Letters: Pride Parade is more than flamboyance. Here's why we march every year
Flamboyant? Probably. It's our métier. Political? Absolutely. The entire history of the gay rights movement is political. We are the bellwether for everyone's rights.
Since 1975, whether I was marching with the Gay Men's Chorus or marching against the religion-based bigotry of Anita Bryant, every step I took was political because there is always someone to dispute my right to exist, lie about my life, debate my full and authentic participation in society or use the coercive power of the state to force us back into the closet.
That won't happen unless it's at gunpoint, and we all know this. It's why we march.
We stand for our full participation in society. We stand and do our best to protect the rights of gay and trans kids to grow up and live their best lives because we grew up in a world that did its best to make our lives as difficult, unpleasant and dangerous as possible.
And we will do it very gaily and flamboyantly.
Ben Janken, Oakland
Small businesses need Medicaid
A recent analysis from Georgetown University and the Small Business Majority found that one-third of Medicaid recipients have some connection to small businesses, including about 11 million children of parents who are self-employed or who work for small businesses.
Given the importance of Medicaid to these businesses, it's hard to imagine why anyone would want to make cuts. But that's exactly what's happening in Washington, D.C., where some lawmakers are pushing to gut vital benefits so they can justify tax cuts for the wealthiest businesses and individuals.
California small businesses should not be forced to pay for anyone else's tax cuts, particularly if it means losing access to health care. Lawmakers should reject cuts to Medicaid and instead focus on legislation that helps small businesses grow and thrive.
Bianca Blomquist, California director, Small Business Majority, San Jose
Innovate with AI
From my experience, AI significantly boosts developer productivity without threatening jobs. Three areas where AI excels in software development are coding, documentation and test generation.
Coding is often the most tedious part of development. AI can handle this by translating a clear design description into code, with fewer bugs than I would typically make.
AI also generates the necessary documentation and testing data, which frees developers to focus on refining designs and reducing hard-to-find logic errors.
The results can easily cut the work by 50%, supporting Benioff's claim.
But the real question for companies like Salesforce is whether to leverage this productivity to speed up innovation or cut costs. Prioritizing innovation is the smarter choice.
AI isn't replacing jobs; it's empowering developers to do more meaningful work, leading to better products and faster delivery.
David Posner, Napa
What counts?
In the Chronicle, we read of an innocent man swept up as part of the Trump administration's quota of 1 million deportations by the end of this year ('A farmworker had broken no laws. A California sheriff and ICE took him anyway,' California, SFChonicle.com, June 29).
Another story presented the federal government's claim that the University of California is illegally using 'race- and sex-based employment quotas' ('Trump administration announces yet another investigation into the UC system,' Politics, SFChronicle.com, June 26).
So, what is worse, a quota that carelessly sweeps up thousands of innocent people and ships them off without a hearing, or a quota meant to pry open old boy networks of white male privilege?
If quotas are unfair, don't dream up new ones.
Kate Lucchese, Emeryville
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Social Security Responds to Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has celebrated the passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, describing it as "landmark" legislation that provides "long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans." On Thursday, Congress passed the legislation in a 218-214 vote in the House, and the bill now awaits Trump's signature in a White House ceremony on Friday. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act will ensure that almost 90 percent of Social Security recipients will no longer be required to pay income taxes on their benefits, according to the SSA. "This is a historic step forward for America's seniors," Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano said in a news release. "For nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump's promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they've earned." Why It Matters The SSA's response comes amid fierce political debate over the bill's long-term consequences for retirees and the federal budget. While Trump initially promised to nix Social Security federal income taxes for beneficiaries, the SSA confirmed that the bill instead creates a targeted deduction that varies by income. What To Know The SSA specified that the legislation enacts a $6,000 tax deduction for individuals aged 65 or older with income up to $75,000—or up to $150,000 for married couples. Above these thresholds, the deduction phases out, ending at incomes of $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples. The deduction is temporary and set to expire after 2028 unless extended by lawmakers. On X, formerly Twitter, the White House said on Monday that under the bill, 51.4 million seniors—88 percent of all seniors receiving Social Security income—would not pay any tax on their benefits income as a result of the change. The "big, beautiful bill" also drew intense criticism for its sharp cuts to Medicaid and other low-income programs, components that Democrats say threaten essential safety nets that millions rely on for basic health and nutrition. The bill's overall fiscal impact, according to the Congressional Budget Office, is projected to result in $3.3 trillion in additional deficit spending over the next decade. Social Security Administration office in Salt Lake City, Utah, on May 11, 2023. Social Security Administration office in Salt Lake City, Utah, on May 11, 2023. GETTY What People Are Saying President Donald Trump said in Iowa on Thursday after the bill's passage: "I think when you go over the bill, it was very easy to get them to a 'yes.' … Biggest tax cut in history." Karla Dennis, an enrolled tax agent and the CEO of the tax strategy firm KDA Inc., told Newsweek: "I really believe we need lasting change for seniors, not just quick fixes or one-time payments that grab attention but don't solve anything long term. We should stop taxing Social Security for people who are living on moderate incomes. Seniors making under $100,000 a year should not be taxed. The way Social Security is taxed today doesn't match how people earn income in retirement today." What Happens Next Trump is scheduled to sign the "One Big Beautiful Bill" into law in the Oval Office at 5 p.m. ET on Friday. The new Social Security deduction provisions are set to take effect in tax year 2026 and remain in effect through 2028.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Karl Rove: Big, beautiful bill will have ‘huge impact on 2026'
Republican strategist Karl Rove said Thursday the Congress-approved spending package will heavily influence the midterm election cycle next year. 'I think it'll have a huge impact on 2026, because remember, as these changes, particularly the Medicaid changes come into effect, they're going to have, people are going to be losing their coverage,' Rove said during an appearance on Fox News's 'America's Newsroom.' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) decided to forego a re-election bid after voting against his party while urging lawmakers to strike the language regarding Medicaid provisions from the big, beautiful bill, marking a first major impact on the midterms. Rove lauded the Republican-backed 'big, beautiful bill,' however, cheering its new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for certain Medicaid recipients. 'The able-bodied, think about it, there was an interesting study done of able-bodied people on Medicaid, and that you know what their number one activity was if they weren't working? It was watching television, and number two was playing online games,' Rove told Fox News. The legislation is set to push millions off of Medicaid coverage and require twice-yearly eligibility check-ins instead of the previous annual evaluation. Rove encouraged GOP members to continue to lobby in favor of the bill as citizens prepare for sweeping cuts to take effect. 'Medicaid was meant for poor seniors, for children in poor families, and for the disabled, and we should not be paying for health care for people who are able-bodied, and can work, and are refusing to work. This is why they got to go on the offense. But yeah, it's going to be a big impact,' the Republican pundit said. 'And the work is just beginning. There's going to be always a tendency to say, 'We got the bill passed, oh let's all take the time off and good, we got it done.' Uh-uh, that's the requirement that you then go to work,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Philipsburg resident announces plans to run for state representative in 77th District
A Philipsburg resident who ran for a seat in Congress during the last election announced his intentions Thursday to seek the Democratic nomination for Pennsylvania's 77th House District next year. Zach Womer made his announcement following the passage of President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and made note of cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program that he said will 'shift responsibility for our social safety net to state legislatures.' 'Whether the decisions were made in Washington D.C. or Harrisburg, I have watched a decades long tragedy of the wealth of our nation transferring from the poor and working class to people who have never swung a hammer, never milked a cow, but hold a large portion of our nation's wealth,' he said in a written statement. The 77th House District has been represented by state Rep. Scott Conklin, D-Rush Township, since 2007. Conklin won reelection in November to another two-year term and has not publicly announced whether he'll run for an 11th term. In November's election, Womer ran as a political newcomer against U.S. Rep. Glenn 'GT' Thompson, R-Howard, who won by more than a 40-point margin. Womer is also running in this year's election for Philipsburg mayor against Republican incumbent John Streno. 'We now sit at a greater disparity in wealth than in the gilded age,' Womer said in the written statement. 'As a state legislator, I will fight to the greatest extent I am able to ensure that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania represents the interests of the working men and women that call it home.' House District 77 includes part of State College borough, along with Port Matilda and Patton, Ferguson, Rush, Huston and Worth townships.
