Ukraine welcomes Trump's nuclear sub move, saying it has ‘silenced' Medvedev
Date: 2025-08-04T07:39:06.000Z
Title: Morning opening: Shush
Content: Andriy Yermak, the most senior aide to Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, seemingly enjoys the silence from Russia following Donald Trump's decision to move two nuclear submarines in response to provocative comments from the country's former president, Dmitry Medvedev.
'The moment American nuclear submarines appeared, … [he] suddenly went silent. Russia understands only one thing: strength,' he said.
Expect Kyiv to keep making similar representations this week, before US special envoy Steve Witkoff visits Russia 'Wednesday or Thursday' for further talks ahead of Trump's 8 August deadline for a ceasefire in Ukraine.
On Friday, there were no signs that Vladimir Putin was willing to change his mind, as he repeated that the Russian 'conditions certainly remain the same,' even as he claimed that he nominally supported 'a lasting and stable peace.'
With things getting quiet elsewhere as we hit peak holiday season, this could be the main focus this week.
I will bring you all key updates from across Europe here.
It's Monday, 4 August 2025, it's Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live.
Good morning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a few seconds ago
- The Independent
Trump administration wants to end abortion coverage through Veterans Affairs
President Donald Trump 's administration is calling to remove abortion coverage from the list of medical benefits for veterans and their families, saying it's not needed. The Department of Veterans Affairs posted the proposed rule change on Monday and opened a public comment period on it that runs through Sept. 3. The department said in its proposal that it wants to ensure it 'provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families.' The department says it would still provide abortion in life-threatening circumstances — something state laws allow, even in places where bans are in place. But critics of the change note that abortion would not be provided when pregnancies are the result of rape or incest. Amy Friedrich-Karnik, director of federal policy at the Guttmacher Institute, said in a statement that the change would cut off millions of veterans and their families from services. 'Veterans have historically faced significant barriers to reproductive health care, and with the current patchwork of abortion bans and restrictions across the country, these barriers are even steeper today," she said. Veterans Affairs, which provides health coverage for veterans and their dependents, did not include abortion in its coverage until 2022. President Joe Biden 's administration added it months after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and state abortion bans began kicking in. The Biden changed allowed the VA to provide abortion even in states where it was banned. The VA says in its proposal that allowing abortion is legally questionable because Congress has not specifically allowed it. The policy change would also bring the VA's coverage into line with other federal health care plans — including Medicaid and the TriCare coverage for active military members and their families — which exclude abortion in most cases. The VA said in its filings that about 100 veterans and 40 dependents obtain abortions using the benefits each year — far below the projection the department made in 2022 of a total of 1,000 a year. The conservative law firm Alliance Defending Freedom called on the VA to drop abortion coverage in a letter last month, saying the cost or providing abortion takes other health resources away from veterans.
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump again threatens 'very substantial' tariff hikes for India over Russian oil
WASHINGTON/NEW DELHI, Aug 5 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would increase the tariff charged on imports from India from the current rate of 25% "very substantially" over the next 24 hours, in view of New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. He also said a "zero tariff" offer for imports of U.S. goods into India was not good enough, alleging that India was "fuelling the war" in Ukraine. Trump's threat to India over its purchases of Russian oil started on July 31, when he announced a 25% tariff for Indian goods, along with an unspecified penalty. "They're fuelling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy," Trump told CNBC in an interview on Tuesday, adding that the main sticking point with India was that its tariffs were too high. "Now, I will say this, India went from the highest tariffs ever. They will give us zero tariffs, and they're going to let us go in. But that's not good enough, because of what they're doing with oil, not good." An Indian government source said that India's purchases of Russian oil have helped to stabilise global oil prices by easing the pressure on supplies from other regions. India, the world's third biggest oil importer and consumer, buys more than a third of the oil it needs from Russia. "If we stop buying Russian oil, who will replace those barrels to maintain balance (in the market) and at the same time prevent the prices from shooting up? We don't want a repeat of 2022 when prices shot up to $137 a barrel," the source said, referring to the oil market spike around the time when Moscow's invasion of Ukraine began. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the source was not authorised to speak to the media. Trump's latest comment followed a similar threat on Monday, which prompted India's Foreign Ministry to say the country was being unfairly singled out over its purchases of Russian oil. "It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia (despite the Ukraine war)," it said in a statement issued late on Monday. "It is unjustified to single out India," it added. The EU conducted 67.5 billion euros ($78.0 billion) worth of trade with Russia in 2024, including record imports of liquefied natural gas that totalled 16.5 million metric tons, the Indian ministry said. The United States continues to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in its nuclear power industry, palladium, fertilisers and chemicals, it added, without giving a source for the export information. The U.S. embassy and the EU's delegation in New Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both the United States and EU have reduced their trade ties with Russia since it launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. It has faced pressure from the West to distance itself from Russia over the Ukraine war. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding ties with Moscow and economic needs. India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is likely to go ahead with a scheduled visit to Russia this week, two government sources said. Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar is expected to visit in the coming weeks. The sudden rift between India and the U.S. has been deepening since July 31. Trump has said that from Friday he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end the war with Ukraine. The trade tensions have caused concern about the potential impact on India's economy. The equity benchmark BSE Sensex .BSESN closed down 0.38%, while the rupee dropped 0.17% versus the dollar.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
New Texas Republican maps dilute Latino voting power in Austin
When Representative Greg Casar won his election last year, he became the first Latino to represent the Texas capitol city of Austin in Congress. A panel of federal judges had drawn his district's lines after a prolonged legal battle over racial gerrymandering. But under the map Texas Republicans unveiled last week, Casar would instead live in the modified version of his neighboring district to the west, which would swallow east Austin – a gentrifying but historically working-class area home to Mexican American and Black residents once forced by segregation laws to live on the east side of town. 'Even a conservative supreme court said central Texas Latinos deserve a district, and that's why my district exists,' Casar said. 'If Donald Trump is able to suppress Latino voters here in Austin, he'll try to spread that plan across America.' Texas Republicans took the unusual step of redistricting several years early in an attempt to deliver more congressional seats to Donald Trump ahead of next year's midterm elections. Democratic state lawmakers fled the state Sunday to try to thwart the GOP redistricting plan by denying state lawmakers a quorum needed to pass it into law. The Texas governor, Greg Abbott, said Monday he would seek to arrest and possibly unseat and replace Democratic lawmakers who do not return. In majority-minority Texas, where Black and brown voters have traditionally leaned left, the overtly political ploy is teeing up another in a series of legal battles over racial gerrymandering that have erupted repeatedly for more than a decade. The dramatic reshaping of Casar's district 35 is one of the most egregious examples cited by civic groups concerned that the new map will dilute Latino voter strength and make it harder for candidates of color to win congressional elections. 'The map as proposed clearly violates the Voting Rights Act and is unconstitutional,' said Lydia Camarillo, the president of the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project. 'It's canceling out districts that are part of the Voting Rights Act … and it's not giving Latinos the right to represent their voice based on their population growth.' Hispanics are the largest population segment in Texas, at about 40%. Only one-fifth of the state's 38-member congressional delegation is Hispanic, however. Since the last census, civic groups like Camarillo's have contended that the state's booming Hispanic population growth merits two more Latino-majority congressional districts under the Voting Rights Act – one in Houston and the other in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. A dozen organizations and several individuals are pressing Texas to create the two Latino-majority districts in an ongoing federal lawsuit in El Paso. The new GOP-drawn map not only fails to provide those two Latino-majority districts, but it significantly dilutes the voting strength of the ones that exist, critics say. 'This is a calculated move that exploits Texas' historically low voter turnout for those in charge to maintain power,' Jackie Bastard, the executive director of the voter turnout group Jolt Action, wrote in an email. 'By deliberately diluting Latino voting strength across districts, these maps would severely diminish the impact of our ongoing voter mobilization efforts and silence the voices of Texas' fastest-growing demographic.' Those intricacies are often difficult to tease out. congressional district nine, represented by Democratic representative Al Green, for example, is a so-called 'coalition district' under the current map, with no one ethnic or racial group holding a solid majority. In practice, however, it functions more like a Black-opportunity district in a state where African American voters are becoming a smaller share of the electorate. Under the new map, district nine's Black population plummets to 11%, while the Hispanic voting age population now holds a majority. But the historically low voter turnout rate there raises doubts that the district will actually function as a Latino-majority district, said Gloria Leal, the general counsel for the League of United Latin American Citizens, one of the plaintiffs in the El Paso case. Representative Sylvia Garcia's district 29 also dropped enough to raise concerns, while retaining a majority on paper. Representative Henry Cuellar's district 28, on the other hand, saw the opposite approach under the new map – Hispanics voters shot up to roughly 90% of the voting age population. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion 'They added like 20 percentage points to that district to pack us all in,' Leal said. 'We oppose the current map that exists and we adamantly oppose the proposed map,' she added. Any redrawing of Texas districts is likely to draw the scrutiny of the federal courts, given the state's long history of voter suppression. The Voting Rights Act, which will celebrate its 60th anniversary on Wednesday, prohibits both diluting a protected groups' votes across multiple districts and packing voters into a single one. Carrying out such sweeping changes so quickly at the request of the White House may also raise legal questions that go beyond the Voting Rights Act, according Tom Saenz, the director the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is representing the plaintiffs in the El Paso case. 'This is clearly improper,' Saenz said. 'Trying to circumvent judicial review by acting so close to an election is straight-up unlawful.' Political analysts had widely viewed Republicans' goal of finding five congressional seats for Trump as an overly ambitious one that may backfire. The map that Republicans came up with in 2021 to fortify their current lopsided majority in the congressional delegation appeared hard to alter without making the party more vulnerable to Democratic challenges. Texas conservatives appear to have exceeded those expectations, according to Rice University political scientist Mark Jones – partly by 'riding roughshod' over the Voting Rights Act. 'I underestimated the level of disregard of the Voting Rights Act,' Jones said. 'It's not clear how the Voting Rights Act constrained this map in any significant way, with the exception that Republicans focused on hitting absolute majorities of Hispanics in a few districts.' Still, Jones said, Republicans drew the map with an exceptionally favorable year in mind. If Republicans fail to consolidate the inroads they made in last year's election, which is normal during a midterm, the new map could easily fail to produce a single new GOP congressional seat in Texas. It might even lead Republicans to lose a seat, according to Jones. 'One thing that is very clear about this whole process is these maps are being drawn under a very rosy scenario,' Jones said. 'And with Trump not on the ballot, with the natural referendum on his presidency, an economy that may be problematic – it's tough to imagine Republicans hitting 2024 numbers in 2026.'
