'You're fired! Why Trump waited until now to sack his national security adviser
As Donald Trump makes the first major reshuffle of his top team - firing Mike Waltz as his national security adviser - our US correspondents Mark Stone and James Matthews ask why it took so long for the repercussions of Signal-gate to bite.
And, will the minerals deal between Ukraine and the US bring an end to the war a step closer?
If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@sky.uk.
Don't forget, you can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Benjamin Netanyahu vows ‘there will be no Hamas' in post-war Gaza
US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. The US leader has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire and hostage agreement, and bring about an end to the war. Hamas said in a brief statement on Wednesday that it had received a proposal from the mediators and was holding talks with them to 'bridge gaps' to return to the negotiating table to try to reach a ceasefire agreement. Mr Trump said the 60-day period would be used to work toward ending the war, something Israel says it will not accept until Hamas is defeated. He said that a deal might come together as soon as next week. But Hamas' response, which emphasised its demand that the war end, raised questions about whether the latest offer could materialise into an actual pause in fighting. Hamas official Taher al-Nunu said that the militant group was 'ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement'. He said Hamas was 'ready to accept any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war'. A relative carries the body of Palestinian girl Mira Bashir, 10, who was killed with her sister, Sabah, eight, in an Israeli army airstrike, during their funeral in Deir al-Balah on Wednesday (Abdel Kareem Hana/AP) A Hamas delegation is expected to meet Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss the proposal, according to an Egyptian official. Hamas has said that it is willing to free the remaining 50 hostages, fewer than half of whom are said to be alive, in exchange for a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an end to the war. Israel says it will only agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and exiles itself, something the group refuses to do. 'I am announcing to you, there will be no Hamas,' Mr Netanyahu said during a speech on Wednesday. An Israeli official said that the latest proposal calls for a 60-day deal that would include a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid to the territory.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Americans who threatened to leave after Trump's re-election are staying put
Based on pronouncements in 2024, you might think now is the time to see U.S. citizens streaming out of the country. Months before the 2024 presidential election, Americans were saying they would leave should candidate Donald Trump win the election. Gallup polling in 2024 found that 21% of Americans wanted to leave the United States permanently, more than double the 10% who had said so in 2011. And indeed in June 2025, a Vermont legislator announced that she was resigning her seat and moving to Canada because of political concerns and economic opportunities. To be sure, people are moving. Even so, as a scholar of American migration overseas, my research finds that the vast majority of Americans are not about to depart for greener shores. A western Massachusetts group In October 2024, I surveyed 68 Americans in western Massachusetts, an area with a slight Democratic majority, asking if they wanted to leave the United States for a lengthy period of time, but not necessarily permanently. Over 90% said no, noting that there were factors limiting their mobility, such as financial obligations or having a partner who would not move, and that there were reasons that made them want to stay, such as owning property and having friends nearby. Just three respondents indicated they were making plans to move, while an additional 11 said they wanted to move 'someday.' Reality strikes After the November 2024 election, I interviewed seven of those respondents, two of whom had said prior to the election that they might leave the United States. After the election, they all said they planned to stay. One who had said she wanted to leave acknowledged her reversal, saying: 'I may have flippantly said, 'Oh, if (Trump) gets voted in … I would leave,' but I can't see leaving. Part of it is because of my daughter,' who had recently become a mother. She continued, 'It's never crossed my mind seriously enough to even research it.' Another told me, 'I'm not going to let somebody push me out of what I consider my country and my home because he's a jerk.' Others spoke of needing to work several more years in order to receive a pension, or having family responsibilities keeping them in the country. None supported the current administration. On a national level In two nationally representative surveys, my colleague Helen B. Marrow, a sociologist of immigration, and I found no significant increase in migration aspiration between 2014 and 2019. We also found that respondents mentioned exploration and adventure much more often than political or economic reasons for wanting to move abroad. Even though the U.S. passport grants visa-free visitor access to more than 180 countries, U.S. citizens still need residence and work visas. At home, they, like others, have family commitments and financial constraints, or may just not want to leave home. More than 95% of the world's population do not move abroad – and U.S. citizens are no different. Relocation coaching In addition to my academic research on overseas Americans, I am also an international relocation coach. I help Americans considering a move abroad navigate the emotional, practical and professional complexities of relocation, whether they're just starting to explore the idea or actively planning their next steps. Many of my clients do not want to live in a United States that no longer aligns with their values, while others are concerned about their safety, particularly, but not only, due to racism or homophobia. They are finding jobs overseas, retiring abroad or acquiring a European citizenship through a parent or grandparent. Most recently, American academics seeking to leave are being courted by European universities. But most are staying In February 2025, a national poll found that 4% of Americans said they were 'definitely planning to move' to another country. That same month, I followed up with my seven interviewees from western Massachusetts, including one trans man. They all reiterated their choice to remain in the United States. One person, who might move abroad at some point, told me she hadn't changed her mind about leaving soon: 'Leaving doesn't necessarily mean anything will be better for me, even if it was a financial possibility.' Two people said that recent political developments actually meant that they were more committed to remaining in the United States. One told me, 'Now, more than ever, individuals need to figure out what small actions can be taken to help our fellow Americans get through this dark period.' But even those 'definitely planning on moving' can have other factors intervene. Two clients of mine who were making serious plans had to stop when family members' health situations changed for the worse. So how many people are actually leaving? It is clear that a growing number of Americans are considering a move abroad. But far fewer are conducting serious research, seeking professional consultation or actually moving. Drawing on available data, my own academic research and my coaching experience, my educated estimate is that no more than 1% to 2% of U.S. citizens are actively making viable plans to leave the country. Nor are all of those leaving out of protest; many are still motivated by exploration, adventure, employment or to be with a partner. Even so, that figure is roughly 3 million to 6 million people – which would be a significant increase over the estimated 5.5 million Americans currently living abroad. As with many migration flows, even the movement of a small percentage of a population can still have the potential to reshape both the United States and its overseas population.
The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
UK ‘growth' strategy is making the world a more dangerous place
Either way, the question is academic. Neither can be used, at the moment, without Donald Trump's say-so, and I suspect he would only deliver that say-so if it would benefit the United States. What the current cost might be for the Dreadnought nuclear submarines being built by the time they are ready – this is currently running at £41 billion including contingency costs – is anyone's guess. READ MORE: Treasury says Rachel Reeves crying at PMQs was 'personal matter' In addition to this astronomical expenditure, Keir Starmer has now ordered twelve F-35 nuclear-bomb-carrying stealth jets from the US at an as-yet-unknown price or delivery date. Why does the RAF needs stealth bombers in the first place, let alone 12 of such an aircraft? I appreciate that it might have something to do with Nato, in which Trump appears to have little interest, having walked out of its last little jolly before the end of its agenda. However, if it means selling American-made armaments, then that probably would be to his delight. Keir Starmer has already admitted that he took his eye off the ball (when parliament was about to vote down his welfare policies) through his complete attention on all things Nato and his notion of being an important world leader. READ MORE: Plane damaged by Palestine Action at Brize Norton spotted over Scotland It looks to me that he has still put his world leadership notions to the fore with a pathetic attempt to pacify his MPs, while still pandering to all things nuclear in the arms industry. Foreign Secretary David Lammy has flown to Turkey on a trade mission involving any defence ties the UK has with that country. He wants to export a number of UK Eurofighter Typhoons jets. This is all part of another free-trade agreement, this time between the UK and Turkey. Talk about UK policies on growth. More like contributing to making the world a more dangerous planet. Why on earth anyone in Holyrood would want to be a part of this is beyond my comprehension. Time yet again to make more noise regarding Scotland's independence. Alan Magnus-Bennett Fife TUESDAY'S 'click bait' was on BBC Scotland's Mornings with Kaye Adams, where the producers covered the UK Government's reduction of Personal Independence Payments, the Scottish version of which – called Adult Disability Payment – will be affected due to the way the Barnett Formula works. The initial guests were from the TaxPayers' Alliance and The Poverty Alliance, both with differing views. The taxpayer guy said the benefits bill was predicted to 'rocket' to £70 billion in 2035. The key word being 'rocket'. The poverty guy said that the wealth gap was increasing, with more people needing help. READ MORE: Anas Sarwar 'totally humiliated' by Labour's dramatic benefits U-turn What I find disgraceful is the frequent anecdotes broadcast about 'the guy who lives next door and never works', who has a wife in another house and is living with his bidie-in, to whom he has sired a child, who have two cars and the latest smart phones. This is the same trope that the Conservatives used during the 1980s in Thatcher's era, which lambasted people that had been turfed out of a job. They were told to 'get on their bikes to find a job' by Norman Tebbit, the Chingford Skinhead named by the Spitting Image crew. They were lazy and good for nothing, waiting for handouts. Whilst there are undoubtedly some people with the intention of getting something for nothing, the popular press during that time and again now seem to be creating a view that this abuse is rife. The truth is something quite different. READ MORE: What it's actually like to apply for DWP disability benefits Hansard (the Westminster Parliament record of reference) states that the overall rate of overpayments is now 3.7% (£9.7 billion) for 2023-24, compared to 3.6% (£8.3 billion) in 2022-23. Overpayments due to fraud were 2.8% compared to 2.7% last year while claimant error and official error remained at 0.6% and 0.3% respectively. The rate of overpayments in Universal Credit was 12.4% in 2023-24 compared to 12.7% in 2022-23. Compare this to tax evasion. The UK's tax gap has widened, according to latest figures from HM Revenue & Customs. New data show that the UK missed out on £46.8bn of tax liabilities in the 2023-2024 financial year, or 5.3% of the total theoretical tax liabilities. The gap refers to the difference between the total amount of taxes owed to the government and the amount actually collected. In 2024 this was reported to be £39.8bn or 4.8% of overall theoretical liabilities. It would seem that pursuing tax-avoidance loopholes would be a better use of parliamentary time and effort. Alistair Ballantyne Angus I WAS well impressed with Pat Kane's article 'Are you one of the doomscrollers? It's time for us to focus on hope instead' (June 28). He articulated on a number of issues that concern me. 'Hopescroll' – spot on. James Grosset Montrose
