Plans revealed for massive 300 acre solar farm to be built across three Welsh counties
123.3 hectares of farmland across three local authorities in south Wales could become a solar farm
123.3 hectares of farmland across Newport, Monmouthshire and Torfaen could become a solar farm
(Image: Copyright Unknown )
A proposal for a 304 acre solar farm spanning across three county boroughs in south Wales has been put forward to Ministers of the Senedd for consideration.
If the Pegasus Group get the go ahead from the Welsh Government, 123.3 hectares of farmland across Newport, Monmouthshire and Torfaen could become a solar farm, meaning thousands of ground-mounted solar panels will be built to fuel the National Grid, and aid the UK Government in reaching their Net Zero target.
The solar panels will be four metres high, and the proposal claims that through the utilisation of natural sunlight, "the facility will generate renewable energy for utilisation on the national grid." For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
Article continues below
This map by the Pegasus Group shows the area that will be turned into a solar farm if the plans are given the go ahead by the Welsh Government. (Area concerned is outlined in red and blue)
The application states: "It is the intention that a full application will be submitted in support of a ground mounted solar photovoltaic arrays (with a capacity of up to 46MW) together with all associated work, equipment, and infrastructure, on land at Court Farm, Ponthir, Monmouthshire.
"The Application Site extends to approximately 123.3 hectares of agricultural land spread across three Local Authority boundaries including Monmouthshire Council, Torfaen County Borough Council and Newport City Council."
"This will support local and national renewable energy targets and ultimately reduce the reliance on finite fossil fuel-based sources as a form of energy."
"Ground mounted solar photovoltaics (PV) are both temporary and reversible, allowing the site to be restored to its former agricultural use on decommissioning.
"The development is proposed for a 40 year period. After this time, the solar farm and its supporting infrastructure will be dismantled and removed from the site."
The applicant claims that the development will have little impact on local people in terms of noise, transport, health, biodiversity or population.
It states that though the solar farm will be visible, it will not have any other impact on local residents. It also states that "hedgerow vegetation and trees will be retained wherever possible."
By virtue of its potential generating capacity of between 10MW-350MW, this project constitutes a Development of National Significance (DNS) under section 4 of the the Wales Act 2015.
Article continues below
A DNS is a type of planning application for large infrastructure projects decided by the Welsh Ministers, rather than local planning authorities (LPAs).
This means the people deciding whether this huge energy plant will be built are the Ministers of the Senedd.
For full details or to access the solar farm proposal, you can go to the Welsh Government website and search reference DNS CAS-02366-F2C3K8 - Court Farm Solar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's scorched-earth farming policy is having its inevitable effect
In Whitehall, Rachel Reeves's inheritance tax raid on farmers and pensions has been a storming success. So much so, in fact, that the civil servant whose 'analysis' was 'needed' to introduce the changes has been awarded 'Expert of the Year' by HMRC. Back in the real world, the effect of this tax increase – and as shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins notes, the 'crippling' National Insurance hike that accompanied it – appears to be a slowly unfolding debacle. The tax raids appear to have triggered a cull of Britain's population of farms, with a record 6,365 agriculture, forestry and fishing businesses closing in the last year. With just 3,190 opening, the result is a precipitous decline in Britain's rural business sector. It is a policy combination that appears hard to justify on economic grounds. Britain's farmers are already facing a difficult combination of rising fertiliser costs and hostile weather conditions, with 240 growers in East Anglia hit by an Environment Agency ban on irrigating their crops without any prior warning. Under these circumstances, the last concern of the Government should be piling additional burdens on the sector. Yet that reckons without the ideological disposition of this Labour Government, and its clear willingness to use the tools of office to pursue long-standing vendettas. As with the tax raid on non-doms and the imposition of VAT on private school fees, the true motivation behind the policy appears to be punishing traditional opponents of the party. Regrettably, in this respect if not in others, it appears to be succeeding.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
What the UK-India trade deal means for Wales
Sir Keir Starmer and India's Narendra Modi are set to agree a trade deal which is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. The UK-India trade deal is worth £6 billion in investment for the British economy and will be signed off on Thursday (July 23). It's set to deliver an £80 million boost to Wales's as part of the Plan for Change, with Welsh food and drink, renewable energy and creative sectors set to benefit following a reduction or elimination of tariffs. Secretary of State for Wales Jo Stevens said: 'Key industries in Wales, such as the renewable energy sector, the creative industries and food and drink producers will see immediate benefits. "On many goods tariffs will be reduced or eliminated. And Welsh businesses will also benefit from access to India's huge procurement market with increased protections so they can confidently export goods and services." According to the Wales Office, 256 Welsh businesses exported goods worth £226 million to India last year. Among those goods is Welsh lamb, which will be able to enter the Indian market duty free from day one, removing a 33% tariff. Gareth Parry, Head of Policy at Farmers Union of Wales, said: "It's really important that we do open up these market opportunities in Asia, the Middle East and other countries across the world. "But we also have to acknowledge how important our nearest trading partners are for the operation of our food system, such as the European Union. We've maintained throughout, ever since the Brexit referendum, that we support maintaining how strong the relationship with our EU partners is, particularly for the trading of Welsh agricultural goods." 'Developing market' for whisky producers Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half, according to the Government, and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. Stephen Davies, Chief Executive of Penderyn Distillery, said: "We are developing our business and brand awareness in both domestic and travel retail sectors in India. It's an exciting and developing market for us. "The agreement to reduce tariffs will provide a better platform for us and our industry to develop links and build business over the next five years. These are exciting times." For Wales' energy sector, the deal will see lower tariffs and unprecedented access to India's public procurement market. The UK already imports £11 billion in goods from India but liberalised tariffs on Indian goods will make it easier and cheaper to buy their best products. The creative sector in Wales will also benefit from increased copyright protections.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Get every child under 13 off social media immediately, minister tells tech giants
Every child in the UK under the age of 13 must be barred from social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and X, the Technology Secretary has said. In an interview with The Telegraph, Peter Kyle said he was aiming for '100 per cent' enforcement of the new laws, which come into force on Friday, requiring tech firms to block children aged under 13 from their platforms. He said he 'expected' the estimated 1.8 million children aged eight to 12 in the UK who already have social media accounts to be removed from the sites. 'I cannot see the circumstances where online activity under 13, when it comes to social media, is ever appropriate. So in this instance, it is right that the Government sets this baseline from which parents can build appropriate boundaries for their families,' said Mr Kyle. 'I've not met anybody within these companies that thinks it is appropriate or that allows their own children to use these products under the age of 13. So we should be working together to solve this issue.' 'Partnering with parents' Asked if that meant the 60 per cent of eight to 12-year-olds with social media accounts should be thrown off, he said: 'I would expect them to be removed and for the law to be rigorously enforced. 'It's going to be really hard for kids who have access that will now have it taken away. It is tough, but we're on the side of parents here. 'Parents repeatedly tell me that once they're on [social media], it is a constant battle between parent and child to get it out of their hands, particularly interrupting study time, bedtime and family time. So we are now partnering with parents, giving them the baseline to move forward.' The tech firms have been told they must either ensure their minimum age limits of 13 are properly enforced, or radically overhaul their sites to make content safe enough for the tens of thousands of underage children currently using them. The measures are part of new children's codes set by the regulator Ofcom, which require companies to block their access to harmful content, including suicide, self-harm, violence or misogyny, from July 25. From Friday, firms hosting porn will also be required by law to introduce 'highly effective' age checks such as credit cards, photo ID matching and digital ID services to prevent any under-18s accessing their sites. The top 10 adult websites, which account for 40 per cent of porn site users, have signed up to these age checks along with over 6,000 other sites including Elon Musk's X, Grindr and Reddit. Those that fail to implement age checks at the ages of 13 and 18 will face fines of up to 10 per cent of their global turnover or be banned from operating in the UK. Mr Kyle said Ofcom must not hesitate to use its powers, including blocking sites to 'send the message that access to the British economy and society is a privilege, not a right'. At least half a dozen tech firms, including a suicide forum and micro-blogging site, have already withdrawn from the UK market by geo-blocking users rather than comply with the Online Safety Act. The changes on Friday follow the implementation in March of tougher bans on illegal online content including child sex abuse, terrorism and fraud. However, Ofcom's new powers are considered more significant for protecting children from 'legal' harms such as suicide and self harm content, which are blamed for 14-year-old Molly Russell taking her own life. Mr Kyle said the move represented the 'biggest step change in the experience of young people online since the internet was created'. It also marks the culmination of an eight-year campaign by The Telegraph for a statutory duty of care on tech giants to protect children from online harms. On behalf of the Government, he offered an apology: 'My other reflection is the huge apology we owe young people who are over the age of 13 and yet lived in the online smartphone era. 'They were unprotected from the vile, harmful and damaging forces that made their way into their feeds without any restraint. I and we as a society owe them an apology, and I certainly offer it with all sincerity.' Mr Kyle said the changes would mean tech bosses, who can face up to two years in jail under the laws for persistent breaches of regulations, would 'live in anxiety' rather than the children who have previously been fed 'harmful content'. 'It means that people who peddle harmful and criminal content will finally be the people who live in anxiety, because we can and we will come after them if they continue to peddle their content,' said Mr Kyle. 'I expect the law to be enforced to the full extent of the powers that Parliament has granted.' He also warned there would be tough penalties for tech firms that tried to circumvent the new laws with, for example, Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) where users can disguise their IDs and bypass blocks on content. 'If platforms or sites signpost towards workarounds like VPNs, then that itself is a crime and will be tackled by these codes,' said Mr Kyle. 'If a company directly delivers harmful content into the feeds of children, it is the arrival into their feeds which is the offence. If they direct children via other means to that content, it has the same outcome.' He confirmed the Government was considering further measures to combat the 'addictive' nature of social media by introducing two-hour caps on app time and curfews to limit use before bedtime. They are expected to be unveiled in the Autumn. 'In the offline world, parents set boundaries on diet, exercise, social networks and sleep time but we've never had that conversation about the online world. It's time we did,' said Mr Kyle. He added: 'It is not telling parents how to parent, but offering tools to parents to set the kind of family life that they think appropriate.' Mr Kyle revealed that at every meeting with tech bosses, he imagined there was a camera in the room where parents like Molly Russell's father who lost their children in online tragedies could watch him. 'Would they feel their views and their children's experiences had been represented? I hope that they would,' he said. 'Some of those conversations I've had have been uncomfortable and ended uncomfortably.' He said that was the reason why he was aiming for all harmful content to be removed from children's feeds. 'I'm aiming for 100 per cent but I need to be realistic with people,' he said. 'If we take steps forward where 70, 80, or even more per cent of vile, hateful, damaging content disappears from children's feeds, that's a win that I'll take to the bank and move forward from. 'But these companies have the capacity to allow hundreds of millions, if not billions, of posts to go online rapidly. Don't tell me they don't have the infrastructure that enables it to be removed too. 'This Act has been one of the longest pieces of legislation in gestation, in its passage through Parliament and its pathway to implementation, than any other. They have had time. They have seen the direction of travel. Now it's time to act.'
