
How Nato's ‘Daddy strategy' finally conquered Donald Trump
You might call it the 'Daddy strategy'. When Nato chiefs pondered how to handle Donald Trump at their summit in The Hague, they appear to have decided that mere praise and flattery were inadequate for the task. Instead, they turned high diplomacy into the art of calculated subservience.
Just as the Congress of Vienna of 1814-1815 was arranged around glittering balls and concerts – with a symphony conducted by Beethoven himself and the British delegation alone getting through 10,000 bottles of wine – so this summit in The Hague was designed to serve one purpose and one alone: satisfying Mr Trump's wants, needs and wishes.
If Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, had believed that Mr Trump yearned for 10,000 bottles of vintage, he would have arranged for their supply. Had he thought that Mr Trump wished to meet Beethoven, Mr Rutte would have attempted a resurrection.
As it turned out, the man who became the longest-serving prime minister in Dutch history – and happens to be 58 years old – publicly hailed Mr Trump as 'Daddy'.
When the president spoke of Iran and Israel as if they were squabbling children who had to be separated, Mr Rutte helpfully interjected: 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language.' He was rewarded with a self-satisfied smile from the target of the adulation.
On arrival at The Hague, Mr Trump was swept to the elegant 17th-century splendour of Huis Ten Bosch palace – the Dutch version of Buckingham Palace – where he dined with other Nato leaders before staying overnight as the guest of King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima of the Netherlands.
Then, on Wednesday morning, as most leaders were bombarded with questions from the media as they drew up at the summit venue, Mr Trump was allowed to make his own entrance via a separate door. He would not have to deign to share the limelight with the small fry, namely the other 31 members of the alliance.
The summit sessions themselves were compressed into a three-hour sprint and the declaration cut to the barest minimum. One Nato official used to describe summit conclusions as 'our Bible' because they described everything that alliance headquarters in Brussels was charged with implementing.
But the Bible has been getting shorter. The Vilnius summit declaration in 2023 exceeded 11,000 words. Last year's conclusions in Washington totalled nearly 5,000 words. And the summit with 'daddy' Trump at The Hague? Just 424 words in five paragraphs.
All of this reflects the central fact about Nato, present since the alliance's birth in 1949. Its founding purpose was described by Lord Ismay, the first secretary general, as: 'Keeping the Russians out, the Americans in and the Germans down.'
The last goal has thankfully fallen away, but the first two are more urgent than ever. Alas they are also inter-dependent: keeping the Russians out requires the Americans to stay in. Why? Because one fact has remained constant since 1949 – and will not change in the foreseeable future: America is the pre-eminent superpower whose military strength towers over all of Europe combined.
The United States alone accounts for 66 per cent of total Nato defence spending; the other 31 allies provide only a third put together.
Hence Mr Trump's rage – which was shared by his predecessors – that America is paying too much and the Europeans are shamelessly free-riding. These European allies expect the US to honour its pledge under Article V of the Washington Treaty to come to their defence – even at the risk of nuclear war – and yet they consistently fail to pay their way.
European leaders privately admit that this extraordinary imbalance amounts to the biggest threat to Nato's future. They know that it must change. They are also aware that Europe's willingness to skimp on defence has created an extraordinary disparity of power around the Nato summit table.
Very few international clubs have one member providing fully two thirds of the heft. This stark fact gives Mr Trump what he prizes most and positively enjoys using: leverage over other nations. Hence the imperative of giving him what he wants. The only alternative, as Mr Rutte once put it, is to 'learn Russian'.
The summit's brief communiqué reflects this yawning imbalance of power. All allies, including America, reaffirm their 'ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article V'. But in return for getting Mr Trump to sign up to this pledge, Europe has agreed to raise defence spending from the current target of 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent, with another 1.5 per cent on top for related infrastructure.
Put simply, they have given 'Daddy' everything he wants while gilding the substance with artful subservience.
Asked why he had called Mr Trump 'Daddy', Mr Rutte conceded that 'it's a bit of a question of taste', but denied that it was demeaning. 'He's a good friend,' said Mr Rutte, pointing out how the president was 'forcing' Europe to spend more on defence. 'Doesn't he deserve some praise?' he asked.
Daddy himself certainly thinks so. When he appeared at the final press conference, tired on his feet but visibly elated by the attention, Mr Trump's words revealed the triumph of Mr Rutte's 'daddy strategy'.
'It was a fairly long trip but worth it,' said Mr Trump. 'Tremendous things have been accomplished.'
The stay in the Palace was evidently a home-run for the hosts. Mr Trump announced that he had 'slept beautifully' and the King and Queen were 'beautiful people'. In fact, the royal couple were worthy of his highest accolade: 'They're central casting,' he said.
And the overall effect was exactly what the secretary general was hoping for. 'I came here because it was something I was supposed to be doing,' said Mr Trump. 'But I left here a little bit different.'
He described how every leader had spoken with 'love and passion' about their countries. 'They want to protect their country,' said Mr Trump. 'They were so respectful of me.'
He continued: 'Almost every one of them said 'thank God for the United States, without the United States we couldn't have Nato.'
Then Mr Trump said the vital words which signalled that all had been forgiven. 'It's not a rip off,' he declared of Nato. 'And we're here to help them.'
Now, instead of 31 delinquents, there was only one. Spain has refused to increase its defence budget to 5 per cent of GDP and Mr Trump denounced this decision as 'very terrible'. He vowed to conduct trade negotiations with Spain in person – apparently unaware that such matters are handled by the EU – and promised to 'make them pay twice as much'. Daddy is not nice to all his children.
And the family had made another gesture for the sake of his happiness. The summit declaration was the first since 2022 that failed to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine. One sentence in paragraph three stated that the allies 'reaffirm their enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine,' but without saying why that support was necessary.
If they had told the truth and blamed Daddy's other friend, Vladimir Putin, he would not have approved. Daddy went home happy, but pleasing him carries a price.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
34 minutes ago
- Times
Nigel Farage: If I can't give young men a voice, wait till what comes after me
When Nigel Farage became an MP on his eighth attempt, he said it would kickstart a 'revolt against the establishment'. Almost 12 months on, with Reform UK riding high in the polls, he is planning his next coup: tearing down the whole parliamentary system. 'I love the [House of Commons] building. I love the history. I respect the Speaker as a human being but I find that the way the place does business just ridiculous,' he said. 'I do think that there's a better way of doing things. I've always believed that you can combine tradition with modernity.' Sitting in his unofficial office of Boisdale of Belgravia over a 'proper f***ing lunch' of lamb and kidney pudding and claret, Farage, 61, spoke for the first time about his plans for power. The political earthquake he had long been promising has hit. YouGov's first seat by seat poll since Labour's election victory was published last week, suggesting Reform is on track to gain 266 seats — up from five last July — making it the largest party in a hung parliament with 271 MPs. Farage's first cabinet would consist of people who had never been an MP, let alone had any experience of government. • The Nigel Farage backers chasing Maga millions and a Jenrick pact So how would he form a government capable of delivering? 'How could we do worse?' he asked. 'I mean, we currently appoint cabinet ministers with zero experience of the areas. We swap them out after 18 months for somebody else with zero experience of the areas. None of it bloody works.' He agrees with assertions by Simon Case, the former cabinet secretary, that politicians have 'less and less direct levers of power than they used to' and this is 'not sustainable'. 'Most of the authority is being transferred to regulatory authorities and quangos who make the real decisions, it seems, that affect people's lives,' he says. 'I think we're stuck with a completely outdated mentality. The government has to be in the House of Commons. Why? I'll tell you why. Accountability.' Farage is a close friend of President Trump and believes he deserves to win the Nobel peace prize for his recent work in the Middle East. He is attracted to the way politics is done in America, where the president is able to appoint his own cabinet, rather than having to choose from a pool of elected politicians. Appointments are subject to Senate confirmation. 'The point about America is that you can have a senior cabinet position and you are held to account by a committee system that takes place on Capitol Hill and that is the equivalent of being in a court of law,' he said. 'That's accountability. Standing up in the House of Commons and telling a pack of lies, frankly, is not accountability. 'It's almost impossible for cabinet ministers to be good MPs anyway, because how could they be? What was interesting was Gordon Brown. Digby Jones is a character that I like very much and Brown made Digby business minister and chucked him in the House of Lords.' This is not the only thing Farage appears to agree with the former Labour prime minister on. Like Brown, who has advocated the creation of a second democratic chamber called the Assembly of Nations and Regions, he is in favour of reforming the House of Lords, which he thinks will 'have to have an elected element based on the regions'. 'The make-up of the Lords is a bloody disgrace,' he said. 'I mean they're all from three postcodes. At least the hereditaries came in from around the country … but I do think a revising chamber is important … All of this needs to be thought through and debated more clearly.' As Farage sketches out his blueprint for power, it is easy to forget his decision to stand as an MP last year was far from a given. Despite his huge surge in popularity after his stint in ITV's I'm a Celebrity, he had still not decided whether to return to politics and admits Rishi Sunak's decision to hold an early general election nearly 'wrong-footed' him. 'I thought at that point, well this is hopeless,' he said. 'Because there's no way in this space of time I can do what needs to be done. And be honest with you, I was very despondent because I thought I'm just turning 60. Another five years and it will be too late.' In the days after the election was called, Farage, who has more TikTok followers than the other 649 MPs added together, hit the campaign trail in Dover, before joining Lee Anderson in Ashfield and Richard Tice in Boston & Skegness. 'As I'm walking through Skegness, people are stopping me in the street saying, 'Why aren't you standing? Like you're letting me down. I believe in you,' ' he said. 'We had a curry that night somewhere in Gainsborough. That's when I started thinking this is terrible. All the people that love me think I'm betraying them. On the Saturday we got back to London and there were a lot of football supporters in the pub wanting selfies. And that's when I just thought, 'You know what, even if I've only got four weeks and three days to do it, let's give it a go.'' Shortly after 4am on July 5, Farage promised to 'change politics for ever' as his party won more than four million votes, propelling him into parliament as the MP for Clacton. 'I was delighted, of course I was,' he said. 'But I realised within a week that actually the real challenge was May 1, 2025 [the local elections]. How the hell were we going to get this organisation ready to fight on such a big scale?' Reform UK were the biggest winners of that night, snatching more than 40 per cent of the 16,000 council seats contested, taking control of eight local authorities from the Tories and defeating Labour in the Runcorn & Helsby by-election to make Sarah Pochin its fifth MP. Farage is prouder of his achievements on May 1 than July 4. He is hoping to build on that at next year's elections, which will include the Welsh senedd and Scottish parliament. • Nigel Farage has blown apart two-party politics. Here's what's next He puts some of his party's meteoric rise in the polls down to societal breakdown and the 'complete unrecognisability of people's communities' and also blames the Covid lockdowns fuelling anti-establishment anger. 'I think what the [Conservative] government did was the biggest peacetime mistake in history,' he said. 'The economic damage, the societal damage, the damage to children in particular. It's changed our behaviour. It's also bred a mentality of work from home, which is utterly catastrophic for productivity. And frankly, I thought the third lockdown was on the verge of criminal. I left the country. I got out. I went through the West Indies and into America for two months. I couldn't bear it. Police kept knocking on my door because I kept ignoring it. 'I think governments have taken away more liberties than we took away during the Second World War. I mean that's completely abhorrent. The frustration that nobody's ever held accountable. I didn't want Matt Hancock telling me telling me: 'Stay at home, that's an order.' I wanted to break the television. 'You sort of always think, well, this country could never fall for totalitarianism. Well, it did. I actually think it did. It worries the life out of me.' • Farage: Royal Marines should take migrants back to France He is amused at how much his party, with five MPs, is able to make waves. 'We're shifting the agenda on everything. We go very public that Palestine Action has to be a proscribed organisation — within 24 hours they do it. I've been very big on industrial policy. Guess what? I mean, they're literally following everything we do.' However much Labour and the Tories seek to ape his party's policies, Farage claims there is still much which sets them apart. Last week Reform announced it would give non-doms the chance to avoid some UK taxes by paying a £250,000 fee, with the proceeds going to people on the lowest income. This week his party is likely to oppose Labour's welfare reform cuts, which the Conservatives have said they will support with conditions. He is keen to exploit the 'big tensions' within the Labour Party because he claims it no longer knows what the working class is. 'It's become the party of the bourgeoisie, very middle class,' he said. 'Middle class with those on benefits are your Labour vote. And the struggling working people are turning to us increasingly and we recognise that, we know that, we understand that. That tremor only gets stronger in my view.' He is also keen to capitalise on the failure of successive governments to stop the migrant boats crossing the Channel. 'This hasn't even started,' he said. 'When the population makes the connection between these young men and increased sexual crime, when that connection is made, you wait.' Farage claims the only answer to the problem is 'nobody that ever comes to this country via that route will ever be given asylum status, will ever be able to walk the streets free and will ever be allowed to stay'. He sees huge merit in Operation Sovereign Borders — the policy adopted by Tony Abbott, the former Australian prime minister, in his 2013 election campaign. Migrant boats were intercepted and either returned to where they travelled from or passengers taken to overseas island detention centres. 'The ultimate threat is you literally tow the boats back to France,' said Farage, who would engage the navy 'if it came to it'. 'Do you think the Royal Marines would worry about doing that? They'd bloody love it.' This would have to be underpinned by a massive deportation operation that Farage admits is not without its challenges and would mean leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). He said: 'I think the whole judicial system is rotten to the core and not working … I think you would firstly take away the tools that they're given through the ECHR and then see how they behave.' He is also keen to shake up the NHS — often seen as the sacred cow that evades reform. He is meeting with some 'very high-up NHS people' to discuss what needs to change, having previously suggested he is open to re-examining the funding model. 'The British population are ready for a change of conversation on this,' he said. 'It's absolutely clear that we have to have some elements of competition in it.' He also believes the public are in a completely different place from Westminster over net zero — the 'next Brexit'. He is keen to revisit the fracking debate to reduce energy costs and believes drilling could start within the first 18 months of a Reform government. 'Energy is absolutely key to our future,' he said. 'It's really interesting that the American economy was exactly the same size as the eurozone in 2008. It is now double. The shale gas revolution for America has been absolutely enormous.' Farage understands he will have to take on many of the vested interests. 'Of course we are going to have some terrible fights,' he said. 'In particular we are going to have to take on the teaching unions … The indoctrination that's happening in our schools is shocking. Kids who support me get kicked out the classroom.' Farage has been careful to distance himself from Tommy Robinson, the right-wing criminal, at the expense of Elon Musk's support. However, he has previously praised the misogynist influencer Andrew Tate and expressed wider concerns that diversity and inclusion policies are discriminating against men. 'I'm not in Andrew Tate's camp, but I see why he's doing well,' he said. He hopes young men will turn to him to give them a voice 'because if I don't, you wait till what comes after me'. He added: 'Those who try to demonise me could be in for a terrible shock once I'm gone. That's why we say we believe that we are the last chance to restore confidence in the democratic system, to change things.' Farage — relatively young compared with the current crop of world leaders — says he is pushing an 'old-fashioned agenda'. 'I think the values thing is underestimated,' he said. 'That sense of safety and security; the sense of knowing where you are. As I came into London in June last year to announce my comeback into this malarkey, I think about the sort of phraseology that came out of that press conference, which we've maintained: family, community, country. I think that resonates quite a lot. 'I think these values are vital and I think if those values break down then we'll risk being in big trouble and there is such a thing as society, there really is.' Farage is a lucky general. He has had four brushes with death, including walking away from a plane crash almost unscathed. 'The biggest single factor in all of our lives is luck,' he said. 'Right now, I feel pretty lucky and that I might just be in the right place at the right time.'


Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Thousands defy Orban to march in Budapest Pride
Tens of thousands of people attended Budapest's Pride march on Saturday, defying a government ban that marked an unprecedented regression of LGBTQ+ rights in the European Union. Earlier this year, Viktor Orban's ruling coalition amended laws and the constitution to prohibit the annual celebration, justifying his years-long clampdown on LGBTQ+ rights on 'child protection' grounds. Hungarian police formally announced the Pride march ban last week but supporters from Hungary and dozens of other countries resisted and turned up in their thousands. Akos Horvath, an 18-year-old student from a city in southern Hungary, told AFP it was 'of symbolic importance to come', saying: 'It's not just about representing gay people, but about standing up for the rights of the Hungarian people.' Pictures from Budapest showed police officers looking on as rainbow-clad marchers passed by. Mr Orban said Friday that while police would not 'break up' the Pride march, those who took part should be aware of 'legal consequences'. His government warned that anyone attending the march faced fines of about £426 and a criminal record, while organisers were threatened with up to a year in prison. In the run-up to the event, cameras were installed on lamp posts along the planned route. The law permits the use of facial recognition cameras to identify people who attend. Gergely Karacsony, Budapest's liberal mayor, insisted that no attendee could face any reprisals because the march, co-organised by the city hall, was a municipal event and did not require police approval. In an interview, Mr Karacsony said the capital city would stand united, adding: 'The strength and greatness of Budapest lie in its diversity. As Pope Francis once said about the city, unity in Budapest does not mean uniformity, but uniqueness. 'This is the essence of being a Budapester, this is the city's DNA – unity in diversity.' Ministers from several EU countries, and dozens of European lawmakers, also said they would attend in defiance of the ban, reminiscent of those imposed in Moscow in 2006 and Istanbul in 2015. Thirty-three countries also spoke up in support. 'We're not just standing up for ourselves... If this law isn't overturned, eastern Europe could face a wave of similar measures,' Viktoria Radvanyi, a Pride organiser, said. Right-wing groups also said they would be present, organising multiple counter-protests along the planned route of the procession. A woman who gave only her first name, Katalin, told AFP she agreed with the ban though she hoped there would be no clashes. 'Disgusting... it's become a fad to show off ourselves,' she said. The Hungarian prime minister's crackdown on rights has also seen LGBTQ+ people banned from featuring in school educational materials or TV shows for the under-18s. Legal changes have also effectively barred same-sex couples from adopting children and prevented transgender people from changing their name or gender in official documents. Opponents see the restrictions as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of a general election next year when Mr Orban will face a strong opposition challenger.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
We must cap virtue-signalling climate budgets to meet the most urgent human needs
The international development system is in disarray. Aid budgets have been slashed in the UK and abroad, USAID has been gutted, and the development banks like the World Bank divert ever more of their funding to climate even as global poverty reduction has slowed. Hunger still afflicts 733 million people, conflict has displaced over 120 million. Easily treatable malaria still kills nearly 600,000 annually, mostly children. On Monday, UN Secretary-General Guterres and many state leaders descend on Seville in Spain to drum up billions for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) –169 sprawling targets to reduce poverty, improve health, advance education, protect the planet, and promote peace. President Trump's decision to withdraw is being decried as isolationist. Yet, the real isolation is the SDG agenda's detachment from reality. A US representative declared, 'the United States rejects and denounces the… Sustainable Development Goals'. Far from a reckless retreat, this rejection offers lumbering development giants a chance to replace a failing framework with one that works. The SDGs were doomed from the beginning, when they were adopted by the United Nations and endorsed by world leaders in 2015. The preceding Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) essentially had eight clear targets like halving extreme poverty and cutting child mortality. This helped drive remarkable progress: global poverty fell from 36 per cent in 1990 to 10 per cent by 2015. By contrast, the SDGs are a bloated wish-list lumping vital goals like eradicating malnutrition and poverty eradication alongside countless vague promises like 'promoting sustainable tourism' and fostering 'lifestyles in harmony with nature.' By refusing to prioritise, the UN ensured none would succeed. Inevitably, this behemoth agenda is 'alarmingly off track' according to the UN's own secretary-general. Only 17 per cent of the goals are on pace to be met by 2030. On average, the world will be more than half a century late in fulfilling its promises. Achieving the full list would additionally cost a spectacular $10-15 trillion each year. In an era of fiscal restraint, this is fantasy. The UN's refusal to focus attention on what matters most has squandered credibility and cash. My think tank, the Copenhagen Consensus, worked with more than a hundred top economists and several Nobel Laureates to identify 12 proven development solutions that deliver the greatest benefits for low cost. These are policies such as efficient learning through structured teacher plans and targeted tablet learning, delivering effective mosquito nets to tackle malaria, agricultural research to drive higher yields, more income and fewer hungry, and better legal protection to ensure poor farmers' rights over their land, increasing productivity. In total, politicians could set aside just £26 billion a year – a rounding error compared to the cost of the SDGs – to deliver immense benefits. Focusing on these 12 policies would save 4.2 million lives annually and make the poorer half of the world more than £800 billion better off every year. Each pound invested would deliver an astounding 52 pounds of social benefits. As it reels from swingeing aid cuts by the UK, US, and Europe, the United Nations and international development industry could seize this moment, by rallying global political support around a compact set of 10-15 targets that maximise impact for the poorest. This means hard choices: saying no to low-value goals, redirecting virtue-signalling climate budgets to the most urgent human needs, and embracing cost-benefit analysis to maximise the return on every dollar. Trump's exit from the SDGs is an opportunity. The question is whether the United Nations Secretary-General and political leaders have the courage to grab it. The world's poorest don't need 169 unrealised promises and more political hot air. They need efficient development.