logo
Billionaire Charlie Munger Said Only Married Couples Need To Buy Homes — 'Single People, I Don't Care If They Ever Get A House'

Billionaire Charlie Munger Said Only Married Couples Need To Buy Homes — 'Single People, I Don't Care If They Ever Get A House'

Yahoo3 days ago
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
Charlie Munger didn't have much patience for home-buying hype—especially if you were single.
At the 1998 Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK, BRK.B)) annual shareholder meeting, the late vice chairman and real estate attorney-turned-investor made his position clear when asked about buying a home: "The single people, I don't care if they ever get a house."
The moment came when an audience member from Southern California stood up to ask a very practical—and very personal—question.
"I'm still quite young, I don't have a house yet and I'm thinking about buying a house someday soon," the man said. "And in order to do that I'm going to have to put a down payment, which means I might have to sell my shares." He wanted advice: When is the best time to buy a house, and how should that decision factor in interest rates, cash on hand, and investment opportunities?
Don't Miss:
Accredited investors can —with up to 120% bonus shares—before this Uber-style disruption hits the public markets
This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to .
Warren Buffett took the first swing at it, sharing how he handled the same decision when he was just starting out. "We did have about $10,000 starting off," he said of his early days with his wife, Susie. "And I told Susie, I said, 'Now, you know, there's two choices, it's up to you. We can either buy a house, which will use up all my capital and clean me out, and it'll be like a carpenter who's had his tools taken away from him. Or you can let me work on this and someday, who knows, maybe I'll even buy a little bit larger house than would otherwise be the case.'"
They didn't buy a house right away. Buffett waited four years, purchasing their first home in 1956, once the down payment represented just about 10% of his net worth. "I really felt I wanted to use the capital for other purposes," he said. And while he acknowledged that buying a home can be a good choice—especially if it's the house you want—he added that it's essentially a low-return move: "You're probably making something in the area of a 7 or 8% investment, implicitly, when you do it."
Then it was Charlie Munger's turn.
"I think the time to buy a house is when you need one," Munger said, with perfect timing.
Trending: With Point, you can
Buffett followed up: "And when do you need one?"
Munger didn't hesitate: "Well, I have very old-fashioned ideas on that, too. The single people, I don't care if they ever get a house."
The crowd burst into laughter—but Munger wasn't done.
Buffett prodded again, asking, "When do you need one if you're married, Charlie?"
Munger's answer: "You need one when your wife wants one."
"Yes," he added dryly, "I think you've got that exactly right."
It was vintage Munger: short, blunt, and sharper than it first sounds. While Buffett looked at the question through the lens of capital allocation, Munger zeroed in on utility. If you don't need a house—because you're not settling down, don't have a family, or don't plan to stay put—it might not be worth the money or the commitment.
That view likely stems from Munger's early background. Before joining forces with Buffett and building Berkshire Hathaway into a global powerhouse, Munger was a real estate attorney. He often had more interest in property than Buffett did, and in his own career, real estate played a foundational role. But even with that background, he saw homeownership as a lifestyle decision—not a default one.
Buffett's logic tracks similarly: if you've got limited capital, tying it up in a home might slow down your ability to invest in higher-yield opportunities. That doesn't mean never buying—but it does mean thinking twice before draining your account for a down payment just because it seems like the "adult" thing to do.So, when is the right time to buy a house?
For Buffett, it was when the down payment didn't derail his plans.
For Munger, it was when you actually needed one.
And if you're single? According to Charlie: maybe never.
Of course, that was a long time ago—and both men were speaking from a time and income bracket far removed from today's median first-time buyer.
But here in 2025, their advice hits harder than ever. Home prices keep climbing, interest rates are holding steady around 7%, and an entire generation is stuck in limbo—unsure whether to buy, rent, or just keep throwing money into the market and hoping for the best.
According to Bankrate's latest Housing Affordability Study, the income needed to afford a typical home has skyrocketed to $116,986 a year. Meanwhile, the median U.S. household income is just $78,171. In other words, the numbers don't add up—and for a lot of young adults, homeownership feels less like a milestone and more like a pipe dream.
Munger may be gone, but his take is still hanging in the air for anyone scrolling Zillow out of boredom: You don't buy a house to prove you're an adult. You buy one when your life says you need it.
Read Next: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs —
Image: Shutterstock
This article Billionaire Charlie Munger Said Only Married Couples Need To Buy Homes — 'Single People, I Don't Care If They Ever Get A House' originally appeared on Benzinga.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Fiserv, Inc. and Certain of Its Executives
Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Fiserv, Inc. and Certain of Its Executives

Business Wire

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Fiserv, Inc. and Certain of Its Executives

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP ('Labaton') has filed a securities class action lawsuit (the 'Action') on behalf of its client the City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System ('Hollywood Police') against Fiserv, Inc. ('Fiserv' or the 'Company') (NYSE: FI) and certain of its executives (collectively, 'Defendants'). The Action, which is captioned City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System v. Fiserv, Inc., No. 25-cv- 06094 (S.D.N.Y.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Fiserv common stock between July 24, 2024 and July 22, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). Fiserv is a global provider of transaction processing software for banks and retail merchants. Fiserv's flagship product and most important growth driver is Clover, which provides merchants with a payment 'gateway' to facilitate the secure processing of credit, debit, and mobile payment transactions on behalf of financial institutions and their customers. The Action alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants misled investors by failing to disclose that: (a) due to cost issues and other problems with its older Payeezy platform, Fiserv forced Payeezy merchants to migrate to its Clover platform; (b) Clover's revenue growth and gross payment volume ('GPV'), the total monetary value of transactions processed through Clover, were temporarily and unsustainably boosted by these forced conversions, which concealed a slowdown in new merchant business; (c) shortly after these conversions, a significant portion of former Payeezy merchants switched to competing solutions due to Clover's high pricing, significant down time, and systematic compatibility issues; (d) as a result of these merchant losses, Clover's GPV growth was significantly slowing, and its revenue growth was unsustainable; and (e) based on the foregoing, Fiserv's positive Class Period statements about Clover's growth strategies, competition, attrition, GPV growth, and business prospects were materially false and misleading. The market began to learn the truth about Defendants' fraud on April 24, 2025. On that date, Fiserv shocked investors by reporting Clover GPV growth of only 8 percent for the first quarter of 2025, a material stepdown from 2024 GPV rates of between 14 and 17 percent. The Company attributed this slowing growth to lower 2025 transaction volumes from Payeezy merchants who had converted to Clover. On this news, Fiserv stock dropped 18.5 percent, closing at $176.90 per share on April 24, 2025. Then, on May 15, 2025, Fiserv disappointed investors by disclosing that GPV growth deceleration would continue throughout 2025. On this news, Fiserv stock dropped 16.2 percent, closing at $159.13 per share on May 15, 2025. Finally, on July 23, 2025, Fiserv lowered the top end of its full-year organic growth guidance range and confirmed that its quarterly organic revenue in the Merchant segment had decelerated to 9 percent year-over-year from 11 percent in the previous quarter. On this news, Fiserv stock dropped 13.9 percent, closing at $143.00 per share on July 23, 2025. If you purchased or acquired Fiserv common stock during the Class Period and were damaged thereby, you are a member of the 'Class' and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff. Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed no later than September 22, 2025. The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class. You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action. If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member. You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action. If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Connor C. Boehme, Esq. of Labaton at (212) 907-0780, or via email at cboehme@ You can view a copy of the Complaint online here. Hollywood Police is represented by Labaton, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $4.5 trillion. Labaton's litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than ninety full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants. Labaton has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications. Offices are located in New York, Delaware, London, and Washington, D.C. More information about Labaton is available at

Securities Fraud Investigation Into Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (BNED) Announced – Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz
Securities Fraud Investigation Into Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (BNED) Announced – Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz

Business Wire

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

Securities Fraud Investigation Into Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (BNED) Announced – Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces an investigation of Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. ('Barnes & Noble' or the 'Company') (NYSE: BNED) on behalf of investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON BARNES & NOBLE EDUCATION, INC. (BNED), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING A CLAIM TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. What Is The Investigation About? On July 18, 2025, Barnes & Noble disclosed that '[c]ertain information regarding the recording of cost of digital sales was brought to the attention of management' and that, as a result, 'management believes that the Company may have a potential overstatement of up to $23.0 million in the aggregate to its accounts receivable balance as of its May 3, 2025 fiscal year-end.' On this news, Barnes & Noble's stock price fell $2.36, or 21%, to close at $8.87 per share on July 21, 2025, thereby injuring investors. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you purchased Barnes & Noble securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz, 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 800, Century City, California 90067 Call us at: 310-914-5007 Email us at: info@ Visit our website at: Follow us for updates on Twitter at If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Deadline Alert: Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit
Deadline Alert: Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit

Business Upturn

time42 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Deadline Alert: Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit

LOS ANGELES, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming August 18, 2025 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Reddit, Inc. ('Reddit' or the 'Company') (NYSE: RDDT) securities between October 29, 2024 and May 20, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR REDDIT INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. What Happened? On May 1, 2025, after market hours, Reddit released its first quarter 2025 financial results, marking a third consecutive quarter with slowdown in daily active user growth. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $4.96, or 4.2%, to close at $113.83 per share on May 2, 2025, thereby injuring investors. Then, on May 19, 2025, Wells Fargo analysts downgraded Reddit's stock, stating that Google's AI features would likely cause 'permanent' disruptions to user traffic for Reddit, and that traffic to Reddit from Google Search would continue to decline and ultimately hurt Reddit's advertising revenue. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $5.24, or 4.6%, to close at $107.99 per share on May 19, 2025. Then, on May 21, 2025, Baird analysts downgraded Reddit's stock, citing similar concerns as Wells Fargo. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $9.79, or 9.3%, to close at $95.85 per share on May 21, 2025, thereby injuring investors further. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google Search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) Defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner the Company was unable to overcome in the short term; (5) Defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for their outlook on user rates and advertising revenues; and (6) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Reddit securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than August 18, 2025 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Charles Linehan, Esq., Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP,1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles California 90067 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 310-201-9150, Toll-Free: 888-773-9224 Visit our website at Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store