
5 weapons in the Trump–Harvard war: The saga of frozen funds, fragile visas and more
What began as a technical dispute over federal grants and immigration policy has now ballooned into a courtroom brawl with nationwide stakes. Two major lawsuits are pending in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts—one over a $2.2 billion federal funding freeze, another over the revocation of SEVP certification threatening thousands of international students. Meanwhile, a potential $500 million settlement hangs over the proceedings, even as Judge Allison Burroughs weighs rulings that could redefine the limits of executive power over universities.
Billions remain locked away, students and faculty are left in limbo, and a constitutional question looms: can the White House turn academic freedom into a pay-to-play privilege? Here, we dissect how funding, visas, social media, litigation, and students themselves have become weapons and pawns in this high-stakes battle for intellectual freedom in the United States.
Funding as political dynamite
The $2.2 billion freeze wasn't triggered by budget shortfalls or scientific failures—it was political muscle flexing.
The administration argued that universities failing to align with 'agency priorities' could lose funding at will, turning federal research grants from investments in knowledge into ideological cudgels. The looming $500 million settlement proposal underscores the stakes: even the wealthiest university may need to effectively 'pay tribute' to regain funds it was already awarded, setting a dangerous precedent where political loyalty, not merit, decides who gets to pursue science.
Visa as a weapon
The SEVP decertification move effectively threatened deportation for thousands of Harvard's international students. These are scholars who cleared every legal hurdle to study in the US, only to find their right to remain tied to an unrelated political feud. If courts uphold this, international education becomes a high-risk gamble: one tweet, one order, and your legal status evaporates.
Social Media as a policy trigger
On April 15, a single Truth Social post railing against 'elite universities undermining American values' preceded real-world policy actions within days.
The spectacle replaced deliberation; a digital rant reshaped immigration policy and funding flows. Governance by tweet means policy can be unpredictable, personal, and weaponised against institutions without due process.
Litigation as the only shield
Harvard filed two lawsuits in as many months simply to keep functioning. Litigation is expensive, slow, and reactive—but in this climate, it is the only defence left. Most universities don't have Harvard's $50 billion endowment to bankroll legal wars, meaning many will pre-emptively self-censor or comply to avoid conflict, shrinking the space for dissent long before courts rule.
Students as pawns in a political chessboard
Students bore the brunt of the standoff: research stipends frozen, lab projects stalled, international enrolments in limbo, and campus life upended. Their futures became bargaining chips in a broader ideological war between a populist White House and an academic institution asserting its independence. The lesson for students is stark: in this new order, their education is negotiable collateral.
Harvard's win or everyone's loss?
The lawsuits grind on, a potential $500 million settlement looms, but a precedent has already been set: A US president can attempt to dictate campus policy, freeze billions, and threaten thousands of students' futures in mere months. If the courts endorse this power play, academic freedom will become conditional, not constitutional. Even Harvard, with all its wealth and clout, is vulnerable. For the vast majority of universities and students, this battle is more than a headline—it's a preview of an American education system where intellectual independence survives only until the next political whim decides otherwise.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘No formal talks on F-35 jets yet': India clarifies after Trump tariff announcement
The Indian government on Friday clarified that there have been no formal discussions yet on the potential sale of F-35 fighter jets to India, despite a reference in the India-US joint statement earlier this year. In a written response to a question in the Lok Sabha, Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said: 'The US will undertake a review of its policy on releasing fifth-generation fighters (such as the F-35) and undersea systems to India. No formal discussions have been held as yet on this issue.' This statement comes in the backdrop of PM Narendra Modi's February visit to US, during which the two sides elevated defence and strategic cooperation, but without finalising key hardware acquisitions like the F-35. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) was also asked whether any proposal had been made by the US regarding the F-35, and about the role of American diplomats in reducing tensions between India and Pakistan in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Singh noted that diplomatic conversations were held with various countries, including the US, between April 22 and May 10. 'All our interlocutors were given a common message that India's approach was focused, measured and non-escalatory,' Singh said. He added that on May 9, India had conveyed its position clearly to US Vice President J D Vance. 'With specific reference to the United States, it was conveyed to Vice President J D Vance on May 9 that India would appropriately respond if Pakistan launched a major attack.' Singh clarified that the decision to cease military action was taken bilaterally between India and Pakistan. 'The discussion to cease military action took place directly between India and Pakistan through the existing channels of communication between the two-armed forces, and it was initiated at Pakistan's request.' Responding to a question on third-party mediation, Singh reiterated New Delhi's long-standing policy: 'As regards any proposal for third-party mediation, our longstanding position remains that any outstanding issue with Pakistan will be discussed only bilaterally. This has been made clear to all nations, including by the Prime Minister to the US President.' He emphasised that the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership is underpinned by mutual trust and respect for sovereignty: 'The India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership is anchored in mutual trust, shared interests, goodwill and robust engagement between our citizens. The partnership has also benefited from growing strategic convergence and cooperation.' Singh also reaffirmed that India remains committed to strategic autonomy despite deepening ties with Washington. 'The Government of India closely evaluates all its external partnerships, including those in the defence and strategic domains, through the prism of India's national interest and commitment to strategic autonomy.'


The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
'Balanced', 'forward-looking': Pakistan hails 19% tariffs under U.S. trade deal
Pakistan on Friday (August 1, 2025) announced that the U.S. has imposed a 19% tariff on its exports and termed the step as a "balanced and forward-looking" move that enhances the country's competitiveness in the American market. The new rate is down from the previous 29% tariff announced by U.S. President Donald Trump. Welcoming the "successful conclusion" of the tariff-related discussions with the U.S., the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a statement said, 'As per the outcome of these talks, a tariff of 19% will be applicable for Pakistani exports to the U.S. market.' The decision reflected a 'balanced and forward-looking approach by the U.S. authorities, keeping Pakistan competitive relative to other South and Southeast Asian countries', it said. The Ministry said the revised tariff level is expected to support Pakistan's export potential, especially in key sectors such as textiles, "which remain the backbone of the country's export economy'. Pakistan's exports to the U.S. rose by 11.06% to $5.552 billion from $4.999 billion in the first 11 months of the last fiscal. The Ministry said the current tariff presented a 'significant opportunity to expand Pakistan's footprint in the U.S. market'. 'It is now essential for Pakistani exporters and trade bodies to adopt an aggressive and focused marketing strategy to capitalise on this development,' it said. The statement also pointed out a substantial potential for growth in other sectors. 'The Government of Pakistan looks forward to further positive engagements and close cooperation with the United States in the areas of investment, artificial intelligence, crypto currency, mines and minerals, energy, and other emerging sectors," it said. The Ministry said Pakistan will continue to engage closely with Mr. Trump and the U.S. administration to promote the shared goals of economic development and mutual prosperity. The revised tariff for Pakistan came after the U.S. and Islamabad finalised a trade deal in Washington on Wednesday. In a social media post on Wednesday, the U.S. President said, 'We have just concluded a deal with the country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive oil reserves.' However, it was not immediately clear what massive oil reserves in Pakistan Mr. Trump was referring to. Meanwhile, Khurram Schehzad, Adviser to Pakistan's Finance Minister, in a social media post said, 'Pakistan is possibly the only country which the U.S. has offered its investments as well, besides a competitive trade deal.' The 'deal signals a strategic deepening of economic ties and shared growth', he said. Pakistan has long claimed to have large oil deposits along its coast, but no progress has been made to tap those deposits. It has been trying to lure in investments to tap into these reserves. The country currently imports oil from West Asia to meet its energy demands. Mr. Trump on Thursday signed an executive order that raised tariffs for over five dozen countries with Washington's negotiations for trade deals went down to the wire ahead of the August 1 deadline. The tariffs in the list range from 10% to 40%, with Japan being charged 15%, Laos and Myanmar (40% each), Sri Lanka (20%) and the United Kingdom (10%).


The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. envoy visits distribution site in Gaza as humanitarian crisis worsens
U.S. President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff visited southern Gaza on Friday (August 1, 2025) amid international outrage over starvation, shortages and deadly chaos near aid distribution sites. With food scarce and parcels being airdropped, Mr. Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee toured one of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's distribution sites in Rafah, Gaza's southernmost city. Chapin Fay, the group's spokesperson, said the visit reflected Mr. Trump's understanding of the stakes and that 'feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority.' All four of the group's sites are in zones controlled by the Israeli military and have become flashpoints of desperation during their months of operation, with starving people scrambling for scarce aid. Hundreds have been killed by either gunfire or trampling. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots at people who approach its forces, and GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired warning shots to prevent deadly crowding. Mr. Witkoff's visit comes a week after U.S. officials walked away from ceasefire talks in Qatar, blaming Hamas and pledging to seek other ways to rescue Israeli hostages and make Gaza safe. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday (July 31, 2025) that Mr. Witkoff was sent to craft a plan to boost food and aid deliveries, while Mr. Trump wrote on social media that the fastest way to end the crisis would be for Hamas to surrender and release hostages. Officials at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza said they have received the bodies of 25 people, including 13 who were killed while trying to get aid, including near the site that U.S. officials visited. The GHF denied anyone was killed at their sites on Friday (August 1, 2025) and said most recent incidents had taken place near United Nations aid convoys. The remaining 12 were killed in airstrikes, the officials said. Israel's military did not immediately comment. International organisations have said Gaza has been on the brink of famine for the past two years. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the leading international authority on food crises, said recent developments, including a complete blockade on aid for two-and-a-half months, mean the 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in Gaza.' Though the flow of aid has resumed, including via airdrops, the amount getting into Gaza remains far lower than what aid organisations say is needed. A security breakdown in the territory has made it nearly impossible to safely deliver food to starving Palestinians, much of the limited aid entering is hoarded and later sold at exorbitant prices. At a Friday (August 1, 2025) press conference in Gaza City, representatives of the territory's influential tribes accused Israel of empowering factions that loot aid sites and implored Mr. Witkoff to stay several hours in Gaza to witness life firsthand. 'We want the American envoy to come and live among us in these tents where there is no water, no food and no light,' they said. 'Our children are hungry in the streets.' In a report issued on Friday (August 1, 2025), Human Rights Watch called the current setup 'a flawed, militarised aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths.' 'It would be near impossible for Palestinians to follow the instructions issued by GHF, stay safe, and receive aid, particularly in the context of ongoing military operations, Israeli military sanctioned curfews, and frequent GHF messages saying that people should not travel to the sites before the distribution window opens,' the report said. It cited doctors, aid seekers and at least one security contractor. Since the group's operations began in late May, hundreds of Palestinians have been killed in shootings by Israeli soldiers while on roads heading to the sites, according to witnesses and health officials. The Israeli military has said its troops have only fired warning shots to control crowds. Responding to the report, Israel's military blamed Hamas for sabotaging the aid distribution system but said it was working to make the routes under its control safer for those traveling to aid sites. GHF did not immediately respond to questions about the report. The group has never allowed journalists to visit their sites and Israel's military has barred reporters from independently entering Gaza throughout the war. International condemnations have mounted as such reports trickle out of Gaza, including from aid organisations that previously oversaw distribution. A July 30 video published Thursday (July 31, 2025) by the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs showed an aid convoy driving past a border crossing as gunfire ricocheted off the ground near where crowds congregated. 'We were met on the road by tens of thousands of hungry and desperate people who directly offloaded everything from the backs of our trucks,' said Olga Cherevko, an OCHA staff member. Some of Israel's traditional allies have moved toward recognising Palestinian statehood hoping to revive prospects of a two-state solution. Germany has thus far refrained from doing so. On a tour in the occupied West Bank, the country's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, Germany's foreign minister called on Israel to be open to making peace and said Hamas militants should lay down their weapons and release the hostages. Speaking in the Christian-majority village of Taybeh, Mr. Wahedphul called Israeli settlements in the West Bank a key obstacle to a two-state solution. He condemned settler violence and destruction and criticised the Israeli military for failing to do more to prevent the attacks. The frequency of settler attacks in the West Bank have increased since the war between Israel and Hamas began, according to the United Nations. The conflict erupted on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and abducting 251 others. They still hold 50 hostages, including around 20 believed to be alive. Most of the others have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians. The ministry operates under the Hamas government. The U.N. and other international organisations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties.