
Expired cheques in the UAE: What the law says about your rights and legal options
A common concern among residents and business owners in the UAE is what to do when holding an old, uncashed cheque, especially one that's worth a significant amount of money. A recent case sheds light on this issue, offering important insights into what the law allows, what deadlines apply, and what rights a cheque bearer retains after key time limits have passed.
The Query: A Four-Year-Old Cheque and a Refusing Bank
A person submitted a legal question after facing refusal from a bank to accept a cheque that was issued over four years ago. The cheque, being more than six months past its date of issuance, was deemed invalid for processing by the bank. The individual also wanted to know whether they could take immediate legal action to stop the issuer from leaving the UAE.
The Legal Position: Missed Deadlines Limit Your Options
According to UAE law, the ability to act against a cheque issuer diminishes significantly once certain legal timeframes have lapsed.
In this case, the individual has lost the right to take immediate preventive action such as banning the cheque issuer from leaving the country due to delays in presenting the cheque and initiating legal steps.
As clarified in the official legal response:
'You do not have the legal right to take immediate action to ban the drawer because you have lost the opportunity to use the cheque as an execution document due to the lapse of more than two years from its due date and the failure to present the cheque to the bank within the required period.'
Key Legal Provisions to Know
The law governing such cases is outlined under multiple articles from the UAE's legal code:
Article 670 of the Commercial Transactions Law
This article sets a strict limit on how long a cheque can be used to claim payment. It states:
'Claims for recourse by the cheque bearer against the drawer, endorsers, and other obligors to pay the cheque value shall not be heard, upon denial and absence of a legitimate excuse, if more than two years have passed since the expiry of the presentment period.'
In simpler terms, after two years from the end of the cheque's presentation window (which itself is six months from the cheque's date), legal claims to recover money based on the cheque will no longer be entertained unless there's a valid excuse.
Article 336 of the Civil Transactions Law
This article provides some legal room to recover the amount via a civil lawsuit, but not through direct cheque execution. It states:
'Claims arising from a beneficial act shall not be accepted after three years from the date the creditor became aware of their right of reversion, and in any case not later than 15 years from when the right arose.'
This means that while the cheque itself may not be valid for direct enforcement, the person can still file a civil case to claim the amount stated in the cheque treating the cheque as supporting evidence of debt rather than a binding financial instrument.
What You Can Do Now
If you hold an expired cheque, here are the steps you can take:
File a Civil Case: You may sue the cheque issuer in civil court for the amount mentioned, treating the cheque as documentary proof of a debt.
Prepare Evidence: The burden of proof lies with the cheque holder. You must present supporting documents or agreements that show the drawer owes you the money.
Use Legal Tools: You may rely on written documents and even request that the court issue an oath to support your claims.
As clarified:
'The liability to prove your case lies with you. You may rely on an oath as well as any written documents between you and the drawer.
The court will make its decision based on the documents submitted.'
Legal Rights Still Exist, But Timing Matters
Although UAE law does not allow you to use an old cheque as a tool to initiate immediate legal action such as a travel ban or criminal enforcement you are not without options. A civil case remains possible, especially if you act within the broader civil claim limits.
However, this situation highlights the importance of timing. Always present cheques to the bank within six months of issuance, and if a dispute arises, initiate legal steps swiftly ideally within two years to maintain your strongest legal position.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 10 Most Hated Billionaires in 2025
Every time a wealthy person crosses over into billionaire status, those of us in lower wealth echelons may show the limitations of our ability for empathy. Generally, the 'have-nots' do not celebrate the 'have-way-too-much.' Watching Elon Musk get richer and richer while many struggle to get above living paycheck to paycheck can really suck. 'Hate' is a strong word, but it may be pretty close to (if not exactly) what many people feel toward billionaires. Find Out: Read Next: A recent study by found the 10 most hated billionaires of 2025. Data was collected from the number of Google search results containing the billionaire's name combined with terms like 'controversy,' 'scam' and 'fraud;' a sentiment-based 'Reddit hate score' on the social news aggregation and forum site, and the billionaire's public disapproval rating that factored in overall negative news coverage (for President Donald Trump, we didn't use public disapproval rating, but instead used fresh data from The Economist). Additionally, net worths were sourced from Forbes. See the 10 most hated billionaires, along with the companies they own and their respective net worths. 10. George Soros Key areas of success or businesses: Open Society Foundations, Soros Foundation Net worth: $7.5 billion Reddit hate score: 5.9 Public disapproval rating: 26% Overall hate score: 36 Check Out: 9. Bill Gates Key areas of success or businesses: Microsoft Net worth: $117 billion Reddit hate score: 8.2 Public disapproval rating: 27% Overall hate score: 41 8. Vince McMahon Key areas of success or businesses: WWE Net worth: $3 billion Reddit hate score: 8.6 Public disapproval rating: 23% Overall hate score: 43 7. Jamie Dimon Key areas of success or businesses: J.P. Morgan Chase/banking Net worth: $2.8 billion Reddit hate score: 9 Public disapproval rating: 25% Overall hate score: 46 6. Jeff Bezos Key areas of success or businesses: Amazon Net worth: $241.3 billion Reddit hate score: 8.2 Public disapproval rating: 30% Overall hate score: 47 5. Mark Zuckerberg Key areas of success or businesses: Meta/Facebook Net worth: $246 billion Reddit hate score: 9.1 Public disapproval rating: 40% Overall hate score: 56 4. Gautam Adani Key areas of success or businesses: Adani Group Net worth: $68 billion Reddit hate score: 7.1 Public disapproval rating: 51% Overall hate score: 56 3. Rupert Murdoch Key areas of success or businesses: Fox News, Sky News Net worth: $24 billion Reddit hate score: 9.2 Public disapproval rating: 55% Overall hate score: 64 2. Elon Musk Key areas of success or businesses: Tesla, SpaceX Net worth: $409 billion Reddit hate score: 9.4 Public disapproval rating: 36% Overall hate score: 92 1. Donald Trump Key areas of success or businesses: Real estate and politics Net worth: $5.5 billion Reddit hate score: 9.5 Public disapproval rating: 55% Overall hate score: 100 More From GOBankingRates 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives This article originally appeared on The 10 Most Hated Billionaires in 2025
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Verstappen wins Belgian GP sprint race
Red Bull's Max Verstappen held off the McLarens of Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris to win a tense sprint race at the Belgian Grand Prix. Verstappen passed Piastri on the opening lap using the slipstream up the long Kemmel straight and used his Red Bull's straight-line advantage to hold the Australian at arm's length for the entire 15 laps. Verstappen was always less than a second half of the McLaren but Piastri never quite managed to get close enough to challenge for the lead. Norris lost third place to Ferrari's Charles Leclerc on the opening lap. But once he past the Monegasque just after half distance, the Briton closed on the lead fight, where like Piastri he was unable to make any progress. Piastri's second place moved him one point further ahead of Norris in the championship, with qualifying for Sunday's grand prix later on Saturday. Verstappen's victory marked a winning start for Red Bull under new team principal Laurent Mekies, after Christian Horner was sacked from the role following the British Grand Prix. More to follow
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hojlund's fight to answer Man Utd's striker question
Rasmus Hojlund is about to face a match at the stadium that will host next year's World Cup final. Manchester United's friendly with West Ham at MetLife Stadium, in the grand scheme of things, is nowhere near as big a deal. But for the Danish striker, it's crucial. A crowd approaching 50,000 is anticipated for United's opening game in the four-team Premier League Summer Series on Saturday evening, just west of New York City. Hojlund's performance could determine whether head coach Ruben Amorim keeps faith with him as United's attacking spearhead. United have spent more than £120m on forward players this summer - but three weeks before the start of the new Premier League season, do not have the number nine many informed observers believe they are desperate for. They were frustrated in their efforts to sign Liam Delap - who left Ipswich for Chelsea instead. And on Friday, Amorim hinted Hojlund remains his first choice for the role. Is he up to the task? Man Utd won't sell players on the cheap - Amorim Hey big spenders - Liverpool lead top-four domination of £1bn deals In May, United finished 15th in the Premier League, their worst final placing since relegation from the top flight in 1974. A Europa League final defeat by Tottenham compounded the disappointment. Vast improvement has to come - Amorim accepts as much. And for that to happen, his side must score more goals. They managed only 44 in the league last season. The week before last, minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe met chief executive Omar Berrada and technical director Jason Wilcox in Iceland. It is probably fair to assume the centre-forward position was discussed. And there is no doubt they wanted Delap. United have been targeting the domestic market because Amorim is keen to add players who do not need time to adapt to the Premier League. But Chelsea sealed the deal. Since then, the names of numerous alternatives have been advanced. Viktor Gyokeres was thought of as a target from the moment Amorim was appointed, given how successful the pair were together at Sporting after the 27-year-old had impressed in the Championship with Coventry. But Gyokeres is heading to Arsenal. Nicolas Jackson's name keeps being mentioned in connection with United. There have been conversations about the Chelsea forward, but not to the point where it has looked as if United might try to buy him. Aston Villa quickly shut down a link to their forward Ollie Watkins, letting it be known they have no interest in selling. Could United put that to the test? Watkins is an interesting case because he slipped down the pecking order at Villa when Marcus Rashford - unwanted by Amorim - arrived on loan. Would a more expensive Watkins, 29, who has scored 75 goals in 184 Premier League games be a better option that a cheaper Jackson, who has been excellent and erratic at Chelsea, often both in the same game? Man Utd to need to raise funds Former Everton striker Moise Kean, who re-established his reputation in Serie A with Fiorentina, Randal Kolo Muani, back at Paris St-Germain and unwanted after a loan spell with Juventus, and Crystal Palace's Jean-Philippe Mateta are all likely to be available. The same is true of RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko, although Newcastle is a more likely destination for the Slovakian. Then there are the wildcard options - out-of-contract forwards such as Dominic Calvert-Lewin and Jamie Vardy. But none of these options come without risk. And for United, funds are limited and there are so many weaknesses to address. Amorim referred to the need for more energy in midfield after last Saturday's 0-0 draw with Leeds in Stockholm. Amorim didn't mention the additional issues, but others have: Goalkeeper, central defence, the right-sided wing-back role. The list goes on. Not all of this can be dealt with in a single transfer window. It is quite possible 12 months from now, if he is still in post, Amorim will still be looking to address flaws that exist now, as well as those that emerge in the coming months. Funds are precious and United need to raise some. They might have generated around £30m this summer through sell-ons being activated for Alvaro Carreras, who has left Benfica for Real Madrid, Anthony Elanga joining Newcastle and Maxi Oyedele moving to Strasbourg - plus the covering of Rashford's wages for the season by his loan move to Barcelona - but more needs to be done. Rashford was one of five unwanted players effectively cast out of the first-team picture by Amorim - the other four being Jadon Sancho, Alejandro Garnacho, Antony and Tyrell Malacia. More money could be generated by selling those four - but Amorim has warned that they won't be allowed to leave on the cheap. Garnacho is a player capable of generating a sizeable fee - albeit not the £60m United went into the summer hoping for. He may be pivotal, especially if Chelsea go back for a player they were close to signing in January. But for now, Amorim has to maximise what he has. The case for sticking with Hojlund Against Leeds in Sweden, 18-year-old Chido Obi started. But the former Arsenal youngster currently appears to be an impact player. Hojlund took over for the second half. As usual, he worked hard enough, didn't receive the service a centre-forward would want and did his best for the team. But, as usual, he didn't score. He has scored 26 goals in 95 competitive appearances over two years at United - just over a goal every four games. The numbers are not terrible. But they include a run of five goals in four games last season and eight in eight the campaign before. Statistics can be manipulated to suit any argument - but if those two sequences are taken out, what is left is 13 goals in 83 appearances, or more than six games for every goal. That is clearly not good enough. The question is whether Hojlund can extend the more productive spells or if they are distorting the overall picture. On Friday, Amorim gave the impression he has not given up on the 22-year-old, who cost United £72m when they bought him from Serie A outfit Atalanta in 2023. In his opening media engagement of the summer in Chicago, United's head coach made a couple of significant points. Firstly, he insisted he would be happy to go into the new season with his current squad. In truth, he couldn't say anything else given there are no guarantees of further signings. Secondly, he confirmed his belief that his attacking reinforcements, Bryan Mbeumo and Matheus Cunha, could both operate as a spearhead in addition to the number 10 roles they appear best suited to. But it was towards the end of a long unrelated answer, in connection to captain Bruno Fernandes, that Amorim might have given an indication about his thinking. The coach wants Fernandes to operate deeper, away from those two prized number 10 spots. He thinks the Portuguese can cause more damage that way because he won't be marked as tightly. "If you have the threat of players; of Rasmus, Matheus and Brian, in the space and a player with Bruno's quality on the ball, it's really important," he said. Events can change course quickly at Old Trafford but at the very least, the namecheck suggested Hojlund is likely to get some time on the pitch with Cunha, Mbeumo and Fernandes at the MetLife and beyond. And if he finds a spark across a trio of pre-season fixtures against West Ham, Bournemouth and Everton over the next nine days, it may cause United's hierarchy to pause and think. To a greater or lesser degree, the search for a striker has been a feature of their summer. Can Hojlund prove he is the answer after all? Latest Manchester United news, analysis and fan views Get Man Utd news notifications