New ice cream parlor opens in Schuylkill Haven
Ice Cream Haven began in May along Route 61, offering the community a new spot to get ice cream and other cold treats.
With its bright decor, family-friendly atmosphere, fresh ingredients and ample servings, the business is already popular, said manager Wasiq Tanveer.
Ice Cream Haven on Route 61 in Schuylkill Haven, pictured Thursday, June 12, 2025, opened in May. (MATTHEW PERSCHALL/MULTIMEDIA EDITOR)
'We are striving to provide both quality and quantity,' he said.
The business, which has a motto of 'every scoop served with a smile,' sells dozens of flavors of both hard and soft ice-cream from Leiby's Dairy near Tamaqua. Customers can get their scoops in a bowl or a sugar, waffle or pretzel cone.
Also on the menu are milkshakes, sundaes, smoothies, banana splits, floats, swirls and specialty items.
Ice Cream Haven, 372 Centre Ave., Schuylkill Haven, has a bright interior and exterior, shown Thursday, June 12, 2025. (MATTHEW PERSCHALL/MULTIMEDIA EDITOR)
The shop is in the same strip mall along Route 61 as Mount Fuji Hibachi and Sushi; Domino's and Subway, and the address is 372 Center Ave., Schuylkill Haven.
Ice Cream Haven opens seven days a week at noon, closing at 10 each day except on Saturdays and Sundays, when it closes at 11 p.m.
It includes a birthday room available to rent for kids' parties.
The plan is for the shop to be open year-round, and in the colder months it is considering offering some hot food items, said employee Daud Ahmad.
Wasiq Tanveer prepares a banana split at Ice Cream Haven on Route 61 in Schuylkill Haven, Thursday, June 12, 2025. (MATTHEW PERSCHALL/MULTIMEDIA EDITOR)
There are also options already on the menu such as vegan and sugar-free ice-cream for those with food allergies or dietary restrictions, he said.
A grand opening is being planned for July.
To reach the shop, call 570-593-5072 or go to its Facebook page.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Report: Zuckerberg Settles $8 Billion Privacy Case—Avoids Testifying
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other executives reached a settlement with a group of the company's shareholders Thursday, ending a long-running, potentially blockbuster $8 billion trial over allegations Facebook knowingly harvested user data, according to Reuters. Facebook shareholders sued Meta leadership in 2018, alleging the company knowingly harvest user ... More data. Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. An attorney representing Meta shareholders told Judge Kathaleen McCormick in Delaware's Chancery Court a settlement was reached with Zuckerberg and other members of the company's leadership, Reuters reported, though details of the settlement were not immediately available. This is a developing story .
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta investors, Zuckerberg reach settlement to end trial over Facebook privacy litigation
WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -A lawyer for Meta Platforms shareholders who were suing Mark Zuckerberg and other company leaders told a Delaware judge on Thursday that the parties had reached a settlement agreement, ending a $8 billion trial over Facebook's user privacy violations. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta Trial on Privacy Scandal Features Tech, Politics A-List
(Bloomberg) -- Behind-the-scenes details of an agreement between Facebook and US privacy regulators in 2019 emerged in a Delaware court Wednesday, during a trial on investor claims the settlement cost them at least $7 billion. The Dutch Intersection Is Coming to Save Your Life Advocates Fear US Agents Are Using 'Wellness Checks' on Children as a Prelude to Arrests LA Homelessness Drops for Second Year Manhattan, Chicago Murder Rates Drop in 2025, Officials Say A company director at the time, Jeffrey Zients, who was later former President Joe Biden's chief of staff, said the board asked its lawyers to approach the Federal Trade Commission with a proposal. The company, now known as Meta Platforms Inc., was willing to pay billions of dollars to settle allegations related to a privacy scandal but would not accept any settlement that held founder Mark Zuckerberg personally responsible. Board members 'felt it was important to get this behind us so we could focus on growth,' Zients said on the first day of an eight-day trial in Delaware Chancery Court. They believed Zuckerberg, as CEO, was essential to the business and 'there wasn't any indication' he personally had anything to do with the privacy missteps related to political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, he said. A parade of Silicon Valley celebrities is expected to testify in the Meta trial over the next two weeks, led by Zuckerberg. Others on the witness list include the company's former chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg and prominent venture capital investors Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel. Andreessen, who still sits on the company's board, is expected to testify Thursday. The investors contend directors of the company hurt share prices through actions tied to the decade-old incident that resulted in Cambridge Analytica acquiring data on millions of Facebook users. The data was used in work the firm did for the 2016 campaign to elect President Donald Trump to his first term. The suit alleges Meta directors engineered the company's $5 billion settlement with the FTC, overpaying to protect Zuckerberg from being held personally liable and to the detriment of shareholders. Meta representatives didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about Zients' testimony Wednesday. Zuckerberg's much-anticipated testimony is expected next week. The case is unusual because it's the first time that director-oversight claims involving a public company have gone to trial in Delaware Chancery Court, the premier venue for business disputes in the US. Other cases have been dismissed or settled. A group of pension funds who hold Meta shares allege Zuckerberg and Sandberg led Facebook to violate a 2012 Federal Trade Commission order covering data-sharing practices. Facebook directors also are accused of failing to properly monitor the platform's adherence to that order, according to court filings. Investors also accuse Zuckerberg of insider trading. The insider-trading claims prompted Zuckerberg to demand his stock-trading strategies be kept under seal in the trial. The tech titan moved to shield the price thresholds that trigger his automatic sales. The public can understand the allegations without that highly confidential information, he said in a court filing. In early 2018, Facebook executives admitted Cambridge Analytica had been allowed to improperly gather data about tens of millions of the company's users. Zuckerberg later apologized, acknowledging Facebook must better safeguard users' information. A year later, the FTC announced the settlement over violations of the order under which Facebook would pay the $5 billion fine. Investors, including pension funds, filed suit in the wake of that order. The case was filed as a derivative lawsuit, one that allows investors to sue company executives or board members on behalf of the company itself. Any recovery will go back to the company rather than any individual shareholder. Zuckerberg, the 41-year-old CEO and chairman of Meta's board, controls about 61% of the company's voting power through a dual-class share structure, effectively granting him sole control over the board composition and corporate strategy — past, present and future. Repeated investor efforts to raise concerns about corporate governance have fallen flat due to his concentrated voting power. Bloomberg Intelligence If Meta's unable to knock out this case ahead of trial, it theoretically could face a $2 billion settlement, The trial is being overseen by Chancellor Kathaleen St. J. McCormick – the same judge who rejected Tesla Inc. CEO Elon Musk's $55 billion pay package. That ruling and a handful of others — part of a court crackdown on insider conflicts of interest — prompted several companies to shift their states of incorporation to Nevada and Texas, including Tesla and Bill Ackman's Pershing Capital. They cited alleged judicial bias against tech leaders such as Musk and Zuckerberg. The wave of exits from Delaware, which funds more than a quarter of its budget with billions in corporate fees, led to a major overhaul of the state's best-in-class corporate laws earlier this year. The changes were drafted by an expert panel that included former judges now practicing law at firms linked to Musk and Zuckerberg, including one involved in the Cambridge Analytica case. Meta officials have publicly said they are weighing whether to yank their incorporation papers out of Delaware, which is the corporate home to more than 60% of Fortune 500 companies. Firms come to Delaware to get access to chancery court, where sophisticated business judges hear cases without juries. Last week, a venture capital firm co-founded by Meta director Andreessen cited a creeping pattern of uncertainty about how the law applies to startups and tech firms to explain its decision to relocate to Nevada. The case is IN RE Facebook Inc. Derivative Litigation, 2018-0307, Delaware Chancery Court (Wilmington). --With assistance from Riley Griffin, Michael Leonard, Jennifer Kay and Kurt Wagner. (Updates with additional Zients testimony.) How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All Forget DOGE. Musk Is Suddenly All In on AI How Hims Became the King of Knockoff Weight-Loss Drugs The Quest for a Hangover-Free Buzz Thailand's Changing Cannabis Rules Leave Farmers in a Tough Spot ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
