logo

BBC expert HMRC tax £2,900 alert over pensions mistake

Wales Online12-06-2025
BBC expert HMRC tax £2,900 alert over pensions mistake
In just three months of this year £44 million was paid wrongly due to pensioners being placed on emergency tax
A financial expert on BBC's This Morning Live has revealed a simple monetary trick that could help individuals avoid being hit with a 'super tax' by HMRC over their pensions.
Finance expert Laura Pomfret joined presenters Helen Skelton and Gethin Jones on the popular programme, where she discussed how people are being heavily impacted by being incorrectly placed on an emergency tax code.
The issue arises when individuals, entirely within the law, access their pension lump sum early. Often, this is a one-off sum used to fund a significant purchase such as home improvements.
However, HM Revenue and Customs assumes the person will withdraw the same amount each month, potentially leading to thousands in unnecessary tax payments.
Ms Pomfret highlighted that in the first quarter of 2025, £44 million needed to be reclaimed by over-55s who had overpaid to HMRC. She elaborated: "To put that in context, it's around 15,000 people and an average of £2,900 each. This isn't a little bit of tax that's going off to HMRC. It's a lot."
"This situation arose because, as you may recall, we had quite a significant change in the pensions industry 10 years ago. It was the introduction of pension freedoms, which gave you the liberty to access chunks of your cash that was in your pension and withdraw it flexibly. However, this has meant that people have been inadvertently overtaxed with these withdrawals."
Article continues below
Coletta Smith, the BBC's Cost of Living correspondent, outlined: "Crucial thing is that the 1st 25% of whatever you take out is tax free. Anything above that, you get taxed on. And what happened was that HMRC didn't change the rules that they had when this new freedom was introduced."
She further explained: "So over the last decade, when people drew down some money from their pension. The tax man looks at that, say you take out £5,000 pounds one month, and that's all you're going to take out for that year. But the tax man assumes that that's month one and that every month you're going to be taking out £5,000 pounds, and that pushes you over the limit as a result.
"So what happens is you get given an emergency tax code, that means that you are taxed at a much higher rate as a result and you have to reclaim as a consequence, and that's the process that people have been having to go through up until this point."
When Helen queried the current status, Ms Pomfret responded: "So it has changed a little bit since then, so in April the government introduced um uh a better tax code process, which means that people taking regular income out of their pension get the correct tax code faster, ideally within a month rather than waiting until the end of the tax year. But it still doesn't help those people making these one-off withdrawals."
Content cannot be displayed without consent
She outlined a scenario involving a 60 year old withdrawing a £10,000 lump sum and being assigned an emergency tax code by HMRC. She explained: "This means it's treated as though he's going to do £10,000 every single month not just a one-off. So he's going to be taxed as though he's taking out £120,000. She said he could be taxed as much as 40 per cent."
Ms Pomfret then highlighted how to recognise if you're paying emergency tax: "You need to know the tax code that you're actually on. It would either have a W1, and M1 or an X on the end if it's an emergency tax code."
She noted that although HMRC will eventually rectify the situation, the individual might have to wait until the end of the tax year. However, there is an option to claim the tax back within 30 days using a specific form.
Helen Skelton inquired: "What's this about £1 to protect your pension?" Ms Pomfret replied: "If you think about Arthur's situation he wants to withdraw a chunk, so what we want Arthur to do is withdraw a small amount first and let's pick £1.
Article continues below
"By doing so as the initial withdrawal instead of the £10,000, this action would activate the system allowing him to check the tax code set by the pension provider and determine its accuracy. If it's incorrect, there's the opportunity to amend it before proceeding. Once the correct tax code is established, then Arthur can confidently withdraw the larger sum, knowing it will be taxed properly."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Commonwealth Games at risk of TV blackout as no broadcast deal secured for Glasgow event
Commonwealth Games at risk of TV blackout as no broadcast deal secured for Glasgow event

Daily Record

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Commonwealth Games at risk of TV blackout as no broadcast deal secured for Glasgow event

The BBC has yet to sign a deal to show the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow with 12 months to go before the event kicks-off. The Commonwealth Games is at risk of a TV blackout in the UK with no broadcast deal yet secured for the event's return to Glasgow next year. ‌ The BBC has been the principal broadcaster of the sporting extravaganza since 1954 but the corporation confirmed today it was still in talks over whether this would continue in 2026. ‌ Insiders said some Beeb bosses were unconvinced of the event's continuing relevance, with fewer countries willing to host it. ‌ Glasgow was previously announced in September last year as an emergency stand-in for the next Games after several other cities pulled out over cost fears. The vast majority of the event's budget is now coming from the £100m compensation the Australian state of Victoria paid Commonwealth organisers after backing out. The UK and Scottish Governments both refused to underwrite the costs of staging the event, citing wider pressures on public finances. ‌ An agreement to broadcast the previous Games in Glasgow in 2014 was in place two years before it kicked-off. Phil Batty, chief executive of Glasgow 2026, said: "This week we have just announced Sky New Zealand as one of our broadcast partners. "We also have Channel 7 in Australia, and there will be news on a UK broadcaster later this year." ‌ A spokeswoman for the Games told the Record: "We're in positive discussions with broadcasters across the Commonwealth, including the UK, and further announcements will be made in the months ahead." First Minister John Swinney has said he is confident Glasgow is "well-organised and well-prepared" for a new-look Games that will capture the public's imagination. He said: "All of our experience tells us that, on major events, the people of Scotland - and especially in Glasgow - get engaged." ‌ Swinney also backed Glasgow's decision to save an event which has been criticised in some quarters as being an outdated link to Britain's colonial past. He told the BBC: "The Commonwealth is still a very important forum for international co-operation and partnership between countries. "And, frankly, we need more international co-operation and friendship and collective endeavour in a world that is becoming increasingly fractured." ‌ The event has been massively scaled-back as a result of cost considerations, with just 11 sports being contested across four venues. Athletics will be staged at Scotstoun stadium, not Hampden Park, while swimming events will once again be held at the existing Tollcross pool. The overall budget for the 2014 event was £543m, but this time around just £114-130m will be spent. Petria Thomas, head of the Australian Commonwealth commission, said: "We're incredibly grateful and fortunate that the Scottish have stepped up to the mark here. It was obviously highly disappointing that the Victorian government pulled out and it left the Commonwealth sport movement in a very difficult position. "It's fantastic that the Games will be on in Glasgow. Obviously a little bit of a different look to them this time with fewer sports which is a shame. But it's the reality of the position that the Commonwealth sport movement was put in, unfortunately."

HMRC hands ‘Expert of the Year' award to civil servant behind tax raid on farmers
HMRC hands ‘Expert of the Year' award to civil servant behind tax raid on farmers

Telegraph

time13 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

HMRC hands ‘Expert of the Year' award to civil servant behind tax raid on farmers

One of the architects of Labour's inheritance tax raid on farmers and pensions has been awarded 'Expert of the Year' by the taxman. Civil servant, James Mee, who works as head of inheritance tax analysis at HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and is largely responsible for the design of the Budget tax raid, was handed the gong last month. He attributed the award to his work on cancelling agricultural reliefs for farms, as well as levying the death duty on pensions. Rachel Reeves announced that inheritance tax would be extended to unspent pensions from April 2027, a move predicted to raise more than £1.4bn in the 2029-2030 tax year. The Chancellor also announced that farms and businesses, which previously benefited from a 100pc relief from inheritance tax, would pay a 20pc levy on anything over £1m from next year.

Families race to transfer cash to kids ahead of inheritance tax reforms
Families race to transfer cash to kids ahead of inheritance tax reforms

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Families race to transfer cash to kids ahead of inheritance tax reforms

The value of gifts made using a little-known inheritance tax loophole has nearly tripled in a year as families look for ways to reduce their death duty bills. The amount of money transferred using the ' gifts out of surplus income ' tax break rose from £52m in 2022-23 to £144m in 2023-24, data shows. The rule allows any taxpayer to give away unlimited sums of money without getting caught by inheritance tax – as long as the gifts do not diminish their quality of life and the money comes out of income, not savings or other capital. The HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) figures were revealed through a Freedom of Information request, with the 2023-24 tax year being the latest for which data was available. Experts said the unpublished current figure was likely to be higher as estate owners looked to reduce their liabilities ahead of Rachel Reeves's imminent inheritance tax reforms. In her maiden Budget last year, the Chancellor announced that unspent pensions would be brought into the scope of inheritance tax from April 2027. Families currently receive their late relative's pensions free of inheritance tax, with income tax due if the person died after age 75. Under Reeves' rule changes, the family of someone dying over the age of 75 could see their inheritance reduced by death duties of 40pc, and then pay income tax on the remainder. Duncan Mitchell-Innes, of TWM Solicitors, said: 'Families will soon have fewer ways to transfer wealth without being hit by inheritance tax, so they're increasingly giving excess income to their loved ones. 'As the number of tax-efficient options narrows, families will make better use of the remaining reliefs.' Rise in inheritance tax Labour on Monday confirmed it would press ahead with the reforms despite strong criticism from the pensions industry. It also confirmed that the onus will be on families to calculate the tax due on inherited pension pots. The Government estimated the measure would raise around £1.5bn a year by 2029-30. Transfers of agricultural and business properties will also face a 20pc inheritance tax rate on their value above £1m from April 2026. Transfers of both are currently fully exempt. Inheritance tax is charged at 40pc on the value of an estate worth more than £325,000. Homeowners get an additional £175,000 allowance when passing on a primary residence to direct descendants. Gifts made more than seven years before death are exempt from inheritance tax. Taxpayers also have a £3,000 annual gift allowance – which is designed to cover events including birthdays and religious holidays. But the surplus income rule means that if a family can prove that there were regular payments – which did not have a negative effect on the giver's normal finances – then that money is automatically exempt, and the seven-year rule does not apply. Despite the rule's potential to cut tax bills, it is only used by a small number of estate owners. Just 400 estates benefited from the tax break in 2023-24, down from 520 in 2020-21, according to HMRC figures. The 2020-21 figure represented just 1.7pc of the 27,800 estates which paid inheritance tax that year. Shaun Moore, of wealth management firm Quilter, said: 'Making gifts out of surplus income remains one of the most effective yet underutilised inheritance tax reliefs available. 'Given the upcoming pension tax changes in 2027, it is not surprising that some are looking to take advantage of this and find ways to mitigate IHT liabilities or find ways to pass on money to younger generations.' The Treasury was approached for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store