logo
SANDF meets with Sandu over unpaid allowances for DRC deployment

SANDF meets with Sandu over unpaid allowances for DRC deployment

TimesLIVE2 days ago

The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) has held an urgent meeting with the South African National Defence Union (Sandu) after the union's public outcry over unpaid allowances for troops deployed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The SANDF said the meeting came after the union issued a statement and circulated a video on its social media platforms regarding outstanding allowances related to the SAMIDRC deployment under Operation Thiba, part of the Sadc Mission in the DRC.
SundayTimes reported that soldiers have turned their anger on their own top brass over a pay dispute, saying they are owed at least R600,000 each.
One of the aggrieved soldiers told the Sunday Times he and his fellow troops should have been paid R100,000 a month during their 15-month deployment as part of a Southern African Development Community force in the eastern DRC, but had received only R58,000.
The SANDF expressed concern that Sandu had released the statement without first following the established process of direct engagement with it..
'This occurred while the SANDF was still in the process of demobilising the deployed members and addressing payment-related and other administrative matters internally,' said SANDF spokesperson Rear-Admiral Prince Tshabalala.
Tshabalala said the meeting focused on clarifying the status of outstanding allowances and emphasising the importance of effective and respectful communication between the SANDF and recognised unions, in line with the Bargaining Council framework.
'During the meeting, Sandu was cautioned that issuing public statements on unresolved internal matters without prior consultation may lead to misinformation and miscommunication, potentially undermining the morale of troops and affecting the command and control structures of the SANDF,' he said.
However, despite these concerns, the meeting was conducted in a cordial and constructive spirit, he said.
Tshabalala said both parties committed to continued engagement to resolve the outstanding issues.
He added that a follow-up meeting would be scheduled.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

News you should know tonight: Top 5 stories you may have missed on June 30, 2025
News you should know tonight: Top 5 stories you may have missed on June 30, 2025

IOL News

time11 hours ago

  • IOL News

News you should know tonight: Top 5 stories you may have missed on June 30, 2025

EFF president Julius Malema has again called on the DA to leave the Government of National Unity (GNU), effectively making way for his party to join the government. Good evening, IOL News family! It's Monday, June 30, 2025, and it's time for a wrap of the biggest headlines making waves in South Africa and beyond. Don't forget to join the IOL WhatsApp Channel to stay in tune, informed, and in the know Malema calls for DA to leave the GNU, paving the way for EFF's entry EFF president Julius Malema has again called on the DA to leave the Government of National Unity (GNU), effectively making way for his party to join the government. To read on, click here. Former Transnet executives granted R50,000 bail over Gupta-linked corruption charges Four former Transnet executives, Brian Molefe, Siyabonga Gama, Anoj Singh, and Thamsanqa Jiyane, have been granted R50,000 bail each following alleged corruption linked to the Guptas. To read on, click here. DA to lay criminal charges against Nkabane for lying to Parliament The Democratic Alliance (DA) has announced plans to lay criminal charges against Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane for allegedly lying to Parliament. To read on, click here. MTN South Africa faces backlash over misleading 'free' router advertising MTN South Africa has been ordered to either remove or amend its 'free-to-use' router advertising, after it has emerged that it is not actually free, the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) ruled. To read on, click here. Another tragic shack fire in Ekurhuleni claims lives of two people, including a toddler Two people, including a two-year-old baby, have perished in Ekurhuleni, after an inferno engulfed their home in Snake Park, Nigel. To read on, click here. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News

Committee wants Section 34 probe into SAPS officials
Committee wants Section 34 probe into SAPS officials

eNCA

time18 hours ago

  • eNCA

Committee wants Section 34 probe into SAPS officials

JOHANNESBURG - Parliament's Police Portfolio Committee is turning up the heat on senior officials in the South African Police Service (SAPS) implicated in an alleged corruption scandal. The committee is pushing for Section 34 inquiries into the head of Police Crime Intelligence, Dumisani Khumalo, and six of his colleagues. They're accused of playing a role in fraudulent appointments within SAPS's powerful Crime Intelligence Unit. Their court appearance relates to the appointment of a Technical Support System Manager. The Investigative Directorate Against Corruption alleges that the 30-year-old employee has no formal qualifications required for the SAPS position. Committee Chairperson Ian Cameron says the law must take its course, but also determine accountability at the highest level. The officials appeared in the Pretoria magistrate's court on 27 June. All seven are facing charges of fraud and corruption. Six of the accused, including Khumalo, were granted bail of R10,000 each. A seventh accused, Philani Lushaba, faces a pending corruption case and has to reapply for bail under a Schedule 6 offence. The others face a schedule 5 offence as they have no other cases.

DA slams R100k taxpayer-funded legal bill for magistrate's protection
DA slams R100k taxpayer-funded legal bill for magistrate's protection

IOL News

time19 hours ago

  • IOL News

DA slams R100k taxpayer-funded legal bill for magistrate's protection

The Minister of Justice has continued to evade the real question as to why a legally trained person is assisted to the tune of R100 143.68 to obtain a protection order against journalists, says the writer. The Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development continues to defend a shocking display of state overreach and misuse of public funds as revealed by a DA parliamentary question. The Department spent over R100k of public money on a personal protection order for a magistrate, when the magistrate herself could have attended to this administrative task. The DA will be writing to the minister, demanding that the magistrate pay back this wasted money. Last year, Magistrate Ezra Morrison sought a protection order against journalists who reported on the magistrate's failure to refer a child, now accused of the murder of Deveney Nel, to the Children's Court when he was a minor. He was accused of raping an 11 year old girl when he was 13 and was found by psychiatrists to be a danger to society and at high risk of reoffending. Despite this warning, nothing was done. In reply to a question posed by the DA, the Minister of Justice has continued to evade the real question as to why a legally trained person is assisted to the tune of R100 143.68 to obtain a protection order against journalists. The minister attempted to justify this gross abuse of funds by claiming that the matter was 'intrinsically linked' to the magistrate's professional duties. What is worse is that costs are for consultations, drafting, formal appearances and settlement. Not only are these prices seriously inflated, but these are all things the magistrate could have done herself for a personal matter. Seeking a protection order is something thousands of vulnerable South Africans are forced to navigate alone every day in terms of the Protection from Harassment Act and the Domestic Violence Act. The two Acts are intended to prevent domestic abuse and harassment, provide safety and security to complainants and their dependents and are specifically designed to be accessible and victim-centred. Magistrate Morrison's application to obtain such an order against journalists is a private matter and not a state function, whichever way you look at it. The DA finds it deeply disturbing that R100 143.68 was spent on an advocate's fees when the Magistrate could have simply attended at the Clerk of the Court and completed the requisite forms. Yet, the minister failed to address this question in her response and only provided vague answers with no proof that this warranted a protection order or an explanation as to why the matter was not referred to the Press Ombud. While the most vulnerable in our society – women, children and the poor – sit in long queues waiting for overwhelmed clerks and backlogged courts, the minister affords preferential treatment for the legal elite. The DA will be pursuing further accountability through parliamentary channels, including demanding that the Magistrate pay the money back to the state. Nicholas Gotsell MP DA NCOP Member on Security & Justice

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store