining after being asked to leave by the rightful owner constitutes trespassing, which is a criminal offence in all Australian states.
The influencer rose to prominence online through his viral TikTok account and website Sh.t Rentals, where he publicly exposed unoccupied, poor-quality or overpriced rental properties.
But his campaign has since evolved into something more confrontational.
Mr van den Lamb said he shared the address of the Victorian property online in a bid to raise awareness and attract more submissions of vacant homes.
'Yes, that was shared by me,' he said.
'That property had been empty, off the top of my head, for like 17 years. We don't know whether the squatters moved in before or after I posted the address.'
He said the situation was brought to his attention by a news organisation and confirmed, 'I had no interaction with her (the homeowner).'
When asked about the impact on the Victorian woman, Mr van den Lamb told The Nightly he felt 'bad' but claimed there were bigger issues at play.
'I feel bad that her belongings were taken, especially if they had sentimental value,' he said.
'But we hear from people like this every day. We never hear from someone sleeping rough — and frankly, their voices matter more, because they're the ones who are dying.'
How it works
Mr van den Lamb said he personally ran the operation using a Google Form to collect submissions of empty homes and verify them through online tools.
'I call for submissions... ask people to submit an empty property, the address, how long they think it's been vacant... then I check Google Maps, street view, last sold, last rented, planning applications.'
He added: 'Once someone reaches out via email, I might ask if they're alone — I prefer not to send solo people just for safety. I go through the list, send through what I know, and tell them to verify it themselves.'
'I only post very few online — just to get more submissions,' he said.
'Most properties are shared privately via email with those in need.'
In one of his TikTok videos, Mr van den Lamb instructs viewers on how to detect long-term vacancies by searching real estate websites and analysing listing duration.
But one real estate agent says Mr van den Lamb's actions have changed how some sellers think about signage and advertising.
Victorian real estate agent manager Mark Vorstenbosch from BigginScott said, 'There's this idea that putting up a 'for sale' board might alert people that a home is empty, but I think not putting one up puts you in more danger, because you don't know when someone might turn up.'
Loading TikTok Post
Kelly Ryan, former chief executive officer of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria (REIV), described Mr van den Lamb's tactics as concerning.
'Encouraging people to squat in properties that aren't theirs isn't good social behaviour — it's not a good service to anybody,' she told The Nightly.
Ms Ryan warned that the broader risk is a chilling effect on landlords and property providers.
'This kind of behaviour is counterproductive to tackling the housing crisis,' she said.
'If you discourage private property owners from staying in the market, you risk starving supply not just now, but five years down the track.'
Ms Ryan also addressed common misconceptions about who owned investment properties.
'There's this idea that all property owners are wealthy. But the second biggest group of landlords in Australia are school teachers, often owning just one investment property. These are the people being affected.'
According to Homes Victoria's Rental Report for December 2024, the number of new rental lettings, which is a key indicator of housing availability, declined statewide by 1.8 per cent in the December quarter compared to the same period the year before.
Metropolitan Melbourne saw a 1.3 per cent drop, while regional Victoria experienced a sharper 4.1 per cent fall.
The total number of active rental bonds held by the Residential Tenancies Bond Authority also declined by 3.6 per cent, a significant shift, given that bond volumes had averaged 1.0 per cent annual growth over the past five years.
'These early indicators suggest a contraction in the overall rental stock,' REIV noted at the time, 'reflecting a waning of investor confidence in the market.'
Victoria Police declined to comment on specific incidents related to Mr van den Lamb's activism but said homelessness was 'not an offence'.
'Should an offence be detected, police will deal with that as per normal practice,' the spokesperson said.
'The priority for Victoria Police is to link people who are homeless or sleeping rough to the services available to them.'
Police advised concerned property owners to report issues to their local council and referred inquiries about broader trends to the Crime Statistics Agency.
Mark Donchi, manager of a Victorian homelessness program for St Mary's House of Welcome, said he doesn't encourage squatting but understands why it happens.
He said his service has noticed a clear demographic shift, 'We're now seeing more families and single women coming to seek our services. The volume has definitely increased over the last five years.'
Mr Donchi said that the increase is largely driven by a massive shortfall in affordable housing.
'And the process of getting into public housing is becoming longer and more complicated,' he said.
However, Ms Ryan said for those on the receiving end of such activism, the consequences were anything but theoretical.
If a squatter refuses to leave after being asked, the property owner must typically seek a possession order through legal channels — a process that can be lengthy and complex.
Real estate agents say the process of removing unauthorised occupants from a property is far from straightforward, especially if the owner lives interstate.
Mr Vorstenbosch said one of the problems was the lack of recourse for property owners if something happened to their homes.
'If the property owner is interstate, you can't even go through VCAT (Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal) anymore, you're redirected to the Magistrates Court, which can take up to six months. And that court isn't specialised in tenancy law, so mistakes happen.'
But Mr van den Lamb argues that the real problem isn't scarcity, but distribution.
'At the last census, there were 30,000 people experiencing homelessness in Victoria. In metropolitan Melbourne alone, there are 100,000 empty homes... This isn't a supply issue. It's a distribution problem.'
He also pushed back on criticism that his campaign might discourage landlords from renting out homes.
'These homes aren't being rented out,' he said. 'So that criticism doesn't really apply.'
'And if landlords are afraid to rent out homes that people could die in — then maybe that's a good thing, especially if we're talking about the substandard properties shown on Shit Rentals.'
When asked whether he worked with homelessness services, he said there was 'informal collaboration' at times, but services were stretched.
'I think that would be unfortunately damaging to their reputations,' he said of formal partnerships, 'but I've spoken with many workers who have support and sympathy... and who've said there's literally nothing more they can do through their work.'
Ms Ryan said for those on the receiving end of such activism, the consequences were anything but theoretical.
'As a society, we rely heavily on the private rental market,' Ms Ryan said.
'If we continue to make landlords feel vulnerable or vilified, we're only accelerating the very housing crisis we're trying to solve.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As a barrister, there was one question I desperately wanted to ask Erin Patterson
As a barrister, there was one question I desperately wanted to ask Erin Patterson

Sydney Morning Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

As a barrister, there was one question I desperately wanted to ask Erin Patterson

There is a particular detail about the so-called 'mushroom trial' in Gippsland that I can't get out of my head. Police located and catalogued over 400 books in the home of the defendant, Erin Patterson. The forensic purpose of this analysis was revealed when prosecutor Nanette Rogers, SC, put to the defendant in cross-examination that not one of the books found in her home was devoted to the subject of mushrooms. The point was to demonstrate to the jury that Patterson's purported interest in foraging for fungi was a recent invention, and no more than a feint. I am a barrister, albeit not of the criminal variety, and I wanted to throw on my robes and be permitted a cameo in Gippsland. I had a question for Patterson. Among the hundreds of books located in her belongings, is there a copy of Shirley Jackson's classic gothic novel, We Have Always Lived in the Castle? Jackson's macabre tale, told from the perspective of Mary Katherine (Merricat), offers a number of eerie parallels with the beef Wellington meal served in Leongatha. Six years before the story starts, Merricat's parents and younger brother have died of arsenic poisoning after sitting down to eat a meal prepared by her sister, Constance. Uncle Julian ingested poison, but survived, and lives with his nieces. Constance was charged with murder, but has been acquitted. Towards the end of the novel, Merricat confides: 'I said aloud to Constance, 'I am going to put death in all their food and watch them die'. Constance stirred, and the leaves rustled, 'The way you did before?' she asked. It had never been spoken of between us, not once in six years. 'Yes,' I said after a minute, 'the way I did before'.' No reason or motive for the murders is ever revealed. The reader is left to sit with the uncomfortable knowledge that Merricat has poisoned her family, but has not told us why. Spotted among the regular attendees at Patterson's trial were Melbourne authors Chloe Hooper, Sarah Krasnostein and Helen Garner. Hooper is the author of The Tall Man: Death and Life on Palm Island (2009), a powerful book about the death in custody of Cameron Doomadgee, and Garner's books about trials and crimes, including This House of Grief: Story of a Murder Trial (2014) deserve their legendary status. Later, it was confirmed that the trio will soon release a book. No doubt it will be a poignant account of the deaths of Gail Patterson, Don Patterson and Heather Wilkinson and the trial of Erin Patterson. I cannot hope to emulate their writing, I have nothing more august to offer than this short piece: This House of Beef (Wellington). But thinking about the family tragedy behind the mushroom trial has now caused me to dwell on a triumvirate of notorious cases of Victorian children murdered by their fathers that have intersected with my life: Darcey Freeman, the Farquharson boys, and Luke Batty. My connection with the death of Luke Batty was direct and intimate. I was briefed to appear for his mother Rosie Batty in the 2015 inquest into the death of her son. The tragedy of Luke's murder at the hands of his abusive father haunts me to this day. During the inquest, I experienced but a fraction of the intense media scrutiny that the legal teams have endured during the Patterson trial. And I know how destabilising it can be. Each day of the inquest there was a phalanx of cameras waiting for us outside the Coroners Court. I was pregnant with my daughter who is now 10 years old. My swelling belly, proof of the life within, felt utterly obscene in light of the tragedy that we were there to attempt to make sense of. By the time of the last sittings in December 2014, I was nearly six months pregnant. I was in the public bathrooms often – attending to the frequent urgent needs of a heavily pregnant woman aged 43. In those small, too close stalls, I could hear women milling near the wash basins tsk-tsking and tutt-tutting over the evidence that had been adduced before the break. I overheard some of them confide in one another that they had nothing to do with either the proceedings or the Batty family, but had taken leave to watch the inquest as a form of spectacle. I remember feeling overcome in the tiny bathroom and needing to move deftly to dodge the outstretched hands of matronly types attempting to touch my growing belly – as if the baby inside me were as much available for public consumption and commentary as the child whose awful death we were all there to bear witness to.

Greg made an insurance claim after a serious bike crash. Then a private investigator came calling
Greg made an insurance claim after a serious bike crash. Then a private investigator came calling

The Age

time11 hours ago

  • The Age

Greg made an insurance claim after a serious bike crash. Then a private investigator came calling

'When someone makes a workers' compensation claim, the insurer needs to figure out two main things: whether the person meets the definition of a 'worker' and whether the injury is one that falls under the scheme,' Denning said. 'To do that, they often ask for personal detail, like how the person was employed, where they live, and exactly what was happening when the injury occurred. That's especially the case for injuries that happen on a journey to or from work.' Denning said if someone was worried about what could happen with their data – especially if the claim ends up being rejected – it was a good idea to speak with a lawyer before proceeding. Under Victorian legislation, employees are entitled to compensation if their injury arises 'out of or in the course of any employment'. But as the Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry notes, 'there is no single definition of what will and will not be deemed to be a work-related injury' – leading to ambiguity on whether a worker's injury should lead to compensation. The chamber said the legislation provided 'some clarity by listing several examples deemed to be 'in the course of employment', such as where the worker is travelling for the purpose of their employment, or where they are injured whilst attending a compulsory training course'. Insurer Allianz Australia, an authorised agent of the Victorian WorkCover Authority, rejected Muller's claim because he was injured during his commute outside work hours. 'Allianz has determined that your injuries have not arisen in or out of the course of your employment … you sustained the injuries while travelling from your home to your workplace,' it said. Allianz did not respond to requests for comment on Muller's case. Loading Muller accepts the decision to reject his claim but does not understand why he was interviewed about his personal life when his accident did not fall under WorkCover's umbrella. 'I thought, why the hell did I go through all this? This should never have proceeded,' he said. He is also frustrated that Allianz says it is unable to delete his personal information – particularly when large-scale cyber breaches are increasingly common. 'Regarding the request to erase information obtained during the claim investigation, please note that we are unable to delete this information. However, rest assured that no personal data will be disclosed externally,' it said. Investigators are not required to determine whether a person is eligible for WorkCover before interviewing them about their personal life. WorkSafe, which manages workers' compensation in Victoria, said investigators had a responsibility to ask a wide range of questions regarding a claimant's personal and health matters to assess a claim. It also said it was required to hold on to claimants' data for various periods in case claimants made future claims or launched legal proceedings. John Pane, data privacy expert and chair of digital rights not-for-profit Electronic Frontiers Australia, said the Victorian and federal governments needed to update privacy laws to require organisations to delete individuals' data on request, as happened in the European Union. 'There is no current right in Australia that grants individuals the power to demand that their personal data be deleted from any organisation that holds it, even if they unlawfully or erroneously captured it,' Pane said. 'And the retention period of these records could be for a substantial period of time.' While there is no 'right to erasure' in this country, Allianz is required, under the Australian Privacy Principles, to only use or disclose personal information 'for the purpose for which it is collected'. Taxpayers have poured more than $1.3 billion into WorkCover to help cover the rising cost of claims, particularly in mental health-related claims. There were 35,575 new claims to WorkCover in the 2024 financial year, up 25 per cent in three years.

Greg made an insurance claim after a serious bike crash. Then a private investigator came calling
Greg made an insurance claim after a serious bike crash. Then a private investigator came calling

Sydney Morning Herald

time11 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Greg made an insurance claim after a serious bike crash. Then a private investigator came calling

'When someone makes a workers' compensation claim, the insurer needs to figure out two main things: whether the person meets the definition of a 'worker' and whether the injury is one that falls under the scheme,' Denning said. 'To do that, they often ask for personal detail, like how the person was employed, where they live, and exactly what was happening when the injury occurred. That's especially the case for injuries that happen on a journey to or from work.' Denning said if someone was worried about what could happen with their data – especially if the claim ends up being rejected – it was a good idea to speak with a lawyer before proceeding. Under Victorian legislation, employees are entitled to compensation if their injury arises 'out of or in the course of any employment'. But as the Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry notes, 'there is no single definition of what will and will not be deemed to be a work-related injury' – leading to ambiguity on whether a worker's injury should lead to compensation. The chamber said the legislation provided 'some clarity by listing several examples deemed to be 'in the course of employment', such as where the worker is travelling for the purpose of their employment, or where they are injured whilst attending a compulsory training course'. Insurer Allianz Australia, an authorised agent of the Victorian WorkCover Authority, rejected Muller's claim because he was injured during his commute outside work hours. 'Allianz has determined that your injuries have not arisen in or out of the course of your employment … you sustained the injuries while travelling from your home to your workplace,' it said. Allianz did not respond to requests for comment on Muller's case. Loading Muller accepts the decision to reject his claim but does not understand why he was interviewed about his personal life when his accident did not fall under WorkCover's umbrella. 'I thought, why the hell did I go through all this? This should never have proceeded,' he said. He is also frustrated that Allianz says it is unable to delete his personal information – particularly when large-scale cyber breaches are increasingly common. 'Regarding the request to erase information obtained during the claim investigation, please note that we are unable to delete this information. However, rest assured that no personal data will be disclosed externally,' it said. Investigators are not required to determine whether a person is eligible for WorkCover before interviewing them about their personal life. WorkSafe, which manages workers' compensation in Victoria, said investigators had a responsibility to ask a wide range of questions regarding a claimant's personal and health matters to assess a claim. It also said it was required to hold on to claimants' data for various periods in case claimants made future claims or launched legal proceedings. John Pane, data privacy expert and chair of digital rights not-for-profit Electronic Frontiers Australia, said the Victorian and federal governments needed to update privacy laws to require organisations to delete individuals' data on request, as happened in the European Union. 'There is no current right in Australia that grants individuals the power to demand that their personal data be deleted from any organisation that holds it, even if they unlawfully or erroneously captured it,' Pane said. 'And the retention period of these records could be for a substantial period of time.' While there is no 'right to erasure' in this country, Allianz is required, under the Australian Privacy Principles, to only use or disclose personal information 'for the purpose for which it is collected'. Taxpayers have poured more than $1.3 billion into WorkCover to help cover the rising cost of claims, particularly in mental health-related claims. There were 35,575 new claims to WorkCover in the 2024 financial year, up 25 per cent in three years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store