&w=3840&q=100)
'Unfair trade practices': US slaps 17% duty on Mexican fresh tomatoes
The United States is imposing antidumping duties on most imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico, the US Commerce Department said on July 14, 2025. AFP
The United States is imposing antidumping duties on most imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico, the US Commerce Department said Monday as Washington alleged its neighbor engaged in unfair trade.
The duties, set at 17.09 percent, come after Washington moved to terminate a 2019 agreement that staved off such charges.
'Mexico remains one of our greatest allies, but for far too long our farmers have been crushed by unfair trade practices that undercut pricing on produce like tomatoes. That ends today,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a statement.
'This rule change is in line with President (Donald) Trump's trade policies and approach with Mexico,' he said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mexico is a dominant supplier of US fresh tomato imports, and the US Commerce Department said that antidumping duties are calculated to measure the percentage by which Mexican tomatoes were sold in the country at 'unfair prices.'
The United States had announced it was withdrawing from the tomato agreement in April, arguing that the action was meant to help American tomato growers compete fairly.
But observers have expressed concern that the duties could cause a spike in tomato prices.
On Monday, the Mexican government said it was working with tomato producers to limit the effects of the 17 percent duty.
'We are working together to minimize the impact,' President Claudia Sheinbaum said at her regular morning press conference, without giving details.
Other Mexican government officials called the tomato tariff unfair and warned the move will ultimately harm Americans.
The measure goes 'against the interests not only of Mexican producers but also of the US industry,' officials said in a joint communique from the Mexican ministries of economy and agriculture.
The antidumping duties are the latest blow to trade after Trump this year introduced wide-ranging tariffs on partners including Mexico.
After returning to the White House in January, Trump swiftly targeted Mexican goods with a 25 percent tariff – although he eventually exempted products covered by the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement signed during his first term.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Over the weekend, Trump threatened to raise the levy to 30 percent on August 1, as he pushes for a re-negotiation of the trade relationship.
Mexico is one of the economies most vulnerable to US tariffs and duties, with 80 percent of its exports destined for its northern neighbor – which is also its largest trading partner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Administration Pulls Back Deployment of National Guard in LA
The Trump administration has recalled about half of the California National Guard troops that were deployed to Los Angeles under federal orders last month after a series of high-profile immigration raids and anti-deportation protests. About 2,000 National Guard troops will be released from duty because 'the lawlessness in Los Angeles is subsiding,' Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement Tuesday. Roughly 700 Marines remain deployed in the city. Trump ordered the federal deployment in early June, the first time in decades that a president used the National Guard in a US city without a request from the state government or local authorities. At the time, he said the troops — which numbered roughly 4,000 — were needed to quell what he described as rioting that would have otherwise destroyed the city. The move drew condemnation from Governor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass, who accused the president of making the tensions even worse. Days of protests were mostly confined to several city blocks around downtown LA, largely focused on a federal detention center and another government building that houses an immigration court office. Federal immigration agents and troops have continued to confront protesters at the sites of arrest operations, but large-scale protests have generally subsided. Bass lifted a curfew in the downtown area on June 17. Newsom, who is suing the administration to end the deployment, said the remaining troops 'continue without a mission, without direction and without any hopes of returning to help their communities.' 'We call on Trump and the Department of Defense to end this theater and send everyone home now,' the governor said in a statement Tuesday. The National Guard troops were initially tasked with protecting federal property, along with hundreds of active-duty US Marines deployed to the city. Some of those troops later escorted immigration agents during raids at Home Depot parking lots, car washes and agriculture fields in nearby Ventura County. Thousands of immigrants across the LA region have been arrested since early June. Dozens of troops were deployed to a city park earlier this month as heavily armed federal agents marched across the area in an operation that didn't yield any arrests, according to city officials who decried the effort as an unnecessary display of force. The recent focus on LA is part of a broader Trump administration effort to carry out the largest mass deportation effort in US history. Federal immigration authorities have been ordered to make at least 3,000 arrests a day and have increasingly swept up farm workers and day laborers along with foreigners accused of committing crimes in the US. Bass, a Democrat, said Tuesday's recall of 2,000 troops was a 'retreat.' 'This happened because the people of Los Angeles stood united and stood strong,' Bass said in a statement. 'We will not stop making our voices heard until this ends, not just here in LA, but throughout our country.' With assistance from Catherine Lucey. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
News18
11 minutes ago
- News18
"She's Done A Good Job" Trump Defends Pam Bondi, Claims Epstein Files "Made Up" By Obama, Biden
"She's Done A Good Job" Trump Defends Pam Bondi, Claims Epstein Files "Made Up" By Obama, Biden | 4K President Donald Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi from mounting criticism over her handling of the federal government's files related to Jeffrey Epstein, attempting to quell Republican infighting over the investigation. 'The attorney general has handled that very well. She's really done a very good job, and I think that when you look at that, you'll understand it,' Trump said. Trump claimed the files were 'made up' by Democrats — including former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden and former FBI Director James Comey. n18oc_world n18oc_crux
India.com
13 minutes ago
- India.com
The Milk India Refuses To Drink: Why ‘Non-Veg Dairy' Is A Red Line In Trade Deal With US
New Delhi/Washington: In the backrooms of New Delhi's diplomatic zone, trade officials kept circling one issue that simply would not move. It was not fighter jets, data servers or farm subsidies. It was milk. Yes, milk. One of the biggest stumbling blocks in the India-U.S. trade pact is white, creamy and sacred to millions. And the problem lies not in how it is consumed, but how it is produced. Washington wants access to India's $16.8 billion dairy market, the largest in the world. It wants to sell its butter, cheese and milk powder to a country that churns out over 239 million metric tonnes of milk a year. But New Delhi is not opening that door. At the centre of India's resistance lies one demand – an assurance that the milk entering Indian homes comes from cows that were never fed meat, blood or animal remains. No exceptions. No compromises. Indian officials are calling it a red line. The idea of 'non-veg milk' does not sit well with millions of Indian households, especially vegetarians who see dairy as nutrition as well as ritual. Ghee is poured into sacred flames during prayer. Milk is bathed over deities. The concept of cows being fed pig fat or chicken remains crosses dietary boundaries and lines of faith. Trade experts struggled to explain this to Washington. 'Imagine eating butter made from the milk of a cow that was fed meat and blood from another cow. India may never allow that,' said Ajay Srivastava from the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi. Despite U.S. claims that the concern is exaggerated, several American reports confirm the reality. A Seattle Times investigation documented how American cattle feed can legally include ground-up remains of pigs, horses and poultry. Even chicken droppings, known as poultry litter, sometimes make their way into the mix. The logic is economic – feed animals cheap and grow them fast. For Indian regulators, it is simply unacceptable. India's Department of Animal Husbandry mandates certification on all imported food items, including milk, to ensure no animal-derived feed is involved. This has long been criticised by the United States at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) as a 'non-scientific barrier'. But for India, it is not about science but belief. In 2006, the Indian government formalised this belief in trade rules. It resulted into high tariffs – 30% on cheese, 40% on butter and a whopping 60% on milk powder. For countries like New Zealand or Australia, breaking into India's dairy space is nearly impossible. For the United States, it is a billion-dollar hurdle. India's dairy sector feeds over 1.4 billion people. It employs more than 80 million, many of them smallholder farmers. Cheap American imports, experts say, could collapse local markets. A report from the State Bank of India estimates an annual loss of Rs 1.03 lakh crore if U.S. dairy is allowed to flood in. That is nearly 2.5-3% of the country's entire Gross Value Added. And the risk is not theoretical. 'If American butter comes in cheap, our milk prices drop. What happens to the village woman who sells five litres of milk a day?' asks Mahesh Sakunde, a dairy farmer from Maharashtra. Meanwhile, Washington sees India's refusal to open up as 'protectionist'. But India's negotiators stood firm. 'There is no question of conceding on dairy. That is a red line,' said a senior Indian official. The United States exported over $8.2 billion worth of dairy last year. Gaining access to India's vast market could supercharge those numbers. But Indian officials are unwilling to allow milk from cows that ate meat to be offered at temple altars or poured into toddler cups. And so, while the two countries hammer out trade terms with hopes of reaching $500 billion in bilateral commerce by 2030, the dairy debate remains unresolved. It may seem like a small detail in a massive negotiation, but in India, this is sacred, culture and a line that will not be crossed.
