Proposal for parliamentary committee on MACC chief's appointment needs review
The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) stated that the idea requires thorough deliberation and coordination among stakeholders, considering its suitability and broader impact.
She highlighted that the Dewan Rakyat currently has 10 Special Select Committees. 'These committees function based on their respective terms of reference under the Dewan Rakyat's Standing Orders and include MPs from both the government and opposition,' she said.
Azalina added that the National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS) 2024–2028 includes a sub-strategy under Public Accountability to 'Review the appointment and dismissal requirements of the MACC Chief Commissioner and establish an MACC Service Commission' as part of long-term reforms.
The appointment of the MACC Chief Commissioner is governed by Section 5 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 696). Her response came after Dr Halimah Ali (PN-Kapar) questioned whether the government plans to establish such a committee. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Creating Anwar's legacy — ending ‘gomenshud'
One of the most common Malaysian words I hear is 'gomenshud'. This is used whenever an issue of concern arises and the 'government should' do something about it rather than the private sector or, heaven-forfend, that individuals should fix it for themselves. It is ironic that people complain of incompetence, systemic corruption and moral turpitude within the executive, legislature, judiciary and the permanent civil service at federal and state levels but still demand that more money, responsibility and interference opportunities should be handed to them. The economics of government and policy design, called 'public choice theory' tells us clearly that people in government are not driven by the 'greater good' or the 'public interest', they are, just like the rest of us, driven by personal and collective self-interest. This is not meant to be cynical or offensive but simply to help us understand those in public policy as human beings — they have hopes and dreams, they want to make life easy for themselves as far as possible and if there is a chance to make a few bucks they will take it. Each year the auditor-general reports hundreds of millions lost in wastage and leakages across the government sector. The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) estimates RM277 billion lost to corruption between 2018 and 2023. The think tank Emir Research estimates that RM4.5 trillion was lost to corruption in the last 26 years. This is all identified after the fact and to stop this haemorrhage of resources we need to address the 'gomenshud mentality' which defaults to intervention from the start without proper evaluation of the costs and benefits and the likely losses due specifically to policy design. A common form of policy design in Malaysia is the 'patronage cascade' where projects, concessions and access routes to money are specifically built-in to benefit middlemen often through pre-allocated packages and contracts. With this in mind, the 13th Malaysia Plan which will be tabled this week should reduce the role and interference of government. We should be cautious if we see 'patronage cascades' where policies are specifically designed to pass projects to vested interests. Instead, broad-based universal programmes, available to everyone, with open and transparent access routes should be the emphasis. This can be achieved first by government exiting commercial activities which crowd out large businesses, SMEs and micro enterprises and leaving these activities to the private sector. Second by slashing regulations and focusing only on minimum standards of health and safety, anti-corruption, good governance and anti-trust issues. Finally, by focusing on the basic role of government in many areas where there are direct and legitimate concerns for public policy including public health, education and social protection. Economic mechanisms we hope to see in the 13MP include liberalisation of markets, reducing regulatory burdens, limiting government interference and promoting creative, innovative, agile, competitive businesses. The US tariff issue also sends us a lesson that protectionist policies come with a reciprocal cost. So removing restrictions to market access should also be a priority for the 13MP. Proper independent assessments have rarely been made of the targets of previous Malaysia plans and many have not been delivered, fully or at all. The main unfulfilled target of every Malaysia plan is to build in a mechanism to end the need for future plans. In other words, these are 'forever wars' against dreamed up economic challenges more typical of centrally planned economies. They are increasingly irrelevant in a modern technology-driven economic environment in which anything laid down in July 2025 will be obsolete by December 2025 let alone by 2030 — gomenshud recognise this and end it once and for all. The views expressed are the writer's own and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
New Straits Times
14 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Watchdog: Unexplained Wealth Orders can deter graft, recover stolen assets
KUALA LUMPUR: The introduction of an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) could be a powerful tool to deter corruption and recover illicit assets, says Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) president Raymon Ram. He said a UWO would strengthen Malaysia's anti-corruption framework by targeting wealth disproportionate to an individual's known income, even without a prior conviction. "It empowers authorities to demand explanations for wealth that far exceeds legitimate earnings," he said. Raymon said similar frameworks in the UK and Australia have proven effective in holding high-level individuals accountable, adding that success in Malaysia would depend on impartial enforcement. In the UK where it was introduced in 2018, a UWO is a court order issued to compel the target to reveal the sources of their unexplained wealth. If they do not provide an adequate explanation, or provide unsatisfactory evidence, the asset will be considered "recoverable property" for the purposes of a civil recovery order under the British Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Poca). A UWO can be sought without any civil or criminal proceedings having begun. There is no need for the subject of a UWO to have been convicted of an offence or to have had a civil law judgement against them. "If applied fairly, UWOs would send a clear message that unexplained wealth won't go unchecked." On legal implementation, Raymon said either amending existing laws or introducing a new statute is viable, though he favours a dedicated law. "While the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act and Anti-Money Laundering Act (Amla) include asset-tracing tools, they only apply during investigations into specific offences. A standalone UWO law would allow earlier scrutiny and recovery." With RM277 billion lost to fraud and illicit outflows from 2018 to 2023, Raymon said enforcement tools have proven inadequate. He, however, acknowledged challenges, especially around constitutional safeguards like the presumption of innocence and property rights. "Since UWOs shift the burden of proof, they must be carefully framed to survive legal scrutiny. "Positioning them as civil mechanisms, as in the UK, could mitigate constitutional issues." He also stressed the need for institutional capacity-building. "Agencies like the MACC and police need stronger forensic tools and protection from political interference. Judicial oversight is crucial to prevent political misuse." Raymon believes properly implemented UWOs could greatly enhance elite accountability. "Ordinary Malaysians are rigorously vetted over income for scholarships or loans, while the wealthy often avoid such checks. "A UWO regime would help level that playing field by making it routine to question and claw back wealth that can't be lawfully accounted for, regardless of one's status or connections. He added that the possibility of having to justify wealth at any time could deter corruption. "Knowing that unexplained millions could prompt immediate legal action may make those who are corrupt think twice." Meanwhile, the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih) chairman Muhammad Faisal Abdul Aziz agreed that Malaysia should have a mechanism to combat corruption among the elites. "Having UWO would be one of the ways that Malaysia can consider since it is perceived as straight forward and more practical to recover the stolen wealth without undergoing court processes which will take decades. "It will bring about all parties to always be cautious about the resources of their wealth." He said in order to implement UWO; "We can consider having an independent body to regulate that matter so that the UWO will not be misused for political weapons against others who are not in line with the government." Yesterday, former Klang member of Parliament Charles Santiago said in a series of posts on X that Malaysia needs an UWO to hold all elites accountable. This follows Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's recent call for the sons of former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to return their wealth if they cannot prove its sources. "This is not about rivalry, but fairness. We need a system where no one is beyond accountability, no matter how powerful.
The Star
14 hours ago
- The Star
Diesel smuggling cases decline significantly in Malaysia, Dewan Rakyat hears
PETALING JAYA: Diesel smuggling activities have significantly declined, with only 261 cases recorded as of July 8 this year, according to the Dewan Rakyat. Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister Datuk Armizan Ali reported that these 261 cases involved seizures amounting to RM5.24mil. In contrast, last year recorded 655 cases with RM17.14mil in seizures, and 2023 saw 992 cases with seizures totalling RM18.04mil. "The targeted subsidy mechanism implemented by the government has effectively addressed diesel smuggling, as evidenced by the reduction in cases," Armizan stated in a parliamentary written reply dated July 31. Armizan was responding to Datuk Rosol Wahid (PN-Terengganu), who inquired about diesel smuggling cases in 2023, 2024, and 2025, and whether the diesel subsidy mechanism had successfully addressed the issue. Armizan highlighted that his ministry, alongside other border enforcement agencies such as the police, the Customs Department, the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA), and the Road Transport Department (JPJ), is conducting joint enforcement efforts to tackle smuggled diesel. Previously, it was reported that the sale of smuggled subsidised petrol and diesel from Malaysia is rampant along southern Thailand due to significant price disparities between the two countries. Armizan noted that the targeted diesel subsidy implementation in Peninsular Malaysia, which began in June last year, has shown a reduction in diesel smuggling cases. Under this scheme, diesel prices were floated and retailed in the peninsula starting last year. Subsidies continue for traders using diesel-powered commercial vehicles and public transportation. Eligible groups such as farmers, smallholders, and private diesel vehicle owners can apply for a RM200 monthly cash subsidy under the Budi Madani initiative.
