logo
Jerry Harrison On Stop Making Sense, Remain In Light, Talking Heads At 50

Jerry Harrison On Stop Making Sense, Remain In Light, Talking Heads At 50

Forbes06-06-2025
This week, in celebration of their 50th anniversary, Talking Heads released a brand new video for one of their most enduring hits.
Directed by Academy Award-nominee Mike Mills (Thumbsucker, 20th Century Women) and starring Oscar-nominated actor Saoirse Ronan (Lady Bird, Little Women), the new 'Psycho Killer' short drops 50 years to the day following an appearance by David Byrne, Chris Frantz and Tina Weymouth as opening act for the Ramones on stage at legendary New York club CBGB.
Following his run alongside Jonathan Richman in The Modern Lovers, guitarist and keyboard player Jerry Harrison would enter the fold shortly thereafter, appearing on the group's debut album Talking Heads: 77.
While the group is prepping the release of a super deluxe edition of their 1978 sophomore studio effort More Songs About Buildings and Food (now available for pre-order on CD/Blu-ray or vinyl in a variety of forms ahead of release July 25, 2025), Harrison has been taking a unique look back of his own, pondering the group's legacy via deep dives into both Stop Making Sense and Remain In Light.
Guitarist Adrian Belew (King Crimson) joined Talking Heads in the studio for the creation of arguably the group's most cherished recording, appearing on four tracks on the 1980 classic Remain In Light.
Wrapping up a European tour this Saturday in London, Harrison and Belew will return to the U.S. for a Remain In Light run set to kick off July 23 in Virginia Beach, Virginia, with Harrison set to host a series of Stop Making Sense screenings beginning September 11 in Concord, New Hampshire.
Two years ago, Talking Heads re-released the classic Jonathan Demme-directed concert film in 4K, celebrating the restoration with their first appearance together in more than 20 years.
Free of the trappings that tend to define most concert films, tricks like audience reaction shots and band ruminations, Stop Making Sense thrives thanks in part to Demme's character development, a motion picture in which band members are introduced one song at a time, giving viewers time to get fully acquainted with each.
Always ahead of their time, Talking Heads independently produced it, self-financing a budget in excess of a million dollars, while orchestrating a shrewd deal that would find them taking back ownership of the film four decades later.
Stop Making Sense utilized digital audio decades before it was the norm, with Harrison in particular playing an integral role in restoring the film's audio following a lengthy quest to recover negatives and multitrack recordings previously thought lost.
'I think a lot of these screenings are going to be in theaters where people dance. It certainly was in Milwaukee and in Madison,' said Harrison prior to a Stop Making Sense screening and audience Q&A just outside Chicago at the North Shore Center for the Performing Arts in Skokie, Illinois. 'The mix took a long time. Because there were just little details. Going to the sort of 13 points that you can go to in Atmos, we had to go back to scratch,' he explained. 'But this is just another level better.'
I spoke with Jerry Harrison about interacting with fans during the Stop Making Sense screenings, improvisation and revisiting Remain In Light. A transcript of our conversation, lightly edited for length and clarity, follows below.
Jim Ryan: How have the Stop Making Sense screenings gone?
Jerry Harrison: Well, the first one, I actually talked for a really long time: for like an hour. What was great about it is there are certain points that you want to make about the film - a discussion of Jonathan Demme, what the show was like leading up to it, things like that. And it's great when the questions provoke that discussion. So, then it's not like a lecture. It's like a naturally flowing conversation.
In Milwaukee, they went off on some tangents - which was perfectly fine. But, because Milwaukee is my hometown, and where I met my wife and everything like that, there were personal questions that could only take place there.
There was a question about my English teacher. Her name was Barbara Gensler. And she cast me in the senior class play. My mother, at the same high school, was in that play. But the senior class play, traditionally, is not the people that are studying acting. They take people out of the general student population and try to get you to do something unusual for yourself and challenge yourself. So, Barbara hired a dancing teacher for me, a singing coach and all sorts of things that, as it went on - and I ended up becoming a professional musician - were really influential. 'Yes, you can sing!'
In fact, the dancing coach said that I was such a good dancer that I should take ballet lessons - which I did for a little while. And then I danced in a show that was like an all Milwaukee show. This was all right before I went off to college. And it was like, 'Wow. I never thought about that...' I didn't go back out for track because I had gotten so into this.
So, she was very influential on, you might say, completing my approach to being on stage.
Ryan: I watched Stop Making Sense this morning on a streaming service. I've seen it before on Blu-ray and different formats. But I haven't seen the restoration yet. The search for the negatives, finding the old tracks - what was it like kind of hearing and seeing that film anew last year?
Harrison: It was thrilling. And here was the most thrilling moment. I had not been there when the transfer to IMAX was made. I couldn't be in L.A. at that moment. And, so, at the Toronto Film Festival, it was also the excitement that we were at the film festival and we were all together again. And, interestingly, it was during the SAG strike - so no actors showed up. So, we were the only performers at the festival. So, of course, it even made us a little more special.
So, seeing it in that light? Ednah Holt's mouth is six feet tall. That was just like, 'Wow!' When we were mixing it and working on it, it never looked better. The scan was beautiful. The color correction was better than ever. All of those things.
The mix took a long time. Because there were just little details. Going to the sort of 13 points that you can go to in Atmos, we had to go back to scratch. And then it was like, 'Well, we used to use this plugin edit - but it doesn't work anymore. We have to listen. How do we get this?'
There was this middle thing. Because you said you saw the Blu-ray. So, 1999, when we did it, we did a re-release of the film. But we didn't find the negatives then. I mean, that 5.1 sound mix is really good. But this is just another level better.
Ryan: And I know that you were pretty intimately involved in restoring the audio - which also required tracking down lost original tracks. What was that process like for you?
Harrison: That's right. Well, we had transferred it to digital back in '84. Because we knew that in film, you have to make copies all of the time. But, at that time, there was this whole thing about two Sony 24 track [tape machines]
When we mixed it originally, we had mag reels as well as the 24 tracks. And it was unbelievable. It was like, you would start mixing - and you'd mix for 15 seconds. And they'd go, 'Sync!' And they had lost sync. You mixed in 15 to 25 second chunks for an hour and a half. So, you never got any sense of the flow while you were doing it. You just backed up a little bit and then, 'OK. Here's where the faders are…'
David and I stayed in L.A. when Jonathan Demme and Lisa Day were doing the edits. Chris and Tina had gone back to the east coast. And so we were there all the way through it. Well, we had hired someone to do the mix - but then we didn't like it. So, after a week of this kind of laborious process, we got someone else - started over.
There was also this sort of Dolby matrix that could kind of give you a surround. But I would go around to the theaters at the festivals to adjust it. Because, if it wasn't adjusted right, a snare drum would fly to the rear and things like that. This was back in '84. Now when you're watching, it's just so clear. You see this and then you close your eyes and go, 'Oh, I can tell someone's over there… And over there. And over there!' It can be an internal thing inside your head as well as allowing stimulation.
I also feel that, for the audience, you ought to go to it twice. Maybe the ideal is you see it in IMAX, which is sort of enlarged. And then the other is you go to a place where everyone's just dancing up a storm. And the aisles aren't too steep. IMAX is very steep. Dancing in an IMAX theater, I think, would be risking your life!
I think a lot of these screenings are going to be in theaters where people dance. It certainly was in Milwaukee and in Madison.
Ryan: In releasing Stop Making Sense independently, you also financed the budget yourselves, right? I can't imagine that was happening a lot at the height of the major label system. What made that the right approach?
Harrison: We did. I think we got like a loan from Warner Bros. We always tried to control our career. And we were kind of unique in this.
Actually, this is sort of an amusing thing. So, when videos began, David really got into videos. And he kept having ideas about it. The first video was with Toni Basil [directing] 'Crosseyed and Painless.' And then they did 'Once in a Lifetime.' But he started saying how many videos he wanted to do. And Warner Bros. was going, 'Well, we don't want to pay for all of those videos…' So, we made the deal that we owned the videos and leased them to them.
I think we're the only band in the world that ever did that. We designed our own album covers too. Which was also unique.
Ryan: In the end, was it more profitable going that route?
Harrison: Storytelling Giant came out with all of the videos. But it was more about control than making money. It's also… I mean, if you own it, then someone else can't do something really bad with it.
Ryan: You guys also got the rights to Stop Making Sense back after 40 years. I know there's that convoluted process where song copyrights can sometimes revert back to the artist. Was this that or did you guys make a concerted effort to go after them from go?
Harrison: No, that's something different. We were right at the beginning of that.
There's a few ways you could go on that. One, you just take the ownership. Another way is you renegotiate with the distributors. And we were at the very early stage of when that was happening - so the case law was… less than clear. So, you had to make decisions based upon how you knew that Warner Bros. was going to really fight.
So, we gave up to them. It improved our position - which was good.
Ryan: It's been fun to watch you revisiting Remain In Light. What's it been like teaming up with Adrian in that way?
Harrison: It's been so much fun. First of all, it's such an amazing record. But that tour was also unbelievable - but in a very different way.
There's this YouTube concert from Rome in 1980 that captures it quite well. In fact, that was kind of the jumping off point, or the blueprint, that Adrian and I used when we put this together.
Ryan: In incorporating horns and some of the stuff that you guys have during these live performances, you're continually finding new ways to push this music forward, even 45 years later. How exciting has it been to do that?
Harrison: Well, it's something I've been thinking about for a long time. I felt that nothing had really quite captured the fun of those tours.
When I produced the group Turkuaz, they would always ask me to come out and play with them. And it was always a Talking Heads song. They seemed to know the material really well. So, I talked to their manager and said, 'Would they want to do this with Adrian and me?' So, they were playing at Exit/In down in Nashville. And Adrian lives there. And I told Adrian, 'I think I finally found the solution…' So, I flew down and we went and saw them. After one song, he goes, 'Yep. You're right!'
It's more than that they knew the material and loved it and were excited to play it. It's all of the mechanics of being on the road. Who takes the lower bunk, the middle bunk or the higher bunk? Who can share a room together? Well, they're an experienced touring group. And, if we had done this with studio musicians, they would've all gone, 'I need my own room. I need this or that…' And it's already such a big touring party.
We're doing it for the joy of the music, not as a get rich quick scheme.
Ryan: Obviously, there's a lot of experimentation on Remain in Light. But, initially, a lot of that music developed out of longer instrumental jam sessions. Was there a sense of improvisation there as well, at least initially?
Harrison: We deliberately went into the recording process without a single song written. And we really used the mixing board as the compositional tool. Mixing boards back then had an A and B button - which grouped channels. So, it really became A, and there's this bunch of tracks playing. B, this bunch of tracks playing. And you're kind of going back and forth between them. Now, you might add something else like a keyboard stab or percussion thing that you'd bring in. Stuff like that.
So, it was an album that was difficult for David to write lyrics to - because it has so few chord changes. It's sort of modal. They suggest a chord - but it's not like, 'OK. I'm going up to the four chord or the five chord or minor third.' It doesn't have that normal song structure quality. Which is also why it's sort of like chants.
I actually think that if you would go back to say the Grateful Dead or psychedelic music - or even the end of the Stones' 'You Can't Always Get What You Want,' where they go like back and forth on two chords and it sort of evolves and evolves - it's music like that but with like African notes. So, instead of being five parts, it's like eight or 10 or 15, you know?
But that's also why it's so danceable. And so it sort of touches your heart I think.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hannah Spearritt and Louie Spence withdraw from Celebrity SAS in first episode
Hannah Spearritt and Louie Spence withdraw from Celebrity SAS in first episode

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hannah Spearritt and Louie Spence withdraw from Celebrity SAS in first episode

S Club 7 singer Hannah Spearritt and former TV dancer Louie Spence have withdrawn from Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins in the first episode of the latest series. The Channel 4 military reality show opened with the 14 celebrity recruits hooded and standing on a breakwater, before they were asked for their identities by chief instructor Billy Billingham – who told many of the celebrities 'don't grin at me'. He then led them on two tasks, the first to plunge 26ft into the water and swim to intercept a boat, which picked them up, and the second to rescue three hostages from a building before blowing it up with a grenade. Before the second challenge began, Spearritt, 44, handed over her number tag to directing staff, telling them 'I'm done, I'm sorry, I've reached a point' – and in a pre-recorded interview which was played after her withdrawal, she said 'I don't think I'll go on the first day' adding she 'wouldn't forgive myself'. During the task, Spence, who is best known for Sky TV show Pineapple Dance Studios, threw a grenade into the building while it still had two hostages in it, and afterwards told the directing staff he wished to withdraw, and was given a second chance to put his armband back on, but turned it down. Spence said: 'I want to do an immediate withdrawal, I just don't have the conviction, and I feel as though I'm not dedicated enough.' He was told that he 'hadn't even started', but Spence replied 'that's what I mean'. After the first task, former model Rebecca Loos was pulled in by directing staff after she gave up during the swimming challenge, who asked her to open up on her alleged affair with footballer Sir David Beckham, who she worked for as a personal assistant, during the interrogation. In an interview before the first task, former Drag Race UK star Bimini Bon Boulash said the show would be 'a piece of piss' after growing up as a queer person in Norfolk. After the second task, former Watford striker Troy Deeney, who also threw a grenade into the building before clearing the hostages, was pulled in by the instructors, where he opened up on physical abuse he and his mother received from his late father. The show sees celebrities enter SAS training, where they are not eliminated and are instead culled by the directing staff or able to withdraw themselves, with those who remain at the end declared the winners. The rest of the celebrity recruits are made up of ex-drug mule Michaella McCollum, former footballer Adebayo Akinfenwa, Strictly Come Dancing 2025 runner-up Tasha Ghouri, former The Traitors winner Harry Clark, rapper Lady Leshurr, boxer Conor Benn, singer Lucy Spraggan, and ex-Love Island contestants Chloe Burrows and Adam Collard. Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins continues on Channel 4 on Monday at 9pm.

Classic 'Star Wars' Movie Receives New Rating
Classic 'Star Wars' Movie Receives New Rating

Screen Geek

timean hour ago

  • Screen Geek

Classic 'Star Wars' Movie Receives New Rating

The Star Wars franchise has a long history, going back to the 1977 release of the original film first titled Star Wars and later retitled A New Hope . While Disney now operates this franchise, it was originally still under the control of creator George Lucas for quite some time, and he was able to create a trilogy of prequels including The Phantom Menace , Attack of the Clones , and Revenge of the Sith . Now one of these Star Wars films has received a new rating in the UK several decades after its initial release. As shared via The Telegraph, the British Board of Film Classification issued the rating when revisiting this aforementioned Star Wars film alongside various other cinematic classics. Interestingly, this Star Wars movie was previously rated U – which stands for 'Universal' – and brought up to a PG. For those unfamiliar, a U is much like a G rating in the United States. With changing times, however, the British Board of Film Classification deemed it necessary to change the UK rating of this Star Wars film released in 1999 – The Phantom Menace . It seems that this decision was made as a result of the film's final lightsaber fight. It's often considered one of the strongest sequences not only in the film, or the prequel trilogy, but the saga as a whole. The sequence has young Obi-Wan and his mentor, Qui-Gon Jinn, battling Darth Maul. It's an impressive fight scene and one that really upped the ante following the original trilogy. The sequence ultimately ends with Obi-Wan slicing Darth Maul in half after his master is killed in battle, and while it isn't particularly gory, it's violent enough that the rating of the entire film has gone up. As mentioned, The Phantom Menace is far from the only title to receive a new classification by the British Board of Film Classification. It is interesting, however, to see one of the least serious Star Wars films receive a slightly heavier rating almost three decades since its initial release. Stay tuned to ScreenGeek for any additional updates regarding the Star Wars franchise as we have them. While the 'Skywalker Saga' that The Phantom Menace opens has come to an end, it's clear that the brand is far from over with many new films and shows currently in the works.

Today's NYT Strands Hints, Answer and Help for Aug. 4 #519
Today's NYT Strands Hints, Answer and Help for Aug. 4 #519

CNET

timean hour ago

  • CNET

Today's NYT Strands Hints, Answer and Help for Aug. 4 #519

Looking for the most recent Strands answer? Click here for our daily Strands hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles. Today's NYT Strands puzzle is a tough one. I had to rack my brain to unscramble a few of the answers. If you need hints and answers, read on. I go into depth about the rules for Strands in this story. If you're looking for today's Wordle, Connections and Mini Crossword answers, you can visit CNET's NYT puzzle hints page. Read more: NYT Connections Turns 1: These Are the 5 Toughest Puzzles So Far Hint for today's Strands puzzle Today's Strands theme is: Cutting it close. If that doesn't help you, here's a clue: Snip-snip. Clue words to unlock in-game hints Your goal is to find hidden words that fit the puzzle's theme. If you're stuck, find any words you can. Every time you find three words of four letters or more, Strands will reveal one of the theme words. These are the words I used to get those hints but any words of four or more letters that you find will work: RIPE, CARB, RARE, PATE, PEAT, TAPE, HOPS, SHOP, SHOPS, PACE, SLICE, LICE, CARE Answers for today's Strands puzzle These are the answers that tie into the theme. The goal of the puzzle is to find them all, including the spangram, a theme word that reaches from one side of the puzzle to the other. When you have all of them (I originally thought there were always eight but learned that the number can vary), every letter on the board will be used. Here are the nonspangram answers: CAPE, COMB, RAZOR, TRIMMER, CLIPPERS, AFTERSHAVE Today's Strands spangram The completed NYT Strands puzzle for Aug. 4, 2025, #519. NYT/Screenshot by CNET Today's Strands spangram is BARBERSHOP. To find it, look for the B that's three letters over and two letters down from the upper left corner, and wind almost straight down.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store