
How SNAP federal funding cuts could change free lunch at Knox County Schools
Cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program will amount to around $300 billion through 2034, according to the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. As of June, 34,268 people in Knox County rely on the program for a regular stipend to use for groceries, according to Tennessee Department of Human Services data.
SNAP is a way kids get access to free and reduced-price school meals through the National School Lunch Program.
SNAP is part of why 63 Knox County schools can offer every student free breakfast and lunch
During the 2025-26 academic year, every student at 63 Knox County schools can receive free breakfast and lunch through the Community Eligibility Provision, which gives all students at a designated school two free meals regardless of family income and without collecting individual applications.
The provision uses data from federal benefit programs, including SNAP, to determine the rate of students already receiving assistance.
For a school to qualify for the Community Eligibility Provision, at least 25% of students have receive government assistance by April 1 of the prior school year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the National School Lunch Program.
With fewer families receiving SNAP benefits, the number of schools that provide meals through the Community Eligibility Provision could drop next school year along with the identified student percentage.
If a school were no longer covered through the Community Eligibility Provision, some students would continue to qualify individually for free and reduced-price lunch, but the benefit would not be extended to all.
How to apply for free school lunch in Knox County
If you child's school doesn't automatically offer free meals, families can apply for help.
"Free and reduced meal applications will be available all school year, based on the information we have currently," Knox County School spokesperson Carly Harrington told Knox News.
Families can submit a an application anytime during the school year to see if they qualify. Applications should be submitted annually, and only one application is needed for all students in a household.
Other ways children in Knox County can receive food
Second Harvest Food Bank of East Tennessee's Food for Kids program helps to fill the weekend gap when children can't get meals at school. Every Friday, students are given a bag filled with foods that are easy to access and prepare.
Teachers at individual schools help identify students who could benefit from Food for Kids, which operates around the region, including in 76 Knox County Schools facilities for the 2025-26 school year, Second Harvest's chief marketing officer Michael Torano told Knox News in an email.
Hayden Dunbar is the storyteller reporter. Email hayden.dunbar@knoxnews.com.
Support strong local journalism by subscribing at subscribe.knoxnews.com.
This article originally appeared on Knoxville News Sentinel: SNAP funding cuts could mean fewer Knox County students get free lunch
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Unemployment among Black Americans is rising. Why that may be a bad sign for the economy.
The surge in unemployment among Black Americans could be a troubling sign for the economy, since this segment is often the first hit by economic downturns. While economists have viewed the U.S. labor market as resilient in recent months, some warn that cracks have started to emerge – including among the country's Black workforce. The unemployment rate for Black Americans hit 7.2% in July, up from 6.3% a year ago and 6.8% the month prior, according to the most recent jobs report from the Labor Department. The most recent surge follows an eye-popping 13% increase from May to June and puts the metric well above the total unemployment rate of 4.2%. Black women in particular have seen a dramatic increase in unemployment over the past year, from 5.5% to 6.3%. Certain states are also seeing exceptionally high unemployment rates for Black people, with some, including Michigan, hovering near 10%, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank. Economists say the surge in unemployment for Black people this year could be a troubling sign for the economy at large, since this segment is often the first hit by economic downturns. Other ethnic groups may already be seeing the effects of a weakening labor market; unemployment rates among White, Asian and Hispanic or Latino workers ticked up 0.1, 0.4 and 0.2 percentage points in July, respectively. Plus, the picture of a strong labor market took a hit with the release of the most recent jobs report, which showed payroll gains for May and June were revised downward by 258,000. "The Black unemployment rate is always the first to go up. That's always the canary in the coal mine,' said Gbenga Ajilore, chief economist at the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Why are unemployment rates among Black workers increasing? Economists told USA TODAY the recent job cuts within the federal government could be hitting Black workers especially hard because they make up a significant share of the workforce. Overall, Black Americans account for 18% of the federal workforce as of September, compared to 12% of the overall workforce, according to a May National Women's Law Center report. Black employees make up an even larger share at some of the agencies that have seen some of the most severe job cuts, like the Department of Education (36%), U.S. Agency for International Development (21%) and the Health and Human Services Department (20.5%), according to September figures from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. The difference is even more stark for Black women, who made up roughly 12% of the federal workforce, nearly twice their participation rate in the civilian labor force, according to 2021 data from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 'This has been a place where Black people are disproportionately more likely to get jobs – better jobs, well-paying jobs,' Ajilore said. Economists point to business uncertainty under the country's shifting trade policy as another potential driver, with companies pausing major decisions like hiring until they have a better understanding of how tariffs will impact their bottom line. A recent survey from the National Association for Business Economics found 1-in-4 companies plan to delay hiring or investments over the next six months. The Trump administration's push to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, programs in the federal government, education and the private sector could also play a role in the recent unemployment figures, creating an 'antagonistic posture against the Black workforce" that may be hurting Black hiring rates, according to Andre Perry, a senior fellow and director of the Center for Community Uplift at the Brookings Institution. DEI programs often fell short of their goal to close racial gaps – Black Americans are still outnumbered 12 to 1 by White people in executive roles, for instance. But the pullback may still impact Black Americans' careers and the diversity of executive suites. USA TODAY previously reported that in 2023, as the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in college admissions and conservative groups targeted DEI efforts at dozens of companies, the ranks of Black executives fell 3% from the prior year, twice the rate of White executives. "It's one of those things where I think it plays a role (in this year's unemployment data), but it's so difficult to actually pinpoint,' said Ajilore. "There's no smoking gun." And while Black employees have benefited from a tight labor market in recent years, he said they may now be more at risk of "last hired, first fired," or the practice of letting the most recently hired employees first, as the labor market cools. Which states have the highest unemployment rates among Black Americans? Certain communities have seen even more dramatic unemployment gains among Black workers. In Michigan, the unemployment rate for Black people hit 10% in the first quarter – nearly double the state's total unemployment rate and up 3.2% from 2020, according to the Economic Policy Institute. South Carolina's rate jumped 3% to 6.9% in that time frame. South Dakota, Alabama and Maryland had some of the lowest rates at 2.8%, 4.3% and 4.3%, respectively. 'The aggregate (labor market) numbers really mask what's going on at the local level,' Perry said. 'So you see in some places, Black people are in a recession by the looks of it. In other places, Black employment is faring much better.' Is this a warning for the economy? Elizabeth Crofoot, senior economist and principal researcher at Lightcast, said recent employment data is 'alarming." While she said it was unclear based on earlier figures if the unemployment surge for Black Americans was caused by blips in the data from small sample sizes, she said July's data paints a more detailed picture of declining Black labor force participation. "The labor market data from BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics), it's volatile month to month – especially because those response rates are not as high as they used to be, so there is a lot of noise in the data,' she said. But "this is looking like an emerging trend." That could spell bad news for the economy at large. Crofoot said unemployment among Black people tends to rise first in a weakening economy, "oftentimes due to equity issues." She pointed to occupational segregation ‒ when different demographic groups are more likely to be concentrated in certain parts of the workforce ‒ as one driver, pointing to how Black employees have a stronger presence in some of the industries that have seen job declines such as the federal workforce, manufacturing (which shed 11,000 jobs between June and July), wholesale trade (which lost 7,800 jobs). "There are certain sectors of the economy where there are more African Americans ... and typically those jobs are also not the best jobs," she said. "Especially in retail, for example, or lower-end health care sector jobs." Ajilore pointed to Labor Department data that shows more than 300,000 Black women lost their jobs in the first half of 2025 as another sign the rise could be the start of a long-term trend. Rising unemployment for Black Americans may not be the only crack in the labor market data. Recent graduates have struggled to find work amid the rise of artificial intelligence and business uncertainty related to tariffs. And job gains this year have been concentrated in areas like health care; leisure and hospitality; and among state and local governments. Overall, U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs in July, below the 105,000 economists expected. "The labor market is slowing down," Ajilore said. "It's one of those things where looking at Black unemployment rate and Black labor market indicators told us this story was coming."


Miami Herald
13 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Suze Orman gives new Social Security reality check
There are millions of older Americans today who collect a monthly Social Security check in retirement. And without those benefits, many would not be able to manage their expenses. Retiring on Social Security alone is no easy feat, though. Related: Warren Buffett sends blunt message on Social Security Average earners can expect Social Security to replace about 40% of their pre-retirement wages. Most retirees need roughly twice that amount of income to keep up with their expenses -- especially these days, with inflation staying stubbornly elevated. Thankfully, many retirees do manage to secure income outside of Social Security. That income can come in the form of an IRA or 401(k) balance, a pension, investments, or earnings from part-time work. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter There's a downside to having income outside of Social Security, though. Retirees with other income streams often pay taxes on their Social Security benefits due to an outdated rule. Recently, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was passed, and with it came a big tax break for seniors. But financial guru Suze Orman warns that this change doesn't necessarily mean that retirees will get out of paying taxes on Social Security. President Trump has been trying to do away with taxes on Social Security benefits since taking office. But there's been pushback. The reality is that Social Security relies on the taxes collected on benefits for revenue. Related: Some seniors in line for huge Social Security tax break As it is, Social Security is facing the strong possibility of benefit cuts in under a decade as the program's trust funds are continuously tapped. If taxes on Social Security were to be eliminated, it could drive the program even closer to insolvency. Instead, what lawmakers did was provide a $6,000 bonus tax deduction for Americans 65 and older -- a deduction that will, in many cases, spare retirees who otherwise would've paid taxes on their Social Security from losing that portion of their benefits. However, Orman insists that the new rules enacted under the OBBBA do not come close to exempting all retirees from being taxed on Social Security. And many seniors will, inevitably, get left out in the cold. Social Security taxes apply to single tax-filers with a combined income of more than $25,000, or $32,000 for joint tax-filers. Combined income is the total of: Adjusted gross incomeTax-exempt interest income50% of yearly Social Security benefits If a threshold of $25,000 for single retirees or $32,000 for couples seems absurdly low, it is. But these thresholds were established decades ago and were never adjusted for inflation. Related: Dave Ramsey raises red flag over Social Security There's a reason for that. Lawmakers want retirees who can afford taxes on Social Security benefits to keep paying them. The program needs that critical revenue to survive. For this reason, Orman cautions Social Security recipients not to fall into the trap of assuming that they're automatically exempt from paying taxes on their benefits. "The rules on taxation of Social Security benefits were not changed," she said recently on her podcast. Moreover, Orman stressed that the rules and thresholds for combined income have not budged under the OBBBA. Put another way, the new $6,000 tax break for seniors is not tied to Social Security in any way. Another hidden surprise? Not all seniors will get that $6,000 deduction, since it phases out at higher income levels. Not only that, but the $6,000 deduction is only in place until 2028. Beyond that point, who knows? More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s The White House has touted its recent $6,000 tax break as "the largest tax break in history for America's seniors." But Orman says Social Security recipients shouldn't be fooled. Many will ultimately continue to be taxed on their benefits. And even those who get the aforementioned tax break may soon enough see it go away. Related: Warren Buffett sends White House blunt message on the economy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Politico
15 hours ago
- Politico
Trump keeps finding new ways to batter green power
The Trump administration is rapidly escalating its war against renewable energy on a battlefield where its power is immense: public lands. Wind and solar developers are still readjusting their survival strategies after President Donald Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last month, slashing renewable tax credits and chilling green investment. Trump's Interior Department is now unleashing a fusillade of policies aimed at restricting wind and solar projects on public lands and ocean floors. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum inked one of his latest salvos Friday, directing his department to vet solar and wind projects according to how much power they generate relative to how much space they take up, my colleagues Ian Stevenson and Scott Streater write. That metric is a strikingly unfavorable one for renewable energy, according to numbers the department included in an appendix. Contending that renewables 'hold America back' from achieving 'energy dominance,' Burgum's order panned wind and solar as 'highly inefficient uses of Federal lands.' It's unclear how land managers will apply the new order, Ian and Scott write. But Burgum's quest to end 'preferential treatment' for renewable projects underscores the industry's worsening outlook. Burgum — whose home state of North Dakota gets roughly 40 percent of its power from renewables — has also halted new offshore wind leasing. Interior said Monday that it's killing a five-year schedule for offshore wind leasing, further darkening the industry's future in U.S. oceans. Collapsing investmentThe anti-renewables push by the Trump administration is a considerable setback for solar, wind and long-distance transmission projects in Western states and Alaska. But the impacts are most severe for offshore wind, which relies almost exclusively on federal real estate and permitting. Bloomberg New Energy Finance has dropped its forecast for new offshore wind in the U.S. from 27.8 gigawatts by 2035 to just over 6 GW. 'That's about $113 billion in missed investment,' said Atin Jain, BNEF senior associate for wind, in an email. 'Crucially, stalled projects also halt the additional billions that would have flowed into U.S. ports, vessels and supply chains to support this buildout.' Burgum has described his renewables overhaul as an effort to right the ship after the Biden administration boosted renewables. Biden also made mining and drilling more challenging on public lands. It's Monday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Heather Richards. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to hrichards@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Phelim Kine breaks down Trump's tariffs on India over its Russian oil purchases. Power Centers Trump's power bill problemHigh electricity bills are creating difficult choices for people across Arizona, and the Republicans' sprawling tax and policy law is unlikely to help, Jason Plautz writes. Arizona and other states with rising populations and tech industry demand for more electricity are bracing for higher costs. The law signed by Trump in early July slashed incentives for wind and solar power and boosted natural gas. As a result, forecasters say electricity bills are going up. 'The question is who pays for all that growth and whether it's possible to build that much generation in such a short period of time,' Amanda Ormond, a former director of the Arizona Energy Office, told Jason. Grassley's last standRepublican Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and John Curtis of Utah have placed holds on three of Trump's nominees to the Treasury Department over its implementation of energy tax policy in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Kelsey Tamborrino and Josh Siegel report. The actions follow a so-far unsuccessful effort by a handful of Senate Republicans to meet with the Trump administration to discuss forthcoming Treasury guidance that will establish rules of the road for the phase-out of tax credits for wind and solar power projects. Grassley placed holds on three Treasury nominees: Brian Morrissey to be general counsel, Francis Brooke to be assistant Treasury secretary and Jonathan McKernan to be an undersecretary. Occidental's carbon capture gainsOf all the major U.S. oil companies, Occidental Petroleum may be best positioned to benefit from the megabill, Corbin Hiar writes. Occidental is an industry leader in using carbon dioxide to coax oil from older wells. And the so-called megabill increased incentives for the use of carbon capture technology. 'Since they are the pacesetter, they are the ones best positioned to take advantage of an enhanced tax credit,' Skip York, an energy fellow at Rice University's Baker Institute, told Corbin. Wildfires across southern EuropeWildfires are raging in Portugal, Spain, the south of France, Sardinia, Greece, Bulgaria, Albania, North Macedonia and Turkey, Louise Guillot and Nektaria Stamouli report. More than twice the area has already burned this year compared with the same period last year, which was a record-breaking fire season, according to the EU's Joint Research Center. Climate change is only making the situation worse. In Other News Hefty deductions: North Dakota landowners say oil companies are withholding 20 percent or more of the money they are paid for the sale of minerals on their property. Stocked up: Tesla's board approved a stock package for Elon Musk worth $23.7 billion that he can claim in two years as long as he remains an executive at the company. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) went from attacking oil companies to working with them after a pair of oil refineries in the state announced they'd close. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) is pushing for passage of a bill that would allow the state to purchase 100 percent of its energy from clean sources by 2035. Conservation groups are asking a federal judge to impose a temporary restraining order on Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center, which critics say has spoiled a remote stretch of the Everglades. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.