logo
Minnesota lawmakers consider taxpayer bailout for wealthy thoroughbred owners

Minnesota lawmakers consider taxpayer bailout for wealthy thoroughbred owners

Yahoo25-03-2025
The House Agriculture Committee heard testimony this week on a bipartisan bill that would write taxpayer-funded checks to thoroughbred owners every time their horses compete on a Minnesota track.
The bill, HF 1540, allocates $7 million over the next two years for a pilot program that awards Minnesota-based thoroughbred owners $750 each day one of their horses starts a race. The money is doled out on a per-horse basis, meaning that an owner with three horses in competition would receive $2,250, regardless of how the horses perform.
Think of it as a taxpayer-funded participation trophy for the people rich enough to own a thoroughbred.
Some of the money would also be directed toward 'mental health and education grants' for stable workers.
The bailout is necessary, its supporters say, because horse racing is a dying industry. 'As everyone knows, racing has been struggling in Minnesota,' said Rep. Brad Tabke, DFL-Shakopee, one of the bill's sponsors, at the hearing. But it's worth saving, Tabke and others says, because the industry supports agricultural and other jobs across the state.
Canterbury Park sits in Tabke's district and is one of Minnesota's two racetracks. Daily wagers have been declining precipitously in recent years. 'Declining interest in horse racing has had a negative impact on revenues and profitability in our horse racing business,' the company said in its most recent SEC filing.
For more than a decade, the industry in Minnesota had been artificially propped up by an infusion of marketing cash from the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community. But the agreement guaranteeing that cash flow recently expired.
As a result, the race tracks and thoroughbred owners have made multiple pleas to the state Legislature for a bailout. Last year, the ask was a multimillion dollar cash infusion for the tracks (it didn't pass).
This year, Tabke was a co-author of a bill that would have legalized sports betting and directed a portion of the proceeds to Minnesota race tracks. The Senate version of the bill failed to pass its first committee.
Now the industry is proposing that the cash go directly into the pockets of the horse owners instead. The idea is that the money will trickle down to other sectors of the state economy, like the farmers who grow the feed, the veterinarians who treat the sick and injured horses and the vendors who work the Canterbury Park stands.
'Canterbury Park is a pillar of our community in Shakopee supporting thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in the ag industry,' Tabke told the Reformer, referring to the results of a study funded by the Minnesota Racing Commission. 'I will always work to support our Shakopee community and that is what this bill does.'
Economists say trickle-down policies like tax cuts for the wealthy make the rich even richer but otherwise have little to no effect on the broader economy.
Thoroughbred ownership is a game for the wealthy, who largely approach it as an enjoyable hybrid of investment and gambling. The horses themselves typically cost tens of thousands of dollars at the minimum, and require tens of thousands more in care, training, boarding and other expenses.
'What motivates thoroughbred ownership given the financial risks?' asks the Paulick Report, an industry publication. 'The answer is simple — the gap between losing and breaking even represents the price people are willing to pay for the excitement of being involved and the potential to own a star horse (and in some cases make a big score).'
Thoroughbred ownership is recommended to the wealthy as a potential source of tax write-offs, thanks to indulgent provisions in the federal tax code.
Horse racing has been mired in scandal and ethical controversy in recent years. Mexican cartels have relied on the industry to shelter proceeds from the illicit drug trade, and industry leaders have been involved in massive doping efforts in the hopes of pushing horses past their biological limits. Dozens of horses have died on Minnesota tracks.
The House Agriculture Committee heard testimony in favor of the bill from Justin Revak, a thoroughbred owner and vice president at UnitedHealth subsidiary Optum, who said that without a taxpayer bailout it would be a challenge to 'make an honest business' out of the horse trade.
Revak heads a racing company with track earnings of nearly $1.4 million since 2013, according to Equibase, an industry data clearinghouse.
Nobody testified against the bill, which was laid over for possible inclusion in the upcoming state budget.
Lawmakers crafting a budget face a daunting task as Minnesota confronts a structural deficit in the coming years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration pushes states to exclude immigrant students from in-state tuition
Trump administration pushes states to exclude immigrant students from in-state tuition

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration pushes states to exclude immigrant students from in-state tuition

Texas let undocumented young people qualify for in-state college tuition for 24 years. President Donald Trump convinced the state to unravel the policy in a matter of hours. Since returning to the White House, Trump's Justice Department has launched legal challenges against laws in Texas, Kentucky and Minnesota that allow undocumented students to pay the tuition rate reserved for state residents. That price can often be half of what out-of-state students are responsible for. Discounting tuition for undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children has a long bipartisan history. Texas' law was signed by Republican then-Gov. Rick Perry and 23 red and blue states, plus the District of Columbia, followed, a political mood that's now reversing: Florida repealed its 2014 in-state tuition law this February. There are about 408,000 undocumented students representing less than 2 percent of those in college. The Justice Department argues these tuition laws unfairly offer a benefit to foreigners that is unavailable to U.S. citizens and legal residents living in a neighboring state. The legal offensive to roll back these laws, which is poised to spread, serves as another sign of how thoroughly the second Trump administration is going about enacting the president's promise to discourage illegal immigration and promote 'self-deportation.' 'This was something that used to not be political,' Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat, said of the in-state tuition policies for undocumented students. 'It was the idea that if this is the only country you've ever known, that more than likely you will be here your entire life, and we should want you to be educated and productive.' But Kentucky's Republican attorney general, Russell Coleman, sided with Trump this summer, urging the state's council on postsecondary education to 'withdraw its regulation rather than litigate what I believe will be, and should be, a losing fight.' Texas, the first state the DOJ targeted with a lawsuit this year, ended its policy in coordination with the White House. The maneuver came after Attorney General Ken Paxton entered into a joint motion with the Justice Department, agreeing that providing in-state tuition to undocumented students wasn't constitutional. 'In-state tuition for illegal immigrants in Texas has ended,' Republican Gov. Greg Abbott wrote in a post on X last month. The policies are crumbling at a time when college enrollment — and the tuition dollars it brings in — fell about 15 percent between 2010 and 2021, according to the National Center for Education Statistics' most recent report. The math is also looking complicated for many schools because the State Department could impose restrictions on international student enrollment, and there is an overall decline in the number of high school seniors. But the Trump administration said states have created laws that favor undocumented students over U.S. citizens. 'Under federal law, schools cannot provide benefits to illegal aliens that they do not provide to U.S. citizens,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement to POLITICO. 'The Justice Department will relentlessly fight to vindicate federal law and ensure that U.S. citizens are not treated like second-class citizens anywhere in the country.' About 119,000 undocumented students are protected under the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival program, which spurred in-state tuition laws for these students and received bipartisan support for years. Now, many Republicans are turning against such policies. Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.) introduced the Florida bill in December that eventually ended the tuition break while serving in the state Legislature. He said the laws Trump is challenging amount to incentives for immigrants to cross the border. 'It's immoral to give in-state tuition to someone who shouldn't even be in America,' Fine said in an interview. 'Think about it. A Georgian who wants to go to Florida State is paying more to go to a Florida institution than a foreigner. It's just not right to do and that's why we cleaned it up in Florida. It's time for illegals to go home.' The Florida repeal took effect in July, prompting concern from education advocates who say the legislation could result in Florida institutions losing nearly $15 million in tuition and fees from potential drops in enrollment. In Texas, advocates say more than $461 million annually is at stake. 'What I know for certain is that a significant number of students are living with anxiety,' said Manuel Gonzalez, vice chair of the Austin Community College Board of Trustees, which is suing over Trump's challenge against Texas. 'Not just about how they're going to afford college, but how are they going to navigate an increasingly more hostile political climate that often vilifies their existence.' The National Immigration Law Center, alongside a host of organizations including the ACLU of Texas and Democracy Forward, are seeking to defend the Texas policy, challenging both the outcome and the process that led the state to gut its law. Education advocates argue that making college more expensive is hardly a deterrent for undocumented immigrants looking for a better life for their families. 'Nobody from Guatemala or Mexico starts googling and thinking, 'What state should I move to so that after my child finishes their education, they'll be able to get in-state tuition to a college?'' said Gaby Pacheco, president of The which advocates for DACA students' college education. The policies remain alive in more than 20 states, including California, New York, Kentucky and Minnesota, but opposition from Republicans is rising. A bill to block 'undocumented noncitizens' from accessing Minnesota's North Star Promise program, which makes college tuition free for state residents whose families make less than $80,000 a year, moved through the statehouse during the previous legislative session. Roughly 500 students a year qualify for in-state tuition in Minnesota under the state's Dream Act. The Trump administration's challenges stem from the president's April executive order that directed agencies to crack down on policies that benefit undocumented people and deemed in-state tuition laws illegal. On Wednesday, the Education Department announced five new probes into University of Louisville, University of Nebraska Omaha, University of Miami, University of Michigan and Western Michigan University, arguing that their scholarships for undocumented students are discriminatory. If Kentucky and Minnesota fold alongside Texas, other states could be vulnerable to the administration's efforts, immigration experts fear. 'Just as Texas was the first state to pass a Dream Act in 2001, later inspiring 23 other states and the District of Columbia to pass similar laws, this wrongful and undemocratic repeal of the law is now being pushed as a blueprint to undemocratically end in-state tuition, militarize college campuses and persecute students in other states,' Juan Jose Martinez-Guevara, Texas advocacy manager of the nonprofit United We Dream, said at a Tuesday press conference. Immigration advocates say there is supposed to be a legal carveout specifically for DACA students that allows them to pay in-state tuition rates, but confusion over the law has some Texas colleges charging those students the out-of-state rates. A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment on whether DACA students should be considered exempt. The number of DACA students is dwindling — both because of the program's 2007 arrival cutoff and legal challenges from the first Trump administration and others seeking to end it — but the president's actions could have long-lasting consequences, political analysts say. Trump's legal challenges contradict earlier promises to 'work with the Democrats on a plan' — as he noted in December — for Dreamers. That dissonance might cost Republicans some of the votes Trump received in 2024, particularly from independents and Hispanic Americans, said Brendan Steinhauser, an Austin-based political consultant who's worked with Texas Republicans such as Sen. John Cornyn and Rep. Dan Crenshaw. 'He definitely did really, really well with Hispanic Americans, especially in South Texas and other places,' Steinhauser said. 'But he's not running for reelection. So, he may just think, well, it doesn't matter what his approval numbers are.' Steinhauser also insisted the president's legal challenges are in line with his larger crackdown on immigration. 'It's symbolic, yes, but it's all real,' he said. 'And it's having an impact, I believe, in the same way that these raids are having an impact on incentives.' Elena Schneider contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword

The Tea app was intended to help women date safely. Then it got hacked
The Tea app was intended to help women date safely. Then it got hacked

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

The Tea app was intended to help women date safely. Then it got hacked

Tea, a provocative dating app designed to let women anonymously ask or warn each other about men they'd encountered, rocketed to the top spot on the U.S. Apple App Store this week. On Friday, the company behind the app confirmed it had been hacked: Thousands of images, including selfies, were leaked online. 'We have engaged third-party cybersecurity experts and are working around the clock to secure our systems,' San Francisco-based Tea Dating Advice Inc. said in a statement. The app and the breach highlight the fraught nature of seeking romance in the age of social media. Here's what to know: Tea was meant to help women date safely Tea founder Sean Cook, a software engineer who previously worked at Salesforce and Shutterfly, says on the app's website that he founded the company in 2022 after witnessing his own mother's 'terrifying'' experiences. Cook said they included unknowingly dating men with criminal records and being 'catfished'' — deceived by men using false identities. Tea markets itself as a safe way for women to anonymously vet men they might meet on dating apps such as Tinder or Bumble — ensuring that the men are who they say they are, not criminals and not already married or in a relationship. It's been compared to the Yelp of dating. In an Apple Store review, one woman wrote that she used a Tea search to investigate a man she'd begun talking to and discovered 'over 20 red flags, including serious allegations like assault and recording women without their consent.'' She said she cut off communication. 'I can't imagine how things could've gone had I not known," she wrote. A surge in social media attention over the past week pushed Tea to the No. 1 spot at the U.S. Apple Store as of July 24, according to Sensor Tower, a research firm. In the seven days from July 17-23, Tea downloads shot up 525% compared to the week before. Tea said in an Instagram post that it had reached 4 million users. Tea has been criticized for invading men's privacy A female columnist for The Times of London newspaper, who signed into the app, on Thursday called Tea a 'man-shaming site'' and complained that 'this is simply vigilante justice, entirely reliant on the scruples of anonymous women. With Tea on the scene, what man would ever dare date a woman again?'' It's unclear what legal recourse an aggrieved man might have if he feels he's been defamed or had his privacy violated on Tea or a similar social media platform. In May, a federal judge in Illinois threw out an invasion-of-privacy lawsuit by a man who'd been criticized by women in the Facebook chat group "Are We Dating the Same Guy,'' Bloomberg Law reported. The breach exposed thousands of selfies and photo IDs In its statement, Tea reported that about 72,000 images were leaked online, including 13,000 images of selfies or photo identification that users submitted during account verification. Another 59,000 images that were publicly viewable in the app from posts, comments and direct messages were also accessed, according to the company's statement. No email addresses or phone numbers were exposed, the company said, and the breach only affects users who signed up before February 2024. 'At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that additional user data was affected. Protecting tea users' privacy and data is our highest priority,' Tea said. .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store