logo
Oklahoma woman testifies before Texas lawmakers on sexual abuse and non-disclosure agreements

Oklahoma woman testifies before Texas lawmakers on sexual abuse and non-disclosure agreements

Yahoo21-03-2025
AUSTIN, Texas — An Oklahoma woman who accused former disgraced megachurch preacher Robert Morris of sexual abuse testified before the Texas House of Representatives, asking them to ban the use of 'non-disclosure agreements' in sexual abuse cases.
Cindy Clemishire publicly accused Robert Morris in 2024 of sexual misconduct ranging from inappropriate touching to rape by instrumentation. Almost two decades after the alleged abuse, Morris's attorneys offered the Oklahoma woman $25,000 if she would sign a non-disclosure agreement and remain silent.
She declined.
Texas House Bill 748, also called 'Trey's Law,' and Missouri House Bill 709, would make non-disclosure agreements unenforceable in child sex abuse cases.
Clemishire waited 43 years for her voice to be heard. Although her voice trembled and she choked back emotion, her words spoke loudly before the Texas House of Representatives, Judiciary, and Civil Jurisprudence Committee members.
'I am a survivor of child sexual abuse.'
Cindy Clemishire, Texas House of Representatives
Clemishire spoke of the years of abuse she allegedly suffered involving Morris that started on Christmas night in 1982 when a then-married father was a traveling evangelist and stayed at the Clemishire home while holding revival services in Hominy.
Morris, the founder of a Texas-based Gateway Church, one of the largest megachurches in the country, is free on $50,000 bail after being charged in Osage County District Court with five counts of lewd or indecent acts to a child.
Clemishire's accusations of sexual assault continued until Clemishire was 17 years old and, in 1987 told her parents about the abuse. Her father told Morris's pastor that if Morris didn't get out of the ministry, he would report him to the police.
It was a losing fight for the family.
'The first time he made the premeditated decision to violate and defile my purity, he told me, 'You can never tell anyone because it will ruin everything,'' Clemishire said.
'When I did finally tell someone, it seemed as though Robert Morris was right,' Clemishire said. 'It ruined everything.'
Clemishire testified how all the relationships in her life 'took a shift.'
'At 17 years old in 1987, I felt like it was all my fault. As I began the lifelong journey to sort through these emotional challenges, my life seemed to attract more shame while Robert's attracted fame.'
Cindy Clemishire
Through decades of off-and-on counseling, Clemishire said she has 'found my way to understand child sexual abuse, forgiveness, and healing.'
She said that at age 37, through her attorney, Oklahoma Attorney General Genter Drummond, who was in private practice in 2007, she asked Morris for $50,000 to cover past and future counseling.
Morris's attorney responded with a letter accusing 'an innocent 12-year-old Cindy of pursuing Robert and making Robert sound like the victim,' she said.
Morris offered a $25,000 settlement as long as Clemishre would sign an NDA.
'Because I refused to sign an NDA, my abuser is finally being held accountable for the horrific crimes he committed against me as a child,' Clemishire said. 'Because I refused to sign the NDA at 37, I can sit here at 55 and share my story and be the voice of so many people who don't have the courage – hoping I can help them.
Trey Carlock was a victim of child sexual abuse at the Branson-based Kanakuk Kamps. As part of his settlement, he was required to sign a 'restricted NDA.' He died by suicide in 2019 and called his settlement 'blood money,' according to his sister, Elizabeth Carlock Phillips, who also testified before Texas legislatures on Wednesday.
In addition to Clemishire and Phillips, Kathryn Robb, director of the Children's Justice Campaign, testified.
Morris's next court date is May 9, when a preliminary hearing on the allegations will be set.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dallas man faces several charges in connection with fatal shooting, police say
Dallas man faces several charges in connection with fatal shooting, police say

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

Dallas man faces several charges in connection with fatal shooting, police say

A 43-year-old Dallas man is facing charges after being arrested in connection with a fatal shooting, police said Sunday. According to the Dallas Police Department, at about 2:35 p.m. Saturday, officers were called to a shooting at 4400 Maple Avenue. When they arrived, a man, later identified as 44-year-old Augustin Espinosa, was found shot. DPD said Espinosa was pronounced dead at the scene. Police said the suspect, later identified as Robert Simmons, was arrested at a nearby location. DPD said Simmons has been charged with deadly conduct discharge firearm, possession of controlled substance and violation of bond conditions. The investigation is ongoing, police ask anyone with information to call 214-608-2832.

Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment
Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment

President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen. Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024 event in Houston. But there is simply no basis for Trump's claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular. Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé's production company, which the campaign listed as a 'campaign event production' expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline last year that they didn't pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances. Regardless of the merits of this particular $165,000 expenditure, it's far from an $11 million one. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment to Beyoncé since the claim that it was '$10 million' began spreading last year among Trump supporters on social media. Fact-check websites and PolitiFact looked into the '$10 million' claim during the campaign and did not find any basis for it. The White House did not immediately respond to a CNN request late Saturday for any evidence of Trump's $11 million figure. When Trump previously invoked the baseless figure, during an interview in February, he described his source in the vaguest of terms: 'Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.' A Harris spokesperson referred CNN on Saturday to a November social media post by Beyoncé's mother Tina Knowles, who called the claim of a $10 million payment a 'lie' and noted it was taken down by Instagram as 'False Information.' 'When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris's (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote. A spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact in November that the claim about a $10 million payment is 'beyond ridiculous.' What Trump wrote Sunday Trump revived the false claim in a social media post published after midnight early Sunday morning in Scotland, where he is visiting. He wrote that he is looking at 'the fact' that Democrats 'admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.' Democratic officials actually reject the claim of an $11 million payment. The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's request for any evidence of a Democratic admission of such a payment. Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is 'TOTALLY ILLEGAL' to pay for political endorsements, though no federal law forbids endorsement payments. Trump concluded: 'Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Trump has repeatedly called for the prosecution of political opponents. His Saturday post about Harris and celebrity endorsements was an escalation from a post in May, when he said he would call for a 'major investigation' on the subject but did not explicitly mention prosecutions.

Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment
Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment

CNN

time3 hours ago

  • CNN

Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment

President Donald Trump called Saturday for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen. Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024 event in Houston. But there is simply no basis for Trump's claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular. Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé's production company, which the campaign listed as a 'campaign event production' expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline last year that they didn't pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances. Regardless of the merits of this particular $165,000 expenditure, it's far from an $11 million one. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment to Beyoncé since the claim that it was '$10 million' began spreading last year among Trump supporters on social media. Fact-check websites and PolitiFact looked into the '$10 million' claim during the campaign and did not find any basis for it. The White House did not immediately respond to a CNN request late Saturday for any evidence of Trump's $11 million figure. When Trump previously invoked the baseless figure, during an interview in February, he described his source in the vaguest of terms: 'Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.' A Harris spokesperson referred CNN on Saturday to a November social media post by Beyoncé's mother Tina Knowles, who called the claim of a $10 million payment a 'lie' and noted it was taken down by Instagram as 'False Information.' 'When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris's (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote. A spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact in November that the claim about a $10 million payment is 'beyond ridiculous.' Trump revived the false claim in a social media post published after midnight early Sunday morning in Scotland, where he is visiting. He wrote that he is looking at 'the fact' that Democrats 'admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.' Democratic officials actually reject the claim of an $11 million payment. The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's request for any evidence of a Democratic admission of such a payment. Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is 'TOTALLY ILLEGAL' to pay for political endorsements, though no federal law forbids endorsement payments. Trump concluded: 'Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Trump has repeatedly called for the prosecution of political opponents. His Saturday post about Harris and celebrity endorsements was an escalation from a post in May, when he said he would call for a 'major investigation' on the subject but did not explicitly mention prosecutions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store