COVID antivirals are heavily marketed. It's not clear how well they work
New Zealand stopped subsidising Lagevrio in 2024 due to concerns about its effectiveness.
Australia's COVID-19 Evidence Taskforce recommends against using the drug, which costs $1102 a pack.
Despite that, Australian doctors gave out 315,000 scripts last year, plus another 243,000 for Paxlovid. Lagevrio and Paxlovid were the fifth and ninth-most-expensive drugs to taxpayers in 2023-24.
The taskforce only recommends Paxlovid for unvaccinated people. It offers a limited recommendation for those who have been vaccinated but are elderly and have multiple risk factors, while noting the evidence is 'unclear'.
'In our systematic review, there were no randomised controlled trials conducted in vaccinated people since 2022 that reported a benefit from COVID-19 antivirals against hospitalisation or death,' said Dr Laura Edwards, a researcher at the University of NSW who led the study.
'It is timely to re-evaluate whether the cost we are paying for these drugs is appropriate.'
It is plausible that the drugs may be useful for a small cohort of extremely high-risk people, who are elderly and have multiple risk factors, says Cheng. But this group is rarely enrolled in medical trials, making it difficult to work out the true efficacy.
Loading
'I'm not entirely sure there's much benefit in that group. But there probably isn't any harm done by it.'
Dr Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, a senior fellow at the University of Wollongong, has published an analysis of Paxlovid's cost-benefit. He said there was evidence of a small reduction in hospitalisation risk, making the drug still worth subsidising.
'I think that Australia has a very reasonable, pragmatic approach, prioritising high-risk individuals who will benefit and not paying for low-risk people who probably won't.'
In a statement, Pfizer pointed to the first study of Paxlovid, which demonstrated an 86 per cent reduction in the risk of hospitalisation or death: 'Real-world data collected during the Omicron period among high-risk populations who have received COVID-19 vaccinations reinforce the effectiveness of Paxlovid in preventing hospitalisations and deaths.'
MSD, which sells molnupiravir, said it stood behind the drug.
The Department of Health said both antivirals were under review by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, with results expected mid-2026.
Lagevrio and Paxlovid work by stopping the virus that causes COVID-19 from multiplying in our cells, theoretically giving the immune system a leg up against it.
The first studies by the drug companies found the two pills cut the risk of hospitalisation or death by about 50 per cent and 89 per cent respectively in unvaccinated people.
Loading
But Lagevrio's 50 per cent effectiveness was only seen in a study that stopped halfway. When the full trial was analysed, whether it offered any benefit at all became debatable. A large independent study in 2022 also found it was likely no better than a placebo.
A study published by Pfizer last year concluded Paxlovid's protective effect in vaccinated patients, including those at high risk, was so small as to not be statistically significant.
That study began in 2021 but was only published in 2024.
Research conducted by the Grattan Institute late last year found that wealthier Australians were far more likely to be prescribed COVID antivirals than those at the bottom of the income ladder, despite people living in disadvantage typically having much greater risk factors for severe disease.
'Essentially, like so many things in our healthcare system, the treatments and services weren't going to the people who need them most,' said Peter Breadon, the Institute's health program director.
Nearly all Australians have either been vaccinated or survived a COVID-19 infection, meaning there is less benefit from antivirals. And the Omicron variant is less likely to hospitalise or kill a patient than the preceding Delta variant.
'COVID is a different disease to what it was,' said Cheng, who is now director of infectious diseases at Monash Health.
'[Patients] don't get pneumonia and lung white-out, generally. It's almost like we're doing a study in a different disease, which is making it difficult to work out how relevant … what we found out early on [is] to what we know now.'
This stark difference shows up in Pfizer's studies of Paxlovid.
In Pfizer's first study, involving unvaccinated people, 7 per cent of patients given a placebo ended up in hospital and 13 died. In the second study, which involved vaccinated people, just 1.6 per cent of the placebo group were hospitalised.
'For young, fit and healthy people, antivirals are not going to do much. You're at pretty low risk,' said Cheng. 'For older people – those over 65 or 70 – or people who have other medical issues, that's one they should go and see their GP.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
5 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Michael thought he was just getting old. A world-first device changed his life
An Australian man has become the first in the world to be implanted with a next-generation device that mimics the heart's pulse, in what doctors have described as a quantum leap for technology that has saved thousands of lives from heart failure. The globally renowned cardiac surgical team at Sydney's St Vincent's Hospital were chosen by French firm CorWave to perform the first in-human implant of their new left ventricular assist device (LVAD), which uses a wave-generating membrane – rather than a rotating pump – to push blood around the body. The team, led by cardiothoracic surgeon Dr Paul Jansz, successfully performed the surgery in May on Michael Smith, a grandfather and former meatworker from Leeton in the NSW Riverina. On Tuesday, Smith left hospital for the first time in three months, saying he felt better than he had in more than a decade. 'You've got to have one inside you to realise how good they are,' he said. 'I feel like I'm 21 again.' The 67-year-old was working at a meat processing plant south of Leeton until three months ago, when his doctor sent him to a cardiologist in nearby Griffith. 'I started feeling like I had no energy, but I just put it down to old age. It wasn't – it was heart failure,' he said. 'He [the cardiologist] put me in hospital straight away … he knew how bad it was.' Smith was soon airlifted to St Vincent's, where he remained until the procedure on May 20.

Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The Australian pharma giant on Trump's tariff hit list
Australian pharmaceutical giant CSL is on tariff watch after US President Donald Trump threatened to slug pharmaceutical imports into the US with a 200 per cent impost, two months after asking the US government to carefully consider the consequences of the measure. CSL is an $117 billion ASX giant and the nation's biggest player in pharmaceuticals, a sector responsible for about $2.2 billion in exports to the US. While CSL is exposed to the hefty tariffs proposed by the Trump administration, analysts said the company was insured by its large overseas operations, including its facilities in the US, and the critical nature of the medicines it makes. Founded in 1916 as a vaccine manufacturer for the Australian government, CSL makes vaccines (including COVID-19 vaccines), antivenom, and plasma-derived medicines. It still makes products in Australia and exports them, with Morningstar analyst Shane Ponraj saying on Thursday that while there are other healthcare stocks on the Australian sharemarket, the Trump tariffs 'will only directly affect CSL.' However despite the risk, Ponraj said that CSL's ability to adjust its supply chain, shifting its reliance onto its US facilities, should allow the company to weather the storm if the US government follows through on the tariff threat. 'CSL processes some US products in Australia but has many facilities in the US and some flexibility to adjust supply chains,' Ponraj said. 'While increasing uncertainty near-term, we don't expect CSL's earnings are materially affected because tariffs this high are unlikely to persist, and CSL can adopt by onshoring manufacturing.' In May, in response to the US government's request for public comments on its investigation into pharmaceutical imports, CSL submitted a seven-page letter opposing the introduction of tariffs. 'Broadly imposing tariffs on the pharmaceutical sector would disrupt and limit US patients' access to therapies, increase costs for patients and the healthcare system, raise manufacturing costs, and limit company resources that are available for biomedical innovation, capital investments, and jobs in the US,' it read.

The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
The Australian pharma giant on Trump's tariff hit list
Australian pharmaceutical giant CSL is on tariff watch after US President Donald Trump threatened to slug pharmaceutical imports into the US with a 200 per cent impost, two months after asking the US government to carefully consider the consequences of the measure. CSL is an $117 billion ASX giant and the nation's biggest player in pharmaceuticals, a sector responsible for about $2.2 billion in exports to the US. While CSL is exposed to the hefty tariffs proposed by the Trump administration, analysts said the company was insured by its large overseas operations, including its facilities in the US, and the critical nature of the medicines it makes. Founded in 1916 as a vaccine manufacturer for the Australian government, CSL makes vaccines (including COVID-19 vaccines), antivenom, and plasma-derived medicines. It still makes products in Australia and exports them, with Morningstar analyst Shane Ponraj saying on Thursday that while there are other healthcare stocks on the Australian sharemarket, the Trump tariffs 'will only directly affect CSL.' However despite the risk, Ponraj said that CSL's ability to adjust its supply chain, shifting its reliance onto its US facilities, should allow the company to weather the storm if the US government follows through on the tariff threat. 'CSL processes some US products in Australia but has many facilities in the US and some flexibility to adjust supply chains,' Ponraj said. 'While increasing uncertainty near-term, we don't expect CSL's earnings are materially affected because tariffs this high are unlikely to persist, and CSL can adopt by onshoring manufacturing.' In May, in response to the US government's request for public comments on its investigation into pharmaceutical imports, CSL submitted a seven-page letter opposing the introduction of tariffs. 'Broadly imposing tariffs on the pharmaceutical sector would disrupt and limit US patients' access to therapies, increase costs for patients and the healthcare system, raise manufacturing costs, and limit company resources that are available for biomedical innovation, capital investments, and jobs in the US,' it read.